Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Dell License Manager (DLM) vs Flexera One comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Dell License Manager (DLM)
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
License Management (14th)
Flexera One
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
IT Asset Management (13th), SaaS Management Platforms (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Dell License Manager (DLM) and Flexera One aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Dell License Manager (DLM) is designed for License Management and holds a mindshare of 3.5%, up 2.4% compared to last year.
Flexera One, on the other hand, focuses on IT Asset Management, holds 0.6% mindshare, down 1.1% since last year.
License Management
IT Asset Management
 

Featured Reviews

Use Dell License Manager (DLM)?
Share your opinion
Anne Watson - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 27, 2023
Robust SAM Solution that is always a Step Ahead of the competition
There is room for improvement in the purchasing module. There are things I would change in that. Also, the automation components, like having the contracts, scheduling, and notifications embedded into the application, which they've been promising to do since 2014. There are some key things in there that make it clunkier than it should be. But overall, the benefits outweigh the drawbacks. Moreover, in additional features, I would like to see the reporting change. Eliminate Cognos and create a dynamic front end that allows for straight SQL queries, to get a more flexible and richer reporting module - especially for the Cloud version, FlexNet One; without having access to the SQL database for reporting, it makes it prohibitive.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"I can say that from a price perspective, you can go for FlexNet Manager if you have a very small environment."
"It was certainly on a par with the price we were paying for Snow License Manager. It wasn't overly expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which License Management solutions are best for your needs.
805,335 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Retailer
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FlexNet Manager?
Based on the enterprise-level packages that my company purchases, I can say that from a price perspective, you can go for FlexNet Manager if you have a very small environment. ServiceNow is better ...
What needs improvement with FlexNet Manager?
The hardware and connectors in the product have certain shortcomings where improvements are required. FlexNet Manager's connectors are not that good, especially when compared to what Flexera provid...
What is your primary use case for FlexNet Manager?
During my tenure from 2018 to 2022 with Intel, my primary client was a global network with a significant presence in Europe, particularly Germany. I provided services using Flexera's FlexNet Manage...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
FlexNet Manager Suite, FlexNet Manager Suite for Enterprises, Flexera SaaS Manager
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Imerys, Dayco, Wayne Fueling Systems, The Center for Space Simulator Development and Personnel Training (CSD&PT), eLongNet Information Technology, Grupo Dutriz, FFR Merchandising, Seminole County Public Schools, Public Utility Commission of Texas
Foray Technologies, BMC
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, IFS, Snow Software and others in License Management. Updated: August 2024.
805,335 professionals have used our research since 2012.