Fortify Static Code Analyzer vs Klocwork comparison

OpenText and Perforce are both solutions in the Static Code Analysis category. OpenText is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.2, while Perforce is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.3. OpenText holds a 25.1% mindshare in SCAS, compared to Perforce’s 5.7% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Perforce users who would recommend it.

Fortify Static Code Analyzer

Read 16 Fortify Static Code Analyzer reviews

1,829 Views
1,289 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Klocwork

Read 20 Klocwork reviews

710 Views
431 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Fortify Static Code Analyzer

Klocwork

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Klocwork and Fortify Static Code Analyzer are both key players in static code analysis, competing primarily in software security. Klocwork is favored for affordability and rapid customer support response, while Fortify Static Code Analyzer gains the upper hand with its extensive security features and solid long-term ROI.

Features: Klocwork provides strong security vulnerability detection, supports efficient integrations, and offers on-the-fly analysis plugins for development tools. Fortify Static Code Analyzer excels in providing deep security insights, integrates easily with multiple IDEs, and supports extensive language options.

Room for Improvement: Klocwork may improve by reducing false positives, expanding language support further, and enhancing its GUI for a more intuitive user experience. Fortify can benefit from easier initial setup, streamlined integration processes, and reducing resource intensity for optimal performance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Klocwork is known for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service, ensuring users can resolve issues quickly. Conversely, Fortify Static Code Analyzer involves a more intricate setup but offers comprehensive support to navigate its deployment complexity, allowing detailed configurations.

Pricing and ROI: Klocwork offers more budget-friendly pricing, providing a quicker ROI due to its lower upfront costs and effective features. Fortify Static Code Analyzer has higher initial costs but delivers significant long-term ROI with its robust security benefits and in-depth functionalities, appealing to larger enterprise clients.

To learn more, read our detailed Fortify Static Code Analyzer vs. Klocwork Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Fortify Static Code Analyzer vs. Klocwork

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 831,158 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortify Static Code Analyzer

Ranking in Static Code Analysis

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Klocwork

Ranking in Static Code Analysis

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (23rd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (16th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Static Code Analysis category, the mindshare of Fortify Static Code Analyzer is 25.1%, up from 19.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Klocwork is 5.7%, down from 6.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Code Analysis

Featured Reviews

Vishal Dhamke

Vice President Application Security North America at BNP Paribas

An expansive platform that comes with a comprehensive set of security rules and patterns to identify vulnerabilities

Setting up Fortify Static Application Security Testing (SAST) involves several steps to ensure that the tool is correctly configured and integrated into your development workflow say for instance Installation, License Activation, User Access and Permissions, Integration with Development Environment, Project Configuration, Custom Rules and Policies, etc. The initial setup is very easy, have used the enterprise version and a standalone version. The enterprise version definitely takes an ample amount of time to deploy because it needs to have a server along with other logistics in place along with a proper RBAC. The enterprise version would take an ample amount of time, but the standard version is just a few clicks. A team of four to five people is required for the maintenance and frequent updates are required to keep all the signatures up to date. I would rate the setup a nine out of ten.

Read full review

AnirbanSarkar

Head - Solution Management Group at Meteonic Innovation Pvt. Ltd.

Lets you find defects during the development phase, so you don't have to wait till the development is over to find and address flaws

What needs improvement in Klocwork, compared to other products in the market, is the dashboard or reporting mechanisms that need to be a bit more flexible. The Klocwork dashboard could be improved. Though it's good, it's not as good as some of the other products in the market, which is a problem. The reporting could be more detailed and easier to sort out because sorting in Klocwork could be a bit more time-consuming, mainly when sorting defects based on filters, compared to how it's done on other tools such as Coverity. What I'd like added in the next release of Klocwork is the peer code review Cahoots which used to be a part of Klocwork, and the architecture analysis and both have been taken out of Klocwork. I found the two critical for specific deployments, so if those can be brought back to Klocwork, that would be very good.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The Software Security Center, which is often overlooked, stands out as the most effective feature."

"The reference provided for each issue is extremely helpful."

"Automating the Jenkins plugins and the build title is a big plus."

"The integration Subset core integration, using Jenkins is one of the good features."

"I like Fortify Software Security Center or Fortify SSC. This tool is installed on each developer's machine, but Fortify Software Security Center combines everything. We can meet there as security professionals and developers. The developers scan their code and publish the results there. We can then look at them from a security perspective and see whether they fixed the issues. We can agree on whether something is a false positive and make decisions."

"It's helped us free up staff time."

"Fortify Static Code Analyzer's most valuable features are its ability to provide best practices for fixing code and its examples and capabilities to address security problems in the code. It effectively identifies security vulnerabilities by analyzing the code and offering insights on improving it."

"The most valuable features include its ability to detect vulnerabilities accurately and its integration with our CI/CD pipeline."

More Fortify Static Code Analyzer pros

"The tool helps the team to think beforehand about corner cases or potential bugs that might arise in real-time."

"We like using the static analysis and code refactoring, which are very valuable because of our requirements to meet safety critical levels and reliability."

"One can increase the number of vendors, so the solution is scalable."

"Klocwork's most valuable feature is the static code analysis feature. It detects the potential problem earlier to allow the developer to receive feedback quickly and then address it before it becomes a problem."

"I like not having to dig through false positives. Chasing down a false positive can take anywhere from five minutes for a small easy one, then something that is complicated and goes through a whole bunch of different class cases, and it can take up to 45 minutes to an hour to find out if it is a false positive or not."

"The reporting helps us understand the trend of our results and whether we improve over time. We can see the history within Klocwork's server architecture and know that we're making things better. It creates a great story for our management. We can demonstrate value and how our software is developing over time."

"There is a central Klocwork server at our headquarter in France so we connect the client directly to the server on-premises remotely."

"The most valuable feature of Klocwork is finding defects while you're doing the coding. For example, if you have an IDE plug-in of Klocwork on Visual Studio or Eclipse, you can find the faults; similar to using spell check on Word, you can find out defects during the development phase, which means that you don't have to wait till the development is over to find the flaws and address the deficiencies. I also find language support in Klocwork good because it used to support only C, C++, C#, and Java, but now, it also supports Java scripts and Python."

More Klocwork pros

Cons

"Streamlining the upgrade process and enhancing compatibility would make it easier for us to keep our security tools up-to-date."

"Fortify Static Code Analyzer has a bit of a learning curve, and I don't find it particularly helpful in narrowing down the vulnerabilities we should prioritize."

"The pricing is a bit high."

"The product shows false positives for Python applications."

"The generation of false positives should be reduced."

"Fortify's software security center needs a design refresh."

"The price can be improved."

"The troubleshooting capabilities of this solution could be improved. This would reduce the number of cases that users have to submit."

More Fortify Static Code Analyzer cons

"We'd like to see integration with Agile DevOps and Agile methodologies."

"I would like to see better codes between projects and a more user-friendly desktop in the next release."

"Klocwork has to improve its features to stay ahead of other free solutions."

"I believe it should support more languages, such as Python and JavaScript."

"The main problem is that since it only parses the code, the warnings or the problems that are given as a result of the report can sometimes require a lot of effort to analyze."

"Every update that we receive requires of us a lengthy and involved process."

"We bought Klocwork, but it was limited to one little program, but the program is now sort of failing. So, we have a license for usage on a program that is sort of failing, and we really can't use the license on anything else."

"The way to define the rules is too complex. The definition/rules for static analysis could be automated according to various SILs, so as to avoid confusion."

More Klocwork cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing is expensive and is in the 50K range."

"I rate the pricing of Fortify Static Code Analyzer as a seven out of ten since it is a bit expensive."

"The setup costs and pricing for Fortify may vary depending on the organization's needs and requirements."

"It has a couple of license models. The one that we use most frequently is called their flexible deployment. We use this one because it is flexible and based on the number of code-contributing developers in the organization. It includes almost everything in the Fortify suite for one developer price. It gives access to not just the secure code analyzer (SCA) but also to FSC, the secure code. It gives us accessibility to scan central, which is the decentralized scanning farm. It also gives us access to the software security center, which is the vulnerability management platform."

"Although I am not responsible for the budget, Fortify SAST is expensive."

"The price of Fortify Static Code Analyzer could be reduced."

"From our standpoint, we are significantly better off with Fortify due to the favorable pricing we secured five years ago."

"There is a licensing fee, and if you bring them to the company and you want them to do the installation and the implementation in the beginning, there is a separate cost. Similarly, if you want consultation or training, there is a separate cost. I see it as suitable only for enterprises. I do not see it suitable for a small business or individual use."

"Klocwork should not to be quite so heavy handed on the licensing for very specific programs."

"Licensing fees are paid annually, but they also have a perpetual license."

"The pricing for Klocwork is very competitive if you compare it from apple to apple. It has competitive pricing regarding the licensing model and the per-license cost. Klocwork isn't a high-end investment for anyone deploying it; even SMBs can afford it. The Klocwork cost per user would depend on the license type, so I'm unable to mention a ballpark figure because it would depend on the type of installation and how the deployment will be, and the nodes to give an accurate calculation or figure. The total price depends on the package, so my company could never publish pricing for Klocwork on the website. My team first collects information from potential clients on the deployment scenario, project environment, etc., before suggesting a package for Klocwork. My rating for Klocwork in terms of pricing is a five because of its flexible license models. There's a license model for every type of organization, whether small, midsize, or enterprise, so it's a five out of five for me."

"Klocwork is still tight on their licensing. If Klocwork would loosen up on the licensing, and where the license could be used, and how many different programs could be run on it, then we have several development programs that I would love to be able to use it for going forward."

"There are other solutions on the market such as Microsoft Visual Studio. They have been adding more static code analysis features that come for free. It is getting better all the time. That is one of the possibilities is that we've been considering that we may stop using the Klocwork because it doesn't give us any added value."

"When it comes to licensing, the solution has two packages, one for a fixed and the other for a floating server, with the former being more cost effective than the latter."

"This solution offers competitive pricing."

"The limitation that we have is that Klocwork is licensed to certain programs, and if you want to license them to other programs, you have to pay more money."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Code Analysis solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

30%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Educational Organization

41%

Manufacturing Company

19%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Fortify Static Code Analyzer?

Integrating the Fortify Static Code Analyzer into our software development lifecycle was straightforward. It highlights important information beyond just syntax errors. It identifies issues like pa...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortify Static Code Analyzer?

I rate the pricing of Fortify Static Code Analyzer as a seven out of ten since it is a bit expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fortify Static Code Analyzer?

False positives need improvement in the future. Fortify's vulnerability remediation guidance helps improve code security, but I think they need to improve the focus of the solution, as it still Con...

See all answers

What do you like most about Klocwork?

It's integrated into our CI, continuous integration.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Klocwork?

Our purchasing department is responsible for tracking costs. It's one of the most widely used tools in our organization. It likely does not have a high price point. I don't have insights into licen...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Klocwork?

The main problem is that since it only parses the code, the warnings or the problems that are given as a result of the report can sometimes require a lot of effort to analyze. It will show all poss...

See all answers

Comparisons

Black Duck vs Fortify Static Code Analyzer

Compared 34% of the time

Snyk vs Fortify Static Code Analyzer

Compared 20% of the time

Veracode vs Fortify Static Code Analyzer

Compared 12% of the time

Sonatype Lifecycle vs Fortify Static Code Analyzer

Compared 9% of the time

More Fortify Static Code Analyzer Competitors

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Klocwork

Compared 40% of the time

Coverity vs Klocwork

Compared 31% of the time

Polyspace Code Prover vs Klocwork

Compared 13% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Klocwork

Compared 3% of the time

PVS‑Studio vs Klocwork

Compared 2% of the time

More Klocwork Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fortify Static Code Analyzer

December 2024

Download Fortify Static Code Analyzer product report

Buyer's Guide

Klocwork

January 2025

Download Klocwork product report

Also Known As

Fortify Static Code Analysis SAST

No data available

Learn More

OpenText

Perforce

Overview

Fortify Static Code Analyzer (SCA) utilizes numerous algorithms in addition to a dynamic intelligence base of secure coding protocols to investigate an application’s source code for any potential risk of malicious or dangerous threats. Additionally, the solution will prioritize the most critical concerns and give direction on how users can repair those concerns. This solution researches each and every potential route that workflow and data can travel to discover and repair all possible vulnerabilities. Fortify SCA allows users to create safe and secure software quickly. Users are able to discover potential security gaps more quickly with precise outcomes and repair them immediately.

Fortify Static Code Analyzer Benefits

CI/CD pipeline security: Fortify SCA integrates well with third-party tools such as ALM Octane, Atlassian Bamboo, Azure DevOps, Eclipse, Jenkins, and Jira. It offers real-time scan results, immediate recommendations, and collaborative auditing, and finds threats faster. It also discovers and prioritizes weaknesses to reduce risk.
Cost-effective: Improves coding actions by training users as they work to better understand the relationship of static application security testing (SAST). Fortify SCA is able to find more vulnerabilities than other solutions and delivers significantly fewer false positives.
Quick and reliable scanning: Fortify SCA will discover and eradicate weaknesses in byte, binary, or source code. SAST is able to stop the bulk of code issues at the start of development. The solution is able to discover 815 specific categories of risk, works through 27 programming languages and more than one million different APIs. Fortify SCA has a positive rate of 100% in the OWASP 1.2 benchmark.

Fortify Static Code Analyzer Features

Flexible deployment: Using Fortify On Demand, users can work in a complete SaaS environment. Fortify Hosted allows users to use on-premises and SaaS to work in a secure virtual space with complete control. Fortify-On-Prem gives users absolute control of the Fortify SCA solution.
Security assistant: Users have an interactive guide as they create code that provides risk analysis and anticipated outcomes. Security Assistant is an outstanding immediate feedback tool that gives instant results with significantly fewer false positives.
Audit assistant: This feature uses machine learning to reduce manual audit time while prioritizing the most important risks to users' networks. It provides automated audits in minutes. Any manual examinations are reduced, all issues are prioritized in accordance with organizational needs, and Fortify SCA consistently provides audit results to all projects.

Results from Real Users

“Fortify Static Code Analyzer tells us if there are any security leaks or not. If there are, then it's notifying us and does not allow us to pass the DevOps pipeline. If it finds everything's perfect, as per our given guidelines, then it is allowing us to go ahead and start it, and we are able to deploy it.” - Arun D., Senior Architect at a healthcare company.

“Its flexibility is most valuable. It is such a flexible tool. It can be implemented in a number of ways. It can do anything you want it to do. It can be fully automated within a DevOps pipeline. It can also be used in an ad hoc, special test case scenario and anywhere in between.” - Tom H., Director of Security at Merito

Klocwork detects security, safety, and reliability issues in real-time by using this static code analysis toolkit that works alongside developers, finding issues as early as possible, and integrates with teams, supporting continuous integration and actionable reporting.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

ACCESS Co Ltd, Risk-AI, Winbond Electronics, Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute, University of Southern California, Alebra Technologies, SIMULIA, Risk Management Solutions, Brigham Young University, SRD, HRL

Buyer's Guide

Fortify Static Code Analyzer vs. Klocwork

October 2024

Free Report: Fortify Static Code Analyzer vs. Klocwork

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortify Static Code Analyzer vs. Klocwork and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fortify Static Code Analyzer vs. Klocwork report.

See our list of best Static Code Analysis vendors.

We monitor all Static Code Analysis reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.