Fortinet FortiClient vs SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection comparison

The compared Fortinet and SonicWall solutions aren't in the same category. Fortinet is ranked #12 in EPP , with an average rating of 8.1, and holds a 1.8% mindshare in the category. SonicWall is ranked #28 in ATP , and holds a 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Fortinet users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SonicWall users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiClient and SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Fortinet FortiClient vs. SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection Report (Updated: March 2020).

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiClient vs. SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection

March 2020

Download the complete report

Helped 889,855 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Fortinet FortiClient	1.8%
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint	7.2%
CrowdStrike Falcon	6.3%
Other	84.7%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection	2.2%
Palo Alto Networks WildFire	7.5%
Microsoft Defender for Office 365	6.9%
Other	83.4%

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Kok Keong-Low

Senior Technical Manager at Flexaccel

Remote access has become seamless and secure while deployment remains simple for our users

Performance could be improved today. People are now moving toward SASE, which stands for Secure Access, Secure Edge Solution. Fortinet also has that offering, which would be easier since it operates through the cloud, acting as a first line of defense. When the user connects to the internet, they connect to the cloud first for posture assessment and monitoring before connecting to the outside world. The impact is significant because nowadays people are adopting SASE. During COVID time, many users were trying to connect back to their office, causing the performance or CPU utilization of the firewall to increase tremendously, which slowed down performance. I have not worked with endpoint telemetry in Fortinet FortiClient that could have been helpful for threat mitigation.

Read full review

MohammadAta

Technical Manager, NOC at TEXUM JORDAN

Has a good configuration but the price should be more competitive

Our primary use case of this solution is for security. It's a good solution but the price is high. It also has an easy configuration. The feedback that we get from our customers is that it's a good product. Our customers are mostly smaller enterprises. The price should be more competitive. I…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Its interface and pricing are most valuable. It is better than other vendors in terms of security."

"The normal protection was really effective, and we detected situations that if we didn't have Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, it's highly likely that we would have been affected, but it protected the infrastructure."

"The one feature of Palo Alto Networks Traps that our organization finds most valuable is the App ID service."

"If the user leaves our premises or network, Palo Alto Traps will still be on that endpoint and will still apply our policies."

"The solution doesn't need a high level of technical training."

"It integrates well into the environment."

"The management capabilities, allow an IT organization to get quite a good picture of attempted cyber attacks."

"The tool is designed to scale for large enterprises and handle large volumes of data."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"Fortinet FortiClient is not disruptive, and its interface is great; it has an in-built VPN, which is very useful."

"The VPN connection is the feature that I like the most."

"The most valuable features are malware detection, integrates well with other solutions, and ease of use for all users."

"This solution makes it easier to work from home."

"There is a lot of documentation available online."

"It works well and the performance is good."

"The solution is stable, we have not had any issues in the time we have been using it."

"Having a centralized console is a valuable feature. The Fortinet fabric is also very valuable where all different pieces talk together to secure our network and track the North, South, East, and West movement of files and data through our network."

More Fortinet FortiClient pros

"The reporting that you get from it is the most valuable feature. You can see it via the appliance itself, and also via the MySonicWall account for the registered device. You are able to select the file if it's malicious, and you can select it in the reporting and see what triggered it, and things like that. I found that to be quite useful."

"The ATP (Advanced Threat Protection) on scanning is the most valuable feature."

"Provides good protection and security."

"I enjoy SonicWall as a package, with a robust firewall solution that protects against zero-day threats, optimizes network traffic for critical applications, and offers easy setup and automation for enterprises as well as small businesses."

"We use it for protection against viruses and ransomware attacks."

"It also has an easy configuration. The feedback that we get from our customers is that it's a good product."

"The most valuable features of the product are the application filters, application policies, that block certain websites and allow bandwidth for others, those kinds of things."

"SonicWall came out with a new add-on; it was inexpensive to add on to the existing product that we already owned, so we added it."

More SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection pros

Cons

"They've been having some issues with updating their endpoint agents, and it has been quite frustrating."

"Cortex XDR could be improved with more GUI features."

"A little bit more automation would be nice."

"Cortex XDR is trickier to configure than other Palo Alto products. This is one area where we are not so satisfied."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is a very good product, but financially, it is very expensive, so the company should look into that area."

"It'll help if customization was easier."

"When it comes to core analysis, and security analysis, Cortex needs to provide more information."

"The playbooks could be improved to include more functionalities or actions."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"The endpoint side of FortiClient needs improvement, specifically the agent-based endpoint, which requires enhancements in detection and additional features to reduce bugs."

"They can improve the interface because it is very technical for a normal client to understand."

"Technical support has been a nightmare."

"One area for improvement in FortiClient is the speed of connectivity."

"The solution could improve by providing analytics or detailed reports."

"The pricing could use improvement. It should be cheaper."

"Its stability can be improved. It is not as reliable as I would like it to be. There are times when things don't work quite right. Our biggest pain point is not related to Fortinet FortiClient and the whole scheme of things. It is related to one of the additional services called FortiGuard. They are the arm that does all of the updates to definitions, keeps all the signatures updated, and responds to new threats and whatnot. What we have found is that they react quickly, but sometimes their solutions aren't compatible with all of the components of the Fortinet security suite, specifically around FortiSandbox."

"I haven't found that that solution does anything amazing."

More Fortinet FortiClient cons

"SonicWall had a recent layoff. This is a concern for us, because now we are missing the local presence from both the engineering and sales side."

"The setup needs improvement. It needs to be made more user-friendly."

"If anything at all, it would be some very minor updates that need to be done, but in terms of changes, nothing comes to mind."

"I would like to have better documentation before starting with deployment because the deployment is a bit complex."

"SonicWall should promote their roadmap and improve their marketing to customers."

"I would say the solution needs a much simpler user interface, but the functionality of the firewall is quite extensive."

"We would like to get immediate alerts from the alerting system without using third-parties."

"I would say the solution needs a much simpler user interface, but the functionality of the firewall is quite extensive. You need the user interface to be that way. However, if there was a way to make the user interface a little easier, that would be great."

More SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Traps pays for itself within the first 16 months of a three-year subscription. This is attributed to OPEX savings, as security teams spent less time trying to identify and isolate malware for analysis as a result of a reduction in malware incidents, false positives, and breach avoidance."

"The pricing seems fair, and I do like the licensing model. You use wherever they are, and it is elastic."

"It is cost-effective compared to similar solutions. It fits for the small businesses through to the big businesses."

"In terms of the cost Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is very expensive because we are a Mexican company and when you translate dollars to pesos the cost is very high. The solution is very expensive for Mexican companies. I understand that they have international prices, but I do not think it offsets the price enough for many companies in countries, such as Mexico. The amount it is reduced is not a massive percentage."

"If one wishes to work with another team or large number of users at a future point, he must purchase a license for them."

"The pricing is okay, although direct support can be expensive."

"I don't like that they have different types of licenses."

"The price of the solution could be reduced. I have customers that have voiced that the solution is good for the value but if I want to sell more of the solution the price reduction would help."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"As a technical team member, I am not responsible to look into the pricing matters. These aspects are typically handled by the management team, who have the authority to obtain the necessary licenses based on certain established principles."

"Pricing is an area that I would like to see improved, as it could be lower."

"The pricing is a six out of ten."

"Generally, Fortinet is not cheap. The features that are available for free are only for FortiClient VPN clients, not other solutions. It includes web security, antivirus, and one more feature."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"We are using the free version of this product."

"Licensing was free up to ten users and after that, it was pretty reasonable."

"The pricing is good because you get and end-to-end security solution in one package price."

More Fortinet FortiClient pricing and cost advice

"The best deal from SonicWall is to buy the HA pair. When you buy the initial one, you receive the second one at a significant discount. If there is an event and something happens to one firewall, then you have the second firewall to roll into. For the price, it's pretty to tough to beat and not a lot of other firewall vendors offer it. You battle for a discount on both. Where with SonicWall, if you buy one, the second one is at half price. It's pretty straightforward."

"We get our value for our money."

"When you compare it with other solutions, they are cheaper and more economical."

"It's thirty dollars per user and we have 30 users."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

889,855 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

17%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Media Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	45
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	48

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	59
Midsize Enterprise	23
Large Enterprise	25

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

How does Fortinet FortiClient compare with Open VPN Access Server?

Fortinet FortiClient is a feature-rich solution that is easy to use and deploy without sacrificing safety and securit...

See all answers

What's the difference between Fortinet's FortiEDR and FortiClient?

I suggest Fortinet’s FortiEDR over FortiClient for several reasons. For starters, FortiEDR guarantees solid protectio...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortinet FortiClient?

The solution is not cloud-based; it comes from the firewall itself.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection?

SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection needs to reconsider the pricing, especially in the cloud environment. Th...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection?

My main use case for SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection is that it helps us with sandboxing for analyzing a...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection?

I advise others looking into using SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection to consider that it is truly helpful ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 8% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

OpenVPN Access Server vs Fortinet FortiClient

Compared 14% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Fortinet FortiClient

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Fortinet FortiClient

Compared 4% of the time

Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum vs Fortinet FortiClient

Compared 3% of the time

Ivanti Connect Secure vs Fortinet FortiClient

Compared 3% of the time

More Fortinet FortiClient Competitors

Fortinet FortiSandbox vs SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection

Compared 21% of the time

Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection

Compared 16% of the time

Check Point SandBlast Network vs SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection

Compared 8% of the time

Barracuda CloudGen Firewall vs SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection

Compared 7% of the time

More SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

April 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiClient

April 2026

Download Fortinet FortiClient product report

Buyer's Guide

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

April 2026

SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection report

Download SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

FortiClient

No data available

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

FortiClient is a fabric agent that delivers endpoint protection, endpoint compliance, and secure access in a single, lightweight, lightweight client, providing visibility, information, and control to your endpoints. In addition, it enables secure, remote connectivity to the security fabric. It also integrates network and endpoint with segmentation and automation. FortiClient enables unified endpoint awareness by sharing endpoint telemetry with the security fabric. It is compatible with third-party EDR (endpoint detection and response and anti-malware solutions.

The FortiClient fabric agent can:

• Report on the status of a device, including firmware version and applications running.
• Send all suspicious files to a fabric sandbox.
• Enforce USB control, application control, URL filtering, and firmware upgrade policies.
• Provide application firewall service and malware protection.
• Enable devices to connect securely to the security fabric over either ZTNA tunnels or VPN (IPsec or SSL), both encrypted. The connection to the security fabric can be either a SASE service or a FortiGate next-generation firewall.

You can purchase FortiClient with one of three levels of capability:

Zero Trust security - The ZTNA edition enables both VPN and ZTNA encrypted tunnels, as well as USB device control and URL filtering.
Endpoint security - The EPP/APT edition adds AI-based NGAV (next-generation antivirus), application firewall, endpoint quarantine, and support for cloud sandbox.
Cloud-based endpoint security

Benefits and Features

• Fabric agent leverages integrations and provides telemetry information to the rest of the Fortinet security fabric.
• SAAS control and web/content filtering
• Dynamic access control helps with automation and simplifies compliance.
• Software inventory management enables visibility as well as management of licenses.
• Automated response detects and isolates any endpoints that may be compromised.
• ZTNA delivers better remote access and consistent application access policies
• Managed endpoint security services remotely assist with setup, configuration, deployment, vulnerability monitoring, and overall monitoring of endpoint security.

Reviews from Real Users:

PeerSpot users like that FortiClient is easy to use and integrates well with other solutions. They also appreciate the richness of its features and find it to be inexpensive in comparison to other products that require separate purchases for separate features.

Fortinet

SonicWall Capture, a cloud based service available with SonicWall firewalls, revolutionizes advanced threat detection and sandboxing with a multi-engine approach to stopping unknown and zero-day attacks at the gateway, and with automated remediation. Customers benefit from high security effectiveness, fast response times and reduced total cost of ownership.

SonicWall

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Black Gold Regional Schools, Amadeus Hospitality, Jefferson County, Chunghwa Telecom, City of Boroondara, Dimension Data

Wonder Cement, Foster Clark Products

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiClient vs. SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection

March 2020

Free Report: Fortinet FortiClient vs. SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet FortiClient vs. SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.

DOWNLOAD NOW

889,855 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fortinet FortiClient vs. SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection report.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.