Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo

Top 10 Cisco Secure Endpoint Alternatives

Vendor: Cisco
4.3 out of 5
297 followers
Post review

Top Cisco Secure Endpoint Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Cisco Secure Endpoint based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, and SentinelOne Singularity Complete. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Cisco Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Cisco, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in endpoint visibility and threat detection with AI-driven insights, appealing to those valuing minimal system impact. In comparison, Cisco Secure Endpoint offers robust malware protection and better integration with Cisco's ecosystem, ideal for businesses needing comprehensive security across platforms.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Report
CrowdStrike Falcon offers competitive setup costs with flexible pricing, whereas Cisco Secure Endpoint typically presents a more structured cost approach.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon offers competitive setup costs with flexible pricing, whereas Cisco Secure Endpoint typically presents a more structured cost approach.
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
4.0 out of 5
Cisco Secure Endpoint excels in {valuable_features_data} and {features_overall_comparison}, while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint stands out in terms of {valuable_features_data}. In comparison, Cisco users appreciate {feature_1}, {feature_2}, Microsoft users value {feature_3}, {feature_4}.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Report
Cisco Secure Endpoint has a higher initial setup cost, while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers a lower setup cost, making it a more cost-effective option for initial deployment.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Secure Endpoint has a higher initial setup cost, while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers a lower setup cost, making it a more cost-effective option for initial deployment.
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete
4.4 out of 5
SentinelOne Singularity Complete excels in automated threat detection and response capabilities. In comparison, Cisco Secure Endpoint integrates well with other Cisco products and offers advanced threat intelligence. SentinelOne is appreciated for swift deployment, while Cisco users value comprehensive features and integration benefits.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete Report
SentinelOne Singularity Complete has a higher initial setup cost compared to Cisco Secure Endpoint, making SentinelOne suitable for businesses willing to invest more upfront for enhanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
SentinelOne Singularity Complete has a higher initial setup cost compared to Cisco Secure Endpoint, making SentinelOne suitable for businesses willing to invest more upfront for enhanced features.
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Fortinet FortiClient
4.0 out of 5
Fortinet FortiClient offers competitive pricing and comprehensive threat protection, appealing to those seeking easy integration within Fortinet's ecosystem. In comparison, Cisco Secure Endpoint provides advanced threat detection and seamless integration with Cisco's security products, attracting buyers interested in sophisticated features and substantial ROI.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. Fortinet FortiClient Report
Fortinet FortiClient has a straightforward setup cost, while Cisco Secure Endpoint requires a higher initial investment, emphasizing Fortinet's cost-efficiency. Cisco offers advanced features that may justify its higher setup cost for some users.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiClient has a straightforward setup cost, while Cisco Secure Endpoint requires a higher initial investment, emphasizing Fortinet's cost-efficiency. Cisco offers advanced features that may justify its higher setup cost for some users.
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5
Cortex XDR offers efficient threat detection and integration with Palo Alto's ecosystem. In comparison, Cisco Secure Endpoint delivers advanced automated response actions and extensive telemetry data. Cortex XDR requires enhancements in reporting and incident response, whereas Cisco Secure Endpoint's policy management is complex. Cortex XDR is cost-effective, while Cisco Secure Endpoint justifies its higher price with extensive features.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Report
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks has a higher setup cost compared to Cisco Secure Endpoint, which offers a more affordable initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks has a higher setup cost compared to Cisco Secure Endpoint, which offers a more affordable initial setup.
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security
3.8 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security offers a comprehensive unified approach featuring threat intelligence and behavior analytics. In comparison, Cisco Secure Endpoint excels with advanced malware protection, sandboxing, and retrospective security. Symantec Endpoint Security needs optimization; Cisco Secure Endpoint requires enhanced detection capabilities. Users find Symantec straightforward to deploy; Cisco has superior service. Symantec provides competitive pricing; Cisco offers better ROI.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report
Symantec Endpoint Security users report lower setup costs, while Cisco Secure Endpoint setup costs are higher, indicating a significant price difference.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security users report lower setup costs, while Cisco Secure Endpoint setup costs are higher, indicating a significant price difference.
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Intercept X Endpoint
4.2 out of 5
Cisco Secure Endpoint is known for its integration with Cisco infrastructure and customer support, while Intercept X Endpoint excels with deep learning and anti-exploit technology. In comparison, Intercept X Endpoint's advanced threat prevention justifies higher initial costs, whereas Cisco Secure Endpoint offers competitive pricing and seamless Cisco ecosystem integration.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. Intercept X Endpoint Report
Cisco Secure Endpoint's setup cost is described as "higher but manageable," while Intercept X Endpoint is noted for "significantly lower initial setup costs."
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Secure Endpoint's setup cost is described as "higher but manageable," while Intercept X Endpoint is noted for "significantly lower initial setup costs."
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security
4.1 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers comprehensive threat detection and response capabilities. In comparison, Cisco Secure Endpoint excels in advanced malware protection and seamless integration with other Cisco products. Trend Vision, with its competitive pricing, contrasts Cisco Secure Endpoint's higher cost justified by its robust features.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a lower setup cost, making it more affordable upfront, whereas Cisco Secure Endpoint requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a lower setup cost, making it more affordable upfront, whereas Cisco Secure Endpoint requires a higher initial investment.
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security
4.0 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security excels with its threat detection and straightforward deployment. In comparison, Cisco Secure Endpoint offers extensive features and strong customer support. Trellix focuses on cost-effectiveness, while Cisco provides higher overall value with its comprehensive security suite despite higher costs.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Report
Trellix Endpoint Security users report a lower setup cost, while Cisco Secure Endpoint presents a moderate initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security users report a lower setup cost, while Cisco Secure Endpoint presents a moderate initial investment.
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business
4.0 out of 5
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business offers strong malware protection, threat intelligence, and policy management. In comparison, Cisco Secure Endpoint provides advanced threat detection, cloud-delivered security, and integration capabilities, making it ideal for complex environments. Kaspersky's simpler deployment contrasts with Cisco's higher cost and advanced features.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Report
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business incurs higher setup costs compared to Cisco Secure Endpoint, with users appreciating the latter's more straightforward implementation process.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business incurs higher setup costs compared to Cisco Secure Endpoint, with users appreciating the latter's more straightforward implementation process.
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Tanium
3.7 out of 5
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Tanium
3.7 out of 5
Tanium offers dependability and extensive capabilities, while Cisco Secure Endpoint excels in integration and ease of use. In comparison, Tanium is praised for real-time data collection, and Cisco Secure Endpoint integrates well with other Cisco products. Tanium’s setup is complex but effective, whereas Cisco Secure Endpoint features simpler deployment.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. Tanium Report
Tanium has a high initial setup cost, whereas Cisco Secure Endpoint offers a more affordable setup. Tanium users often mention the complexity of initial deployment, contrasting with Cisco Secure Endpoint's straightforward installation process.
View comparison
Pricing
Tanium has a high initial setup cost, whereas Cisco Secure Endpoint offers a more affordable setup. Tanium users often mention the complexity of initial deployment, contrasting with Cisco Secure Endpoint's straightforward installation process.
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform
4.1 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform appeals to those seeking affordability and reliable support, excelling in malware detection and low system resource usage. In comparison, Cisco Secure Endpoint's advanced threat intelligence and integration with other Cisco products justify its higher cost, benefiting large enterprises with detailed reporting.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a lower setup cost compared to Cisco Secure Endpoint, making it a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a lower setup cost compared to Cisco Secure Endpoint, making it a more budget-friendly option.
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
BigFix excels in patch management and endpoint visibility, making it a cost-effective choice with strong ROI. In comparison, Cisco Secure Endpoint delivers advanced threat detection and automation capabilities, justifying its higher price. Tech buyers seeking cost efficiency may choose BigFix; those prioritizing features may prefer Cisco.
Download BigFix vs. Cisco Secure Endpoint Report
BigFix has a lower setup cost, making it a more budget-friendly option, while Cisco Secure Endpoint has a higher setup cost, reflecting its extensive feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
BigFix has a lower setup cost, making it a more budget-friendly option, while Cisco Secure Endpoint has a higher setup cost, reflecting its extensive feature set.
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint is preferred for its anti-ransomware and zero-day protection. In comparison, Cisco Secure Endpoint stands out for its XDR and threat hunting. Check Point Harmony Endpoint excels in deployment ease, while Cisco Secure Endpoint offers better long-term ROI despite higher costs.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Cisco Secure Endpoint Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint setup costs are lower compared to Cisco Secure Endpoint, which often requires a higher initial investment. Cisco Secure Endpoint offers additional features that may justify the higher expense for some users.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint setup costs are lower compared to Cisco Secure Endpoint, which often requires a higher initial investment. Cisco Secure Endpoint offers additional features that may justify the higher expense for some users.
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint
3.9 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint excels in detection capabilities and forensic tools, making it a strong choice for thorough threat analysis. In comparison, Cisco Secure Endpoint offers advanced threat hunting and seamless integration with Cisco tools, appealing to those needing versatile features.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint's setup cost is relatively high, while Cisco Secure Endpoint offers a lower upfront setup cost. This key difference may impact budget-conscious organizations when selecting between these endpoint security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint's setup cost is relatively high, while Cisco Secure Endpoint offers a lower upfront setup cost. This key difference may impact budget-conscious organizations when selecting between these endpoint security solutions.
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
HP Wolf Security is praised for its isolation technology, effectively containing threats before they spread. In comparison, Cisco Secure Endpoint offers advanced analytics and real-time threat detection. HP Wolf Security's seamless integration into workflows contrasts with Cisco Secure Endpoint's sophisticated analytics capabilities.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. HP Wolf Security Report
HP Wolf Security offers a low setup cost, while Cisco Secure Endpoint has a higher initial investment but may provide long-term savings.
View comparison
Pricing
HP Wolf Security offers a low setup cost, while Cisco Secure Endpoint has a higher initial investment but may provide long-term savings.
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
3.8 out of 5
Cisco Secure Endpoint is praised for its threat detection, response capabilities, and easy integration with other Cisco products. In comparison, Trellix ENS offers superior advanced threat intelligence and flexible policy management, justifying its higher cost and making it suitable for long-term investment.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Report
Cisco Secure Endpoint has a higher initial setup cost, while Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) offers a more economical setup solution.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Secure Endpoint has a higher initial setup cost, while Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) offers a more economical setup solution.
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
Cynet offers cost-effective pricing with reliable support and automated threat detection, ideal for small to mid-sized businesses. In comparison, Cisco Secure Endpoint, with its advanced features and integration, attracts enterprises looking for comprehensive protection. Cisco's robust support helps mitigate its more complex deployment process.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. Cynet Report
Cynet has a lower initial setup cost, making it more budget-friendly, while Cisco Secure Endpoint, though more expensive initially, provides extensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
Cynet has a lower initial setup cost, making it more budget-friendly, while Cisco Secure Endpoint, though more expensive initially, provides extensive features.
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Microsoft Defender for Business
3.6 out of 5
Cisco Secure Endpoint offers advanced threat detection and integrates easily with IT infrastructure. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Business provides real-time threat intelligence and a comprehensive security suite, making it valuable for extensive security needs. Cisco's pricing appeals with substantial ROI, while Microsoft justifies higher costs through robust features.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. Microsoft Defender for Business Report
Cisco Secure Endpoint's setup cost is relatively high, reflecting its extensive features, while Microsoft Defender for Business offers a lower setup cost aimed at more budget-conscious organizations seeking robust security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Secure Endpoint's setup cost is relatively high, reflecting its extensive features, while Microsoft Defender for Business offers a lower setup cost aimed at more budget-conscious organizations seeking robust security solutions.
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Malwarebytes
4.0 out of 5
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Malwarebytes
4.0 out of 5
Malwarebytes is highly rated for affordability and support, while Cisco Secure Endpoint excels in comprehensive security features, making it worth its higher price for many users. In comparison, Malwarebytes could improve performance impact and control options. Cisco Secure Endpoint users seek intuitive navigation and better alerts.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. Malwarebytes Report
Malwarebytes setup cost is generally lower and easier to handle, whereas Cisco Secure Endpoint has a higher setup cost but offers a more extensive configuration process. The price gap between the two highlights the difference in initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Malwarebytes setup cost is generally lower and easier to handle, whereas Cisco Secure Endpoint has a higher setup cost but offers a more extensive configuration process. The price gap between the two highlights the difference in initial investment.
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
4.0 out of 5

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response offers intuitive design and real-time monitoring. In comparison, Cisco Secure Endpoint provides advanced malware protection and integration with other Cisco products. Cybereason simplifies management, while Cisco's extensive reporting aids security. Cybereason is cost-effective; Cisco's comprehensive feature set justifies higher costs.

Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Report
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response offers lower setup costs, while Cisco Secure Endpoint has higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response offers lower setup costs, while Cisco Secure Endpoint has higher initial expenses.
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity
4.0 out of 5
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity is favored for its machine learning capabilities and pricing, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, Cisco Secure Endpoint attracts those seeking advanced threat detection and broader security features, despite higher costs, justifying a significant ROI for comprehensive protection.
Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Cisco Secure Endpoint Report
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity offers a cost-effective setup, while Cisco Secure Endpoint requires a higher initial investment. Their pricing structure highlights the budget considerations for each product.
View comparison
Pricing
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity offers a cost-effective setup, while Cisco Secure Endpoint requires a higher initial investment. Their pricing structure highlights the budget considerations for each product.
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Panda Adaptive Defense 360
4.1 out of 5
Panda Adaptive Defense 360 offers advanced threat detection and robust endpoint protection with minimal system impact. In comparison, Cisco Secure Endpoint excels with comprehensive threat intelligence and forensic analysis tools. Panda is praised for easy deployment, while Cisco provides deeper integration and advanced analytics.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. Panda Adaptive Defense 360 Report
Panda Adaptive Defense 360 has a higher setup cost compared to Cisco Secure Endpoint. The setup process for Cisco Secure Endpoint is relatively budget-friendly, while Panda Adaptive Defense 360 involves a more significant initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Panda Adaptive Defense 360 has a higher setup cost compared to Cisco Secure Endpoint. The setup process for Cisco Secure Endpoint is relatively budget-friendly, while Panda Adaptive Defense 360 involves a more significant initial investment.
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Seqrite Endpoint Security
3.8 out of 5
Cisco Secure Endpoint offers advanced threat detection and high-quality support services, making it suitable for organizations seeking robust security features. In comparison, Seqrite Endpoint Security provides cost-effective security with a user-friendly management console and efficient performance, appealing to budget-conscious buyers.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security Report
Cisco Secure Endpoint has moderate setup costs, whereas Seqrite Endpoint Security is generally seen as budget-friendly.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Secure Endpoint has moderate setup costs, whereas Seqrite Endpoint Security is generally seen as budget-friendly.
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Deep Instinct Prevention Platform
4.3 out of 5
Cisco Secure Endpoint is valued for its integration capabilities and robust threat intelligence. In comparison, Deep Instinct offers proactive threat prevention with advanced machine learning. Cisco is noted for straightforward deployment and competitive pricing, while Deep Instinct attracts those seeking innovative security features and lower incident response costs.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. Deep Instinct Prevention Platform Report
Cisco Secure Endpoint has lower setup costs compared to Deep Instinct Prevention Platform, which has higher setup costs.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Secure Endpoint has lower setup costs compared to Deep Instinct Prevention Platform, which has higher setup costs.
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Bitdefender Total Security
4.4 out of 5
Cisco Secure Endpoint is valued for its advanced threat detection and seamless integration with Cisco products. In comparison, Bitdefender Total Security offers comprehensive protection and features like a secure VPN. Cisco Secure Endpoint's superior customer service contrasts with Bitdefender Total Security's affordability and extensive coverage.
Download Bitdefender Total Security vs. Cisco Secure Endpoint Report
Cisco Secure Endpoint has a higher setup cost compared to Bitdefender Total Security, which provides a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Secure Endpoint has a higher setup cost compared to Bitdefender Total Security, which provides a more budget-friendly option.
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Automox
4.4 out of 5
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Automox
4.4 out of 5
Cisco Secure Endpoint offers robust threat detection and real-time response capabilities; however, its complex configurations and steep learning curve may be challenging. In comparison, Automox excels in automation and patch management, providing a simpler deployment process, although its higher cost might be a consideration.
Download Automox vs. Cisco Secure Endpoint Report
Cisco Secure Endpoint has high setup costs, while Automox is more affordable.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Secure Endpoint has high setup costs, while Automox is more affordable.
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Webroot Business Endpoint Protection
3.9 out of 5
Webroot Business Endpoint Protection provides competitive pricing, ease of use, and straightforward deployment. In comparison, Cisco Secure Endpoint offers comprehensive features such as extensive threat detection and in-depth analysis, though it requires more involved deployment and comes at a higher cost.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. Webroot Business Endpoint Protection Report
Webroot Business Endpoint Protection has a low setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while Cisco Secure Endpoint requires a higher initial investment for setup, reflecting its focus on larger enterprises.
View comparison
Pricing
Webroot Business Endpoint Protection has a low setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while Cisco Secure Endpoint requires a higher initial investment for setup, reflecting its focus on larger enterprises.
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
4.0 out of 5
Cisco Secure Endpoint excels in comprehensive threat detection and prevention, with smooth deployment and solid customer support. In comparison, WithSecure Elements offers quicker adaptability to new threats, strong post-deployment assistance, and long-term cost-effectiveness, despite its higher initial costs.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Report
Cisco Secure Endpoint has moderate setup costs, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection offers a more cost-effective setup option. Cisco's higher initial investment reflects its comprehensive feature set, contrasting with WithSecure's affordability and streamlined implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Secure Endpoint has moderate setup costs, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection offers a more cost-effective setup option. Cisco's higher initial investment reflects its comprehensive feature set, contrasting with WithSecure's affordability and streamlined implementation.
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager
4.2 out of 5
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager offers robust protection with user-friendly integration, ideal for simpler setups. In comparison, Cisco Secure Endpoint excels with advanced threat detection, justifying its higher price for comprehensive features suitable for complex environments. Ivanti provides competitive pricing and good ROI.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager Report
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager has a higher initial setup cost compared to Cisco Secure Endpoint, which offers a more affordable entry point for users.
View comparison
Pricing
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager has a higher initial setup cost compared to Cisco Secure Endpoint, which offers a more affordable entry point for users.
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Morphisec
4.6 out of 5
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Morphisec
4.6 out of 5

Cisco Secure Endpoint is preferred for its extensive support and pricing structure. In comparison, Morphisec stands out with innovative features and a proactive approach. Cisco also has comprehensive threat detection, while Morphisec excels in lightweight protection.

Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. Morphisec Report
Cisco Secure Endpoint has a higher setup cost compared to Morphisec, which is more affordable for small to medium businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Secure Endpoint has a higher setup cost compared to Morphisec, which is more affordable for small to medium businesses.
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Avast Business Hub
4.1 out of 5
Cisco Secure Endpoint Logo
Avast Business Hub
4.1 out of 5
Cisco Secure Endpoint impresses with advanced threat detection and strong customer support, justifying its higher cost. In comparison, Avast Business Hub stands out for its easy-to-use VPN and detailed reports, despite needing better customization options. Both excel in deployment but differ in their specialized features.
Download Avast Business Hub vs. Cisco Secure Endpoint Report
Cisco Secure Endpoint has a higher setup cost, while Avast Business Hub offers a more cost-effective setup. This difference may influence budget-conscious businesses toward Avast Business Hub.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Secure Endpoint has a higher setup cost, while Avast Business Hub offers a more cost-effective setup. This difference may influence budget-conscious businesses toward Avast Business Hub.

Related categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Cisco Security Portfolio