CrowdStrike Falcon vs VIPRE Endpoint Security comparison

CrowdStrike and VIPRE Security are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. CrowdStrike is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.6, while VIPRE Security is ranked #58. CrowdStrike holds a 7.0% mindshare in EPP, compared to VIPRE Security’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of CrowdStrike users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of VIPRE Security users who would recommend it.

CrowdStrike Falcon

Read 136 CrowdStrike Falcon reviews

49,388 Views
19,755 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

VIPRE Endpoint Security

Read 2 VIPRE Endpoint Security reviews

755 Views
619 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

CrowdStrike Falcon

VIPRE Endpoint Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2025

CrowdStrike Falcon and VIPRE Endpoint Security compete in the endpoint protection market. CrowdStrike generally has the upper hand due to its advanced threat intelligence and comprehensive features.

Features: CrowdStrike Falcon is noted for its robust threat intelligence, real-time protection, and scalable cloud-native architecture. VIPRE Endpoint Security is recognized for its easy installation, integrated email protection, and effective malware scanning. CrowdStrike focuses on sophisticated threat analysis, while VIPRE is suitable for users prioritizing simplicity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CrowdStrike Falcon offers a cloud-based deployment that facilitates the installation process and efficient updates, with dedicated customer support. VIPRE Endpoint Security provides straightforward deployment with minimal configuration, alongside reliable customer service.

Pricing and ROI: CrowdStrike Falcon has a higher initial setup cost due to its comprehensive features but is believed to provide significant long-term ROI. VIPRE Endpoint Security is more affordable upfront, offering good ROI for budget-conscious users. CrowdStrike’s higher cost is justified by its advanced capabilities, contrasted with VIPRE’s cost-effectiveness and essential protection.

To learn more, read our detailed CrowdStrike Falcon vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CrowdStrike Falcon vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,768 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CrowdStrike Falcon

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

136

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (6th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (1st), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (1st), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (1st), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (1st), Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) (1st), AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (1st)

VIPRE Endpoint Security

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

58th

Average Rating

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of CrowdStrike Falcon is 7.0%, down from 11.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VIPRE Endpoint Security is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
CrowdStrike Falcon	7.0%
VIPRE Endpoint Security	0.5%
Other	92.5%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Waleed Omar

Information Security Specialist at Arab Open University

Provides effective real-time threat detection with potential for cost optimization

Some features such as device control, firewall management, and file analysis are standalone products that we need to purchase separately. If these features came out of the box within the product, it would be much more beneficial for us. Other providers such as SentinelOne include these features in their base product. We attended a CrowdStrike Falcon event where they discussed some shallow AI features, but we cannot see these in our panel yet. We work with different solutions such as Darktrace and SocRadar, where AI features are automatically displayed in our dashboards after release. However, for CrowdStrike Falcon, we cannot see these features.

Read full review

Shawn S

IT Security Analyst at a healthcare company with 11-50 employees

Easy to upgrade and manage but needs better reporting

There just was a lot about it that I didn't like. For blocking certain items, such as USBs, we felt like it was slowing down the network too much. Therefore we utilized a GPO for blocking things like that instead. Our environment was big and I didn't feel like the console did a good enough job. We outgrew the product. I've been asking for a change for a couple of years now, and it finally got approved. In terms of the console, I had over 2000 endpoints in there and there wasn't even a search feature for me to look through them. If I had to find where a policy was I had to sort in alphabetical order to find an endpoint that I wanted. They need to offer a search function within the console - maybe something that shows a "last connected" notice. That way, it's easier to manage obsolete machines that you don't need anymore. They had a very vague setting, like after so many days, when do you want us to remove these, you'd see them. I just wish the console was a little more responsive when I would do commands. The reports could have been better. The product would show a lot of endpoints as not communicating. That was another pain point. We constantly had to run an SQL query to clean up the database as I would know immediately when I was in the console, that it just wasn't being responsive. I could tell I was being given bad data and that we had to clean up the database. As soon as I would clean up that database, it was like a purging of the SQL database and it would become a lot more responsive. The problem was that our environment was too big. We're going through a growth spurt right now. In the end, the solution is small and much better suited for a small business. We would get a lot of false positives and instead of them fixing the false positive, they would just want us to put in an exception, which I didn't care for. The product is based on an older model of signature files. It doesn't use any artificial intelligence or anything. It was slow to refresh the policies and computer scans. The larger we got, the more it became an issue. If a company stayed small, I'm not sure if they would have noticed.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like the vulnerability assessment and proactive hunting features of CrowdStrike Falcon."

"The most valuable features are the complete IPS and IDS."

"CrowdStrike Falcon's most valuable features are the lightweight agent which has absolutely zero performance issues. There is no performance deterioration on the laptop on the network. It is a signature-less antivirus and anti-malware solution, it doesn't depend on signatures which better protects the systems."

"CrowdStrike has improved our incident response capabilities."

"The DLP is the most valuable feature of CrowdStrike Falcon."

"Everything we've done with CrowdStrike is due to Arctic Wolf. We don't even need to get alerts from CrowdStrike anymore. It'll send those to Arctic Wolf, and then Arctic Wolf analyzes those and let us know if there's a major issue."

"It provides very good protection and the ability to crosscheck environments."

"I like the overall reports of this solution. They are crisp, and to the point."

More CrowdStrike Falcon pros

"In general, it was pretty easy to manage."

"It has low overhead as far as machine resources are concerned. Everything runs faster with VIPRE installed versus some of the competitors. It has also been pretty easy to use. It just runs and gives us reports. It also sends us alerts when there is something that we need to look at. It does its job, and you just look at the reports. In other ways, you just forget that it is there."

Cons

"CrowdStrike Falcon by itself does not supply in-depth reporting."

"On the firewall management side, there should be more granularity. There should also be more granularity for device control. Everything else is brilliant."

"I would like them to improve the correlation of data in the search algorithms. When we run an investigation, malware, phishing, etc., I want to look at multiple endpoints at once to correlate that data to see the likenesses, e.g., how are they not alike or what systems and processes are running across those systems? I don't want to have to run the same search in their Spotlight module five, 10, 15, or 100 times to get 100 different results, copy that data out, and then correlate it on my own. In a very simple way, I want to be able to load up a comma-delimited list giving me the spotlight data on these X amount of hosts, letting me search for it quickly. We have had to go back to CrowdStrike, and say, "Our search are taking far too long for even one host." They did bump up the cores and that did improve performance, but it is still kind of slow to get that Spotlight data. That is probably our biggest pain point. I think that needs some help. I understand this kind of information access is probably not the easiest thing to do. It is probably a big ask depending on how their back-end is setup."

"I would love to see more investment in Insight because CrowdStrike have an opportunity to potentially displace some of the vulnerability management vendors with the visibility they can see over time. I want to see them continue to evolve, e.g., what other things can they disrupt which are operational things we have to continue to do as an organization."

"If we have a dashboard capability to uninstall agents, I think that would be great."

"CrowdStrike Falcon needs to improve their host management system."

"The GUI can use improvement, it's cloud-based so sometimes the interface can be a bit slow. The interface could use a little bit more speed."

"Forensic controls have room for improvement."

More CrowdStrike Falcon cons

"Their management interface is a little buggy. It requires a few system resources on the management interface. Its reporting can also be better. Overall, the reports are pretty good. They patch some third-party software, but if they can expand what they do for reporting and patch enterprise software, it would be handy."

"We would get a lot of false positives and instead of them fixing the false positive, they would just want us to put in an exception, which I didn't care for."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Crowdstrike Falcon is relatively cheap."

"The pricing is good and there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"The more endpoints an organization adds the cheaper the cost."

"I would like them to further reduce the price, because it is quite pricey at the moment."

"The cost of CrowdStrike Falcon could be reduced. It is quite expensive if you compare it to other solutions, such as Blue Coat, Symantec, McAfee, or Kaspersky."

"We pay between $30-50 per user for a yearly license, which is more expensive than SentinelOne or Bitdefender. However, CrowdStrike gives better value for money."

"The price of CrowdStrike Falcon is expensive."

"The solution's pricing is great for us."

More CrowdStrike Falcon pricing and cost advice

"Its price point has been phenomenal. Our previous solution from Trend Micro was triple the cost of it."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,768 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

University

10%

Wholesaler/Distributor

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	46
Midsize Enterprise	34
Large Enterprise	62

No data available

Questions from the Community

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions that are very scalable, secure, and user-friendly. Cortex XDR by Palo Alto offers ...

See all answers

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with Darktrace?

Both of these products perform similarly and have many outstanding attributes. CrowdStrike Falcon offers an amazing user interface that makes setup easy and seamless. CrowdStrike Falcon offers a cl...

See all answers

How does Microsoft Defender for Endpoint compare with Crowdstrike Falcon?

The CrowdStrike solution delivers a lot of information about incidents. It has a very light sensor that will never push your machine hardware to "test", you don't have the usual "scan now" feature ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 4% of the time

Fortinet FortiEDR vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 3% of the time

Microsoft Defender XDR vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 3% of the time

Darktrace vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 2% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 2% of the time

More CrowdStrike Falcon Competitors

Huntress Managed EDR vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 12% of the time

Bitdefender Total Security vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 11% of the time

Fortinet FortiEDR vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 9% of the time

More VIPRE Endpoint Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CrowdStrike Falcon

January 2026

Download CrowdStrike Falcon product report

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

December 2025

Download VIPRE Endpoint Security product report

Also Known As

CrowdStrike Falcon, CrowdStrike Falcon XDR, CrowdStrike Falcon Threat Intelligence, CrowdStrike Identity Protection, CrowdStrike Falcon Surface, CrowdStrike Falcon Platform

VIPRE Cloud, VIPRE Endpoint Security Cloud Edition, VIPRE Endpoint Security Server Edition

Overview

CrowdStrike Falcon offers robust endpoint protection and threat detection, leveraging cloud-native architecture and AI-driven capabilities for advanced security. Its design ensures minimal system impact, making it a preferred choice for organizations seeking efficient protection solutions.

CrowdStrike Falcon provides comprehensive security features, including endpoint detection and response, real-time threat insights, and advanced AI-driven detection mechanisms. Its cloud-native architecture facilitates effortless scalability and seamless integration with cloud services, securing endpoints, servers, and roaming users. While Falcon delivers strong threat intelligence and automated detection, it faces challenges in operating system compatibility, reports require enhancements, and integration with some technologies is limited. High pricing and occasional false positives are noted areas for improvement, along with expanded support for older systems.

What are the key features of CrowdStrike Falcon?

Endpoint Detection and Response: Offers real-time threat tracking and quick reaction capabilities.
AI-Driven Threat Detection: Utilizes machine learning for identifying sophisticated threats.
Cloud-Native Architecture: Ensures seamless scalability and integration with cloud platforms.
Lightweight Design: Minimizes impact on system performance for efficient operation.
Remote Access and Isolation: Facilitates remote endpoint management and network protection.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Comprehensive Dashboards: Provides detailed insights for informed decision-making.
Scalability: Handles expansion effortlessly as organizational needs grow.
Threat Intelligence: Enhances security strategies with robust data.
Reduced Resource Consumption: Operates efficiently, saving on system resources.

In industries requiring fortified cybersecurity measures, CrowdStrike Falcon is deployed for endpoint protection and incident response. It offers advanced threat defense and integrates well with cloud services, making it a suitable replacement for traditional antivirus solutions. For sectors engaging in forensic investigations and real-time malware defense, Falcon's capabilities align with their security demands, serving industries from healthcare to finance.

CrowdStrike

VIPRE Endpoint Security provides fast, powerful and easy-to-manage endpoint protection for businesses of all sizes, with a small footprint that won't slow you down.

VIPRE Security

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

College Station ISD, Mid-West Companies, Guardian Network Solutions

Buyer's Guide

CrowdStrike Falcon vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security

December 2025

Free Report: CrowdStrike Falcon vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike Falcon vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,768 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CrowdStrike Falcon vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.