Cortex Xpanse vs NetSPI Attack Surface Management (ASM) comparison

Palo Alto Networks and NetSPI are both solutions in the Attack Surface Management (ASM) category. Palo Alto Networks is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.5, while NetSPI is ranked #38. Palo Alto Networks holds a 3.1% mindshare in ASM, compared to NetSPI’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Palo Alto Networks users are willing to recommend the solution.

Cortex Xpanse

Read 6 Cortex Xpanse reviews

1,471 Views
1,456 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NetSPI Attack Surface Manag...

499 Views
250 Comparison Views

Cortex Xpanse

NetSPI Attack Surface Manag...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

Cortex Xpanse and NetSPI Attack Surface Management compete in the cybersecurity attack surface management category. While Cortex Xpanse has a feature-rich offering, NetSPI ASM stands out with advantageous pricing and support structures, providing better customer value.

Features: Cortex Xpanse includes automated asset discovery, continuous monitoring, and visibility into shadow IT and third-party exposures. NetSPI ASM features vulnerability management integration, risk prioritization, and detailed vulnerability insights, focusing on targeted threat mitigation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetSPI ASM allows straightforward deployment and strong customer support for smooth integration. Cortex Xpanse emphasizes automated deployment but may need more configuration. Both prioritize security effectiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Cortex Xpanse has higher initial setup costs with potential ROI from reduced risks. NetSPI ASM provides competitive pricing, reducing entry barriers and promising ROI through effective risk management.

To learn more, read our detailed Attack Surface Management (ASM) Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Attack Surface Management (ASM)

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,789 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex Xpanse

Ranking in Attack Surface Management (ASM)

7th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NetSPI Attack Surface Manag...

Ranking in Attack Surface Management (ASM)

38th

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Software Development (56th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Attack Surface Management (ASM) category, the mindshare of Cortex Xpanse is 3.1%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetSPI Attack Surface Management (ASM) is 0.9%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Attack Surface Management (ASM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex Xpanse	3.1%
NetSPI Attack Surface Management (ASM)	0.9%
Other	96.0%

Attack Surface Management (ASM)

Featured Reviews

reviewer1442496

System Administrator at a retailer with 5,001-10,000 employees

Ensures robust security management with seamless integration

We work with the cloud version of Cortex Xpanse. We are working with Palo Alto products right at the moment. We have Cortex and GlobalProtect that we are using. I'm not sure if we utilize Cortex Xpanse's capability to identify internet-facing assets. I'm not sure about the automated threat assessment of Cortex helping prioritize vulnerabilities. I would assess the integration capabilities of Cortex Xpanse as good; no issues so far with integration with other tools from different vendors. Cortex Xpanse supports our organization's regulatory compliance efforts 100%, and it's what we need from it. Right now, I am working only with Palo Alto for security. I am not planning to work with some other vendors. On a scale of one to ten, I rate Cortex Xpanse a nine.

Read full review

Use NetSPI Attack Surface Management (ASM)?

Leave a review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Attack Surface Management (ASM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

10%

Performing Arts

Construction Company

22%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Performing Arts

12%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cortex Xpanse?

I don't know the licensing or setup cost; I have no idea about the cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cortex Xpanse?

I'm not sure right now; I have nothing to comment on regarding what could be improved in the product. We are using it and we are satisfied. I have nothing to comment right now on what other feature...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cortex Xpanse?

Cortex Xpanse is usually used for security from clients.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tenable Attack Surface Management vs Cortex Xpanse

Compared 16% of the time

CyCognito vs Cortex Xpanse

Compared 12% of the time

Bitsight vs Cortex Xpanse

Compared 12% of the time

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management vs Cortex Xpanse

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Security Randori Recon vs Cortex Xpanse

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex Xpanse Competitors

Resecurity EASM vs NetSPI Attack Surface Management (ASM)

Compared 34% of the time

Bitsight vs NetSPI Attack Surface Management (ASM)

Compared 31% of the time

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management vs NetSPI Attack Surface Management (ASM)

Compared 20% of the time

More NetSPI Attack Surface Management (ASM) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Attack Surface Management (ASM)

March 2026

Download Cortex Xpanse product report

Buyer's Guide

Attack Surface Management (ASM)

March 2026

NetSPI Attack Surface Management (ASM) report

Download NetSPI Attack Surface Management (ASM) product report

Overview

Xpanse provides a complete, accurate and continuously updated inventory of all global internet-facing assets. This allows you to discover, evaluate, and mitigate cyber attack surface risks. You can also evaluate supplier risk and assess the security of acquired companies.
Manual asset inventory maintenance is slow and prone to error. An outside-in view of your attack surface catches assets and exposures you never knew existed to help with attack surface reduction.

Get ahead of your ransomware risk assessment by discovering and remediating RDP exposures, the leading attack vector in ransomware attacks. Find exposed assets before attackers do.

Integration with Cortex XSOAR, Prisma Cloud, and our broader portfolio allows our ASM findings to enhance security workflows, and secure unknown, unmanaged risks on your cloud attack surface.

Palo Alto Networks

NetSPI Attack Surface Management (ASM) offers comprehensive visibility into an organization's digital footprint, real-time threat updates, and detailed analytics. It streamlines workflows, enhancing productivity and collaboration. ASM automates security testing, aiding in compliance management to meet regulatory standards and avoid penalties.

NetSPI

Buyer's Guide

Attack Surface Management (ASM)

March 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Qualys, TrendAI and others in Attack Surface Management (ASM). Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Attack Surface Management (ASM) vendors.

We monitor all Attack Surface Management (ASM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.