Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) pros and cons

Vendor: F5

4.1 out of 5

14 reviews
86% willing to recommend

Pros & Cons summary

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) is recognized for its stability, reliability, and ease of installation, integration, and use. Customers report significant ROI, especially in critical access scenarios, and highly rate portal access effectiveness. The stickiness and virtual IP creation features are valuable for advanced network management. However, cloud services, pricing, product integration, operational deployment, and technical support response times need improvement.

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager is stable and reliable, with a strong performance track record.

It is easy to install, integrate, and use, facilitating efficient deployment and operation.

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager offers valuable features such as load balancing and virtual IP creation.

The tool has provided a return on investment, particularly by enabling access during crucial times.

Customized portal creation features allow tailored user experiences, enhancing user satisfaction.

CONS

Cloud services are something that F5 Access Policy Manager could do better.

The price of F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager can be improved.

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager has room for improvement in integration with other products.

The initial setup of F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager was complex.

The operational deployment of F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager is not great.

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Pros review quotes

IS

Senior Network Engineer at Fiserv

Feb 12, 2024

The most valuable feature is the virtual IP creation. It's our most frequently used feature.

Read full review

Ashish Kumar Rai

Associate Network Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Mar 18, 2024

In my opinion, the GUI is perfect with the configuration options provided. F5 BIG-IP has given customization options and policy configuration tools in the GUI. It's good and good enough to work.

Read full review

AL

reviewer1401780

Cyber Security Solution Architect at a tech consulting company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Aug 19, 2020

Our customers have never complained about the stability

Read full review

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

Free Report: F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Sr. Architect at NBC Universal

Jun 21, 2022

We have seen a return on investment from F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager. It provided access at a time when we didn't have it.

Read full review

AT

reviewer1245708

Director of consulting at a marketing services firm with 51-200 employees

Jun 27, 2022

The portal access was very good.

Read full review

AR

IT Security Specialist at a educational organization with 201-500 employees

Sep 10, 2024

Our organization is small - a college with about 3,500 students. We use F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager to protect our site, especially from the Iranian attacks we faced last year. We restrict access to only inside the country.

Read full review

SH

reviewer1659684

Engineer at a non-profit with 1-10 employees

Sep 6, 2021

The solution is stable and reliable.

Read full review

AV

reviewer1868262

Technical Staff at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Dec 1, 2023

The tool is reliable and easy to configure.

Read full review

Network and Security Engineer at CITG - Continental Information and Telecom Group

Oct 27, 2023

The product allows us to create customized portals for your users.

Read full review

MR

Senior Site Reliability Engineer

May 12, 2023

Stickiness is the most valuable feature of the product.

Read full review

Show 4 more reviews (out of 14)

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Cons review quotes

IS

Senior Network Engineer at Fiserv

Feb 12, 2024

In my opinion, the GUI side needs some improvement based on my usage. Sometimes, it doesn't work as efficiently as the CLI side.

Read full review

Ashish Kumar Rai

Associate Network Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Mar 18, 2024

I'd suggest improved documentation integration directly within the GUI. Right now, finding comprehensive documentation often requires going to external websites like the community portal.

Read full review

AL

reviewer1401780

Cyber Security Solution Architect at a tech consulting company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Aug 19, 2020

Cloud services are something that F5 Access Policy Manager could do better

Read full review

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

Free Report: F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Sr. Architect at NBC Universal

Jun 21, 2022

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager has room for improvement in integration with other products.

Read full review

AT

reviewer1245708

Director of consulting at a marketing services firm with 51-200 employees

Jun 27, 2022

The initial setup was complex.

Read full review

AR

IT Security Specialist at a educational organization with 201-500 employees

Sep 10, 2024

Regarding price, I'm not directly involved in purchasing, but our CIO thinks the product is very expensive. He's considering moving from the tool to Citrix NetScaler WAF because it's cheaper, and we already have Citrix for VDI. We got NetScaler almost free as part of our VDI deal. Three years ago, I convinced him to use the solution because it's better, but now, with budget constraints, he may want to switch.

Read full review

SH

reviewer1659684

Engineer at a non-profit with 1-10 employees

Sep 6, 2021

The solution is quite costly.

Read full review

AV

reviewer1868262

Technical Staff at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Dec 1, 2023

The technical support’s response time must be improved.

Read full review

Network and Security Engineer at CITG - Continental Information and Telecom Group

Oct 27, 2023

Integrating identity providers and single sign-on solutions can simplify user authentication and access control.

Read full review

MR

Senior Site Reliability Engineer

May 12, 2023

The solution’s GUI looks very old.

Read full review

Show 4 more reviews (out of 14)

Product Categories

Product Categories

Secure Web Gateways (SWG)

Network Access Control (NAC)

Access Management

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Microsoft Intune vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

Microsoft Entra ID vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

Microsoft Remote Desktop Services vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

Aruba ClearPass vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

Forescout Platform vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

Okta Workforce Identity vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

TeamViewer vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

Fortinet FortiNAC vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

Auth0 vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

Check Point Remote Access VPN vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

ForgeRock vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

See all alternatives

Product Categories

Product Categories

Secure Web Gateways (SWG)

Network Access Control (NAC)

Access Management

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Microsoft Intune vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

Microsoft Entra ID vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

Microsoft Remote Desktop Services vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

Aruba ClearPass vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

Forescout Platform vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

Okta Workforce Identity vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

TeamViewer vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

Fortinet FortiNAC vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

Auth0 vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

Check Point Remote Access VPN vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

ForgeRock vs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)

See all alternatives

Related questions

26

When evaluating Web Security Gateways, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?

29

What is the best security web gateway?

43

Is Netskope's SWG as good as the Zscaler SWG?

26

What secure web gateway do you recommend?