Cloudify vs OpenNebula comparison

Cloudify and OpenNebula are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Cloudify is ranked #35, while OpenNebula is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.0. Cloudify holds a 1.6% mindshare in CM, compared to OpenNebula’s 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cloudify users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenNebula users who would recommend it.

Cloudify

Read 12 Cloudify reviews

1,071 Views
1,017 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenNebula

Read 15 OpenNebula reviews

2,805 Views
2,665 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cloudify

OpenNebula

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Cloudify and OpenNebula are competing platforms in cloud orchestration and management, with Cloudify holding an advantage due to its flexible features and advanced integration capabilities.

Features: Cloudify supports multi-cloud integration, application orchestration, and automation, making it ideal for complex environments. Extensive TOSCA support, infrastructure-as-code, and service chaining enhance its flexibility. OpenNebula is renowned for easy setup and management of virtualized data centers, scalable architecture, and robust API support for custom automation.

Room for Improvement: Cloudify could improve by simplifying the deployment process to better accommodate smaller organizations. Additionally, enhanced out-of-the-box integrations and streamlined resource consumption might attract more users. OpenNebula could benefit from expanded customer support, more refined enterprise features, and increased documentation for complex cloud setups.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cloudify offers customizable deployments suitable for complex enterprise needs, backed by dedicated support. OpenNebula's straightforward deployment model allows for rapid implementation, but its customer support may not match Cloudify's depth.

Pricing and ROI: Cloudify typically incurs higher setup costs but offers significant ROI for adaptable and scalable environments. OpenNebula provides a cost-effective solution with lower upfront investment, appealing to budget-conscious organizations or those with less complexity.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloudify vs. OpenNebula Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cloudify vs. OpenNebula

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,880 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cloudify

Ranking in Cloud Management

35th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenNebula

Ranking in Cloud Management

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of Cloudify is 1.6%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenNebula is 2.5%, down from 8.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenNebula	2.5%
Cloudify	1.6%
Other	95.9%

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

Mark Wittling

Cloud Architect at Cox communications

Works very well for advanced service chaining requirements and has extremely advanced engineers for support

We had a manager who thought that Cloudify could be used as a replacement for Horizon in OpenStack, but we found that Cloudify lacked the user interface or GUI for doing multitenancy and basic platform management tasks. Cloudify was really good at launching, for example, firewalls and configuring them and doing service chaining and rather advanced things like that, but it didn't meet the requirements for a basic platform management solution. It is something that seems to work better as a bolt-on or an augmented solution. It is a bit mis-marketed as a Cloud Management solution. It is not that. It is more of a service orchestration and automation tool. It is very good at doing that, but it fails to meet basic platform management requirements. Once you have it running, you can't really do anything with it without writing code and scripts. It requires a full-time DevOps person to use it. We deployed a Palo Alto firewall with it. That's basically what the project was for us, and it worked flawlessly once we got it finished, but it took another 12 weeks to get all of the automation and everything else coded, tested, and working. There is certainly a place for this technology, but when we got rid of OpenStack and moved to VMware, we either had to go with the vRealize Automation Suite to do this kind of automation, or we had to find an alternative solution to manage the private cloud. So, we put Cloudify in, but we really couldn't find it useful for basic platform administration tasks.

Read full review

FOURES Jean-Philippe

Products Manager at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

Reliable, simple to manage, and offers great technical support

The support of VXLAN fits with our network management. Thanks to this we can propose mixed solutions using virtual resources on OpenNebula and bare metal servers hosted in our facilities linked to each other on the sale network. This use case is very useful when some applications need bare metal power (Kubernetes workers, huge databases, AI models computations, et cetera). The cluster management is very useful for splitting our different clusters (mutual vs dedicated). We can manage deployments and capacity planning without pain. The API is also really simple and it helped us to develop the Terraform provider to manage OpenNebula like any other cloud infrastructure.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Valuable features are auto-scaling and load balancing."

"The solution includes the option to run background scripts and processes from a connected API."

"TOSCA model allows modeling the application rather than the automation. It is a machine-readable representation of the application and its infrastructure, which can be used for other things too, not just for the orchestration (e.g. enterprise architecture big picture, who connects to whom)."

"Even with the learning curve, the solution is an interesting concept and reminds me of Vagrant Terraform with its own difficulties and easiness."

"Product has given us the ability to catch early scaling issues that many companies hit on with private clouds."

"Cloudify works in cases where you have very advanced service chaining requirements; it really works well there, and it fits the best."

"We have found that this is not an undue burden, and the extra work gives immense flexibility and portability."

"This is a somewhat complex solution for very complex use cases where there are multiple cloud vendors, multiple infrastructures, and multiple configurations."

More Cloudify pros

"I also like the ability to build custom functions. I can define a function where I have two types of views and configure the dependencies. The virtual data centers concept allows me to define users. If a user wants to join certain kinds of machines, the host and the other user won't see them. It gives me the flexibility to define multiple views and data centers in one place."

"The service feature appeals most to us, thus it is the most valuable."

"For our use case, we found the solution to be the best fit when dealing with infrastructure services."

"It is quite easy to deploy."

"The solution provides templates for configurations that can easily be exchanged to VMs."

"OpenNebula freed my customer from doing the maintenance operations of the servers because now that can be done by his clients."

"OpenNebula is easy to deploy and manage compared to other solutions like OpenStack."

"OpenNebula is lightweight, stable, and easy to customize."

More OpenNebula pros

Cons

"Install of the product itself could be improved and I would like to see better event monitoring."

"Certainly the UI could use some intensive work, but nevertheless, overall, it’s a complete product with its 3.4 version and much better features are available with 4.0."

"The upgrading process could be simplified."

"The solution is a bit of a headache because mistakes happen in the blueprint every time we deploy and they require modifications."

"More of the debug functionality is needed; hopefully, we can pause during the server building process."

"There were some issues with deploying the solution on OpenStack Mitaka."

"The solution could be improved with respect to error handling. If we want to troubleshoot further and deep dive, we don't have access to admin privileges to extract those errors."

"I did encounter any issues with scalability."

More Cloudify cons

"They have been saying for the past two and a half years that they would develop a feature to hot-add RAM and CPU, but it does not work."

"Hosting platforms are limited so the deployment process needs improvement."

"Backup features are only available in the enterprise edition. The community version lacks a good solution for making backups."

"They have been saying for the past two and a half years that they would develop a feature to hot-add RAM and CPU, but it does not work."

"The storage feature that they have is a bit confusing."

"The protocol for clusterization is rough and doesn't work well."

"The front-facing API can be improved to support lots of requests when the platform is huge with lots of virtual resources."

"I would like to see OpenNebula add more integration with REST API. XML-RPC API is good, but it becomes a pain to form a resting output."

More OpenNebula cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I wasn't involved in the pricing of it because we were just doing prototype work with it, but I was told by the upper management team that it was quite expensive. That was another reason we switched to Morpheus."

"We use the Community Edition, rather than the Enterprise Edition."

"VRA is very expensive but OpenNebula is free."

"The licensing for OpenNebula used to be free, but now it's no longer free. A customer contacted me asking to move to another provider because of the changes in the licensing terms for OpenNebula. I have no information on how much the OpenNebula license is because the customer pays for it, and I only do the integration."

"The solution is open source so is free."

"OpenNebuoa has recently come up with a new subscription model that is economical and a lot of new customers are choosing this as it is an easy subscription model."

"OpenNebula gives good value for money."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,880 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Performing Arts

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

University

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with OpenNebula?

The web interface could be better. It's not very difficult to use, but there's room for enhancement. Another area for improvement is the integration with hardware to manage the lower layer of the n...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for OpenNebula?

Previously, we were using VMware, but recently, we've started using OpenNebula for cloud management. As a big cloud provider, it helps give customers increased control over their clusters. We use L...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering OpenNebula?

I recommend it, especially if you need a management interface for a small to medium private cloud. I would rate OpenNebula an eight out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

VMware Aria Automation vs Cloudify

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs Cloudify

Compared 9% of the time

Red Hat CloudForms vs Cloudify

Compared 7% of the time

CloudBolt vs Cloudify

Compared 7% of the time

Lumen Cloud Application Manager vs Cloudify

Compared 4% of the time

More Cloudify Competitors

CloudStack vs OpenNebula

Compared 20% of the time

Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM) vs OpenNebula

Compared 8% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs OpenNebula

Compared 6% of the time

VMware Cloud Director vs OpenNebula

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenNebula Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloudify

April 2026

Download Cloudify product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenNebula

March 2026

Download OpenNebula product report

Overview

Cloudify is an open-source orchestration-first cloud management platform. The solution allows applications to efficiently run across multiple cloud or data center platforms for premium multi-cloud infrastructure automation and orchestration. It provides infrastructure automation using environment as a service (EaaS) technology to deploy and continuously manage any cloud, private data center, or Kubernetes service from one central point while leveraging existing toolchains.

Cloudify Product Highlights

Fully customizable (white label, add, and modify widgets)
Create a custom view per business units, groups, user role
Easy integration with any 3rd-party/homegrown portal
Identify and eliminate task execution failures via a visual interface
Easy service composition that allows you to create new or update existing services
Switch between code and topology views
Import existing automation templates and scripts into Cloudify and automatically convert them into certified environments.
Intelligent and declarative engine that automates the entire lifecycle management
Intuitive UX and dashboards allowing complete visibility and control over usage, behavior, faults, and events of application/network services.

Cloudify Features

Cloudify has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Elastic caching
Post-deployment automation
Deployment monitoring
Service catalog
Real-time code validation
Plugins (Kubernetes, Ansible, AWS Cloud Formation, Azure ARM, Terraform)
Advanced Kubernetes management UI
Multi cluster action
Governance and compliance
Self-serve experience

Cloudify Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing Cloudify. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Operation agility: Cloudify gives your organization and DevOps teams the ability to react to resource needs, evolve, and adapt quickly over time.

Self-service: Cloudify provides a self-service catalog and portal framework for cloud automation and cloud orchestration to provide a helpful and intuitive experience for environments, apps, and services setup and management.

Real-time visibility: Cloudify enables you to visually track all task executions. By implementing Cloudify, you can monitor progress and status of each execution step on Cloudify’s cloud orchestration platform, identify and eliminate task execution failures via a visual interface, and you can also apply management actions, such as stop, correct, and resume, quickly.

Reduce design and configuration time: The Cloudify solution has a visual editor, allowing greater visibility into blueprint structure and dependencies, and drag-n-drop service composition that helps you leverage shared resources and components for ultimate open-source infrastructure and cloud orchestration.

Fast deployment: Another benefit of Cloudify is that it helps speed up deployments of your test/dev/production environments from your CI/CD.

Enables continuous updates: With Cloudify, you have continuous updates for your production environments. Cloudify enables your organization to monitor health, heal failures, update patches, and scale resources without any environment downtime.

Governance: By using the Cloudify solution, you can accommodate governance changes and can scale and update operations according to your certified architecture.

Easier to manage Kubernetes: Cloudify makes it simple for you to manage multi Kubernetes clusters via service orchestration, enabling you to manage the application service itself rather than just its infrastructure.

Cost optimization: With Cloudify, you can control costs by employing end-to-end modeling of the entire infrastructure. The solution offers cost-saving policies, which include the decommissioning of formerly complex services and resources.

Cloudify

OpenNebula provides the most simple but feature-rich and flexible solution for the comprehensive management of virtualized data centers to enable private, public and hybrid IaaS clouds. OpenNebula interoperability makes cloud an evolution by leveraging existing IT assets, protecting your investments, and avoiding vendor lock-in.

OpenNebula is a turnkey enterprise-ready solution that includes all the features needed to provide an on-premises (private) cloud offering, and to offer public cloud services.

OpenNebula

Sample Customers

Proximus Partner Communications (Israel) VMware NTT Data Metaswitch Spirent Communications Lumina Networks Atos Fortinet

Akamai, BBC, Fermilab, Terradue, Surf Sara, Produban, Netways, ESA, China Mobile, BlackBerry, Deloitte, Fuze, Telefonica, Trivago, Nokia, Encore Tech, Beeks.

Buyer's Guide

Cloudify vs. OpenNebula

April 2026

Free Report: Cloudify vs. OpenNebula

Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudify vs. OpenNebula and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,880 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cloudify vs. OpenNebula report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.