Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs Eggplant Test comparison

Digital.ai and Keysight Technologies are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Digital.ai is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.0, while Keysight Technologies is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.7. Digital.ai holds a 0.3% mindshare in TAt, compared to Keysight Technologies’s 3.6% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of Digital.ai users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Keysight Technologies users who would recommend it.

Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Read 3 Digital.ai Continuous Testing reviews

290 Views
202 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Eggplant Test

Read 18 Eggplant Test reviews

2,718 Views
1,530 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Eggplant Test

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Digital.ai Continuous Testing and Eggplant Test compete in the software testing landscape. Eggplant Test often emerges as the preferred choice due to its comprehensive feature set, even though Digital.ai is viewed more positively in terms of pricing and support.

Features: Digital.ai Continuous Testing excels with integration capabilities, seamless parallel test execution, and efficiency in continuous delivery workflows. Eggplant Test distinguishes itself with AI-driven automation, cross-platform testing, and capabilities that cater to diverse testing requirements more effectively.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Digital.ai Continuous Testing features a straightforward cloud-based deployment model that integrates rapidly within existing systems. Eggplant Test offers both on-premises and cloud deployment options, providing flexibility for various business needs. Digital.ai is known for quick resolutions and robust support. However, Eggplant Test is favored for personalized support and comprehensive guidance, beneficial for those needing detailed assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Digital.ai Continuous Testing is noted for competitive pricing and quick ROI through cost reductions via automated testing efficiencies. Eggplant Test, although considered more expensive, delivers substantial ROI over time through extensive features and reduced maintenance efforts, making it attractive for organizations looking for a powerful testing tool despite the initial investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. Eggplant Test Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. Eggplant Test

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

20th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (9th), AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools (2nd)

Eggplant Test

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (9th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Digital.ai Continuous Testing is 0.3%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Eggplant Test is 3.6%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Alan Chiou

PM at Galaxy Software Services

Has Mobile Studio feature which can generate scripts

The integration process was good, but I've faced some challenges. Every time they release a new version, I find bugs in the UI and features. Sometimes, buttons don't work well. When this happens, I submit a ticket to technical support, but they often have to fix it in the next version.

Read full review

Tayyaba Noreen

Student at SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY

Empowers effective test automation with comprehensive platform coverage and scalability

There was no free trial in it. So, I studied it through a page that tells how it works. It will be good if a free trial is provided for users. Moreover, I would like to give some feedback on the installation process. There are other tools that are much easier to install and get started with. Eggplant could improve its installation process.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Experitest is one of the only companies to offer a real device on the cloud to perform testing. They also provide quality documentations that help you navigate and maximize the solution."

"The most useful feature for me is Mobile Studio. It has a UI where I can click on elements, and it generates a script for me. Mobile Studio can generate code from testing steps. I'm using Python with it."

"The most valuable part of Experitest is the number of real devices on which the test is run."

"Good text reading ability."

"We did see a massive return on investment from using Eggplant."

"The most valuable features of Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence are bug hunting and OCR technology."

"Eggplant Test is valuable due to its OCR technology, which is independent of underlying technologies and can identify applications based on labels such as 'username' and 'password'."

"Everything is happening on the layout or display that is used by the user. Eggplant prompts processes, like 'click here,' or 'look for this image.' Eggplant makes it possible for QA people and BAs, working in the actual display, to check if the software is providing the right images, the right text, and the right results. They don't have to go inside the code or to the TCP/IP layer. Everything is happening at the highest level."

"The solution is a stable one."

"The biggest advantage has been the ability to improve the quality significantly."

"DAI's newest release allows us to test via scripts rather than models, because we have done 95 percent of our development in functional, not through modeling. I am really happy that then we can use the controller to run scripts rather than having to translate things to models. There are lots of options."

More Eggplant Test pros

Cons

"I would also like to see more videos and descriptions that could make installation more efficient."

"I have been automating tests for many years on many things but not on mobile devices. The amount of time that I have spent on just figuring out how to use Experitest and get it to work was quite long compared to what I have been doing before. I spent the first two weeks just getting it started. It would be good to have some video explanation of how to use it on your devices and get started. Their online documentation is quite good and extensive, but it would be quite good to have some end-to-end examples demonstrated."

"The integration process was good, but I've faced some challenges. Every time they release a new version, I find bugs in the UI and features. Sometimes, buttons don't work well. When this happens, I submit a ticket to technical support, but they often have to fix it in the next version."

"We found that we had issues regarding the VPN setup, which is one of the reasons that we did not purchase this solution."

"The IDE could be even more full-featured. Because I was a developer, I was very spoiled by either Visual Studio Code or Visual Studio for shortcuts. For example, I was able to say "ctor" and hit Tab and it would create a template of a constructor for me... It would be great, when I want to create a new function, if there were shortcut commands like those that helped create all of the functions, or if there were shortcut features to do any of the complex plans."

"I would like to see standardized actions already built into Eggplant. For example, "wait eight seconds". That way, I wouldn't need to create it as an action. Right now, I have to program that wait and describe it as an action so that everybody knows it is an action that waits eight seconds... That way, somebody who is not familiar with programming processes like "if-else", or "for", or "while", would be able, from the first moment, and without programming, to put some easy-to-use, standardized, actions in place."

"There was no free trial in it."

"Eggplant Test should emphasize on improving its offering in non-Windows environments."

"In terms of additional features, it would be helpful to have one package for all testing. You have the manager, the AI, then you have functional, and about 10 different packages for installing."

"If one area could be improved, it would be some of their documentation. In particular, some of their online help and user support documentation is a little bit out of date and could be revised and updated on a more frequent basis. Other than that, I haven't really found any issues or problems."

"A step forward would be to have event support, because it is more or less linear at the moment."

More Eggplant Test cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is quite fairly priced, but it really depends on your budget. It is somewhere in the mid-range of products. It is not free and it is not QGP that nearly costs a whole house. You pay for the number of users who require access to execute the tests."

"We make monthly payments. The cost is dependent on the number of devices we intend to support."

"The price is reasonable for our company, but I'm not the decision-maker."

"It is scalable, but it is a matter of money in the pocket. You can scale it, but then you have to have additional licenses. The licensing approach of eggPlant is not the best."

"End-to-end testing isn't possible for us because of the licensing problems. It's very expensive, so we only have two development/execution licenses."

"This solution is expensive when compared to the market. However, the reason it is more expensive is because of its stability, high performance, and for its support of any technology."

"Make a smart decision about the number of developer- and execution-only licenses you purchase to maximize your budget. We found that going heavier on execution-only licenses has been a way to reduce our costs and maximize our ability to benefit from the software."

"Eggplant Test is a very expensive solution."

"It probably has a yearly license."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

24%

Computer Software Company

23%

Insurance Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Healthcare Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Digital.ai Continuous Testing?

The price is reasonable for our company, but I'm not the decision-maker.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Digital.ai Continuous Testing?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Digital.ai Continuous Testing?

I'm using Digital.ai Continuous Testing to create and test a mobile application. We're developing and testing a mobile app.

See all answers

How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?

Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...

See all answers

What do you like most about Eggplant Manager?

The solution is a stable one.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Eggplant Manager?

Eggplant Test is a bit expensive compared to its competitors.

See all answers

Comparisons

BrowserStack vs Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Compared 47% of the time

Perfecto vs Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Compared 32% of the time

LambdaTest vs Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Compared 21% of the time

More Digital.ai Continuous Testing Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Eggplant Test

Compared 21% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Eggplant Test

Compared 17% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs Eggplant Test

Compared 11% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Eggplant Test

Compared 9% of the time

Qt Squish vs Eggplant Test

Compared 9% of the time

More Eggplant Test Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BrowserStack vs. Digital.ai Continuous Testing

March 2025

Download Digital.ai Continuous Testing product report

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test

April 2025

Download Eggplant Test product report

Also Known As

Experitest Seetest, Experitest

Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence, Eggplant DAI, Eggplant Automation Cloud, Eggplant Manager, Eggplant Mobile, Eggplant Customer Experience Insights

Overview

Experitest's continuous testing solutions enable enterprises to reduce risk and provide their customers satisfying, error-free experiences across all devices and browsers. They seamlessly integrate with best-in-class tools throughout the DevOps pipeline allowing organizations to rapidly deliver highly protected, quality applications at-speed and at-scale.

Digital.ai

Across every industry, digital transformation is top of mind. New methods of developing software are driving fast change, and test teams are feeling the pressure. Increasing demand to release faster while maintaining the highest levels of quality is making the testing process more complex and harder to scale.

With AI-powered testing, Eggplant’s test and automation intelligence delivers the coverage you need to optimize the user experience, speed up release cycles, and improve your quality assurance process. Discover a fast, secure, and easy-to-use solution that tests any kind of software on any platform or device.

Keysight Technologies

Sample Customers

Samsung, American Express, Barclays, China Mobile, Citi, Cisco, McAfee

FUJIFILM Group, NEC Personal Computers

Buyer's Guide

Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. Eggplant Test

March 2025

Free Report: Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. Eggplant Test

Find out what your peers are saying about Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. Eggplant Test and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. Eggplant Test report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.