Claroty Platform vs Tenable Security Center comparison

Claroty and Tenable are both solutions in the Vulnerability Management category. Claroty is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.1, while Tenable is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.4. Claroty holds a 0.4% mindshare in VM, compared to Tenable’s 8.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Claroty users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Tenable users who would recommend it.

Claroty Platform

Read 11 Claroty Platform reviews

263 Views
213 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tenable Security Center

Read 51 Tenable Security Center reviews

12,479 Views
9,170 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Claroty Platform

Tenable Security Center

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Tenable Security Center and Claroty Platform both compete in the realm of security solutions, with Tenable having an advantage in environments with a broad IT focus, while Claroty excels in specialized OT settings.

Features: Tenable Security Center is renowned for its vulnerability scanning and prioritization, supporting large-scale operations with its extensive data visualization dashboard. Claroty Platform specializes in industrial control systems, offering real-time threat detection and integration with third-party tools.

Room for Improvement: Tenable Security Center could enhance the flexibility and efficiency of its query engine and report customization, integration with external systems, and improve features catering to non-technical users. Claroty Platform can improve its user interface, vulnerability management reporting, and IT network integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tenable Security Center provides a range of deployment options including hybrid and private cloud, with responsive technical support that varies by region and tier. Claroty Platform primarily supports on-premises OT environments, with consistent support but room for improvement in regional nuances.

Pricing and ROI: Tenable Security Center is seen as more expensive, aligning with competitors but provides savings by reducing manual tasks, offering a significant ROI for large organizations. Claroty Platform, although costly, justifies its price through avoidance of potential breaches, especially in industrial settings where security infrastructure investment is crucial.

To learn more, read our detailed Claroty Platform vs. Tenable Security Center Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Claroty Platform vs. Tenable Security Center

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 815,854 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Claroty Platform

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Remote Access (10th), Operational Technology (OT) Security (1st), Cyber-Physical Systems Protection (1st)

Tenable Security Center

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (13th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Claroty Platform is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable Security Center is 8.6%, down from 14.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Vulnerability Management

Featured Reviews

AnandKumar2

Senior OT Security Consultant at Tata Consultancy

Jul 8, 2024

Useful for active coding, deep inspection of packages, and data retrieval

I appreciate the active coding, deep inspection of packages, and data retrieval. The tool covers information about assets and attack vectors, which I find superior to other tools. Based on alerts, I create reports detailing how an attacker can penetrate the plant, both externally and internally. Initially, I felt the Claroty Platform wasn't up to the mark for vulnerability management, but recent upgrades have been very helpful. The new features provide more detailed information, including CVE numbers and thorough explanations, such as for MS17-010 (WannaCry). This level of detail meets my expectations and allows me to determine how much of the plant's assets and devices would be compromised if a vulnerability is exploited. This information is crucial for reporting to the CISO.

Read full review

Md. Shahriar Hussain

Cyber Security Chartered Engineer at Banglalink

Feb 23, 2024

A security solution for vulnerability assessment with automated scans

Additional costs are associated with using the solution, as additional scanners are required for different endpoints connected to the Tenable Security Center. If Tenable Security Center could extract information from these scanners automatically rather than manually, it would enhance user-friendliness for customers. For example, suppose I manually conducted CIS hardening or compliance scoring in a separate data centre. These scores should also be reflected in the Tenable Security Center dashboard. Since the scanner is connected to the Tenable Security Center, the dashboard should display the direct scan results from the general security centre and the connected scanners. There could be unusual activities or attacks with the rising AI-related issues or threats that the Tenable Security Center could track in the future.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like how the tool does passive and active discovery and threat detection and shows risks, recommendations, and vulnerabilities. It gives risk scores and gathers everything in one place - IP, device name, etc. We can integrate it with other tools for overall network mapping. It's useful for audits, compliance, and monitoring of all devices in the industry. It provides both monitoring and control. We also have SRA for incident response, which lets us search all alerts if we deploy the Claroty Platform."

"The main advantage of Claroty, when compared to its competitors, is integrated secure remote access."

"The solution offers comprehensive tools that greatly enhance your IT operations if implemented correctly."

"Claroty identifies all vulnerabilities available in our environment."

"The solution's most valuable feature is the map, which shows everything that is connected and communicates with each other."

"Claroty provides continuous threat protection and identifies pre-empty stuff and false positives."

"I appreciate the active coding, deep inspection of packages, and data retrieval. The tool covers information about assets and attack vectors, which I find superior to other tools. Based on alerts, I create reports detailing how an attacker can penetrate the plant, both externally and internally."

"The solution's asset management is really great compared to Dragos or Nozomi."

More Claroty Platform pros

"I found the dashboard features very useful. It made it easy to track remediation progress. I could publish dashboards to remediation teams and track the progress on the dashboards."

"This product has the best results in terms of the lowest number of false-positives and false-negatives."

"What is useful to me is being able to fulfill very customized scanning policies. In the clinical environment, because of vendor control, we can't perform credential-vulnerability scanning. And network scans, which I've done before, can cause a lot of impact. Being able to create very customized policies to be able to routinely scan and audit our clinical networks, while simultaneously not causing impact, is important to us."

"It's a very useful tool."

"Tenable Security Center scans networks and gives reports."

"Tenable is the leading product for vulnerability scanning."

"Tenable SC's most valuable features are the low number of false positives and the strong capability of providing prioritization for the vulnerabilities detected."

"The most valuable features of Tenable SC are scanning, reporting, dashboards, and automation."

More Tenable Security Center pros

Cons

"I've reported four bugs and three feature requests so far. The main area of focus should be on how attacks are detected. The attack vector information needs to be more detailed. For example, it's not enough to state that an SMB v1 version open can lead to a WannaCry attack. A more detailed explanation should help clients understand the various ways an attack could occur."

"The graphical user interface is quite poor."

"Claroty Platform could improve the pricing to get more acceptability in the market."

"The product's integration capabilities are an area of concern where improvements are required."

"Claroty Platform only gives the vulnerabilities based on the make and model of the devices, so it doesn't provide any resolution or any detailed explanation of how one can resolve such issues."

"There are a few protocols that Claroty doesn't currently support."

"For improvement, I think the training could be more practical. We have external training, but they're mostly theoretical. I want the solution to provide hands-on lab experience to help users learn better."

"We face issues in the alert investigation area because it does not properly give the alert communication patterns."

More Claroty Platform cons

"It's good at creating information, it's good creating dashboards, it's good at creating reports, but if you want to take that reporting metadata and put it into another tool, that is a little bit lacking."

"At times we have had the typical bugs."

"Tenable SC could improve by making the creation of the initial reports easier that correspond to our network."

"The dashboard templates are limited."

"The reporting side can be improved. The dashboards are nice, but exporting things out for reports for management was a little tough."

"There is not much room for improvement. However, there should be a guide that describes the step-by-step procedures for doing tasks. Otherwise, training is required from a senior guy to a junior guy."

"Certain aspects require manual effort, such as exporting and analyzing data for our dashboards. The built-in components of the Tenable solution are somewhat clumsy that require external tools. So, this is an area of improvement."

"It could be more user-friendly for creating custom reports."

More Tenable Security Center cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing for physical devices is cheap, but the software version is expensive. The software version costs around 26-28 dollars. I was surprised and even double-checked. It was shocking."

"The tool is quite expensive."

"It's a bit expensive compared to other solutions."

"The tool costs around 15,000 Saudi riyals monthly."

"For 500 users the licensing fee is roughly $100,000."

"Tenable is open-source."

"The pricing is more than Nexpose."

"We pay around 60,000 on a yearly basis."

"Though reasonable, the main competitor of Tenable SC, Rapid7, offers a more aggressive and better priced product."

"Compared to other companies or other products it could maybe be a little bit less, but the price is okay. I would say it's not very expensive."

"I would rate the pricing a nine out of ten, where ten is expensive. It is the most expensive tool my company is using."

More Tenable Security Center pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

15%

Energy/Utilities Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

21%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Which solution do you prefer: Nozomi Networks or Claroty Platform?

Nozomi Networks and Claroty Platform are both leading operational technology (OT) security solutions offering a wide range of features, including asset discovery, risk assessment, and threat detect...

See all answers

What do you like most about Claroty Platform?

The product helps mitigate potential threats, especially if its users have signature rules. The product also provides alerts.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Claroty Platform?

For improvement, I think the training could be more practical. We have external training, but they're mostly theoretical. I want the solution to provide hands-on lab experience to help users learn ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tenable SC?

The tool's dashboard and reporting capabilities match our company's needs since we are able to modify the basic view to create a new dashboard, and it works out very well for our needs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tenable SC?

Tenable Security Center is considered pricey compared to other solutions, yet relatively cheaper than some like Qualys. However, when compared to Rapid7, it is more expensive. I rate the pricing si...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tenable SC?

The dashboard templates are limited. More templates that align with our daily needs would be beneficial. Current dashboards are available for Linux, separate unit systems, and other systems, but th...

See all answers

Comparisons

Nozomi Networks vs Claroty Platform

Compared 38% of the time

Tenable OT Security vs Claroty Platform

Compared 11% of the time

Dragos vs Claroty Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Armis vs Claroty Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Defender for IoT vs Claroty Platform

Compared 6% of the time

More Claroty Platform Competitors

Tenable Vulnerability Management vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 26% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 13% of the time

Rapid7 InsightVM vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 11% of the time

Tenable Nessus vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 10% of the time

The NodeZero Platform vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 7% of the time

More Tenable Security Center Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Claroty Platform

November 2024

Download Claroty Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Tenable Security Center

October 2024

Download Tenable Security Center product report

Also Known As

No data available

Tenable.sc, Tenable Unified Security, Tenable SecurityCenter

Learn More

Claroty

Tenable

Overview

The Claroty Platform is tailored for monitoring and securing industrial control systems. It offers deep visibility into OT networks, enabling effective anomaly detection and vulnerability assessments. Its user-friendly interface and robust reporting tools facilitate easy management and compliance, enhancing organizational efficiency and cybersecurity posture in industrial environments.

Get a risk-based view of your IT, security and compliance posture so you can quickly identify, investigate and prioritize your most critical assets and vulnerabilities.

Managed on-premises and powered by Nessus technology, the Tenable Security Center (formerly Tenable.sc) suite of products provides the industry’s most comprehensive vulnerability coverage with real-time continuous assessment of your network. It’s your complete end-to-end vulnerability management solution.

Sample Customers

Rockwell Automation

IBM, Sempra Energy, Microsoft, Apple, Adidas, Union Pacific

Buyer's Guide

Claroty Platform vs. Tenable Security Center

October 2024

Free Report: Claroty Platform vs. Tenable Security Center

Find out what your peers are saying about Claroty Platform vs. Tenable Security Center and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Claroty Platform vs. Tenable Security Center report.

See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.