Cybereason Endpoint Detection &amp; Response vs Malwarebytes comparison

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...

Read 36 Malwarebytes reviews

4,702 Views
4,082 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response and Malwarebytes compete in the cybersecurity solutions category. While Cybereason boasts advanced features and scalability, Malwarebytes is simpler and more user-friendly, leading to higher overall user satisfaction.

Features: Cybereason shines with real-time detection, automated threat response, and advanced analytics, making it valuable for comprehensive threat tracking. Malwarebytes stands out in malware remediation, ease of use, and straightforward malware eradication capabilities. Cybereason is more feature-rich, but Malwarebytes' simplicity holds strong appeal.

Room for Improvement: Cybereason users highlight the need for an improved alert system, faster response times, and better user interface design. Malwarebytes users desire enhanced reporting tools, better integration capabilities, and more advanced functionality. Cybereason's areas of improvement are more critical for larger enterprises, while Malwarebytes needs more advanced functionality to meet user needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cybereason offers a robust deployment model but can be complex for some users. Its customer service receives mixed reviews. Malwarebytes offers quick and simple deployment, with highly rated customer support. Cybereason demands more setup effort, making Malwarebytes preferable for ease of deployment and customer service satisfaction.

Pricing and ROI: Cybereason's setup cost is higher, but users report significant ROI due to its extensive capabilities. Malwarebytes offers better pricing and demonstrates solid ROI through its effective, user-friendly approach. Users generally feel Cybereason justifies its cost for larger-scale needs, but Malwarebytes provides better value for smaller organizations or simpler requirements.

To learn more, read our detailed Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Malwarebytes Report (Updated: January 2025).

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Malwarebytes

Download the complete report

Helped 831,158 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

41st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (35th)

Malwarebytes

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

16th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is 1.0%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Malwarebytes is 1.7%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Chad Kliewer

Information Security Officer at PTCI

We can make more informed decisions on whether an action is malicious

The ease of use and dashboards are improving. We came in at a time when they were developing a new dashboard screen. Therefore, we have had some confusing times between the old and new dashboards. Knowing how the new one works, I have seen vast improvements with it. While the product is very good, there are still some areas for improvement. The initial triage area could be a bit simpler. They get into the weeds real fast; it gets very detailed very fast. I am still looking for an easier triage layer on top with the ability to dig deeper. They are improving on this because I have seen some improvements in the user interface that helps with this. Part of it was moving two different screens into one, merging the two together. It is very good, but it is very technically detailed and would be harder for an entry-level person to decipher. However, improvements are being made. It leverages indicators of behavior to help us remediate faster against attacks. Sometimes, I wish there was more detail on why they consider it malicious.

Read full review

Anas Anas

Solution Consultant at Creation for Smart Software Development

Effective threat predictions, simple to deploy, and light on resources

Malwarebytes's initial setup is simple. It is easy to deploy and configure the policies and the configuration. I deployed Malwarebytes for one customer and I did it in under two days. They had approximately 50 users, it took approximately an hour. The steps I took for the implementation were downloading the Malwarebytes management console from the site, installing it, then running the discovery tool, scanning my network, and checking all of the PCs on my network. It's already pre-configured, you don't need to configure anything. The only configuration that I did on the administration console was some of the exclusion from the scan. This is the only rule that I have created. I rate the initial setup of Malwarebytes a ten out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup process is straightforward."

"It gives all the information in a clear response."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"The most valuable feature is the capability of the command used by the machine so that we see the kind of performance that is running."

"The initial setup is not overly complicated."

"Immediately we can pick up the computers in the network if any malicious operation that is triggered."

"What I find most valuable is the clarity of the platform."

"For me, the technical support is good."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pros

"This solution helps us by providing central management of anti-malware and anti-exploit functionality."

"The product provides notifications for suspicious events. We have several public access points. The product helps to prevent unauthorized entry. Its most valuable features are pre-installation procedures and a cloud console. The console's interface is simple and can be viewed easily to take action. It covers everything in terms of security threats."

"The most valuable features of the solution are malware scanning and malware removal."

"The endpoint protection and response that allows us to restore a machine back to a pre-infected state are the most valuable features."

"I never have to look at it or do anything with it, and then my system just stays clean."

"I was very satisfied with Malwarebytes in terms of its antivirus abilities."

"We don't have to spend any time remediating bad things happening: Not viruses nor ransomware."

"The platform is straightforward to install."

More Malwarebytes pros

Cons

"I feel it is a shame that I cannot create groups of groups with inheritance."

"Cybereason does not have sandbox functionality."

"It should be more stable, and the sensor needs improvement in terms of connectivity."

"I feel that the product lacks reporting features and needs improvement."

"The product's reporting isn't great."

"The integration with Microsoft solutions and Microsoft capabilities needs to be improved."

"The network coverage becomes an issue most of the time."

"While the product is very good, there are still some areas for improvement. The initial triage area could be a bit simpler. They get into the weeds real fast; it gets very detailed very fast. I am still looking for an easier triage layer on top with the ability to dig deeper."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response cons

"The reporting is not as flexible as you would find with other antivirus software."

"The stability and performance of the solution are areas with shortcomings that need improvement."

"The product could be improved in blocking malicious traffic, such as communication with known malicious IP addresses."

"Strictly in terms of cyber security, the release cycle should be quarterly, at most. It shouldn't be more frequent than that because, for one thing, keeping up with tech support is difficult."

"The product is a little bit more expensive than the other brands."

"Malwarebytes should improve its mobile compatibility."

"It's not good in search hunting."

"It would be better if updates could be downloaded, and deployed, on-premises to avoid low bandwidth causing issues."

More Malwarebytes cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing an eight."

"I had to go through a third-party to purchase it, which I wasn't really pleased about."

"I do not have experience with the licensing of the product."

"The pricing is manageable."

"This product is somewhat expensive and should be cheaper."

"In terms of pricing, it's a good solution."

"We considered a few other solutions. Some were ridiculously overpriced, while others didn't have solutions for Mac endpoints. That was a deal-breaker because most of our organization is on Mac. It came down to two vendors: Cybereason and another. They had similar pitches and almost identical approaches, but in the end, Cybereason gave us the best value for our money."

"In terms of cost, this is a good choice for our needs."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pricing and cost advice

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price and ten is a high price, I rate the product's pricing a seven."

"The price of Malwarebytes is in the middle range compared to other vendors."

"The cost may be something in the ballpark of $20-25 a year per computer."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."

"The licensing is per seat, with clients being a little less expensive than servers. If we need more licenses, we can accomplish that within a day. As Malwarebytes adds new features to their product, such as DNS filtering and a patching module, they want to charge us more even though we're a premium user, which isn't ideal."

"It is expensive."

"Yearly, it is around $50 per client."

"Its licensing is annual. There are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee."

More Malwarebytes pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

14%

University

10%

Government

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

Comparison with other products showed it be cheaper than some larger competitors. Set up cost for us were cheaper as we already had users experienced with the product in other business units. Initi...

What is your primary use case for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

We use the product for enhancing security postures by leveraging behavioral analytics and security engines effectively minimizing false positives and detecting threats.

What do you like most about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

The interface is user-friendly.

What do you like most about Malwarebytes?

Ten times a day, improved signatures will be downloaded, so it is very up-to-date in terms of malware experience.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Malwarebytes?

Malwarebytes is a bit pricey for some regions, such as Ukraine, since it's priced in US dollars. I prefer to use the paid version, and I am a pay-to-play person.

What needs improvement with Malwarebytes?

There are no built-in backups or integrated backup options, which could be an opportunity. The free version is effective, however, the paid version is pricey compared to it. Other customers have me...

Darktrace vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Comparisons

Compared 25% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 24% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 10% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 8% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 4% of the time

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Malwarebytes

Compared 26% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs Malwarebytes

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Malwarebytes

Compared 10% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs Malwarebytes

Compared 6% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Malwarebytes

Compared 5% of the time

More Malwarebytes Competitors

Product Reports

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Download Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response product report

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response report

Download Malwarebytes product report

Also Known As

Cybereason EDR, Cybereason Deep Detect & Respond

No data available

Learn More

Video not available

Cybereason

Overview

Cybereason's Endpoint Detection and Response platform detects in real-time both signature and non-signature-based attacks and accelerates incident investigation and response. Cybereason connects together individual pieces of evidence to form a complete picture of a malicious operation.

Malwarebytes is used for malware detection, endpoint protection, ransomware prevention, and behavior monitoring on Windows and Mac, serving as an EDR for detecting usage behaviors and providing comprehensive security features.

Primarily deployed for compliance scanning, real-time threat monitoring, and as a supplementary antivirus, Malwarebytes is favored for security assessments, cloud management, and endpoint protection for both personal and company use. Featuring robust scanning, ease of use, and a user-friendly interface, it effectively prevents and removes malware, detects unwanted programs, and provides real-time updates. The management interface and dashboard offer strong endpoint protection, automated updates, detailed reporting, and quick remediation, minimizing downtime. Comprehensive protection, extensive visibility, and efficient performance are highly valued.

What are the key features of Malwarebytes?

Robust Scanning and Threat Detection: Efficiently identifies and removes malware.
Ease of Use: Simple and straightforward interface for users.
User-Friendly Interface: Easy navigation and management dashboards.
Cloud Management: Manage endpoints through cloud-based solutions.
Automated Updates: Ensures protection with regular updates.
Detailed Reporting: Provides comprehensive and detailed security reports.
Quick Remediation: Minimizes downtime with fast threat removal.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Comprehensive Protection: Ensures security against diverse threats.
Effective Performance: Maintains system performance while protecting.
Minimized Downtime: Quick threat removal ensures business continuity.
Extensive Visibility: Detailed logs and reports for better oversight.

Industries implementing Malwarebytes benefit from enhanced endpoint protection, compliance scanning, and security assessments. It is frequently utilized in IT departments for real-time threat monitoring, automated remediation, and cloud management, providing organizations with reliable security for both personal and company endpoints.

Sample Customers

Lockheed Martin, Spark Capital, DocuSign, Softbank Capital

Knutson Construction

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Malwarebytes