Flowgear vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform comparison

Flowgear and Salesforce are both solutions in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category. Flowgear is ranked #23, while Salesforce is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.1. Flowgear holds a 0.4% mindshare in PaaS, compared to Salesforce’s 11.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Flowgear users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Salesforce users who would recommend it.

Flowgear

Read 7 Flowgear reviews

157 Views
41 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Read 58 MuleSoft Anypoint Platform reviews

3,251 Views
2,184 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Flowgear

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and Flowgear compete in the API management and integration space. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform seems to have the upper hand in feature breadth and scalability, making it ideal for large organizations, while Flowgear is more user-friendly and cost-effective for small to medium-sized enterprises.

Features: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform offers a robust set of API management tools, supports cloud and on-premise deployments, and provides a vast array of connectors for diverse integrations. It is well-suited for handling complex, large-scale integration projects. Flowgear, though not as extensive, is highly rated for its ease of integration, quick implementation, and user-friendliness, ideal for rapid deployment in smaller enterprises.

Room for Improvement: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform could enhance its technical support, improve documentation, and offer more competitive pricing to appeal to smaller businesses. Flowgear could expand its training materials, improve workspace navigation, and extend advanced deployment features to lower-priced plans to better support SMBs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform offers flexible deployment options including cloud, hybrid, and on-premise solutions, but its technical support is inconsistent. Flowgear is primarily cloud-oriented and praised for its responsive, client-centric support, offering personalized assistance that outshines many competitors.

Pricing and ROI: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is known for its high costs and complex licensing, which can challenge smaller enterprises despite its feature set. Flowgear offers a more affordable and accessible pricing model, delivering significant value in its basic packages, making it a strong candidate for cost-effective integration solutions for small to mid-sized businesses.

To learn more, read our detailed Flowgear vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Flowgear vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Flowgear

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

23rd

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Message Queue (MQ) Software (4th), Business-to-Business Middleware (1st), Workload Automation (8th), Cloud Data Integration (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of Flowgear is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is 11.2%, down from 16.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

Featured Reviews

Yugan Pillay

DevOps Engineer at Astute

A nice interface and good training with helpful data transformation connectors

The data transformation and use of the pre-connectors have been really useful. We are able to clean and convert files before data is ingested into SQL. The workflow allows us to find errors and fix them as well easily. The interface is really nice and easy to learn. The workflow process helps us save time when we need to figure out which part of the workflow is failing. The time spent on fixing issues is reduced drastically. The data transformation connectors are really nice since we are able to work with data in any format. The training material is really good.

Read full review

Vijay Subramanyam

Delivery Head at cblsolutions

Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations

I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten; it is a highly scalable solution. We have around 200 end users using this solution in our company. We use it to its maximum capacity. However, it's not for P1 applications, but definitely for severity two cases (P2 level). It integrates critical applications, but it's not a platform that, if it stops, the entire system would come down. So, it's more like a severity two level. However, it has the potential to eventually become a P1 platform. Not exactly P1 applications, but a P1 platform. Because now we are still in the transition to migrate everything, all the integrations to Mule Anypoint Platform. But once it's done, then this platform becomes critical. Because even now, we have point-to-point connections.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The no-code visual front end, along with pre-built samples, allows someone with very little technical ability to get an integration up and running."

"Being able to seamlessly make changes to how one can do mapping visually without having to be a seasoned developer is great."

"Great for data flow."

"It has improved our integration with our data supplier."

"The Flowgear tool is helping us reduce the manual work that is done."

"The solution has increased efficiency and productivity and saved us time and money."

"Well-managed version control of workflows and the simplicity in promoting workflows through each environment has aided my team in developing workflows for various environments without the risk of losing development work."

"The product’s ability to seamlessly translate protocols is great."

"Mule Anypoint Platform's valuable features are its flexibility in terms of deployment and its SaaS capabilities."

"It's easy to use and comes as a bundle package with the Anypoint Platform, removing the need for any complex setup."

"The most valuable feature of Mule Anypoint Platform is rapid development."

"The product is very user-friendly."

"Overall, it is a pretty good product. It is also very scalable."

"The community manager is the standout feature of the Mule Anypoint Platform, as it provides a platform to showcase your API to external parties. It is exceptionally user-friendly and enables external parties to easily utilize and consume the APIs."

"We use simple queues and exchanges to route messages to multiple queues. The publish/subscribe model is also helpful."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pros

Cons

"We would like to see more learning videos for beginners."

"The product would be nice if it could provide the deployment features in the lower packages."

"The product needs to improve the self-help tools and samples."

"The software itself needs to keep up with the daily demand to service all clients as the need arises."

"Currently, when designing and testing larger workflows, the sessions timeout and re-authentications are frequently required."

"The UI could be improved."

"The initial setup was a bit complex as we were new."

"The customer service is not good enough"

"The platform's data integration tools need improvement on the processing side."

"What I hear from my customers is that it's very expensive compared to the cost of other integration suites. The cost keeps increasing. MuleSoft should come up with customization factors by using a different way of getting the cost-related stuff to attract customers. That is, they should come up with some cost optimizations."

"The stability could be better."

"Mule Anypoint Platform should improve its pricing. In my experience, a customer using the sandbox version couldn't upgrade to the final version because it exceeded their budget. Another area for improvement is the login mechanism. We need to integrate with third-party products for strong authentication, but it would be better if MuleSoft had its own robust login mechanism."

"The solution is very costly. The solution should provide a package with fewer capabilities at a lower price for specific companies that don’t have a big IT budget. Not every customer requires all the capabilities of the software. It will be a good fit in the market, and they will easily sell it more."

"An on-premise setup requires special skills and you need a lot of professional services."

"There is not much information on the internet...The transforming message is an area in the solution that needs to be improved."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Mule Anypoint Platform pricing is slightly higher compared to Dell Boomi."

"The solution's pricing, as per the old approach, is expensive."

"The tool is heavily bundle-priced. I rate the solution’s pricing five on a scale of ten, where one is expensive, and ten is cheap."

"The solution has a high price."

"Mule Anypoint Platform is an expensive solution."

"Making changes in Anypoint MQ is expensive."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing as four or five out of ten."

"The product's price seems to be competent in comparison to other products in the market."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Educational Organization

22%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Flowgear?

Great for data flow.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Flowgear?

I think the UI could be improved.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Flowgear?

We use it for bringing data into Salesforce, it deals with data flow, bringing in data from a third-party source into our CRM. I'm a CX specialist and we are customers of Flowgear.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Mule Anypoint Platform?

I architected solutions using Oracle SOA/OSB, Spring Boot, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes; What I see is though if you are an enterprise and have enough money th...

See all answers

How does TIBCO BusinessWorks compare with Mule Anypoint Platform?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether TIBCO BusinessWorks or Mule Anypoint platform integration and connectivity software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mule...

See all answers

What can Mule Anypoint Platform be used for and what do you use it for most often?

This is a very flexible solution that comes with multiple uses. My organization mostly uses Mule Anypoint Platform for API management, as it lets us build new APIs easily and design new interfaces...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Redwood RunMyJobs vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 17% of the time

Tidal by Redwood vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Apache Kafka vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 6% of the time

ActiveMQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 6% of the time

IBM MQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Flowgear

April 2025

Download Flowgear product report

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

March 2025

Download MuleSoft Anypoint Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Data Integrator, Anypoint MQ

Overview

Flowgear enables companies of all sizes to increase efficiency and reduce cost by integrating their apps, services, API’s and databases. No coding with 200+ pre-built connectors, reusable workflows and APIs.

Flowgear

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is used for integration and API management, connecting enterprise applications across retail, e-commerce, and supply chain. It supports cloud-to-cloud and cloud-to-on-premises scenarios with real-time and asynchronous messaging.

Users leverage MuleSoft Anypoint Platform for diverse integrations including cloud-based and on-premises, enabling data transformations, middleware functions, and hybrid integrations. It seamlessly connects systems like SAP, Salesforce, and Oracle, facilitating data transfers and integrating legacy systems. The platform offers a graphic interface, quick implementation, and a variety of connectors, contributing to its popularity for robust and scalable solutions. Despite its strengths, users seek better technical support, more connectors, simplified runtime management, and improved documentation.

What are the key features of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform?

Marketplace for integration platforms: Provides pre-built connectors and templates.
API management: Efficient management and monitoring of APIs.
Graphic interface: User-friendly design for ease of use.
Monitoring capabilities: Comprehensive monitoring and observability features.
Quick implementation: Rapid deployment of integrations and APIs.
Pre-built templates: Ready-to-use templates for common integrations.
Stability and performance: Reliable and high-performing platform.
Data transformation with DataWeave: Powerful tool for data mapping and transformation.
Support for hybrid deployments: Flexibility to integrate cloud and on-premises systems.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Increased connectivity: Seamless integration of multiple systems.
Operational efficiency: Streamlined processes and data flows.
Scalability: Ability to grow with business needs.
Cost savings: Reduced development time with pre-built components.
Enhanced visibility: Improved monitoring and management of integrations.

Enterprises in retail, e-commerce, and supply chain implement MuleSoft Anypoint Platform to connect various applications and systems. It supports real-time messaging for inventory management, synchronizes customer data across platforms, and integrates with legacy systems for smooth data migration. Users benefit from quick deployments and a marketplace that accelerates integration projects.

Salesforce

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

VMware, Gucci, MasterCard, Target, Time Inc, Hershey's, Tesla, Spotify, Office Depot, Intuit, CBS, Amtrak, Salesforce, Gap, Ralph Lauren

Buyer's Guide

Flowgear vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

March 2025

Free Report: Flowgear vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Flowgear vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Flowgear vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform report.

See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.