Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Everteam vs IBM FileNet comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Everteam
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
33rd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IBM FileNet
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
99
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Enterprise Content Management category, the mindshare of Everteam is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM FileNet is 10.3%, up from 9.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Content Management
 

Q&A Highlights

SD
Jan 22, 2020
 

Featured Reviews

Use Everteam?
Share your opinion
WolfgangPichler - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to integrate, and enables our clients to guarantee compliance
The area of migrations to new versions must be made easier. It's quite good that they have now begun to improve the API area, to modernize the interfaces, but there's always a very big investment involved in migrating from one version to another. That prohibits rolling out new functionalities to customers. It's not so easy. You can't release a new version every three months to bring in new capabilities. That is the old-fashioned, the way it worked ten or 20 years ago. That is bad. In that area, they really must improve. We have FileNet, Content Manager, and TSM in our own installation. We migrated that installation three years ago to version 5.12. Now we have to migrate to 5.25 to bring in new facilities, and it's a big task. We have to do it in addition to our other tasks where we support customers. We need a parallel machine and to set it up there and to migrate step-by-step, then test it and roll it out. It's not so easy. That is a big area where there is much to be done to satisfy the needs of customers.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Answers from the Community

SD
Jan 22, 2020
Jan 22, 2020
If you are comparing the products, then it's important to look into your requirements outside the product. From the comparison point of view, we have worked with EverTeam which is SharePoint based and FileNet. FileNet is a much-matured product and can be compared to Opentext, Documentum (now OT), as it has a complete gamete of information management (Do you actually require all of it? that yo...
2 out of 4 answers
Moshe Elbaz - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 20, 2020
We don't have any experience with Ever Team but as far as I know, you need to take into consideration what the feature is that must be in your ECM solution. FileNet is a stable high volume system but as long as you add more features, you can run into a performance issue. You can ingest a huge amount of DOC via ICC (IBM Content Collector ). You can spread your installation with different repositories across your region. You can easily scale up your system. The new version is CONTAINER KUBERNTES DOCKER. Textual search and analytics are not so flexible so it will be hard to compare between those 2 softwares. Are you going to use BPM? Did you compere IBM BOW 19 VS Ever Team?
GD
Jan 20, 2020
I am interested to know more about all the products as mentioned below, but I am not an expert to discuss and compare.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
23%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
11%
Insurance Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about IBM FileNet?
The product is robust and can process a lot of documents for enterprise content management.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM FileNet?
It depends on the business partner providing the solution to the customer. We have an ESA contract with IBM which allows us to offer the solution at a competitive price, providing added value when ...
What needs improvement with IBM FileNet?
The setup process is very complex, and I would prefer if it were easier. A modern interface would also be an enhancement.
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

Ever Team
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

MAIF, Mutualit_ Sociale Agricole, Qatar General Insurance, SMI Mutual Insurance, ODDO&CIE, Qatar National Bank, SGBL, Jeddah Municipality, Lebanese General Security, Ministry of Higher Education, National Institute of Statistics, National Water Company, Office of The Prime Minister, Al Fardan, Mango, Tatex, Najran University, University of Barcelona, University of Hikmeh
Suncorp Group Limited, St. Vincent Health, Citigroup, SRCSD, and UK Dept for Work and Pensions.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, IBM and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: January 2025.
831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.