Fortra's Intermapper vs PRTG Network Monitor comparison

Fortra and Paessler GmbH are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Fortra is ranked #82, while Paessler GmbH is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.6. Fortra holds a 0.2% mindshare in NMS, compared to Paessler GmbH’s 4.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Fortra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Paessler GmbH users who would recommend it.

Fortra's Intermapper

Read 4 Fortra's Intermapper reviews

355 Views
236 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

PRTG Network Monitor

Read 101 PRTG Network Monitor reviews

7,844 Views
5,253 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Fortra's Intermapper

PRTG Network Monitor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 24, 2024

PRTG Network Monitor and Fortra's Intermapper compete in the network monitoring solutions category. PRTG Network Monitor has the upper hand in user-friendly pricing and flexible monitoring capabilities, while Fortra's Intermapper excels in robust features and user satisfaction, indicating a high perceived value.

Features: PRTG Network Monitor is versatile, supports a wide range of devices and systems, and has a flexible alerting system designed for proactive monitoring. Fortra's Intermapper offers real-time network mapping, exceptional visualization capabilities, and detailed insights into network topology, setting it apart with its depth of network analysis.

Room for Improvement: PRTG could enhance its visual representation and extend its feature set for complex network analysis. Intermapper might improve its initial deployment ease and reduce manual configuration requirements. Both systems could refine their dashboards for better intuitive use and extend integration options for third-party tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PRTG Network Monitor offers seamless deployment, aided by a setup wizard and strong customer support known for prompt responses. In contrast, Intermapper's setup can require more manual configuration steps, though it provides extensive documentation for those preferring self-service options.

Pricing and ROI: PRTG Network Monitor presents scalable licensing with low initial costs, offering compelling ROI due to its inclusion of multiple functionalities. Intermapper might have a higher setup cost, but justifies long-term investments with significant network management advantages, making it suitable for environments needing detailed network insights.

To learn more, read our detailed Fortra's Intermapper vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Fortra's Intermapper vs. PRTG Network Monitor

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 832,460 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortra's Intermapper

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

82nd

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

PRTG Network Monitor

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

101

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (6th), Cloud Monitoring Software (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Fortra's Intermapper is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PRTG Network Monitor is 4.0%, down from 5.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Andrian Lubimov

SVP of Networking and Operations at Skywire Networks

It tremendously cuts down our troubleshooting timeframe, but needs advanced SLA monitoring and reporting

They can do a better job with SLA reporting. It does some basic reporting, but it really doesn't offer the ability to monitor devices by groups, customers, or carrier to give an overall health performance of specifically-defined environments. That's where HelpSystems Intermapper could have done a better job. I would love to see advanced SLA monitoring and reporting in this solution. They already have a lot of ingredients. They already have SNMP polling. It is really about what people are looking for from SLA monitoring, especially someone who looks at the network topology. You want to see your endpoints. You want to see half of your endpoints by simply analyzing ICMP or SNMP-based availability of your endpoints. Having an ability to define your group and how you bring devices into your group would be a huge benefit.

Read full review

Tochukwu Uzomba

Solutions Architect at Boch Systems Company Limited

Efficiently monitor networks across regions with seamless setup and robust feature set

PRTG Network Monitor is easy to set up. Within a few minutes, it is operational. It is an all-in-one monitoring solution without extra costs. For example, we set it up for an insurance company with branches across Africa. We are able to monitor from Lagos without installing anything in the branches, using the agentless feature. We just put in the IP address and the parameter, and we monitor from those ends. Additionally, all the sensors are very useful. Most people are interested in the bandwidth monitoring sensor to see what bandwidth the users are consuming. The pricing is affordable compared to SolarWinds.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What is really cool about HelpSystems InterMapper is that because of its SNMP base, you can integrate all different makes and models on the same map. You, of course, can have more than one map, but you have an option to have visibility into the entire network from one centralized system. You can monitor IPs, routers, radios, DC power plants, and UPS. You can do it all from one network management and monitoring solution. That's what really makes HelpSystems Intermapper great. Another great thing about HelpSystems InterMapper is that you can really bundle different probes under one device. You can have a bundled device. You can monitor the physical status of a host based on the IP availability. You can also monitor services and actually see if anything happens. You can quickly determine whether it is the application layer, host layer, or network layer. HelpSystems Intermapper gives such a unique representation of a network. Ever since we started using HelpSystems InterMapper, we don't have to document everything in a detailed format and store it somewhere. Right now, it is really a combination of network topology, network monitoring, and network analyzing. So, in my opinion, it is awesome. When you have your SNMP topology defined, you don't require a dedicated NMS engineer to manage your system, which is another great thing about HelpSystems InterMapper. I see how our operators get so excited by having the ability to map a device or interface and connect interfaces together. HelpSystems InterMapper is also very operator friendly; not just user friendly, but also operator friendly. This is a unique feature, and it works really great."

"It's all today portal-based which is a good feature for us."

"The most valuable features are its: log history, real-time monitoring capabilities, accuracy - the number of false positives is very low, and the mapping features."

"It's a nice graphical interface, a nice map, that relates Layer 1 to Layer 3, virtually instantly, to the Helpdesk support staff. It provides a default place to get critical information so we can deploy our staff."

"From a network point of view, we can see the state of the network, as well as bandwidth usage and downtime."

"Its initial setup process is fast and easy."

"Accessibility, ease of use (Web GUI, MobileApps). In general, compared with other software"

"The most valuable features of PRTG Network Monitor are user-friendly, and the graphical interface is good for all the network devices that are mapped in this organization. It's very easy to find reports for any devices that we are looking for."

"It allows us to directly add individual VMs independently."

"This solution provides us with the needed feedback on our IT infrastructure. It allows us to grab all the information from a single point of view."

"The most valuable feature of PRTG Network Monitor is real-time monitoring."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is being able to see things graphically."

More PRTG Network Monitor pros

Cons

"It's a smaller solution so tools are not as advanced as you would find in a larger solution"

"They can do a better job with SLA reporting. It does some basic reporting, but it really doesn't offer the ability to monitor devices by groups, customers, or carrier to give an overall health performance of specifically-defined environments. That's where HelpSystems Intermapper could have done a better job. I would love to see advanced SLA monitoring and reporting in this solution. They already have a lot of ingredients. They already have SNMP polling. It is really about what people are looking for from SLA monitoring, especially someone who looks at the network topology. You want to see your endpoints. You want to see half of your endpoints by simply analyzing ICMP or SNMP-based availability of your endpoints. Having an ability to define your group and how you bring devices into your group would be a huge benefit."

"I'd love to see more of the network management side of it coming back into it. If we were able to run scripts to bounce ports on switches, that would be great. It's asking a lot, but it's actually very doable because I do it through scripting into other products. If we could incorporate that directly into Intermapper, that would be fantastic."

"A room for improvement in PRTG Network Monitor is its sensors. Its application technology sensor, such as the IAS, .NET, etc., needs some improvement because it doesn't work as expected. For example, the IAS sensor doesn't give immediate information, and the information you get from it isn't of good value. The web GUI of PRTG Network Monitor also needs improvement because errors keep popping up if it's not been updated to the latest version. What I'd like to see in the next release of the tool is end-to-end topology mapping for the business model, and that should be required. There has to be a technical map. Technical mapping and topological creation are missing in PRTG Network Monitor, so I would like to see those in the future."

"PRTG Network Monitor can improve by having better integration with devices."

"Technical support is an area with concerns in PRTG Network Monitor, where improvements are required."

"There seems to be a big jump from the basic scan to the really thorough scan. There is a big jump in the quantity of sensors it uses for certain things. One minute you might get ten and then the next you get 200. There seems to be a big jump between the two at times."

"We run it in a cluster, so we have two that run together. The cluster behind it is sketchy at times."

"When you email the support team, they take three to seven days to respond and resolve simple issues."

"The automation should be improved."

"I've encountered a challenge in my functions, particularly in adding and printing."

More PRTG Network Monitor cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"PRTG Network Monitor is not that expensive, so I like it cost-wise. There's no additional cost apart from the standard licensing fees. On a scale of one to five, with one being the cheapest and five being the most expensive, I would rate the cost of PRTG Network Monitor a two."

"It is expensive."

"It is about £4,500 for the first year, then about another 15 to 20 percent annually after that. So, we are looking at about £1000 running costs a year. When you think about how much an outage costs per minute, it's negligible."

"We are satisfied with the price."

"There is a license to use PRTG Network Monitor and it is annually."

"It's a cost-efficient tool."

"We pay nothing for it. Its 100 sensors have allowed us to put a magnifying glass on some systems, providing an extra layer of detail. Therefore, our outgoing is nothing and our incoming is a lot of useful data that we can react to proactively."

"Our licensing costs are 10,000 euros over three years."

More PRTG Network Monitor pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

832,460 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user174738

IT Developer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

May 31, 2015

Nagios vs. Zabbix vs. PRTG vs. Spiceworks vs. Solarwinds Network Performance Monitor

I have researched a quite a few network monitoring tools which can be used for various monitoring purposes of not only the servers, but the intermediate routers as well. There are majorly three types of these softwares. Ones which are completely open-source, you can do almost anything you want…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

25%

Government

18%

University

Energy/Utilities Company

Educational Organization

54%

Computer Software Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

PRTG network monitor is one of the best tool i have ever used for the monitoring. It have auto discovery option. it avoid the configuring the device in PRTG. It automatically discover the device an...

See all answers

What do you like most about PRTG Network Monitor?

The tool is integrated with our email for the alerts.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PRTG Network Monitor?

The prices are very high for PRTG Network Monitor. That's why I'm using the free100 sensor license.

See all answers

Comparisons

Meraki Dashboard vs Fortra's Intermapper

Compared 54% of the time

Zabbix vs Fortra's Intermapper

Compared 46% of the time

More Fortra's Intermapper Competitors

LibreNMS vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 8% of the time

Zabbix vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 7% of the time

Centreon vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 7% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

Nagios XI vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

More PRTG Network Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

January 2025

Download Fortra's Intermapper product report

Buyer's Guide

PRTG Network Monitor

January 2025

Download PRTG Network Monitor product report

Also Known As

HelpSystems Intermapper

No data available

Overview

Fortra's software frees you up to focus on what matters most, aligning IT and business goals to help organizations build a competitive edge. Intermapper is network monitoring software for organizations who want to monitor their IT infrastructure in real time.

With Intermapper, you can visualize all your physical and virtual network components on a live map and get up-to-date performance data on its availability. Powerful and user-friendly, Intermapper helps leading businesses prevent costly outages and maximize uptime for 24/7 availability of network resources.

Features include flexible monitoring for anything with an IP address, free probes to monitor different types of equipment from various vendors, dynamic network mapping, bandwidth monitoring, real-time alerts, and remote access. Our add-on integration with Automate allows you to remediate network failures and conduct network self-healing.

Intermapper runs on Mac, Windows, and Linux.

Fortra

PRTG Network Monitor runs on a Windows machine within your network, collecting various statistics from the machines, software, and devices which you designate. PRTG comes with an easy-to-use web interface with point-and-click configuration. You can easily share data from it with non-technical colleagues and customers, including via live graphs and custom reports. This will let you plan for network expansion, see what applications are using most of your connection, and make sure that no one is hogging the entire network just to torrent videos.

To monitor a large IT environment, it's important to be able to scale PRTG up. Paessler PRTG Enterprise Monitor includes all the proven capabilities of PRTG Network Monitor, which are enhanced by exclusive ITOps Board for a service-oriented, central overview of multiple PRTG servers.

Paessler GmbH

Sample Customers

Greater Media Detroit, University of British Columbia, Don's Farm Supply

Jameson Bank, Sidnix, RungeICT, MedicalAnimal, Truck-lite, GamingGrids, The Covell Group, Forsythn County Schools, NetMass, Musgrove Park Hospital, Lanes Health, Columbia Southern University, Vodafone, Intrust Bank

Buyer's Guide

Fortra's Intermapper vs. PRTG Network Monitor

January 2025

Free Report: Fortra's Intermapper vs. PRTG Network Monitor

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortra's Intermapper vs. PRTG Network Monitor and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

832,460 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fortra's Intermapper vs. PRTG Network Monitor report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.