Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
PRTG Network Monitor Logo

Top 10 PRTG Network Monitor Alternatives

Vendor: Paessler GmbH
4.0 out of 5
3,902 followers
Start review

Top PRTG Network Monitor Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to PRTG Network Monitor based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Veeam Data Platform, Datadog, and Zabbix. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. PRTG Network Monitor surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive monitoring capabilities, customizable dashboards, and an intuitive interface, providing businesses with real-time insights and ensuring improved network performance and reliability.

Paessler GmbH Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Paessler GmbH, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Veeam Data Platform
4.3 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers rapid deployment and scalability, ideal for versatile network monitoring. In comparison, Veeam Data Platform excels with advanced backup features for complex data protection. PRTG benefits small setups, while Veeam is suited for robust data resilience.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. Veeam Data Platform Report
PRTG Network Monitor has a low initial setup cost making it cost-effective; compared to Veeam Data Platform which requires a higher investment upfront yet offers robust capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor has a low initial setup cost making it cost-effective; compared to Veeam Data Platform which requires a higher investment upfront yet offers robust capabilities.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers cost-effective deployment for on-premises, attracting smaller businesses with budget-conscious needs. In comparison, Datadog provides integration across modern infrastructures, appealing to those needing comprehensive cloud features but requiring careful budget management for higher upfront costs.
Download Datadog vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor has a one-time setup fee which can be cost-effective, while Datadog charges a recurring monthly setup cost, making it potentially more expensive over time.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor has a one-time setup fee which can be cost-effective, while Datadog charges a recurring monthly setup cost, making it potentially more expensive over time.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
Zabbix, with its open-source model, offers extensive customization at no cost, attracting budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor provides an intuitive setup with pre-configured sensors and professional support, making it appealing for those prioritizing ease of use and prompt assistance.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. Zabbix Report
Zabbix offers cost-effective setup, while PRTG Network Monitor provides a straightforward installation with varied pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
Zabbix offers cost-effective setup, while PRTG Network Monitor provides a straightforward installation with varied pricing.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers rapid deployment, scalable infrastructure monitoring, and cost-effective licensing, making it ideal for small to medium-sized environments. In comparison, New Relic provides deep application insights and robust cloud integrations, appealing to larger enterprises needing detailed performance monitoring.
Download New Relic vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers straightforward setup costs catering to smaller budgets, while New Relic presents a more complex setup that may incur higher expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers straightforward setup costs catering to smaller budgets, while New Relic presents a more complex setup that may incur higher expenses.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Azure Monitor
3.9 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Azure Monitor
3.9 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor is favored for its quick deployment and diverse sensor options, appealing to businesses seeking minimal customization. In comparison, Azure Monitor offers real-time analytics and strong cloud integration, making it ideal for those deeply invested in Azure cloud services.
Download Azure Monitor vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup with lower costs, while Azure Monitor may involve higher initial setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup with lower costs, while Azure Monitor may involve higher initial setup expenses.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Splunk AppDynamics
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Splunk AppDynamics
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics provides robust application performance management with deep insights into complex environments. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor delivers rapid deployment and scalability in network monitoring. Tech buyers might choose AppDynamics for comprehensive analytics or PRTG for effective infrastructure monitoring.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost, whereas PRTG Network Monitor offers a more economical setup, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost, whereas PRTG Network Monitor offers a more economical setup, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Elastic Observability
4.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor excels in rapid deployment and network monitoring with minimal customization, while Elastic Observability offers comprehensive logging and flexible integrations. In comparison, PRTG is favored for easy use, whereas Elastic attracts those seeking data analysis and open-source solutions.
Download Elastic Observability vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor often presents a lower initial setup cost compared to Elastic Observability, highlighting a more budget-friendly option for organizations looking to minimize upfront expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor often presents a lower initial setup cost compared to Elastic Observability, highlighting a more budget-friendly option for organizations looking to minimize upfront expenses.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
SolarWinds NPM
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
SolarWinds NPM
4.1 out of 5
SolarWinds NPM is ideal for those needing an extensive feature set and configuration flexibility. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor suits buyers prioritizing ease of use and cost-effectiveness, offering a comprehensive all-in-one package without additional fees.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. SolarWinds NPM Report
SolarWinds NPM involves a higher setup cost, attributed to its comprehensive feature set, while PRTG Network Monitor offers a more cost-effective setup, highlighting affordability and ease of installation.
View comparison
Pricing
SolarWinds NPM involves a higher setup cost, attributed to its comprehensive feature set, while PRTG Network Monitor offers a more cost-effective setup, highlighting affordability and ease of installation.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Cisco DNA Center
4.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Cisco DNA Center
4.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor is preferred for rapid deployment and cost-effectiveness, while Cisco DNA Center offers advanced automation and robust analytics. In comparison, PRTG focuses on ease of use, whereas Cisco provides deeper integration but is suited for larger enterprises due to its higher cost.
Download Cisco DNA Center vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor features a minimal initial setup cost, making it budget-friendly, whereas Cisco DNA Center involves significant initial investment, highlighting its comprehensive enterprise capabilities. These pricing aspects underscore the contrast between their budgetary and infr...
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor features a minimal initial setup cost, making it budget-friendly, whereas Cisco DNA Center involves significant initial investment, highlighting its comprehensive enterprise capabilities. These pricing aspects underscore the contrast between their budgetary and infr...
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
ThousandEyes
4.2 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
ThousandEyes
4.2 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers quick deployment and affordability, appealing to cost-conscious organizations with diverse sensor needs. In comparison, ThousandEyes provides detailed cloud and internet path monitoring, suited for enterprises needing extensive visibility and willing to invest in higher-priced solutions.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. ThousandEyes Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers competitive setup costs, while ThousandEyes may incur higher expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers competitive setup costs, while ThousandEyes may incur higher expenses.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Cisco Secure Network Analytics
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor attracts tech buyers with rapid deployment and cost-effective monitoring; it offers flexible and customizable sensors. In comparison, Cisco Secure Network Analytics suits those prioritizing network security and deep analytics with seamless Cisco integration and robust threat detection capabilities.
Download Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup process, while Cisco Secure Network Analytics may involve higher setup costs.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup process, while Cisco Secure Network Analytics may involve higher setup costs.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Nagios XI
4.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Nagios XI
4.0 out of 5
Nagios XI offers customization through plugins, ideal for those seeking tailored solutions. In comparison, PRTG's all-in-one package with pre-configured sensors is suited for quick deployments. Nagios appeals to Linux enthusiasts, while PRTG attracts users favoring ease and scalability.
Download Nagios XI vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
Nagios XI requires a higher initial setup cost with extensive configuration needs, while PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup with lower costs, highlighting a cost-effective option for users seeking a quick start.
View comparison
Pricing
Nagios XI requires a higher initial setup cost with extensive configuration needs, while PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup with lower costs, highlighting a cost-effective option for users seeking a quick start.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
SCOM
3.9 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
SCOM
3.9 out of 5
SCOM offers robust management for Microsoft applications with deep Windows integration, ideal for enterprises needing comprehensive dashboards. In comparison, PRTG provides ease of setup with versatile monitoring across systems, appealing to those valuing simplicity and affordability over extensive customization.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. SCOM Report
SCOM's setup cost is notably higher, requiring significant investment, whereas PRTG Network Monitor offers a more cost-effective setup, making it appealing for budget-conscious organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
SCOM's setup cost is notably higher, requiring significant investment, whereas PRTG Network Monitor offers a more cost-effective setup, making it appealing for budget-conscious organizations.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
ServiceNow IT Operations Management
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor is ideal for rapid setup and detailed network insights without extensive customization. In comparison, ServiceNow IT Operations Management suits enterprises needing a broad IT service management platform, offering robust integrations and a holistic IT operations view.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. ServiceNow IT Operations Management Report
PRTG Network Monitor has a low initial setup cost, while ServiceNow IT Operations Management tends to be more expensive. The cost difference may influence buyer preference based on budget flexibility.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor has a low initial setup cost, while ServiceNow IT Operations Management tends to be more expensive. The cost difference may influence buyer preference based on budget flexibility.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
LogicMonitor
4.5 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
LogicMonitor
4.5 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor excels with user-friendly features, making it a fit for diverse infrastructures and smaller environments. In comparison, LogicMonitor offers robust customizability for advanced monitoring needs. PRTG's cost-effective solution contrasts with LogicMonitor's premium pricing, reflecting its extensive capabilities.
Download LogicMonitor vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor requires a one-time setup cost that may appeal to those who prefer upfront investments, whereas LogicMonitor offers a flexible subscription model, highlighting a contrast in how these solutions approach initial cost structures.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor requires a one-time setup cost that may appeal to those who prefer upfront investments, whereas LogicMonitor offers a flexible subscription model, highlighting a contrast in how these solutions approach initial cost structures.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Centreon
4.2 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Centreon
4.2 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers rapid deployment and ease of installation with an all-in-one model appealing for quick visibility. In comparison, Centreon provides flexible customization and supports extensive integrations, ideal for users needing adaptable monitoring across complex environments.
Download Centreon vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a flexible pricing structure with an easy-to-understand setup process, while Centreon features a more complex setup cost that might involve additional professional services.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a flexible pricing structure with an easy-to-understand setup process, while Centreon features a more complex setup cost that might involve additional professional services.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Nagios Core
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Nagios Core
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor excels in rapid deployment and user-friendliness with integrated features. In comparison, Nagios Core is an open-source solution offering extensive customizability through plugins. A tech buyer might choose PRTG for its comprehensive package or Nagios for its cost-efficient flexibility.
Download Nagios Core vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers straightforward setup without additional costs, while Nagios Core, being open-source, has no setup fee but requires more manual configuration.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers straightforward setup without additional costs, while Nagios Core, being open-source, has no setup fee but requires more manual configuration.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Auvik Network Management (ANM)
4.4 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor excels in deployment speed and infrastructure compatibility, offering affordable licensing. In comparison, Auvik impresses with network discovery and remote access. PRTG faces large-scale deployment challenges, while Auvik could improve integration options.
Download Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup process with minimal costs involved, whereas Auvik Network Management (ANM) may require a more significant investment in time and resources for initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup process with minimal costs involved, whereas Auvik Network Management (ANM) may require a more significant investment in time and resources for initial setup.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Checkmk
4.2 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Checkmk
4.2 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers diverse, detailed monitoring capabilities with easy setup, making it ideal for large infrastructures. In comparison, Checkmk excels in resource and infrastructure monitoring for cost-efficient packages. PRTG's extensive sensors result in higher costs while Checkmk provides predictable pricing.
Download Checkmk vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor requires an initial setup fee, while Checkmk offers a more flexible setup cost structure. The main difference lies in PRTG's fixed cost versus Checkmk's variable pricing based on deployment needs.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor requires an initial setup fee, while Checkmk offers a more flexible setup cost structure. The main difference lies in PRTG's fixed cost versus Checkmk's variable pricing based on deployment needs.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Icinga
3.8 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Icinga
3.8 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor is chosen for its rapid deployment, scalability, and all-in-one feature set. In comparison, Icinga appeals through its open-source flexibility and strong plugin architecture, providing extensive customization options for those prioritizing integration and community-driven contributions.
Download Icinga vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor involves a higher setup cost, while Icinga offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor involves a higher setup cost, while Icinga offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
ScienceLogic
4.3 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
ScienceLogic
4.3 out of 5
ScienceLogic offers high customization and strong integration capabilities appealing to complex setups. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor emphasizes ease of use and quick setup, ideal for smaller environments. ScienceLogic demands a steeper learning curve, while PRTG provides predictable pricing benefits.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. ScienceLogic Report
ScienceLogic incurs higher setup cost than PRTG Network Monitor, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup. ScienceLogic provides advanced features as a justification for its cost, while PRTG appeals with affordability and simplicity.
View comparison
Pricing
ScienceLogic incurs higher setup cost than PRTG Network Monitor, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup. ScienceLogic provides advanced features as a justification for its cost, while PRTG appeals with affordability and simplicity.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
OpsRamp
4.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
OpsRamp
4.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor is ideal for those seeking quick deployment, affordability, and comprehensive real-time monitoring capabilities. In comparison, OpsRamp appeals to businesses focused on advanced integration and predictive analysis, providing AI-driven, cloud-native solutions for modern IT infrastructure management.
Download OpsRamp vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor typically exhibits lower setup costs compared to OpsRamp, which may have higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor typically exhibits lower setup costs compared to OpsRamp, which may have higher initial expenses.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
LibreNMS
1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
LibreNMS
1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor's comprehensive setup offers advanced features for complex monitoring needs, appealing to organizations investing in robust solutions. In comparison, LibreNMS's open-source model provides affordability and simplicity, making it attractive to budget-conscious buyers seeking essential network monitoring.
PRTG Network Monitor requires an upfront setup cost, unlike LibreNMS which offers a no-cost initial installation, highlighting cost differences between the two.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor requires an upfront setup cost, unlike LibreNMS which offers a no-cost initial installation, highlighting cost differences between the two.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Cisco Intersight
4.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Cisco Intersight
4.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers rapid deployment, scalability, and cost-effectiveness, ideal for smaller companies. In comparison, Cisco Intersight focuses on integration with cloud solutions and data center visibility, appealing to enterprises prioritizing cloud-centric management. Buyers choose based on scalability needs and cloud features.
Download Cisco Intersight vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Cisco Intersight has a more complex installation requiring higher initial investment. Comparing both, the significant difference lies in installation simplicity and associated costs.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Cisco Intersight has a more complex installation requiring higher initial investment. Comparing both, the significant difference lies in installation simplicity and associated costs.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
ITRS Geneos
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
ITRS Geneos
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor enables quick deployment and ease of use with out-of-the-box options for diverse infrastructures. In comparison, ITRS Geneos offers powerful customization capabilities and excels in real-time data integration, appealing to complex environments and industry-specific needs.
Download ITRS Geneos vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor has no setup cost, appealing to smaller budgets, while ITRS Geneos incurs a substantial initial investment. This cost distinction highlights PRTG's attractiveness for budget-conscious users compared to Geneos's targeted enterprise-level deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor has no setup cost, appealing to smaller budgets, while ITRS Geneos incurs a substantial initial investment. This cost distinction highlights PRTG's attractiveness for budget-conscious users compared to Geneos's targeted enterprise-level deployment.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
BMC TrueSight Operations Management
4.1 out of 5
BMC TrueSight excels in comprehensive event management with complex deployment, appealing to enterprises needing extensive features. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor offers easy setup and cost-effectiveness, ideal for companies seeking straightforward usability and scalable network monitoring.
Download BMC TrueSight Operations Management vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
BMC TrueSight Operations Management incurs significant setup costs, while PRTG Network Monitor offers a more affordable setup. Each product's cost structure distinctly reflects differences in initial investment required for deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
BMC TrueSight Operations Management incurs significant setup costs, while PRTG Network Monitor offers a more affordable setup. Each product's cost structure distinctly reflects differences in initial investment required for deployment.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE
4.1 out of 5
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE delivers extensive features like deep packet analysis for large-scale networks needing detailed insights. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor offers rapid deployment and affordability, appealing to businesses requiring straightforward monitoring. Both cater to different scales and complexities, addressing diverse network monitoring needs.
Download NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE involves a significant setup cost, while PRTG Network Monitor offers more budget-friendly initial pricing. This cost discrepancy underscores the varying financial commitments required for deploying these network management solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE involves a significant setup cost, while PRTG Network Monitor offers more budget-friendly initial pricing. This cost discrepancy underscores the varying financial commitments required for deploying these network management solutions.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
InfluxDB
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
InfluxDB
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers comprehensive monitoring with a simple setup and diverse sensor options, appealing to those needing rapid deployment. In comparison, InfluxDB efficiently handles time-series data integration, attracting buyers prioritizing scalability and integration with modern software like Grafana.
Download InfluxDB vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor features a straightforward setup process with clear instructions, while InfluxDB's setup requires more technical expertise, highlighting a significant difference in ease of initial deployment between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor features a straightforward setup process with clear instructions, while InfluxDB's setup requires more technical expertise, highlighting a significant difference in ease of initial deployment between the two solutions.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud
4.2 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers rapid deployment and user-friendliness suited for diverse infrastructures. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud excels in log searching and scalability. PRTG is cost-effective with perpetual licensing, while Splunk provides in-depth insights despite its higher cost.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a low initial setup cost, while Splunk Observability Cloud presents a higher setup investment. This significant difference influences budget considerations for users evaluating network monitoring solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a low initial setup cost, while Splunk Observability Cloud presents a higher setup investment. This significant difference influences budget considerations for users evaluating network monitoring solutions.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
VMware Aria Operations for Applications
4.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor excels in rapid deployment and cost-effectiveness with diverse sensors for infrastructure, ideal for small to medium enterprises. In comparison, VMware Aria Operations for Applications specializes in application performance management with comprehensive insights for resource planning, best for advanced application monitoring needs.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup process, typically at a lower initial cost, while VMware Aria Operations for Applications may involve higher setup expenses due to its comprehensive feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup process, typically at a lower initial cost, while VMware Aria Operations for Applications may involve higher setup expenses due to its comprehensive feature set.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)
4.2 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor is favored for its extensive sensor options, easy setup, and cost-effective deployment, particularly for smaller environments. In comparison, IBM SevOne excels in scalability and detailed real-time data analysis, ideal for complex networks requiring high-frequency polling and hybrid deployment models.
Download IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a more cost-effective setup, while IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) requires higher initial investment, underscoring a significant difference in setup costs.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a more cost-effective setup, while IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) requires higher initial investment, underscoring a significant difference in setup costs.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
WhatsUp Gold
3.9 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
WhatsUp Gold
3.9 out of 5
WhatsUp Gold offers a competitive pricing model and excels in real-time performance monitoring, appealing to cost-conscious businesses. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor's advanced sensors and scalable architecture attract tech-focused organizations seeking extensive customization and higher scalability.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. WhatsUp Gold Report
WhatsUp Gold generally involves a higher initial setup cost compared to PRTG Network Monitor, which often provides a more budget-friendly option with minimal upfront financial commitment.
View comparison
Pricing
WhatsUp Gold generally involves a higher initial setup cost compared to PRTG Network Monitor, which often provides a more budget-friendly option with minimal upfront financial commitment.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Meraki Dashboard
4.3 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Meraki Dashboard
4.3 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers rapid deployment and real-time monitoring with customizable sensors, ideal for scalable infrastructures. In comparison, Meraki Dashboard's cloud-based platform provides centralized management, appealing for ease of use across devices with a comprehensive yet costly offering.
Download Meraki Dashboard vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor typically involves higher setup costs compared to Meraki Dashboard, which tends to offer a more cost-effective initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor typically involves higher setup costs compared to Meraki Dashboard, which tends to offer a more cost-effective initial deployment.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
ManageEngine OpManager
4.0 out of 5
ManageEngine OpManager is praised for network device monitoring and automation, providing comprehensive integration and reporting. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor excels in alert accuracy and remote probe capability, making it a solid option for environments requiring extensive sensor and integration support.
Download ManageEngine OpManager vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
ManageEngine OpManager requires an initial setup cost, while PRTG Network Monitor offers a more straightforward setup process without additional fees. This distinction highlights the cost efficiency of PRTG in terms of setup resources.
View comparison
Pricing
ManageEngine OpManager requires an initial setup cost, while PRTG Network Monitor offers a more straightforward setup process without additional fees. This distinction highlights the cost efficiency of PRTG in terms of setup resources.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
DX Spectrum
4.2 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
DX Spectrum
4.2 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor emphasizes rapid deployment and ease of use, ideal for diverse IT infrastructures. In comparison, DX Spectrum provides detailed network visualization and device management, catering to enterprises with complex networks. PRTG offers cost-effectiveness, while DX Spectrum targets extensive management capabilities.
Download DX Spectrum vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
DX Spectrum has a higher setup cost compared to PRTG Network Monitor, which offers a more affordable initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
DX Spectrum has a higher setup cost compared to PRTG Network Monitor, which offers a more affordable initial deployment.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
ControlUp
4.3 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
ControlUp
4.3 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor attracts tech buyers for its scalability and cost-effectiveness, focusing on infrastructure adaptability. In comparison, ControlUp offers advanced user-end monitoring and real-time performance analysis, appealing to those seeking robust endpoint monitoring and comprehensive insights into user experiences.
Download ControlUp vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor requires a one-time setup cost, while ControlUp has a subscription-based setup fee structure, highlighting a fundamental pricing model difference.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor requires a one-time setup cost, while ControlUp has a subscription-based setup fee structure, highlighting a fundamental pricing model difference.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
HPE OneView
4.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
HPE OneView
4.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers quick deployment, user-friendliness, scalability, and cost-effective monitoring. In comparison, HPE OneView provides centralized infrastructure management, integrating seamlessly within HPE systems for efficient operations. Tech buyers might choose PRTG for its adaptability or HPE for comprehensive HPE-centric management.
Download HPE OneView vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor's setup cost is often deemed lower than HPE OneView, highlighting a cost-effective edge for budget-conscious users, while HPE OneView offers a more comprehensive setup at a higher initial expense.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor's setup cost is often deemed lower than HPE OneView, highlighting a cost-effective edge for budget-conscious users, while HPE OneView offers a more comprehensive setup at a higher initial expense.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Huawei eSight
3.7 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Huawei eSight
3.7 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers scalability and ease of deployment, making it ideal for varied infrastructures. In comparison, Huawei eSight is cost-effective for Huawei-centric systems but may face challenges in managing non-Huawei devices, emphasizing versatility and simplicity in its selection criteria.
Download Huawei eSight vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor usually has lower setup costs, making it more budget-friendly initially, whereas Huawei eSight can be more expensive to set up, reflecting its extensive feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor usually has lower setup costs, making it more budget-friendly initially, whereas Huawei eSight can be more expensive to set up, reflecting its extensive feature set.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance
4.4 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor suits diverse IT environments with ease of setup and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance offers robust integration into Cisco-centric environments. Each solution caters to different business needs, with PRTG focusing on flexibility and affordability, while Cisco emphasizes connectivity assurance.
Download Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor has a lower setup cost compared to Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance, offering a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment. Cisco's solution incurs higher initial expenses but includes advanced features tailored for large-scale networks.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor has a lower setup cost compared to Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance, offering a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment. Cisco's solution incurs higher initial expenses but includes advanced features tailored for large-scale networks.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Moogsoft
3.8 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Moogsoft
3.8 out of 5
PRTG is notable for rapid deployment and ease of setup, ideal for scalable SaaS infrastructures. In comparison, Moogsoft offers AI-driven event management, excelling in incident correlation. Tech buyers might choose PRTG for its reliability, while Moogsoft provides advanced AI features for comprehensive event analysis.
Download Moogsoft vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor requires a lower setup cost compared to Moogsoft, making it more budget-friendly for initial deployments. Moogsoft, however, offers advanced features that might justify its higher setup cost for larger enterprises.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor requires a lower setup cost compared to Moogsoft, making it more budget-friendly for initial deployments. Moogsoft, however, offers advanced features that might justify its higher setup cost for larger enterprises.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Cisco UCS Manager
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Cisco UCS Manager
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor provides a cost-effective, flexible solution for small to medium enterprises with extensive sensors and simple deployment. In comparison, Cisco UCS Manager offers advanced integration for larger organizations, emphasizing comprehensive management capabilities and robust hardware-software synergy, justifying its higher cost.
Download Cisco UCS Manager vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, providing simplicity for users, while Cisco UCS Manager involves a more complex and potentially costly installation process, focusing on comprehensive enterprise-level management solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, providing simplicity for users, while Cisco UCS Manager involves a more complex and potentially costly installation process, focusing on comprehensive enterprise-level management solutions.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Spiceworks
3.9 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Spiceworks
3.9 out of 5
Spiceworks is ideal for SMBs needing cost-effective inventory and help desk management. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor offers comprehensive monitoring features and flexible deployment for diverse infrastructures. Spiceworks excels in simplicity, while PRTG provides detailed infrastructure monitoring with a scalable pricing model.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. Spiceworks Report
Spiceworks offers a free setup, making it cost-effective, while PRTG Network Monitor involves an initial setup cost, reflecting its comprehensive features and scalability.
View comparison
Pricing
Spiceworks offers a free setup, making it cost-effective, while PRTG Network Monitor involves an initial setup cost, reflecting its comprehensive features and scalability.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
LiveAction LiveNX
3.4 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
LiveAction LiveNX
3.4 out of 5
LiveAction LiveNX provides advanced visualization and analytics, ideal for networks needing detailed insights. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor offers versatility with its sensors and alert systems, featuring easy integration and lower costs appealing to budget-conscious organizations.
Download LiveAction LiveNX vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
LiveAction LiveNX requires a higher initial setup cost compared to PRTG Network Monitor, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
LiveAction LiveNX requires a higher initial setup cost compared to PRTG Network Monitor, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
vRealize Network Insight
4.3 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers rapid deployment, ease of use, and cost-effectiveness, making it ideal for straightforward monitoring. In comparison, vRealize Network Insight provides deep network flow visualization and extensive application insights, appealing to those managing complex network environments.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. vRealize Network Insight Report
PRTG Network Monitor has a straightforward setup cost, ensuring affordability, while vRealize Network Insight features a higher setup cost, suggesting a more intensive initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor has a straightforward setup cost, ensuring affordability, while vRealize Network Insight features a higher setup cost, suggesting a more intensive initial investment.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
OpenNMS
1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
OpenNMS
1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor is renowned for ease of use and comprehensive notification systems, ideal for smaller networks. In comparison, OpenNMS offers scalability and fault management, preferred by large-scale environments, providing flexibility for those investing time in configuration.
PRTG Network Monitor offers a cost-effective setup with straightforward pricing, while OpenNMS provides a flexible, open-source option that may require more complex initial configuration, highlighting distinct approaches to network monitoring solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a cost-effective setup with straightforward pricing, while OpenNMS provides a flexible, open-source option that may require more complex initial configuration, highlighting distinct approaches to network monitoring solutions.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
AppNeta by Broadcom
4.3 out of 5
AppNeta by Broadcom focuses on end-user experience with effective pricing and robust customer service. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor offers feature-rich device monitoring and adaptability, catering to diverse network environments, making it ideal for enterprises prioritizing extensive customization and long-term value.
Download AppNeta by Broadcom vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
AppNeta by Broadcom involves a higher initial setup cost, while PRTG Network Monitor offers a more budget-friendly setup.
View comparison
Pricing
AppNeta by Broadcom involves a higher initial setup cost, while PRTG Network Monitor offers a more budget-friendly setup.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Dell CloudIQ
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Dell CloudIQ
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers rapid deployment and flexibility for diverse infrastructures, appealing to those seeking scalability. In comparison, Dell CloudIQ is ideal for Dell hardware integration, though its applicability in heterogeneous environments is limited. PRTG enables cost-effective solutions, while Dell CloudIQ offers bundled benefits with Dell setups.
Download Dell CloudIQ vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers relatively low setup costs with straightforward implementation, while Dell CloudIQ involves higher setup expenses due to its complex integration requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers relatively low setup costs with straightforward implementation, while Dell CloudIQ involves higher setup expenses due to its complex integration requirements.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Flowmon
4.3 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Flowmon
4.3 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor is praised for customizable alerts and competitive pricing, appealing to budget-conscious IT teams. In comparison, Flowmon offers advanced traffic analysis and anomaly detection, attracting enterprises prioritizing intricate network insights despite a higher price point.
Download Flowmon vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor's setup cost is straightforward and often lower, while Flowmon may involve a higher initial investment due to advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor's setup cost is straightforward and often lower, while Flowmon may involve a higher initial investment due to advanced features.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
eG Enterprise
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
eG Enterprise
4.1 out of 5
eG Enterprise excels in end-to-end infrastructure monitoring with cost-effective licensing options, making it appealing for users needing comprehensive visibility. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor's rapid deployment and scalability are ideal for those requiring intuitive dashboards and robust network insights.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. eG Enterprise Report
eG Enterprise entails significant initial setup costs, while PRTG Network Monitor offers a more streamlined approach with lower costs, highlighting a critical difference in entry barriers for budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
eG Enterprise entails significant initial setup costs, while PRTG Network Monitor offers a more streamlined approach with lower costs, highlighting a critical difference in entry barriers for budget-conscious users.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Pandora FMS
4.6 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Pandora FMS
4.6 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor excels in rapid deployment with comprehensive monitoring. In comparison, Pandora FMS offers significant customization and strong integration capabilities. PRTG is ideal for straightforward setups, while Pandora FMS suits complex environments seeking flexibility and open-source customization.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. Pandora FMS Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup cost, while Pandora FMS requires a more flexible investment.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup cost, while Pandora FMS requires a more flexible investment.

Related categories

Network Monitoring Software
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
Cloud Monitoring Software