Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

F5 Advanced WAF vs Radware Cloud WAF Service comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

F5 Advanced WAF
Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
2nd
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
57
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Radware Cloud WAF Service
Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
10th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2024, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of F5 Advanced WAF is 11.8%, up from 10.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Radware Cloud WAF Service is 0.9%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
 

Featured Reviews

AE
Apr 5, 2024
Offers features of DDoS protection, bot blocking and HTTP header verifications
More legacy protocols should be added to the solution. The aforementioned protocols are generally less used and might have been phased out from multiple solutions. But some of the large corporations that are clients of our company are unwilling to let go of applications that have been developed. The aforementioned clients believe that as some of the new websites do not use these technologies, it wouldn't be ideal to replace the existing applications; for example, a bank with millions of dollars connected to a software wouldn't be willing to replace it instantly. It often takes years for enterprise-level businesses to replace applications. The vendor of F5 Advanced WAF needs to consider that even if legacy protocols are not necessarily used for new projects, existing or prior applications projects rely heavily on them, and such protocols need to be protected until they are completely phased out of the market. The vendor needs to provide complete support for the legacy protocols, just like the latest protocols in the market, until they are assured that none of the customers are using them. I would like to witness the expansion of the supported protocols set by the solution. The tool should be promoted as an advanced protection solution that supports all types of protocols. In future versions, some protocols offered by the solution need to be more specialized. All public-facing protocols should be added to F5 Advanced WAF.
VT
May 17, 2023
Is user-friendly, helps save time, and has good end-to-end API protection
The effectiveness of Radware Cloud WAF Service in blocking unknown threats and attacks depends on the situation. Usually, when we deploy applications, we have everything planned in advance. In this case, we can simply log in to the portal and configure the WAF. However, if we are dealing with a repeated case or if we need to update a certificate, we can use automation to make the changes. In most cases, we do not need to make any changes to the WAF configuration. For example, if we need to block a specific IP address, we can create a template and apply it to all of our web applications. This allows us to use WAF for both web applications and API code. Radware Cloud WAF Service's automated analytics for looking at events is good. We actually had something similar before, but this service gives us a better understanding of how we use WAF for different products. For example, DDoS protection is also included. This allows me to analyze which users are coming from which locations, what my status is, and if I have a SQL injection or something similar. There are a lot of features, so I definitely know my application better and can identify any security events that are happening on my web or application. The end-to-end API protection offered by Radware Cloud WAF Service's API discovery feature is a good tool. However, it can only be effective if we understand the WAF portal concept and know what the tool does. Before we use the tool, we should read its documentation. Radware also has a universal university where we can learn more about how Radware works in a web application. This is helpful because different vendors have different ways of using the same application. I have been part of this learning experience and found it to be very helpful. API Discovery is easy to use for those who are familiar with WAFs and APIs. However, we need to use a document to configure it, which is not a big deal. Using Radware CDN services and Cloud WAF together is easy. However, it requires coordination between two different teams. The security team is responsible for CDN, while the development team is responsible for the application. If these teams communicate effectively, it is very easy to use the combined services. Even if the development team does not have experience with CDN, it is not difficult to learn. I have been part of both teams, and I can confirm that using Radware CDN services and Cloud WAF together is easy. Radware Cloud WAF Service is user-friendly. It provides us with what we need and tells us where to click. Even if we are new to using it, we will not get lost or confused. Once we log in, we can simply click through the steps and understand what is happening. The application is easy to configure and does not require highly technical knowledge. Radware Cloud WAF Service helped reduce the overhead on one team. In a previous product preview event, only two teams were configuring everything for the project team. However, now even the user developer can develop applications. They develop the application, put their endpoint, and go to Radware to create everything. The system management and network teams are no longer involved. This reduced the dependency on a team by 70 percent. Additionally, any individual team can now configure and use the service. Radware Cloud WAF Service helped reduce our TCO by ten percent. We noticed the time to value within two months of using Radware Cloud WAF Service.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable features of F5 Advanced WAF are the security features and the protection."
"It's a fairly easy-to-use and user-friendly tool. My administrators and team also like its ability to customize the rules per the requirements."
"F5 Advanced WAF is a stable solution, we are satisfied. It is more stable than ForiWeb."
"F5 Advanced WAF has very good stability and scalability. Its initial setup was straightforward."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the WAF protection, Data Safe, and the seven-layer DDoS."
"One of the most valuable features is the Local Traffic Manager."
"The solution is stable."
"The anti-bot protection is the solution's most valuable feature. Safe-guard or credential staffing are also useful features."
"Cloud WAF's interface is easy to use and protects us from OWASP Top Ten threats. Our dev team do QA checks on applications before they go live, but Cloud WAF creates an additional security layer on our website."
"The solution offers good protection."
"The most valuable feature is the monitoring dashboard that we access through the portal."
"Radware Cloud WAF Service is user-friendly and easy to deploy."
"The solution requires very little maintenance; we install it, it works without any problems, is reliable, and we can almost forget about it."
"The most valuable feature of Radware Cloud WAF Service is the visibility into attacks that are being cut off instantly."
"The best feature is the SQL injection signatures, and another is the DDoS protection. Radware is more efficient than other solutions."
"Radware Cloud WAF Service has several valuable features, with good support and a user-friendly GUI."
 

Cons

"The solution should include RASP for another level of protection at the code itself."
"We get false positives sometimes."
"One thing that can be improved, is to increase the quantity over predefine policy."
"I would not expect traffic details to pass through the web application firewall across the length of the whole application. I think that there is a web application where it can let the application function without traffic going in into the WAF."
"I think the deployment templates can be better."
"The delay times on firmware patches and software updates could be better and improved."
"The contextual-based component needs a lot of help to catch up with the next-gen products."
"Nevertheless, F5 products are generally considered to be hard to deploy."
"The integration part could be better."
"The lower-level technical team at Radware could improve their approach to problem-solving as they sometimes are very slow."
"Our only complaint is the reporting on the DDoS side. We also use Radware for on-premises DDoS protection and their Vision product. I just want to give paint you an example. We face so many Layer 3 and Layer 4 DDoS attacks on Cloud WAF. The reporting on those types of attacks can be improved."
"Radware does not have much online training available to help customers get the most out of this solution."
"If we want to publish services to a limited number of providers and we only want those providers to connect, we need to forward those requests to the Radware support team and they apply them, but it takes some time."
"Radware Cloud WAF Service has limited integrations, and I would like to see it integrate with our use of Azure DevOps."
"The Cloud Portal has room for improvement."
"Radware Cloud WAF Service should provide SSL certificates for its hosting customers."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I think the price is very high."
"F5 bundles up services and the bundle is what you pay for rather than individual components."
"I am not sure about pricing but licenses are available on Google."
"The pricing of F5 Advanced WAF is more expensive than other solutions like Radware and CD18, it is quite high."
"It is expensive. Its price should be better. Its licensing is on a yearly basis. Its licensing is also based on the model. There are no additional costs."
"The cost is slightly above average."
"I would rate the pricing as seven out of ten"
"The pricing for F5 Advanced WAF is comparable to a Rolls-Royce. Its price is a bit high when you compare it with other vendors. F5 Advanced WAF is a bit expensive. The customer was on a three-year plan and it was around $560,000."
"We are based in El Salvador and don't have a direct license with Radware; we purchase the license through resellers. The pricing is reasonable, as I managed an Akamai product in a previous position, and Cloud WAF is competitively priced."
"If you plan to deploy Cloud WAF, keep in mind that the product is priced based on the megabits of traffic that pass through and the number of transactions. You should get your requirements correct up front. The active attackers feed and CDN services cost extra, so you need to negotiate these features upfront."
"I believe the prices are fair."
"We evaluated other options and, if I remember correctly, one of them was Fortinet, but they didn't seem as effective as Radware. But the price was the biggest difference. Radware had the best price for our type of network and level of scaling."
"The pricing is fair. We compared Radware to others using industry reviews and Radware is at the top right now."
"The pricing is fair; it's neither particularly cheap nor expensive."
"For the current market, the price for Radware Cloud WAF Service is exactly where we want it to be."
"We are paying $20,000 annually for six licenses that provide basic WAF functionality."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
802,829 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
15%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Computer Software Company
16%
Retailer
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about F5 Advanced WAF?
It's a fairly easy-to-use and user-friendly tool. My administrators and team also like its ability to customize the rules per the requirements.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F5 Advanced WAF?
I would rate the pricing as seven out of ten. Sometimes, for specific models, additional licenses over the standard one need to be purchased. F5 Advanced WAF doesn't offer a single license that fit...
What needs improvement with F5 Advanced WAF?
More legacy protocols should be added to the solution. The aforementioned protocols are generally less used and might have been phased out from multiple solutions. But some of the large corporation...
What do you like most about Radware Cloud WAF Service?
One of the most valuable features we have found in the solution is protection against attacks from botnet networks and the requests that these remote networks can generate that are blocked from our...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Radware Cloud WAF Service?
I'm not a part of the purchasing team. I do not know about the costs or licensing.
What needs improvement with Radware Cloud WAF Service?
They need to improve their reporting. We need to present our management with reports and we need better options for reporting. They don't want lengthy reports. They need something that is one to tw...
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

MAXIMUS, Vivo, American Systems, Bangladesh Post Office, City Bank
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about F5 Advanced WAF vs. Radware Cloud WAF Service and other solutions. Updated: September 2024.
802,829 professionals have used our research since 2012.