Cisco Secure Endpoint and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum are leading security solutions. Cisco has the upper hand in deployment ease and customer service, while Kaspersky excels in feature richness and effectiveness.
Features: Cisco Secure Endpoint is valued for its robust threat intelligence, automated workflows, and proactive threat hunting capabilities. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum stands out with its advanced threat detection, response tools, and comprehensive reporting features.
Room for Improvement: Users note that Cisco could improve its advanced threat detection and reporting capabilities. Kaspersky users suggest enhancing its integration with other security solutions and refining its automated response functionalities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Secure Endpoint is highlighted for its straightforward deployment processes and responsive customer service. Kaspersky users find the deployment process slightly more complex but appreciate the detailed guidance provided.
Pricing and ROI: Cisco users find the setup cost manageable and report satisfactory ROI, though some consider it high. Kaspersky's pricing is viewed as competitive, and users report a high ROI, justifying the expense with its advanced features and effectiveness.
Cisco has good technical support, especially considering these are newer solutions compared to traditional routing and switching products.
We usually solve issues ourselves due to our experience, as paid support is not used.
I rate the technical support between seven and eight out of ten for Kaspersky.
Cisco Secure Endpoint is definitely scalable.
It is very easy for me to scale.
Currently, I find it good and easily scalable.
We have not encountered any problems.
The solution is highly stable, scoring more than nine in terms of protection.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is stable.
The forensic capabilities need enhancement, especially for deep forensic data collection.
To increase the benefits of the product, Managed Detection and Response (MDR) service from Kaspersky should be included.
Occasionally, I encounter connection problems, and the signal is not very good.
We face challenges with the automated effective awareness platform program (ASAP), particularly with its implementation.
Cisco is aggressive in pricing, making it competitive and sometimes even cheaper than other good products like CrowdStrike, Microsoft Defender, or SentinelOne.
Kaspersky is very cheap compared to solutions like CrowdStrike or other vendors.
The value from Kaspersky is very good, especially since we recently got a special deal.
Providing security even for real-time, day-zero attacks through its strong Talos threat intelligence platform.
It fulfills security and protection requirements against newly discovered malware, especially ransomware attacks.
I use Kaspersky to protect the domain and the network, allowing or denying web categories according to business needs.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is effective, especially in isolating computers from the network when needed.
Cisco Secure Endpoint is a comprehensive endpoint security solution that natively includes open and extensible extended detection and response (XDR) and advanced endpoint detection and response (EDR) capabilities. Secure Endpoint offers relentless breach protection that enables you to be confident, be bold, and be fearless with one of the industry’s most trusted endpoint security solutions. It protects your hybrid workforce, helps you stay resilient, and secures what’s next with simple, comprehensive endpoint security powered by unique insights from 300,000 security customers and deep visibility from the networking leader.
Cisco Secure Endpoint was formerly known as Cisco AMP for Endpoints.
Reviews from Real Users
Cisco Secure Endpoint stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its ability to enable developers to easily secure their endpoints with one single operation using its management console and its advanced alerting techniques.
Tim C., an IT manager at Van Der Meer Consulting, writes, "The solution makes it possible to see a threat once and block it everywhere across all endpoints and the entire security platform. It has the ability to block right down to the file and application level across all devices based on policies, such as, blacklisting and whitelisting of software and applications. This is good. Its strength is the ability to identify threats very quickly, then lock them and the network down and block the threats across the organization and all devices, which is what you want. You don't want to be spending time working out how to block something. You want to block something very quickly, letting that flow through to all the devices and avoiding the same scenario on different operating systems."
Wouter H., a technical team lead network & security at Missing Piece BV, notes, "Any alert that we get is an actionable alert. Immediately, there is information that we can just click through, see the point in time, what happened, what caused it, and what automatic actions were taken. We can then choose to take any manual actions, if we want, or start our investigation. We're no longer looking at digging into information or wading through hundreds of incidents. There's a list which says where the status is assigned, e.g., under investigation or investigation finished. That is all in the console. It has taken away a lot of the administration, which we would normally be doing, and integrated it into the console for us."
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Optimum delivers straightforward defense-in-depth against complex and advanced threats with no additional overheads. Use automated and 'single-click' responses so you can ensure every last piece of the threat is rooted out of your system.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.