Cybereason Endpoint Detection &amp; Response vs Malwarebytes comparison

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...

Read 36 Malwarebytes reviews

5,000 Views
4,321 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response and Malwarebytes compete in the cybersecurity solutions category. While Cybereason boasts advanced features and scalability, Malwarebytes is simpler and more user-friendly, leading to higher overall user satisfaction.

Features: Cybereason shines with real-time detection, automated threat response, and advanced analytics, making it valuable for comprehensive threat tracking. Malwarebytes stands out in malware remediation, ease of use, and straightforward malware eradication capabilities. Cybereason is more feature-rich, but Malwarebytes' simplicity holds strong appeal.

Room for Improvement: Cybereason users highlight the need for an improved alert system, faster response times, and better user interface design. Malwarebytes users desire enhanced reporting tools, better integration capabilities, and more advanced functionality. Cybereason's areas of improvement are more critical for larger enterprises, while Malwarebytes needs more advanced functionality to meet user needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cybereason offers a robust deployment model but can be complex for some users. Its customer service receives mixed reviews. Malwarebytes offers quick and simple deployment, with highly rated customer support. Cybereason demands more setup effort, making Malwarebytes preferable for ease of deployment and customer service satisfaction.

Pricing and ROI: Cybereason's setup cost is higher, but users report significant ROI due to its extensive capabilities. Malwarebytes offers better pricing and demonstrates solid ROI through its effective, user-friendly approach. Users generally feel Cybereason justifies its cost for larger-scale needs, but Malwarebytes provides better value for smaller organizations or simpler requirements.

To learn more, read our detailed Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Malwarebytes Report (Updated: December 2024).

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Malwarebytes

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

42nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (34th)

Malwarebytes

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is 1.0%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Malwarebytes is 1.6%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Chad Kliewer

Information Security Officer at PTCI

We can make more informed decisions on whether an action is malicious

The ease of use and dashboards are improving. We came in at a time when they were developing a new dashboard screen. Therefore, we have had some confusing times between the old and new dashboards. Knowing how the new one works, I have seen vast improvements with it. While the product is very good, there are still some areas for improvement. The initial triage area could be a bit simpler. They get into the weeds real fast; it gets very detailed very fast. I am still looking for an easier triage layer on top with the ability to dig deeper. They are improving on this because I have seen some improvements in the user interface that helps with this. Part of it was moving two different screens into one, merging the two together. It is very good, but it is very technically detailed and would be harder for an entry-level person to decipher. However, improvements are being made. It leverages indicators of behavior to help us remediate faster against attacks. Sometimes, I wish there was more detail on why they consider it malicious.

Read full review

Anas Anas

Solution Consultant at Creation for Smart Software Development

Effective threat predictions, simple to deploy, and light on resources

Malwarebytes's initial setup is simple. It is easy to deploy and configure the policies and the configuration. I deployed Malwarebytes for one customer and I did it in under two days. They had approximately 50 users, it took approximately an hour. The steps I took for the implementation were downloading the Malwarebytes management console from the site, installing it, then running the discovery tool, scanning my network, and checking all of the PCs on my network. It's already pre-configured, you don't need to configure anything. The only configuration that I did on the administration console was some of the exclusion from the scan. This is the only rule that I have created. I rate the initial setup of Malwarebytes a ten out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We didn't have the visibility that we now have. It has increased our visibility by a lot. So, we put a lot more time into really looking at our environment and what is happening throughout our different networks. It has increased our visibility by around fivefold."

"The interface is user-friendly."

"It gives all the information in a clear response."

"The initial setup is not overly complicated."

"What I like most about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is the support because the support is good. The solution is also easy to use, and it has a dashboard. Everything is good, and there's no problem with it."

"For me, the technical support is good."

"Cybereason absolutely enables us to mitigate and isolate on the fly. Our managed detection response telemetry has dropped dramatically since we began using it. It's very top-of-mind. We were running some tabletop exercises and none of the detections were getting triggered by the managed security services provider. So we needed to find a solution that would trigger high-fidelity alerts. That was Cybereason and it dramatically changed our landscape from the detection and response perspective."

"They do a very good job of providing multi-stage visualizations of malicious operations that immediately show all attack details across all devices and users. Since it is MalOp-centric model, you can see if there has been a similar operation across multiple machines. If it is the same thing appearing on multiple machines, you see all the machines and users affected in one screen."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pros

"I never have to look at it or do anything with it, and then my system just stays clean."

"The solution has a good management interface."

"The behavior-based detection is very nice, and it combats zero-day threats by looking for anomalous behaviors."

"It's very versatile and thorough."

"This solution helps us by providing central management of anti-malware and anti-exploit functionality."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that I can use it wherever I want, be it at the office, at home, or even outside."

"The product provides notifications for suspicious events. We have several public access points. The product helps to prevent unauthorized entry. Its most valuable features are pre-installation procedures and a cloud console. The console's interface is simple and can be viewed easily to take action. It covers everything in terms of security threats."

"The protection is really good with Malwarebytes. It's also user friendly and quite easy to set up."

More Malwarebytes pros

Cons

"Compared to our previous endpoint, we have a lot more false positives and a lot more duplication of alerts. So we're chasing more alerts."

"I feel that the product lacks reporting features and needs improvement."

"Cybereason does not have sandbox functionality."

"The product's reporting isn't great."

"Reporting could be a bit more granular so that we had the ability to check regions and countries. I just noticed that, for instance, if I look at our servers, it's either "contained" or it's "not contained". I don't have the option, for instance, to look at countries. It only allows me to look at users as one big group."

"The deployment on individual endpoints is more geared toward larger organizations. It might prove to be a bit too complicated for a smaller organization. You need to know what you're doing when you're deploying the sensor."

"The integration with Microsoft solutions and Microsoft capabilities needs to be improved."

"What needs to improve in Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response and what I'd like to see in its next release is a centralized dashboard that allows you to view what is there, similar to what's on Symantec Endpoint Protection Manager: a beautiful display and reporting. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response has to start with the compliance, the homepage, etc. Everything should be there and should be customizable. The options should be there. The tool is very good currently, but visibility for IT administrators is lacking and needs to be worked on."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response cons

"A solution must be installed in the main gateway to give an overview of the incoming and outgoing traffic. The technical support team's response time should be faster."

"This solution reports far too many false positives!"

"I would like to see integration with other vendors going forward."

"The online reporting needs to be improved. Currently, we have to look at it online, and if we want to download a report, it just downloads as an Excel file. It's just raw information. There needs to be some way to better display it when it's downloaded."

"The reporting is not as flexible as you would find with other antivirus software."

"There is room for improvement in the way it is deployed, in terms of being able to distribute it. Right now we have to get our hands on a machine to deploy it. It would be nice if there was an easier system."

"We experience a lot of false positives."

"The product's stability needs improvement."

More Malwarebytes cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I had to go through a third-party to purchase it, which I wasn't really pleased about."

"In terms of pricing, it's a good solution."

"Though it is not the cheapest solution but it fits our budget. We pay an annual licensing fee."

"I do not have experience with the licensing of the product."

"This product is somewhat expensive and should be cheaper."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing an eight."

"In terms of cost, this is a good choice for our needs."

"We considered a few other solutions. Some were ridiculously overpriced, while others didn't have solutions for Mac endpoints. That was a deal-breaker because most of our organization is on Mac. It came down to two vendors: Cybereason and another. They had similar pitches and almost identical approaches, but in the end, Cybereason gave us the best value for our money."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pricing and cost advice

"It is really expensive. We've got between 30 and 40 licenses every year, and for the number of licenses that we have, we're finding that Malwarebytes on average costs between $900 and $1,000 more per year than comparable options. We're paying about $3,300 per year for these licenses. There are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee."

"Its licensing is annual. There are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee."

"The licensing is per seat, with clients being a little less expensive than servers. If we need more licenses, we can accomplish that within a day. As Malwarebytes adds new features to their product, such as DNS filtering and a patching module, they want to charge us more even though we're a premium user, which isn't ideal."

"The cost may be something in the ballpark of $20-25 a year per computer."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."

"It is expensive."

"Its cost is around $60 a machine. The cost of the total solution for 250 people is about $8,500 a year. If we add EDR to it, it will bring that cost up to about $15,000. The cost for Carbon Black is about $25,000, which is $10,000 more, but you get all AI functions with it."

"The platform pricing is competitive with other antivirus products."

More Malwarebytes pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

13%

University

Government

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

Comparison with other products showed it be cheaper than some larger competitors. Set up cost for us were cheaper as we already had users experienced with the product in other business units. Initi...

What is your primary use case for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

We use the product for enhancing security postures by leveraging behavioral analytics and security engines effectively minimizing false positives and detecting threats.

What do you like most about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

The interface is user-friendly.

What do you like most about Malwarebytes?

Ten times a day, improved signatures will be downloaded, so it is very up-to-date in terms of malware experience.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Malwarebytes?

Malwarebytes is a bit pricey for some regions, such as Ukraine, since it's priced in US dollars. I prefer to use the paid version, and I am a pay-to-play person.

What needs improvement with Malwarebytes?

There are no built-in backups or integrated backup options, which could be an opportunity. The free version is effective, however, the paid version is pricey compared to it. Other customers have me...

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Comparisons

Compared 25% of the time

Darktrace vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 23% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 10% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 8% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 4% of the time

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Malwarebytes

Compared 24% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs Malwarebytes

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Malwarebytes

Compared 10% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs Malwarebytes

Compared 6% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Malwarebytes

Compared 6% of the time

More Malwarebytes Competitors

Product Reports

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Download Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response product report

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response report

Download Malwarebytes product report

Also Known As

Cybereason EDR, Cybereason Deep Detect & Respond

No data available

Learn More

Video not available

Cybereason

Overview

Cybereason's Endpoint Detection and Response platform detects in real-time both signature and non-signature-based attacks and accelerates incident investigation and response. Cybereason connects together individual pieces of evidence to form a complete picture of a malicious operation.

Malwarebytes is used for malware detection, endpoint protection, ransomware prevention, and behavior monitoring on Windows and Mac, serving as an EDR for detecting usage behaviors and providing comprehensive security features.

Primarily deployed for compliance scanning, real-time threat monitoring, and as a supplementary antivirus, Malwarebytes is favored for security assessments, cloud management, and endpoint protection for both personal and company use. Featuring robust scanning, ease of use, and a user-friendly interface, it effectively prevents and removes malware, detects unwanted programs, and provides real-time updates. The management interface and dashboard offer strong endpoint protection, automated updates, detailed reporting, and quick remediation, minimizing downtime. Comprehensive protection, extensive visibility, and efficient performance are highly valued.

What are the key features of Malwarebytes?

Robust Scanning and Threat Detection: Efficiently identifies and removes malware.
Ease of Use: Simple and straightforward interface for users.
User-Friendly Interface: Easy navigation and management dashboards.
Cloud Management: Manage endpoints through cloud-based solutions.
Automated Updates: Ensures protection with regular updates.
Detailed Reporting: Provides comprehensive and detailed security reports.
Quick Remediation: Minimizes downtime with fast threat removal.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Comprehensive Protection: Ensures security against diverse threats.
Effective Performance: Maintains system performance while protecting.
Minimized Downtime: Quick threat removal ensures business continuity.
Extensive Visibility: Detailed logs and reports for better oversight.

Industries implementing Malwarebytes benefit from enhanced endpoint protection, compliance scanning, and security assessments. It is frequently utilized in IT departments for real-time threat monitoring, automated remediation, and cloud management, providing organizations with reliable security for both personal and company endpoints.

Sample Customers

Lockheed Martin, Spark Capital, DocuSign, Softbank Capital

Knutson Construction

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Malwarebytes