Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs Symantec Endpoint Security Complete comparison

Cybereason and Broadcom are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Cybereason is ranked #35 with an average rating of 8.2, while Broadcom is ranked #38 with an average rating of 8.6. Cybereason holds a 0.9% mindshare in EPP, compared to Broadcom’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Cybereason users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...

Read 21 Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response reviews

3,671 Views
2,049 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Symantec Endpoint Security ...

Read 17 Symantec Endpoint Security Complete reviews

1,015 Views
752 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...

Symantec Endpoint Security ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response and Symantec Endpoint Security Complete compete in the field of endpoint security solutions. Cybereason seems to have the upper hand in real-time threat analysis, while Symantec leads in comprehensive security features and support.

Features: Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is known for its strong detection capabilities, real-time analysis, and detailed threat visibility. Symantec Endpoint Security Complete is noted for its extensive threat intelligence network, integrated security features, and overall reliability.

Room for Improvement: Cybereason needs smoother integration with other security tools, better alert management, and more streamlined processes. Symantec requires more intuitive incident response processes, quicker update cycles, and a less complex deployment process.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cybereason has a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Symantec’s deployment is more complex, though users report robust support services post-deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Cybereason’s pricing is considered reasonable with a quick realization of ROI. Symantec is seen as more expensive but worth the investment due to its comprehensive features and reliability.

To learn more, read our detailed Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Complete Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Complete

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,646 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

35th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (25th)

Symantec Endpoint Security ...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

38th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is 0.9%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Endpoint Security Complete is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Chad Kliewer

Information Security Officer at PTCI

We can make more informed decisions on whether an action is malicious

The ease of use and dashboards are improving. We came in at a time when they were developing a new dashboard screen. Therefore, we have had some confusing times between the old and new dashboards. Knowing how the new one works, I have seen vast improvements with it. While the product is very good, there are still some areas for improvement. The initial triage area could be a bit simpler. They get into the weeds real fast; it gets very detailed very fast. I am still looking for an easier triage layer on top with the ability to dig deeper. They are improving on this because I have seen some improvements in the user interface that helps with this. Part of it was moving two different screens into one, merging the two together. It is very good, but it is very technically detailed and would be harder for an entry-level person to decipher. However, improvements are being made. It leverages indicators of behavior to help us remediate faster against attacks. Sometimes, I wish there was more detail on why they consider it malicious.

Read full review

Livin Sunil

Information Security Engineer at M.Tech

Provides comprehensive protection with a need for a more intuitive interface

Security Complete comes with antivirus plus EDR, which is a convergence of antivirus and EDR. I have both the antivirus and EDR features constantly, allowing my team's customers to conduct detailed analyses of where attacks have occurred or if any malicious files are present, which devices or files have been targeted. It provides a greater level of view, making it easy for my team to mitigate those particular attacks.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We didn't have the visibility that we now have. It has increased our visibility by a lot. So, we put a lot more time into really looking at our environment and what is happening throughout our different networks. It has increased our visibility by around fivefold."

"The dashboard is very good and you can consider it as an interactive UI."

"For me, the technical support is good."

"The interface is user-friendly."

"Immediately we can pick up the computers in the network if any malicious operation that is triggered."

"What I like most about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is the support because the support is good. The solution is also easy to use, and it has a dashboard. Everything is good, and there's no problem with it."

"The solution is efficient."

"What I find most valuable is the clarity of the platform. It is very straightforward."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pros

"The solution prevents any damage from viruses and provides risk mitigation for virus threats."

"The most valuable features of Symantec Endpoint Security Complete for me are sandboxing and its threat-hunting capabilities."

"One of the most valuable features includes elements such as host libraries."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the advanced rate firewall protection, the URL filtering."

"It is a very reliable product."

"I am impressed with the tool's detection response."

"The SONAR feature is valuable as it offers real-time protection and threat rejection."

"The solution's most important feature is its reliability. It is not heavy on the workstation."

More Symantec Endpoint Security Complete pros

Cons

"It initially took some time to deploy."

"Cybereason does not have sandbox functionality."

"The deployment on individual endpoints is more geared toward larger organizations. It might prove to be a bit too complicated for a smaller organization. You need to know what you're doing when you're deploying the sensor."

"Reporting could be a bit more granular so that we had the ability to check regions and countries. I just noticed that, for instance, if I look at our servers, it's either "contained" or it's "not contained". I don't have the option, for instance, to look at countries. It only allows me to look at users as one big group."

"While the product is very good, there are still some areas for improvement. The initial triage area could be a bit simpler. They get into the weeds real fast; it gets very detailed very fast. I am still looking for an easier triage layer on top with the ability to dig deeper."

"The network coverage becomes an issue most of the time."

"What needs to improve in Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response and what I'd like to see in its next release is a centralized dashboard that allows you to view what is there, similar to what's on Symantec Endpoint Protection Manager: a beautiful display and reporting. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response has to start with the compliance, the homepage, etc. Everything should be there and should be customizable. The options should be there. The tool is very good currently, but visibility for IT administrators is lacking and needs to be worked on."

"Its Microsoft PowerShell protections still need some compatibility improvements. We have run across just a few. It is compatible with 90% of what we have in our network, but there is that 10% that we are still struggling with as far as compatibility with the type of PowerShell scripts needed to run our day-to-day business."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response cons

"Any traffic coming through should be recognized whether it is a legitimate URL or not."

"They could improve the user interface."

"An area for improvement in Symantec Endpoint Security Complete is that it needs to be developed more because competitors have started providing EDR and XDR functionalities, but in the product, those are still missing. Another area for improvement in Symantec Endpoint Security Complete is that it needs to be lightweight. Currently, the product is very heavy when compared to other vendors. It takes up too much space on the hard drive and the memory."

"The Threat Defense for Active Directory feature has a problem in that it is not possible to deploy it within a hybrid management architecture... we would have to migrate all the infrastructure to be managed by the cloud to deploy this feature, so we have not deployed it."

"Symantec Endpoint Security Complete does not cover everything on the cloud. It does not cover the workstation emails. There are risks associated with it."

"The deployment of Symantec components could be improved."

"The solution's support is not available over the weekends. We also need to have the DLP, endpoint security, and encryption integrated into one agent."

"Symantec could have better support for iOS and Android mobile devices."

More Symantec Endpoint Security Complete cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This product is somewhat expensive and should be cheaper."

"In terms of pricing, it's a good solution."

"The pricing is manageable."

"I had to go through a third-party to purchase it, which I wasn't really pleased about."

"We considered a few other solutions. Some were ridiculously overpriced, while others didn't have solutions for Mac endpoints. That was a deal-breaker because most of our organization is on Mac. It came down to two vendors: Cybereason and another. They had similar pitches and almost identical approaches, but in the end, Cybereason gave us the best value for our money."

"I do not have experience with the licensing of the product."

"In terms of cost, this is a good choice for our needs."

"Though it is not the cheapest solution but it fits our budget. We pay an annual licensing fee."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pricing and cost advice

"The product's pricing is dependent on partnership levels. The solution's price is competitive compared to other solutions."

"Symantec Endpoint Security Complete is not expensive."

"I'm recommending going with three-year licensing, rather than the yearly licensing option for this product."

"In terms of costs, Symantec Endpoint Security Complete has become costlier compared to how much it was in the past. The cost of the product is very high now. The customer needs to pay extra for additional features, but not for technical support. For example, if you need an email gateway or if you are looking for URL filtering, you have to pay extra, and that's where the costs for Symantec Endpoint Security Complete become higher."

"It's cost-effective and well-suited for smaller to midrange companies."

"The pricing is good. It's good value for the money."

"License renewal is not a straightforward process. I have a three-year subscription. It takes a long time to renew the license after three years. It is not proactive on that. The solution is expensive for the coverage that it does. I have to include other products to complement the protection that Symantec Endpoint Security Complete does not cover. We have to pay 18 euros. There are no additional support or maintenance costs."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,646 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

Comparison with other products showed it be cheaper than some larger competitors. Set up cost for us were cheaper as we already had users experienced with the product in other business units. Initi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

We use it to improve detection in the whole industrial sector. We are a big energy company. Across multiple endpoints, we deploy the EDR to secure all, improve detection, and also attempt to automa...

See all answers

What do you like most about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

The interface is user-friendly.

See all answers

What do you like most about Symantec Endpoint Security Complete?

The solution prevents any damage from viruses and provides risk mitigation for virus threats.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Symantec Endpoint Security Complete?

Symantec Endpoint Security Full/Complete license is not expensive and advise using the full feature.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Symantec Endpoint Security Complete?

They could improve the user interface. Currently, everything is pretty good, however, when it comes to the Maniac and Protection, there could be enhancements.

See all answers

Comparisons

Darktrace vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 28% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 18% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 10% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 9% of the time

Fortinet FortiEDR vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 5% of the time

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Competitors

Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise vs Symantec Endpoint Security Complete

Compared 77% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Business vs Symantec Endpoint Security Complete

Compared 10% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum vs Symantec Endpoint Security Complete

Compared 8% of the time

Malwarebytes vs Symantec Endpoint Security Complete

Compared 4% of the time

More Symantec Endpoint Security Complete Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

April 2025

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response report

Download Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response product report

Buyer's Guide

Symantec Endpoint Security Complete

March 2025

Symantec Endpoint Security Complete report

Download Symantec Endpoint Security Complete product report

Also Known As

Cybereason EDR, Cybereason Deep Detect & Respond

No data available

Overview

Cybereason's Endpoint Detection and Response platform detects in real-time both signature and non-signature-based attacks and accelerates incident investigation and response. Cybereason connects together individual pieces of evidence to form a complete picture of a malicious operation.

Cybereason

Symantec Endpoint Security (SES) Complete delivers comprehensive protection for all your traditional and mobile devices across the entire attack chain. Symantec endpoint innovations include behavioral isolation, Active Directory security, and Threat Hunter technologies to protect your endpoints against sophisticated threats and targeted attacks. For higher return-on-investment and lower total cost of ownership, this single-agent solution supports on-premises, hybrid, and cloud-based deployments.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Lockheed Martin, Spark Capital, DocuSign, Softbank Capital

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Complete

April 2025

Free Report: Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Complete

Find out what your peers are saying about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Complete and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,646 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Complete report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.