Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Digital Safe vs OpenText Content Manager comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.0
OpenText Content Manager is scalable but challenges arise with large deployments, suggesting planning and using cloud platforms for enhancement.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.0
OpenText Content Manager offers efficient document management with strong search, customization, integration, security, and large-scale enterprise support.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
4.0
OpenText Content Manager needs enhancements in integration, usability, search, security, installation, pricing, and service responsiveness for better user experience.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.2
OpenText Content Manager's stability is generally rated high, but integration and scalability issues affect some users' experiences.
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
OpenText Content Manager support varies; users praise premium help but note deficiencies and complexity, especially after third-party involvement.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
OpenText Content Manager's licensing is complex and expensive, but negotiation and customization are possible despite high ongoing costs.
 

Categories and Ranking

Digital Safe
Ranking in File Archiving
10th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OpenText Content Manager
Ranking in File Archiving
4th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Content Management (7th), Document Management Software (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the File Archiving category, the mindshare of Digital Safe is 2.3%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Content Manager is 4.6%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
File Archiving
 

Featured Reviews

it_user948 - PeerSpot reviewer
Solid product, functionally rich, but complex.
The message archiving tool is very powerful and can handle many search / flagging scenarios, as well as numerous message types (SMS, E-mail, bloomberg, etc). With flexibility comes complexity. The solution is very complex and requires significant configuration. If hosting…
Maurice Riverso - PeerSpot reviewer
Our our official repository and it has disposal management and retention management
The security architecture is the only problem as it's a little bit complex and too torturous at times. So it could be improved a little bit, but it is regarded as a very good system in Australia. It's probably overly subscribed. Also, what's missing is what people would like, which is basically online collaboration. That's a problem. But it has so many other things to offer that SharePoint, I'm sure, will not have. So, that will be an interesting issue to come up. It's not very good at providing stable and robust add-ins to Microsoft. That's a bit of a problem with Content Manager. They're kind of very volatile. So, that's been definitely something that could be improved.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File Archiving solutions are best for your needs.
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Government
20%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Micro Focus Content Manager?
An advantage is integration with your IP directory.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Content Manager?
Pricing is a disadvantage as it is very expensive, especially in this market.
What needs improvement with Micro Focus Content Manager?
Pricing is an issue, as it is too expensive. Support and services need to be more user-friendly. The support has been slow, and there is room for improvement. Additionally, they could improve build...
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus Digital Safe, Autonomy Zantaz, HPE Autonomy Zantaz, HPE Digital Safe
Micro Focus Content Manager, HPE Records Manager, HPE Content Manager
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

EDF, Morgan Stanley, RateCity, Missouri State Courts
Missouri State Courts
Find out what your peers are saying about Veritas, Commvault, Microsoft and others in File Archiving. Updated: November 2024.
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.