Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CyCognito vs IONIX comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

CyCognito
Ranking in Attack Surface Management (ASM)
15th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) (12th)
IONIX
Ranking in Attack Surface Management (ASM)
6th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Attack Surface Management (ASM) category, the mindshare of CyCognito is 7.3%, down from 10.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IONIX is 2.4%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Attack Surface Management (ASM)
 

Featured Reviews

Use CyCognito?
Share your opinion
BV
Apr 24, 2024
Helps us prioritize our security fixes, reduce our false positives, and improve our security posture
Our team is always looking for ways to improve the product. Although we understand we are not the only client, the company has been very receptive to our suggestions. They work with the development team to implement our requests, and most of the time, they do. However, we are currently facing a challenge with the RBAC system. Our view on how it should function differs slightly from theirs. While we understand their position, more flexibility in controlling the system would be beneficial. Due to the sensitive nature of our data, we need to limit access to specific user information within IONIX. Although we have implemented some user feedback for improvement, other areas require changes to IONIX's RBAC model. We understand their reasons for the current model, but we believe modifications are necessary. Unfortunately, achieving those changes seems unlikely.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Its pricing is fair."
"The pricing is good."
"The solution's pricing is reasonable and at par with the rest of the industry."
"Since we were an early adopter of IONIX, I believe we have a very favorable pricing model."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Attack Surface Management (ASM) solutions are best for your needs.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
9%
Computer Software Company
14%
Insurance Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Retailer
11%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about IONIX?
The most valuable feature of IONIX is the effortless setup.
What needs improvement with IONIX?
I don't have anything that I don't like, but there is a feature that IONIX can also consider. We're a heavy user of IONIX services and have a very, very good partnership. However, IONIX only looks ...
What is your primary use case for IONIX?
We use IONIX to identify and monitor any vulnerabilities or issues within the attack surface. It is also used to validate the remediation actions.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
Cyberpion
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

UTA, BERTELSMANN, WIPRO
Warner Music Group, Lexmark, Infosys, The Telegraph, Grand Canyon Education, E.ON
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Trend Micro, Darktrace and others in Attack Surface Management (ASM). Updated: October 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.