Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and ESET PROTECT Enterprise both compete in the endpoint security category. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint seems to have an upper hand due to its integration with Microsoft products and comprehensive threat visibility.
Features: Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers advanced threat and vulnerability management, integration with Microsoft products like Sentinel, and comprehensive threat visibility. ESET PROTECT Enterprise focuses on ease of management, efficient resource usage on older systems, and offers a user-friendly interface with strong antivirus protection.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft Defender for Endpoint could improve real-time alert generation, third-party tool integration, and false positive management. ESET PROTECT Enterprise needs better dashboard insights, improved threat detection automation, and enhanced mobile device management.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers flexibility in hybrid cloud environments but has a complex deployment process and mixed technical support reviews. ESET PROTECT Enterprise provides straightforward on-premises and public cloud deployments, but faces occasional connectivity issues and could benefit from more comprehensive documentation.
Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is costlier as a standalone product, yet offers savings when bundled with Microsoft offerings like E5 licenses, providing good ROI for enterprises using Microsoft ecosystems. ESET PROTECT Enterprise is more affordable, offering cost-effective security solutions for small to mid-sized organizations.
The return on investment is excellent due to its functionality and ease of installation.
There was money saving from using ESET PROTECT Enterprise, which is why I switched from CrowdStrike to ESET.
Without detection and protection measures, organizations would face substantial payments and reputational damage, including the necessity to inform customers about data breaches, potentially leading to loss of business.
We have seen a return on investment when using Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, as it saves labor by reducing the need for staff to focus on it.
The biggest return on investment for me when using Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is the time saving.
The tech support from ESET is amazing, and I would rate it as ten out of ten.
They are very responsive and help in solving issues quickly.
Even if support is addressing my problem, if the two issues I mentioned are not resolved, then the support process is not complete.
The Microsoft agent, who did not actually work for Microsoft, is one of the vendors that Microsoft uses for support, said, 'Just to set expectations, my lunch break is in an hour and I am going to go away then.'
The level-one support seems disconnected from subject matter experts.
I rate Microsoft support 10 out of 10.
It can efficiently scale up to thousands of devices in an organization without issues.
I have used many products before, and this solution is definitely scalable.
It is better suited for workstations rather than server environments.
We managed to scale it out in a short amount of time, with two months of planning and three months of implementation on 10,000 computers.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is scalable enough to handle various devices across environments, whether they are laptops, Android devices, or operating in hybrid environments.
Compatibility is its main feature.
When it performs an update, ESET PROTECT Enterprise should request permission for restarting because otherwise, users lose their work.
The solution is stable, and I have not encountered any glitches.
The solution is very, very stable.
I haven't seen any outages with Microsoft.
I rate Defender 10 out of 10 for stability.
Defender for Endpoint is extremely stable.
Sometimes, agents lose connection with the management console, and the administration team needs to reinstall the agents on the computers.
They need to reduce the number of notifications on the endpoints.
It takes a lot of processing power when the machine is initially booted.
Repeated interactions are necessary due to Level One's lack of tools and knowledge, hindering efficient problem-solving and negatively impacting our experience with Microsoft support.
In contrast, competing products offer reduced pricing for long-term commitments, which makes it difficult for us in that environment.
We use Microsoft partners to help govern the platform, and as part of an alliance, we want to gather data from each tenant and combine them for a complete view.
I pay 40 dollars per agent annually, which is cheaper than 60 dollars per agent for Check Point.
We recently paid fourteen dollars and thirty-six cents per unit for 20 users, which is reasonable.
Comparing it to other solutions in the market, it was slightly higher.
That has been the trend we have seen with Microsoft lately—it is just getting more and more expensive.
Given our extensive Microsoft licensing, transitioning to Defender for Endpoint did not affect licensing costs.
It costs $15 per VM for the P2 plan, which is seen as affordable for customers.
It allows simple whitelisting and has a learning mode for new installations, which reduces false positives by adapting to typical user habits.
Its web component prevents infections from malicious websites, which enhances its anti-malware capabilities.
One of the strong features of ESET PROTECT Enterprise is its ability to work well on old computers.
Defender for Endpoint's coverage across different platforms in our environment is pretty good. We have devices running Linux, Mac OS, Windows, iOS, and Android. It covers all of them.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint provides a unified management interface allowing customers to manage their on-premises and hybrid infrastructures from a single pane.
One of the best features of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is its database for identifying zero-day attacks or malware attacks.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | 6.0% |
| ESET PROTECT Enterprise | 1.7% |
| Other | 92.3% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 11 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 2 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 82 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 44 |
| Large Enterprise | 97 |
ESET PROTECT Enterprise is a robust security platform for threat detection and management, offering features like dynamic folders and reporting tools. It provides online transaction security and effective threat protection with tools for compliance and policy customization.
Designed for advanced threat management, ESET PROTECT Enterprise offers a range of features to enhance online security. The straightforward console aids in managing dynamic groups and EDR capabilities efficiently. Zero-Day protection and customizable policies ensure compliance, while its resource-efficient design supports older hardware. Despite needing improvements in remote deployment, user-friendliness, and connection stability, it remains a compelling choice for managing computers, extending antivirus protections, and handling device management across multiple operating systems.
What are the key features of ESET PROTECT Enterprise?In industries such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing, ESET PROTECT Enterprise is implemented for its reliable security and management of endpoint devices. It automates antivirus installations and enhances web filtering to safeguard critical systems and data. Many sectors rely on its capability to isolate compromised systems and manage policy applications on-premises or during a cloud transition.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint provides comprehensive threat protection that integrates well with current systems, offering proactive threat detection and automatic updates while reducing manual efforts.
The platform is designed for seamless integration with Microsoft products, facilitating efficient management and use. It offers proactive ransomware protection and valuable threat intelligence, crucial for timely response and increased visibility across devices. Users highlight its ability to secure endpoints from viruses and malware, integrating with Windows and Office 365 to enhance real-time detection capabilities in diverse environments, including hybrid and on-premises setups. However, enhancements are needed in Linux integration, detection accuracy, and policy implementations.
What are the key features of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint?
What benefits should be evaluated in Microsoft Defender for Endpoint?
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is implemented across industries for securing endpoints, relying on its deep integration with Windows and Office 365 to protect against malware and viruses. Organizations benefit from its real-time detection and comprehensive management capabilities, particularly in hybrid environments where diverse digital infrastructures need safeguarding.
We monitor all Anti-Malware Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
