Cloudera Data Science Workbench vs IBM SPSS Modeler comparison

Cloudera and IBM are both solutions in the Data Science Platforms category. Cloudera is ranked #24 with an average rating of 6.0, while IBM is ranked #17 with an average rating of 7.5. Cloudera holds a 1.3% mindshare in Data Science Platforms, compared to IBM’s 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of Cloudera users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Cloudera Data Science Workb...

Read 2 Cloudera Data Science Workbench reviews

836 Views
819 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

IBM SPSS Modeler

Read 40 IBM SPSS Modeler reviews

2,148 Views
1,418 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Cloudera Data Science Workb...

IBM SPSS Modeler

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 5, 2024

IBM SPSS Modeler and Cloudera Data Science Workbench are competing products in data science tools. Cloudera has the upper hand with its robust feature set and scalability that many buyers find justify its cost.

Features: IBM SPSS Modeler has strengths in predictive analytics, machine learning capabilities, and easy integration with IBM's ecosystem. Cloudera Data Science Workbench provides scalable data processing, flexibility in coding languages, and strong integration with Hadoop ecosystems.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM SPSS Modeler offers straightforward installation with comprehensive customer support resources. Cloudera Data Science Workbench requires a more complex setup but offers strong community support and a versatile infrastructure.

Pricing and ROI: IBM SPSS Modeler has a clear pricing model with predictable ROI, suitable for budget-conscious businesses. Cloudera Data Science Workbench involves higher setup costs, but its ROI is validated by enhanced capabilities and scalability, appealing to businesses seeking growth in data science.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloudera Data Science Workbench vs. IBM SPSS Modeler Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cloudera Data Science Workbench vs. IBM SPSS Modeler

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,676 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cloudera Data Science Workb...

Ranking in Data Science Platforms

24th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM SPSS Modeler

Ranking in Data Science Platforms

17th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Mining (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Data Science Platforms category, the mindshare of Cloudera Data Science Workbench is 1.3%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM SPSS Modeler is 2.5%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Science Platforms Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
IBM SPSS Modeler	2.5%
Cloudera Data Science Workbench	1.3%
Other	96.2%

Data Science Platforms

Featured Reviews

Ismail Peer

Program Management Lead Advisor at Unionbank Philippines

Useful for data science modeling but improvement is needed in MLOps and pricing

If you don't configure CDSW well, then it might be not useful for you. Deploying the tool can vary in complexity, but most of the time, it's relatively simple and straightforward. Triggering a job from data to production is easy, as the platform automates the deployment process. However, ensuring optimal resource allocation is essential for smooth operations.

Read full review

PeterHuo

Application Architect at Canada Border Services Agency

Good tool for extracting data from data warehouses, creating streams, and manipulating logic to extract final data

There are performance issues. Extracting data from many combined tables can take hours and occasionally crash the server due to memory leaks. This performance problem bothers people. The performance issue seems to be related to the server. We design streams on the client and submit them to the server, which generates a large SQL statement. There are two potential bottlenecks: one in the server and another in data extraction. I'm unsure about the exact mechanics of data splitting when fetching from the database. When streams become larger, performance bottlenecks may occur in the IBM SPSS Modeler server or the database. Sometimes the server crashes and needs to be restarted to release memory on both sides. I'm not sure exactly where the problem is caused, as I focus on stream design rather than server issues. The problem could be on the IBM SPSS Modeler server and database.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I appreciate CDSW's ability to logically segregate environments, such as data, DR, and production, ensuring they don't interfere with each other. The deployment of machine learning is fast and easy to manage. Its API calls are also fast."

"The Cloudera Data Science Workbench is customizable and easy to use."

"We have a local representative who specializes in SPSS. He will help us do the PoC."

"It handles large data better than the previous system that we were using, which was basically Excel and Access. We serve upwards of 300,000 parts over a 150 regions and we need to crunch a lot of numbers."

"The most valuable features of the IBM SPSS Modeler are visual programming, you don't have to write any code, and it is easy to use. 90 to 95 percent of the use cases, you don't have to fine-tune anything. If you want to do something deeper, for example, create a better neural network, then you have to go into the features and try to fine-tune them. However, the default selection which is made by the tool, it's very practical and works well."

"The supervised models are valuable. It is also very organized and easy to use."

"Automated modelling, classification, or clustering are very useful."

"It will scale up to anything we need."

"IBM was chosen because of usability. It's point and click, whereas the other out-of-the box-solution, or open-source solutions, require full-on programming and a much higher skill level."

"You take two quarters and compare them and this tool is ideal because it gives you a lot of visibility on the before and after."

More IBM SPSS Modeler pros

Cons

"Running this solution requires a minimum of 12GB to 16GB of RAM."

"The tool's MLOps is not good. It's pricing also needs to improve."

"We have run into a few problems doing some entity matching/analytics."

"I would like better integration into the Weather Company solution. I have raised a couple of concerns about this integration and having more time series capabilities."

"Time Series or forecasting needs to be easier. It is a very important feature, and it should be made easier and more automated to use. For instance, for logistic regression, binary or multinomial is used automatically based on the type of the target variable. I wish they can make Time Series easier to use in a similar way."

"Unstructured data is not appropriate for SPSS Modeler."

"The platform's cloud version needs improvements."

"I would like see more programming languages added, like MATLAB. That would be better."

"It's not as user friendly as it could be."

"Expensive to deploy solutions. You need to buy an extra deployment unit."

More IBM SPSS Modeler cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is expensive."

"Having in mind all four tools from Garner’s top quadrant, the pricing of this tool is competitive and it reflects the quality that it offers."

"Its price is okay for a company, but for personal use, it is considered somewhat expensive."

"$5,000 annually."

"The government has funds and a budget, it's hard to say if it's expensive or cheap. In Canada, they have a yearly budget. They used to encourage people to use the modeler for development. If ten users use the server with ten licenses, it runs faster. But if forty users use the same appliance, everything slows down. People then think it's not easy to do things and prefer using remote tools like Python to extract data from the database. It's not about being expensive or cheap, but about people's knowledge and experience in how to do the work."

"I am using the free version of IBM SPSS Modeler, it is the educational edition version."

"When you are close to end of quarter, IBM and its partners can get you 60% to 70% discounts, so literally wait for the last day of the quarter for the best prices. You may feel like you are getting robbed if you can't receive a good discount."

"It got us a good amount of money with quick and efficient modeling."

"It is an expensive product."

More IBM SPSS Modeler pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Science Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

34%

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Educational Organization

11%

Government

10%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	32

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cloudera Data Science Workbench?

I appreciate CDSW's ability to logically segregate environments, such as data, DR, and production, ensuring they don't interfere with each other. The deployment of machine learning is fast and easy...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cloudera Data Science Workbench?

The tool's MLOps is not good. It's pricing also needs to improve.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cloudera Data Science Workbench?

We have different use cases. Our banking use case uses machine learning to identify customer life events and recommend the best-suited card products. These machine-learning models are deployed in o...

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM SPSS Modeler?

Compared to other tools, the product works much easier to analyze data without coding.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM SPSS Modeler?

The government has funds and a budget, it's hard to say if it's expensive or cheap. In Canada, they have a yearly budget. They used to encourage people to use the modeler for development. If ten us...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM SPSS Modeler?

The customer comes to you and says they want to deploy it and make a production out of this, which is very difficult and expensive with IBM SPSS Modeler. With MATLAB, there is no problem. I have a ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Databricks vs Cloudera Data Science Workbench

Compared 34% of the time

Dataiku vs Cloudera Data Science Workbench

Compared 19% of the time

Amazon SageMaker vs Cloudera Data Science Workbench

Compared 19% of the time

KNIME Business Hub vs Cloudera Data Science Workbench

Compared 12% of the time

Alteryx vs Cloudera Data Science Workbench

Compared 8% of the time

More Cloudera Data Science Workbench Competitors

IBM SPSS Statistics vs IBM SPSS Modeler

Compared 31% of the time

Microsoft Power BI vs IBM SPSS Modeler

Compared 21% of the time

KNIME Business Hub vs IBM SPSS Modeler

Compared 14% of the time

Altair RapidMiner vs IBM SPSS Modeler

Compared 6% of the time

Alteryx vs IBM SPSS Modeler

Compared 5% of the time

More IBM SPSS Modeler Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Science Platforms

August 2025

Download Cloudera Data Science Workbench product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM SPSS Modeler

September 2025

Download IBM SPSS Modeler product report

Also Known As

CDSW

SPSS Modeler

Overview

Cloudera Data Science Workbench (CDSW) makes secure, collaborative data science at scale a reality for the enterprise and accelerates the delivery of new data products. With CDSW, organizations can research and experiment faster, deploy models easily and with confidence, as well as rely on the wider Cloudera platform to reduce the risks and costs of data science projects. Access any data anywhere – from cloud object storage to data warehouses, CDSW provides connectivity not only to CDH but the systems your data science teams rely on for analysis.

Cloudera

IBM SPSS Modeler is an extensive predictive analytics platform that is designed to bring predictive intelligence to decisions made by individuals, groups, systems and the enterprise. By providing a range of advanced algorithms and techniques that include text analytics, entity analytics, decision management and optimization, SPSS Modeler can help you consistently make the right decisions from the desktop or within operational systems.

Buy
https://www.ibm.com/products/spss-modeler/pricing

Sign up for the trial
https://www.ibm.com/account/reg/us-en/signup?formid=urx-19947

IBM

Sample Customers

IQVIA, Rush University Medical Center, Western Union

Reisebªro Idealtours GmbH, MedeAnalytics, Afni, Israel Electric Corporation, Nedbank Ltd., DigitalGlobe, Vodafone Hungary, Aegon Hungary, Bureau Veritas, Brammer Group, Florida Department of Juvenile Justice, InSites Consulting, Fortis Turkey

Buyer's Guide

Cloudera Data Science Workbench vs. IBM SPSS Modeler

July 2025

Free Report: Cloudera Data Science Workbench vs. IBM SPSS Modeler

Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudera Data Science Workbench vs. IBM SPSS Modeler and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cloudera Data Science Workbench vs. IBM SPSS Modeler report.

See our list of best Data Science Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Data Science Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.