CodeTwo Exchange Rules vs Microsoft Exchange Online comparison

"The solution offers great features."

"Microsoft Exchange Online is easy to use. You have a common storage where people can store documents. It also helps with version control."

"One of the important features is the collaboration tool used in Office 365. The security and DLP mechanisms are also quite good."

"The solution is stable."

"It is a scalable product. We are using it for 500 users."

"The data prevention and protection feature is good."

"Exchange Online's best feature is its webmail platform."

"I enjoy not having to maintain the local infrastructure, local servers, local whatever. You use the software and don't have to worry about the details."

"The solution generally works well. We can send and receive emails just fine."

"NVMe support is lacking when it comes to performance on the disk side."

"The interface is a bit confusing."

"I would rate Exchange Online's stability eight out of ten - it has room for improvement."

"They should tighten their cloud security."

"It should integrate better with social media formats."

"Also, I think the mobile app on the forms you can improve a little bit more."

"The solution’s technical support could be improved."

"What I don't like about Microsoft Exchange Online is too much integration because now it has many services connected to it. In the beginning, it was just email, and now it's also Teams and Visio, and many other services which I don't like. Microsoft Exchange Online should focus on one service. The product now lost focus, and this is its area for improvement. I would also like more freedom in choosing to use just one service, for example, just Microsoft Exchange Online, which means I don't need Teams or any other Microsoft product or service there. Right now, all services are either in the Microsoft Office suite, or there are more products or services integrated with Microsoft Exchange Online, and I'd like to just focus on one."

"I would like to let new users know that there are challenges regarding user provisioning, HRMS and the AD. Also, the data migration integrity needs to be checked in terms of the old data."

"The model is one which is pay-per-use go. There is no license. We are talking about per-user subscription-based use."

"Microsoft Exchange Online is too expensive."

"The license for the solution is cheap, but it could be more affordable in the long term."

"The costs of this platform vary based on subscriptions, but it is generally reasonable."

"Our organization pays for a corporate license to use the solution."

"We pay per user per year for the cluster with over a thousand users."

"The pricing is based on a yearly contract and a floating license option is offered."

"The pricing for Microsoft Exchange Online is quite reasonable, in my opinion. Many licensing options are available so that we can choose based on the customer's needs. For example, if a customer only requires mailbox features, we can recommend Plan One or Plan 2. We can suggest an E3 or E5 license if they need the entire Office suite. There are also premium subscriptions for enterprise customers, offering additional security features. Overall, I don't find the pricing costly because Microsoft provides many features and security capabilities, making it reliable for all customers, depending on their requirements."