CrowdStrike Falcon vs VIPRE Endpoint Security comparison

CrowdStrike and VIPRE Security are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. CrowdStrike is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.8, while VIPRE Security is ranked #61. CrowdStrike holds a 11.1% mindshare in EPP, compared to VIPRE Security’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of CrowdStrike users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of VIPRE Security users who would recommend it.

CrowdStrike Falcon

Read 122 CrowdStrike Falcon reviews

29,093 Views
21,501 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

VIPRE Endpoint Security

Read 2 VIPRE Endpoint Security reviews

502 Views
428 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

CrowdStrike Falcon

VIPRE Endpoint Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 24, 2024

CrowdStrike Falcon and VIPRE Endpoint Security are competing endpoint security products catering to different user needs. User reviews suggest that while CrowdStrike Falcon is preferred for advanced features and ease of deployment, VIPRE Endpoint Security stands out in certain pricing aspects.

Features: CrowdStrike Falcon offers robust features like real-time threat intelligence, advanced threat hunting, and comprehensive threat coverage. VIPRE Endpoint Security provides solid basic protection with a focus on antivirus, anti-phishing capabilities, and straightforward essential protection.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest improvements in CrowdStrike Falcon's pricing model, a more intuitive management portal, and refined extensive capabilities. VIPRE Endpoint Security users call for better scalability, enhanced customer support, and improved adaptability for larger deployments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CrowdStrike Falcon is praised for its seamless cloud-based deployment and responsive customer service. VIPRE Endpoint Security, while easy to deploy, receives mixed reviews on the consistency of their customer support.

Pricing and ROI: CrowdStrike Falcon is seen as a premium product with higher costs but delivers substantial ROI through its advanced features. VIPRE Endpoint Security is recognized for its cost-effectiveness, offering good value for basic security needs but may not provide the same return on investment as CrowdStrike for enterprises requiring comprehensive security solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed CrowdStrike Falcon vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CrowdStrike Falcon vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,265 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CrowdStrike Falcon

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

122

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (6th), Identity Management (IM) (6th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (2nd), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (1st), Active Directory Management (2nd), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (1st), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (1st), Ransomware Protection (1st), Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) (3rd), AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (1st)

VIPRE Endpoint Security

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

61st

Average Rating

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of CrowdStrike Falcon is 11.1%, up from 8.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VIPRE Endpoint Security is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Chintan-Vyas

Associate Director at KPMG

Easy to set up with good behavior-based analysis but needs a single-click recovery option

Most organizations are currently looking for a scheduled scan to meet their compliance needs. Other players like Symantec and Trend Micro, FireEye, et cetera, are still providing the signature-based regular scheduled scans also, which is not available in CrowdStrike. That is one parameter that we feel should be there in CrowdStrike. CrowdStrike is only working on the dynamic or the files under execution. CrowdStrike is not scanning the static files. The product could be more accurate in terms of performance. We'd like to have a single-click recovery option. With some machines getting corrupted by malware, we need an easy way to start with a blank slate if things happen. That one feature should be there in the EDR.

Read full review

Jeremy Tew

Information Technology Director at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Easy to deploy, good price, low overhead, and keeps our Servers and PC's free of virus'

Their management interface is a little buggy as it will hang up and crash from time to time. Although It requires more system resources than the desktop client, adding additional resources' ex. CPU and Memory don't seem to improve it. Its reporting can also be improved as the executive and patching reports are missing the ability to provide what groups of PC's are included in the reports. Also, It's great they patch some third-party software, but it is a limited list expanding this would be a huge improvement. I'm yet to see it properly handle USB Device control.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Scalability hasn't been an issue for us."

"The most useful feature is that we do not need to install or keep signature files. Regular scanning that consumes a lot of computer resources is not needed."

"We are happy with CloudStrike's ease of use and touch notification."

"It helps us to identify the threats according to the behavior of any process that is running on any particular system. It helps immensely to identify any malicious behavior on any endpoints."

"All the features are beneficial."

"CrowdStrike Falcon is a very light solution. It does not use too much processor or RAM."

"The most valuable feature is the machine learning that they use to check certain patterns in the endpoint devices. It checks the whole ecosystem or entire environment."

"It's really good because it can detect anything."

More CrowdStrike Falcon pros

"In general, it was pretty easy to manage."

"It has low overhead as far as machine resources are concerned. Everything runs faster with VIPRE installed versus some of the competitors. It has also been pretty easy to use. It just runs and gives us reports. It also sends us alerts when there is something that we need to look at. It does its job, and you just look at the reports. In other ways, you just forget that it is there."

Cons

"CrowdStrike costs a little more than its competitors."

"It would be nice if they did have some sort of Active Directory tie-in, whether that be Azure or on-prem. Sometimes, it is difficult for us to determine if we are missing any endpoints or servers in CrowdStrike. We honestly don't have a great inventory, but it would be nice if CrowdStrike had a way to say this is everything in your environment, Active Directory-wise, and this is what doesn't have sensors. They try to do that now with a function that they have built-in, but I have been unsuccessful in having it help us identify what needs a sensor. So, better visibility of what doesn't have a sensor in our environment would be helpful."

"I have experience with a product called SentinelOne, which has a feature that allows for the customization of query languages. I would like to see such a feature for CloudStrike."

"On the firewall management side, there should be more granularity. There should also be more granularity for device control. Everything else is brilliant."

"The solution isn't known in my market. The brand isn't as recognizable. Their shortcomings are more on the marketing side."

"The solution needs to have integration with on-premises security devices and security facilities. That means all the security products, including the perimeter firewall, the DMZ."

"Falcon could include more integrative features."

"Technical support could be better than what is currently offered."

More CrowdStrike Falcon cons

"We would get a lot of false positives and instead of them fixing the false positive, they would just want us to put in an exception, which I didn't care for."

"Their management interface is a little buggy. It requires a few system resources on the management interface. Its reporting can also be better. Overall, the reports are pretty good. They patch some third-party software, but if they can expand what they do for reporting and patch enterprise software, it would be handy."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are three to four licensing models available to choose from for CrowdStrike Falcon. The price of CrowdStrike Falcon depends on the distributor and the reseller partner. The price we received was good."

"There is no license required to use this solution."

"It is an expensive product, but I think it is well worth the investment."

"The pricing is good and there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"The cost of CrowdStrike Falcon in Latin America seems high relative to the economic conditions in the region."

"We are at about $60,000 per year."

"The product is expensive."

"The pricing could be reduced. If it was more reasonable that would be great."

More CrowdStrike Falcon pricing and cost advice

"Its price point has been phenomenal. Our previous solution from Trend Micro was triple the cost of it."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

22%

Government

16%

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions that are very scalable, secure, and user-friendly. Cortex XDR by Palo Alto offers ...

See all answers

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with Darktrace?

Both of these products perform similarly and have many outstanding attributes. CrowdStrike Falcon offers an amazing user interface that makes setup easy and seamless. CrowdStrike Falcon offers a cl...

See all answers

How does Microsoft Defender for Endpoint compare with Crowdstrike Falcon?

The CrowdStrike solution delivers a lot of information about incidents. It has a very light sensor that will never push your machine hardware to "test", you don't have the usual "scan now" feature ...

See all answers

What do you like most about VIPRE Endpoint Security?

In general, it was pretty easy to manage.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VIPRE Endpoint Security?

The solution is not overly expensive. It was less than $20 a user. In comparison, CrowdStrike is much more expensive. We paid once a year and there wasn't any other fee beyond the standard licensin...

See all answers

What needs improvement with VIPRE Endpoint Security?

There just was a lot about it that I didn't like. For blocking certain items, such as USBs, we felt like it was slowing down the network too much. Therefore we utilized a GPO for blocking things li...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender XDR vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 6% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 4% of the time

Darktrace vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 3% of the time

More CrowdStrike Falcon Competitors

Huntress Managed EDR vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 26% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 24% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Business vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 20% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 14% of the time

More VIPRE Endpoint Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CrowdStrike Falcon

January 2025

Download CrowdStrike Falcon product report

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

December 2024

Download VIPRE Endpoint Security product report

Also Known As

CrowdStrike Falcon, CrowdStrike Falcon XDR, CrowdStrike Falcon Threat Intelligence, CrowdStrike Identity Protection, CrowdStrike Falcon Surface

VIPRE Cloud, VIPRE Endpoint Security Cloud Edition, VIPRE Endpoint Security Server Edition

Overview

CrowdStrike Falcon provides endpoint protection and threat intelligence using a cloud-based platform for real-time detection and response. Its minimal impact on system performance and ease of deployment are key benefits along with advanced logging and reporting for compliance and forensic analysis.

CrowdStrike Falcon is known for its efficacy in identifying malware, ransomware, and sophisticated cyber threats. The platform's cloud-native architecture and advanced AI capabilities ensure comprehensive endpoint visibility and rapid response times. Users appreciate the lightweight agent and seamless deployment process, along with detailed reporting features. Integration with security tools and efficient customer support are essential features, although some users highlight high pricing, occasional detection delays, and challenges with integration. Frequent alerts and the mobile app's performance are areas for improvement.

What are the key features of CrowdStrike Falcon?

Real-time Threat Detection: Provides immediate threat identification and response.
Lightweight Agent: Minimal impact on system performance.
Cloud-native Architecture: Ensures flexibility and scalability.
Advanced AI Capabilities: Enhances threat detection and prevention.
Comprehensive Endpoint Visibility: Complete insight into endpoint activities.
Detailed Reporting: Facilitates compliance and forensic analysis.
Security Tool Integration: Seamless integration with other tools.
Efficient Customer Support: Robust support services.

What are the benefits or ROI of CrowdStrike Falcon?

Improved Threat Detection: Identifies sophisticated threats, reducing risk.
Enhanced System Performance: Lightweight agent ensures minimal disruption.
Faster Response Times: Swift reaction to incidents minimizes damage.
Better Compliance: Detailed logs meet regulatory requirements.
Streamlined Deployment: Easy to implement with minimal downtime.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and retail, CrowdStrike Falcon is often used for critical security due to its robust threat detection capabilities. Financial firms value its rapid response and detailed reporting for compliance, while healthcare providers appreciate the minimal system performance impact. Retailers benefit from its comprehensive endpoint visibility and integration with other security tools.

CrowdStrike

VIPRE Endpoint Security provides fast, powerful and easy-to-manage endpoint protection for businesses of all sizes, with a small footprint that won't slow you down.

VIPRE Security

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

College Station ISD, Mid-West Companies, Guardian Network Solutions

Buyer's Guide

CrowdStrike Falcon vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security

January 2025

Free Report: CrowdStrike Falcon vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike Falcon vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CrowdStrike Falcon vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.