CrossBrowserTesting vs Zeenyx AscentialTest comparison

SmartBear and Zeenyx are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. SmartBear is ranked #28, while Zeenyx is ranked #16 with an average rating of 10.0. SmartBear holds a 0.7% mindshare in FT, compared to Zeenyx’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of SmartBear users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Zeenyx users who would recommend it.

CrossBrowserTesting

Read 19 CrossBrowserTesting reviews

589 Views
449 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Zeenyx AscentialTest

Read 13 Zeenyx AscentialTest reviews

381 Views
125 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CrossBrowserTesting

Zeenyx AscentialTest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Zeenyx AscentialTest and CrossBrowserTesting compete in the software testing domain. Zeenyx AscentialTest has an advantage in pricing and support, while CrossBrowserTesting stands out for its robust feature set.

Features: Zeenyx AscentialTest is renowned for automation capabilities, scriptless testing, and test maintenance. It allows creation of application objects through snapshots, integrates Subversion for versioning, and utilizes the TestSet feature for test execution. CrossBrowserTesting provides extensive cross-browser compatibility, real device testing, and performance diagnostics. It includes Screenshot and Screen Recording tools to aid in browser-specific testing scenarios, offering a comprehensive range of environments.

Room for Improvement: Zeenyx AscentialTest could enhance its interface for more intuitive navigation and integration options with popular tools. Expanding cloud capabilities and introducing more third-party integrations would be beneficial. CrossBrowserTesting might improve its live testing speed and device selection availability. Additional support for complex test scenarios and real-time troubleshooting could optimize its service. Introducing more advanced analytics and reporting could enrich user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zeenyx AscentialTest supports on-premise deployment, appealing to those preferring controlled environments. It offers strong customer support. CrossBrowserTesting is cloud-based, allowing easy access with minimal setup. It provides responsive support through multiple channels, facilitating quick resolution of issues.

Pricing and ROI: Zeenyx AscentialTest offers a cost-effective solution with straightforward ROI through competitive pricing and lower setup costs. It is appealing to budget-conscious teams. Despite a higher price, CrossBrowserTesting justifies its cost with extensive features and long-term benefits in testing efficiency and coverage. Its higher initial investment can lead to significant returns for broader test scenarios.

To learn more, read our detailed CrossBrowserTesting vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CrossBrowserTesting vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CrossBrowserTesting

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

28th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Zeenyx AscentialTest

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

16th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of CrossBrowserTesting is 0.7%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zeenyx AscentialTest is 0.2%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Michael Hutchison

Web Specialist at Mayo Clinic

Static screenshots are the feature most often used, because they are a simple method of detecting problems

The screenshot tool defaults to a screen layout instead of a full page test. I find it a bit cumbersome that I can't have it run a full screenshot as my default. Every time, I have to select the full screen, then restart its captures, which seems a waste of time and energy. This is, admittedly, a minor complaint.

Read full review

Tobias Roth

Software developer at Weiss GmbH Softwarelösungen

Robust automation with reusable steps and seamless integration

The concept of reusable steps in Zeenyx AscentialTest has significantly enhanced our test automation efficiency. Encapsulating common actions into modular steps reduces redundancy in test scripts and ensures consistency across scenarios. This approach streamlines maintenance efforts, allowing updates to be applied universally, making our test suite more agile and adaptable to evolving project requirements. The concept of reusable steps is a key factor in maximizing reusability and maintainability in our test automation strategy. AscentialTest's object recognition in snapshots is a robust feature that goes beyond standard elements, even accurately identifying objects within Datawindows. This capability ensures precise interaction with various components of an application's interface, further enhancing the reliability and effectiveness of our automated tests.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"With screenshots, I can quickly verify a page looks universally good in minutes."

"The ability to replay sessions is valuable for tracking down issues."

"Each new session started with the live testing feature allows for a cleared browser and new experience to be able to not only see these attributes on the page clearly but also pass clean data."

"When developing new pages that have questionable functionality or coding, we will often use CBT to test it in a browser. CBT works with our testing environment and development site."

"I have found CrossBrowserTesting to be scalable."

"This solution helps lower the overhead cost associated with buying multiple devices."

"SmartBear has excellent, informative webinars, so keep an eye out for those."

"Selenium Grid allows testing multiple platforms to insure functionality for most users."

More CrossBrowserTesting pros

"It’s been really easy to automate the same application TestComplete struggled with. I have been able to automate two of our key applications in just a few months. I haven’t even taken their training."

"AscentialTest's object recognition in snapshots is a robust feature that goes beyond standard elements, even accurately identifying objects within Datawindows."

"If you use the PowerBuilder application, do choose AscentialTest without thinking twice."

"The most valuable feature of AscentialTest for us is that it fully supports PowerBuilder."

Cons

"I have experienced some lagging issues, and it does not seem like all of the testing environments are configured the same."

"We had some issues with the onboarding process and the cloud conductivity could improve."

"It would be useful if we can run the live-testing test cases on multiple platforms at the same time, instead of waiting for one session to finish."

"I have had quite a few issues trying to use a virtual machine to test our application on."

"Sometimes the testing is slow."

"Being able to test on real devices via the virtual connection is wonderful, but it can cause some lag and load time issues while testing."

"Elements of 'real' mobile/tablet testing could be sped up."

"Sometimes, some of their instances fail, particularly in older versions of browsers."

More CrossBrowserTesting cons

"Classes are not as object-oriented as I would like, but I am a programmer and not QA so I expect a lot."

"I would like to see an improvement in the User Interface."

"The only thing I can't wait for is for Zeenyx to add automating Mobile apps."

"Streamlining the retrieval of results from individual test set runs would be beneficial."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"SmartBear offers bundles of products that work together."

"The lowest price point is very reasonable. It is also useful if only one person in the company needs to check on the browser display."

"A few intermediary pricing options for small QA teams would be nice, e.g., unlimited screenshots, "as you need it" parallel tests, etc."

"It is worth the pricing as the product is supported on multiple platforms and browsers."

"CrossBrowserTesting offered the best value for its price."

"Once it starts generating ROI, which for us took between three and six months, one will not even think about the investment."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

23%

Financial Services Firm

20%

Government

12%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Government

18%

Healthcare Company

15%

University

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Zeenyx AscentialTest?

AscentialTest's object recognition in snapshots is a robust feature that goes beyond standard elements, even accurately identifying objects within Datawindows.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zeenyx AscentialTest?

While Zeenyx AscentialTest has proven to be a valuable asset in our testing processes, there are areas where improvements could enhance the overall user experience. One notable aspect is the user i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Zeenyx AscentialTest?

We use AscentialTest for automated testing of Powerbuilder applications via CI/CD pipeline with GitLab. We have fully integrated all tests in our CI/CD pipeline. Thanks to the integration, much wor...

See all answers

Comparisons

BrowserStack vs CrossBrowserTesting

Compared 67% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs CrossBrowserTesting

Compared 19% of the time

Sauce Labs vs CrossBrowserTesting

Compared 13% of the time

More CrossBrowserTesting Competitors

SmartBear TestComplete vs Zeenyx AscentialTest

Compared 100% of the time

More Zeenyx AscentialTest Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CrossBrowserTesting

April 2025

Download CrossBrowserTesting product report

Buyer's Guide

Zeenyx AscentialTest

March 2025

Download Zeenyx AscentialTest product report

Also Known As

No data available

AscentialTest

Overview

CrossBrowserTesting is a cloud testing platform that gives instant access to 1500+ different real desktop and mobile browsers for testers, developers, and designers.

Native debugging tools make manual testing easy to inspect and correct HTML, CSS, and JavaScript errors on any browser.
Take automated screenshots across multiple browsers at once, then compare side-by-side against historical test runs.

SmartBear

AscentialTest™ by Zeenyx Software is an enterprise level Test Management System that encompasses Test Planning, Development, Data Management, Execution and Defect Tracking for applications running on Windows, the web, java, dotNet, terminals and PowerBuilder. This “next generation” testing solution allows users to build robust automated and manual tests from reusable components created by its powerful object recognition engine without recording or scripting. Our patented ‘snapshot’ technology generates graphical representations of the application under test which allows users to build ‘Steps’ by dragging and dropping objects in a visual test editor. Reusable Steps are combined to form a multitude of automated and manual tests that are easy to create and maintain. With AscentialTest, companies realize a dramatic reduction in test creation and maintenance times, resulting in increased productivity and lower costs.

Zeenyx

Sample Customers

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Accenture, Sony, Los Angeles Times, ADP, Verizon, T-Mobile, Wistia

TJX Companies, Nuance Communications, Ericsson Inc., Transatlantic Reinsurance Company, Accenture, Nutrition Coordinating Center, Univ. of MN, iConectiv, Fortress Software, and LMP Corp.

Buyer's Guide

CrossBrowserTesting vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest

February 2025

Free Report: CrossBrowserTesting vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest

Find out what your peers are saying about CrossBrowserTesting vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest and other solutions. Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CrossBrowserTesting vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.