Cybereason Endpoint Detection &amp; Response vs Malwarebytes comparison

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...

Read 37 Malwarebytes reviews

4,194 Views
3,627 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response and Malwarebytes compete in the cybersecurity solutions category. While Cybereason boasts advanced features and scalability, Malwarebytes is simpler and more user-friendly, leading to higher overall user satisfaction.

Features: Cybereason shines with real-time detection, automated threat response, and advanced analytics, making it valuable for comprehensive threat tracking. Malwarebytes stands out in malware remediation, ease of use, and straightforward malware eradication capabilities. Cybereason is more feature-rich, but Malwarebytes' simplicity holds strong appeal.

Room for Improvement: Cybereason users highlight the need for an improved alert system, faster response times, and better user interface design. Malwarebytes users desire enhanced reporting tools, better integration capabilities, and more advanced functionality. Cybereason's areas of improvement are more critical for larger enterprises, while Malwarebytes needs more advanced functionality to meet user needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cybereason offers a robust deployment model but can be complex for some users. Its customer service receives mixed reviews. Malwarebytes offers quick and simple deployment, with highly rated customer support. Cybereason demands more setup effort, making Malwarebytes preferable for ease of deployment and customer service satisfaction.

Pricing and ROI: Cybereason's setup cost is higher, but users report significant ROI due to its extensive capabilities. Malwarebytes offers better pricing and demonstrates solid ROI through its effective, user-friendly approach. Users generally feel Cybereason justifies its cost for larger-scale needs, but Malwarebytes provides better value for smaller organizations or simpler requirements.

To learn more, read our detailed Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Malwarebytes Report (Updated: March 2025).

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Malwarebytes

Download the complete report

Helped 842,690 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

35th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (26th)

Malwarebytes

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is 0.9%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Malwarebytes is 1.7%, down from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Chad Kliewer

Information Security Officer at PTCI

We can make more informed decisions on whether an action is malicious

The ease of use and dashboards are improving. We came in at a time when they were developing a new dashboard screen. Therefore, we have had some confusing times between the old and new dashboards. Knowing how the new one works, I have seen vast improvements with it. While the product is very good, there are still some areas for improvement. The initial triage area could be a bit simpler. They get into the weeds real fast; it gets very detailed very fast. I am still looking for an easier triage layer on top with the ability to dig deeper. They are improving on this because I have seen some improvements in the user interface that helps with this. Part of it was moving two different screens into one, merging the two together. It is very good, but it is very technically detailed and would be harder for an entry-level person to decipher. However, improvements are being made. It leverages indicators of behavior to help us remediate faster against attacks. Sometimes, I wish there was more detail on why they consider it malicious.

Read full review

Anas Anas

Solution Consultant at Creation for Smart Software Development

Effective threat predictions, simple to deploy, and light on resources

Malwarebytes's initial setup is simple. It is easy to deploy and configure the policies and the configuration. I deployed Malwarebytes for one customer and I did it in under two days. They had approximately 50 users, it took approximately an hour. The steps I took for the implementation were downloading the Malwarebytes management console from the site, installing it, then running the discovery tool, scanning my network, and checking all of the PCs on my network. It's already pre-configured, you don't need to configure anything. The only configuration that I did on the administration console was some of the exclusion from the scan. This is the only rule that I have created. I rate the initial setup of Malwarebytes a ten out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I find most valuable is the clarity of the platform."

"The solution is efficient."

"Cybereason's threat hunting and investigation are the most valuable features. Threat hunting is a user-friendly feature that keeps you safe. Investigation offers an added value that I haven't seen with other EDR services. It allows you to find specific policy problems within your environment."

"For me, the technical support is good."

"What I like most about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is the support because the support is good. The solution is also easy to use, and it has a dashboard. Everything is good, and there's no problem with it."

"The dashboard is very good and you can consider it as an interactive UI."

"The initial setup was easy and straightforward."

"I haven't had any issues with the solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pros

"I was very satisfied with Malwarebytes in terms of its antivirus abilities."

"The most valuable features of Malwarebytes are the agents, user experience, efficiency of the findings, and MDR features."

"I never have to look at it or do anything with it, and then my system just stays clean."

"The most valuable features of the solution are malware scanning and malware removal."

"When it comes to frontend protections, it has some of the best definitions. In addition, they do traditional signature and heuristic detection a lot better than Microsoft and some other players in that space."

"It allows us to have better knowledge of the way people use the tool and how we can improve their workflows."

"The pricing of the product is very good."

"The most valuable features of Malwarebytes are the EDR and the complete feature set provided."

More Malwarebytes pros

Cons

"The deployment on individual endpoints is more geared toward larger organizations. It might prove to be a bit too complicated for a smaller organization. You need to know what you're doing when you're deploying the sensor."

"Reporting could be a bit more granular so that we had the ability to check regions and countries. I just noticed that, for instance, if I look at our servers, it's either "contained" or it's "not contained". I don't have the option, for instance, to look at countries. It only allows me to look at users as one big group."

"I would like to see improvements on the operational side, specifically in grouping."

"The integration with Microsoft solutions and Microsoft capabilities needs to be improved."

"The reporting feature needs improvement."

"I feel it is a shame that I cannot create groups of groups with inheritance."

"While the product is very good, there are still some areas for improvement. The initial triage area could be a bit simpler. They get into the weeds real fast; it gets very detailed very fast. I am still looking for an easier triage layer on top with the ability to dig deeper."

"Compared to our previous endpoint, we have a lot more false positives and a lot more duplication of alerts. So we're chasing more alerts."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response cons

"They could come up with better reporting capabilities."

"Strictly in terms of cyber security, the release cycle should be quarterly, at most. It shouldn't be more frequent than that because, for one thing, keeping up with tech support is difficult."

"The product could be improved in blocking malicious traffic, such as communication with known malicious IP addresses."

"This solution reports far too many false positives!"

"Malwarebytes is not there in the reports from Gartner or IDC...If we look at the market trends and the industry, most customers look at Gartner's reports to identify whether a product is a leader, challenger, or a big product, depending on which they choose."

"They can include advanced scanning and improve reporting. I scan malware on the pen drive. Some more reports need to be added for that. It should also provide better protection because we have a new version of the malware."

"Malwarebytes should improve its mobile compatibility."

"The online reporting needs to be improved. Currently, we have to look at it online, and if we want to download a report, it just downloads as an Excel file. It's just raw information. There needs to be some way to better display it when it's downloaded."

More Malwarebytes cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing an eight."

"Though it is not the cheapest solution but it fits our budget. We pay an annual licensing fee."

"This product is somewhat expensive and should be cheaper."

"I do not have experience with the licensing of the product."

"I had to go through a third-party to purchase it, which I wasn't really pleased about."

"In terms of cost, this is a good choice for our needs."

"In terms of pricing, it's a good solution."

"The pricing is manageable."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pricing and cost advice

"It is expensive."

"I would say that it's affordable. It costs much less than Sentinel One, CrowdStrike, or anything of that nature. But, at the same time, you are getting what you pay for. So I would say it's one of the best when you're comparing traditional NextGen AVs like Webroot that aren't the best in the bunch."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."

"The cost may be something in the ballpark of $20-25 a year per computer."

"Its licensing is annual. There are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee."

"The licensing is per seat, with clients being a little less expensive than servers. If we need more licenses, we can accomplish that within a day. As Malwarebytes adds new features to their product, such as DNS filtering and a patching module, they want to charge us more even though we're a premium user, which isn't ideal."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price and ten is a high price, I rate the product's pricing a seven."

"It is really expensive. We've got between 30 and 40 licenses every year, and for the number of licenses that we have, we're finding that Malwarebytes on average costs between $900 and $1,000 more per year than comparable options. We're paying about $3,300 per year for these licenses. There are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee."

More Malwarebytes pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,690 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

13%

University

12%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

Comparison with other products showed it be cheaper than some larger competitors. Set up cost for us were cheaper as we already had users experienced with the product in other business units. Initi...

What is your primary use case for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

We use it to improve detection in the whole industrial sector. We are a big energy company. Across multiple endpoints, we deploy the EDR to secure all, improve detection, and also attempt to automa...

What do you like most about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

The interface is user-friendly.

What do you like most about Malwarebytes?

Ten times a day, improved signatures will be downloaded, so it is very up-to-date in terms of malware experience.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Malwarebytes?

I really hate the automatic rebilling without officially confirming it with me. It's an annoyance and they should at least confirm with me, like a month before they bill me.

What needs improvement with Malwarebytes?

It takes up too much space when it's trying to run in the background.

Darktrace vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Comparisons

Compared 27% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 19% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 10% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 9% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 5% of the time

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Malwarebytes

Compared 21% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Malwarebytes

Compared 13% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs Malwarebytes

Compared 10% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Malwarebytes

Compared 6% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs Malwarebytes

Compared 6% of the time

More Malwarebytes Competitors

Product Reports

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Download Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response product report

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response report

Download Malwarebytes product report

Also Known As

Cybereason EDR, Cybereason Deep Detect & Respond

No data available

Overview

Cybereason's Endpoint Detection and Response platform detects in real-time both signature and non-signature-based attacks and accelerates incident investigation and response. Cybereason connects together individual pieces of evidence to form a complete picture of a malicious operation.

Cybereason

Malwarebytes is used for malware detection, endpoint protection, ransomware prevention, and behavior monitoring on Windows and Mac, serving as an EDR for detecting usage behaviors and providing comprehensive security features.

Primarily deployed for compliance scanning, real-time threat monitoring, and as a supplementary antivirus, Malwarebytes is favored for security assessments, cloud management, and endpoint protection for both personal and company use. Featuring robust scanning, ease of use, and a user-friendly interface, it effectively prevents and removes malware, detects unwanted programs, and provides real-time updates. The management interface and dashboard offer strong endpoint protection, automated updates, detailed reporting, and quick remediation, minimizing downtime. Comprehensive protection, extensive visibility, and efficient performance are highly valued.

What are the key features of Malwarebytes?

Robust Scanning and Threat Detection: Efficiently identifies and removes malware.
Ease of Use: Simple and straightforward interface for users.
User-Friendly Interface: Easy navigation and management dashboards.
Cloud Management: Manage endpoints through cloud-based solutions.
Automated Updates: Ensures protection with regular updates.
Detailed Reporting: Provides comprehensive and detailed security reports.
Quick Remediation: Minimizes downtime with fast threat removal.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Comprehensive Protection: Ensures security against diverse threats.
Effective Performance: Maintains system performance while protecting.
Minimized Downtime: Quick threat removal ensures business continuity.
Extensive Visibility: Detailed logs and reports for better oversight.

Industries implementing Malwarebytes benefit from enhanced endpoint protection, compliance scanning, and security assessments. It is frequently utilized in IT departments for real-time threat monitoring, automated remediation, and cloud management, providing organizations with reliable security for both personal and company endpoints.

Sample Customers

Lockheed Martin, Spark Capital, DocuSign, Softbank Capital

Knutson Construction

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Malwarebytes