Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ForgeRock vs Ubisecure Identity Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

ForgeRock
Ranking in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
30
Ranking in other categories
Identity Management (IM) (10th), Access Management (6th)
Ubisecure Identity Platform
Ranking in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
18th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (44th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) category, the mindshare of ForgeRock is 12.1%, up from 9.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ubisecure Identity Platform is 0.8%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
 

Featured Reviews

Trisha Bhola - PeerSpot reviewer
It's easier to customize and maintain our code
I worked on two different projects based on ForgeRock, and both are automated deployments. One is a UI-based deployment. It's an automated process using some scripts. The deployments are done through Octopus, so it's also automated. We first deploy the essential components of AM and then implement additional configurations like Amster Imports. After that, we import all the SAML Federation data and add some certificates. We have two teams of five and three team members working on the different deployment processes. One is working on the dev side, another is looking at the higher environment, and one is managing the data. In another project, I'm the only developer. We also deploy on the dev environments so that anyone can test new features, configurations, and client requirements. They can test it on the dev environment, but a team of four people manages higher environments. The Access Management component involves the most customization, which takes around 15 to 20 minutes because of the need to import the Amster configuration. If another deployment is simultaneously happening, it may be a little slower and take around 30 minutes. The other components, like the user data stores, take about five to seven minutes. It's another five to 10 minutes for Identity Management. After deployment, the maintenance is mostly checking for security vulnerabilities. If ForgeRock shares security vulnerabilities or advisories, we check to see if there is something inside we need to maintain. Other than that, we just install updates when they add features each month.
Use Ubisecure Identity Platform?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
23%
Computer Software Company
12%
Insurance Company
8%
Government
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ForgeRock?
The most valuable features of ForgeRock are social login and data protection.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ForgeRock?
Our company was considering switching back to Keycloak from ForgeRock, so as to not pay any license fees. ForgeRock also supports M-PIN and biometric features that Keycloak does not provide. My com...
What needs improvement with ForgeRock?
In the past, I saw that Splunk was integrated with a testing portal, and then it was integrated with Slack. I don't think ForgeRock directly supports integrations with Slack, making it an area wher...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

ForgeRock Identity Platform, ForgeRock OpenIDM
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Geico, Thomson Reuters, Salesforce, McKesson, Trinet, SKY, BNP Paribas, Deloitte, Capgemini, North Western University
S Group, SokoPro, Finnish Goverment, Ecraft, Grano
Find out what your peers are saying about Auth0, Ping Identity, Omada and others in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM). Updated: December 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.