We performed a comparison between Cisco Wireless WAN and Mist AI and Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Ubiquiti Networks, Ruckus, Cambium Networks and others in Wireless WAN."The network management is good. We use it to control access, channels, and phones and limit bandwidth."
"Cisco Wireless WAN is stable and scalable, and the support received is good."
"The product can scale well."
"I also like that now you can add a cellular connection to the Cisco router. So, if your operator is down, you can now still have one connection in the office with the cellular module."
"Provides good visibility and insights into what is happening."
"Cisco Wireless WAN's best features are simple management, the cloud base, dashboards, and reliability."
"Cisco Wireless access points are highly stable with a wide coverage area."
"We find the product to be stable."
"Ability to control the access points by groups."
"Regarding features, the solution seems to be very intuitive."
"The most useful aspect of Mist AI and Cloud is automation capabilities."
"If you compare wired versus wireless, it's convenient. You don't need to have one place for connectivity. You can move around and it's easier. Sometimes it's a hassle to work with wires, which is why wireless is so convenient."
"Natural language patching is an important feature."
"It's really easy to provision and support. Those are its main features."
"The Marvis feature of Mist AI, an artificial intelligence tool, is very useful."
"The tool's best part is the GUI. It is user-friendly and fast due to AI features. The solution can help you fix things with AI, which is impressive."
"A lot of the time, for users, it comes down to pricing. Many would like to see it be a bit less costly."
"If there's a problem, it's usually when Cisco pushes out updates. The users don't always push the updates to their computer, and it causes some issues. It's reliable as long as everyone is doing what they're supposed to."
"The only thing I would like to see is better high availability if you're using the embedded wireless controller."
"The initial setup and deployment should be easier."
"The price could be better."
"The solution could lower its pricing to make it more affordable."
"We found the initial setup to be a bit complex due to the CLI commands."
"Pricing is very high with Cisco products. It's something that many people complain about. They should work to make it more affordable."
"There could be more integration."
"There is no local support for Mist in Brazil."
"There are some technical issues that may require attention"
"If there's one thing I'd like to change, it's the pricing. They are quite expensive, but honestly, it's justified by the value they provide. However, for a simple Wi-Fi connectivity with basic security needs, there are alternatives in the market that offer comparable features at a more budget-friendly price."
"The solution lacks documentation."
"Currently, the solution lacks the ability to configure with other solutions from other vendors."
"The solution doesn't provide mail notifications currently."
"Mist AI and Cloud should improve its integrations."
Cisco Wireless WAN is ranked 4th in Wireless WAN with 61 reviews while Mist AI and Cloud is ranked 7th in Wireless LAN with 21 reviews. Cisco Wireless WAN is rated 8.2, while Mist AI and Cloud is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Cisco Wireless WAN writes "Widely available and has a straightforward setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mist AI and Cloud writes "A combination of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and data science techniques to optimize user experiences". Cisco Wireless WAN is most compared with Cambium Networks Wireless WAN, Fortinet FortiExtender and Ubiquiti Wireless, whereas Mist AI and Cloud is most compared with Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Aruba Wireless, Cisco Wireless, ExtremeCloud IQ and Ruckus Wireless.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.