Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
PRTG Network Monitor Logo

Top 10 PRTG Network Monitor Alternatives

Vendor: Paessler GmbH
4.1 out of 5
4,238 followers
Post review

Top PRTG Network Monitor Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to PRTG Network Monitor based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Datadog, Zabbix, and New Relic. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. PRTG Network Monitor surpasses its competitors by offering an intuitive interface, real-time insights, customizable alerts, and broad protocol compatibility, enabling seamless network management and ensuring peak performance and reliability for IT infrastructures globally.

Paessler GmbH Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Paessler GmbH, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers features like customizable dashboards and extensive reporting, ideal for small to medium-sized enterprises. In comparison, Datadog excels in cloud monitoring and real-time data analytics, making it suitable for larger organizations seeking superior cloud integration and comprehensive support.
Download Datadog vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor has a lower initial setup cost compared to Datadog, but Datadog provides more advanced monitoring capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor has a lower initial setup cost compared to Datadog, but Datadog provides more advanced monitoring capabilities.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Zabbix
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Zabbix
4.1 out of 5
Zabbix offers open-source cost-efficiency with advanced monitoring and third-party tool integration. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor provides ease of use and all-in-one features suited for less complex environments. Zabbix appeals with scalability, while PRTG's intuitive design attracts those wanting simple deployment.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. Zabbix Report
Zabbix has a higher initial setup cost compared to PRTG Network Monitor, which offers a more budget-friendly setup, making it a more attractive option for cost-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
Zabbix has a higher initial setup cost compared to PRTG Network Monitor, which offers a more budget-friendly setup, making it a more attractive option for cost-conscious users.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers rapid deployment and robust network monitoring with scalability and affordable pricing. In comparison, New Relic excels in real-time application monitoring and integration capabilities, making it suitable for DevOps environments seeking deep application performance insights, despite higher costs.
Download New Relic vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor has a straightforward setup cost structure, while New Relic offers flexible pricing with additional fees for advanced features. These differences highlight PRTG's simplicity compared to New Relic's customizable options.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor has a straightforward setup cost structure, while New Relic offers flexible pricing with additional fees for advanced features. These differences highlight PRTG's simplicity compared to New Relic's customizable options.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
SolarWinds NPM
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
SolarWinds NPM
4.1 out of 5
SolarWinds NPM offers robust reporting, real-time updates, and extensive monitoring, ideal for enterprises needing comprehensive device compatibility and bandwidth analysis. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor provides ease of use with integrated sensors and competitive pricing, appealing to budget-conscious organizations.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. SolarWinds NPM Report
SolarWinds NPM entails higher setup costs, accommodating larger infrastructures, whereas PRTG Network Monitor offers a lower initial investment, appealing to smaller networks.
View comparison
Pricing
SolarWinds NPM entails higher setup costs, accommodating larger infrastructures, whereas PRTG Network Monitor offers a lower initial investment, appealing to smaller networks.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Cisco DNA Center
4.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Cisco DNA Center
4.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor is ideal for enterprises needing rapid deployment, scalability, and ease of use. In comparison, Cisco DNA Center excels in advanced network management and seamless integration with Cisco products. PRTG offers cost-effectiveness, while Cisco DNA appeals to those prioritizing comprehensive network insights and automation.
Download Cisco DNA Center vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor has a lower initial setup cost, emphasizing affordability, while Cisco DNA Center presents a more significant initial financial commitment, reflecting its comprehensive network management capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor has a lower initial setup cost, emphasizing affordability, while Cisco DNA Center presents a more significant initial financial commitment, reflecting its comprehensive network management capabilities.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Cisco Secure Network Analytics
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor excels in rapid deployment, scalability, and ease of setup with effective proactive alert notifications and flexible deployment options. In comparison, Cisco Secure Network Analytics offers superior threat detection, deep analytics, and enhanced network visibility, making it ideal for security-conscious environments.
Download Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor has a straightforward setup with no hidden costs, while Cisco Secure Network Analytics involves a more complex installation process, leading to potentially higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor has a straightforward setup with no hidden costs, while Cisco Secure Network Analytics involves a more complex installation process, leading to potentially higher initial expenses.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
ThousandEyes
4.2 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
ThousandEyes
4.2 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers cost-effective, comprehensive monitoring ideal for smaller setups. In comparison, ThousandEyes focuses on detailed insights and robust features, suited for complex environments. PRTG's affordability appeals to budget-conscious buyers, whereas ThousandEyes targets advanced needs with its higher-priced capabilities.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. ThousandEyes Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while ThousandEyes presents a more complex setup with higher expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while ThousandEyes presents a more complex setup with higher expenses.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Nagios XI
4.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Nagios XI
4.0 out of 5
Nagios XI offers open-source flexibility and cost-effective customization for extensive network monitoring. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor provides an all-in-one package that's intuitive and scales better for enterprises, facilitating rapid deployment with comprehensive functionality for dynamic IT environments.
Download Nagios XI vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
Nagios XI requires a higher initial setup cost compared to PRTG Network Monitor, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Nagios XI requires a higher initial setup cost compared to PRTG Network Monitor, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
SCOM
3.9 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
SCOM
3.9 out of 5
SCOM excels in monitoring Microsoft environments with extensive management packs and integration, preferred for detailed object-based monitoring. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor is valued for its broad monitoring capabilities and cost-effectiveness, excelling in network visualization and simple setup.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. SCOM Report
SCOM has higher setup costs compared to PRTG Network Monitor, which offers a more affordable entry point. PRTG provides a cost-effective solution, while SCOM's setup may be more resource-intensive, highlighting significant differences in initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
SCOM has higher setup costs compared to PRTG Network Monitor, which offers a more affordable entry point. PRTG provides a cost-effective solution, while SCOM's setup may be more resource-intensive, highlighting significant differences in initial investment.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
LogicMonitor
4.5 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
LogicMonitor
4.5 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor appeals to those valuing rapid deployment and cost-effectiveness for simpler setups. In comparison, LogicMonitor attracts customers needing comprehensive dashboards and robust integration for complex environments. PRTG's ease contrasts with LogicMonitor's advanced features and scalability, suitable for larger enterprise demands.
Download LogicMonitor vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward and low-cost setup, whereas LogicMonitor has a more flexible pricing model with potentially higher initial costs.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward and low-cost setup, whereas LogicMonitor has a more flexible pricing model with potentially higher initial costs.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Centreon
4.2 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Centreon
4.2 out of 5
PRTG offers rapid deployment and extensive sensor libraries, ideal for those prioritizing ease of use. In comparison, Centreon provides deep customization and flexibility with numerous plugins, making it suitable for environments needing detailed infrastructure monitoring and advanced data visualization capabilities.
Download Centreon vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers lower setup costs compared to Centreon, making it a more affordable option for organizations with budget constraints, while Centreon provides extensive customization options that may appeal to businesses seeking tailored solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers lower setup costs compared to Centreon, making it a more affordable option for organizations with budget constraints, while Centreon provides extensive customization options that may appeal to businesses seeking tailored solutions.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Nagios Core
4.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Nagios Core
4.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor suits those seeking rapid deployment and ease, integrating diverse sensors and a mobile app. In comparison, Nagios Core's strength lies in extensive customizability and integration options, appealing to users needing flexibility with technical expertise.
Download Nagios Core vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup cost with no hidden expenses, while Nagios Core provides flexibility with its open-source framework, potentially leading to higher initial investment depending on user requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup cost with no hidden expenses, while Nagios Core provides flexibility with its open-source framework, potentially leading to higher initial investment depending on user requirements.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Auvik Network Management (ANM)
4.4 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor excels in scalability and affordability, with effective alerting capabilities. In comparison, Auvik Network Management provides real-time visibility and ease of use. PRTG offers significant ROI, while Auvik simplifies network mapping despite pricing challenges for smaller organizations.
Download Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup at a lower cost, while Auvik Network Management incurs higher initial expenses, providing more comprehensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup at a lower cost, while Auvik Network Management incurs higher initial expenses, providing more comprehensive features.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
ScienceLogic
4.3 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
ScienceLogic
4.3 out of 5
ScienceLogic offers customization for large enterprises with diverse environments; its flexibility is optimal for complex infrastructures. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor facilitates rapid deployment and ease of use, ideal for smaller systems with straightforward pricing and intuitive features.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. ScienceLogic Report
ScienceLogic incurs higher setup cost than PRTG Network Monitor, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup. ScienceLogic provides advanced features as a justification for its cost, while PRTG appeals with affordability and simplicity.
View comparison
Pricing
ScienceLogic incurs higher setup cost than PRTG Network Monitor, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup. ScienceLogic provides advanced features as a justification for its cost, while PRTG appeals with affordability and simplicity.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Icinga
3.8 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Icinga
3.8 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers extensive features like rapid deployment and robust monitoring, appealing to diverse infrastructure needs. In comparison, Icinga provides an open-source, flexible solution ideal for custom plugin creation, appealing to tech buyers seeking cost-effective customization options.
Download Icinga vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor requires a higher initial investment compared to Icinga, which is more affordable upfront.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor requires a higher initial investment compared to Icinga, which is more affordable upfront.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Checkmk
4.2 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Checkmk
4.2 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor appeals with its intuitive setup and wide compatibility, ideal for seamless integration. In comparison, Checkmk excels in complex infrastructure management with strong auto-discovery and robust functionality, appealing to budget-conscious organizations needing comprehensive monitoring without high upfront costs.
Download Checkmk vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor involves initial setup costs, while Checkmk offers varying setup complexity and potential costs. Users often highlight the ease of PRTG's setup, contrasting with Checkmk's need for configuration expertise.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor involves initial setup costs, while Checkmk offers varying setup complexity and potential costs. Users often highlight the ease of PRTG's setup, contrasting with Checkmk's need for configuration expertise.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE
4.1 out of 5
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE suits those needing advanced traffic analysis with capabilities like packet inspection, ideal for complex environments. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor excels in ease of deployment and scalable monitoring, attracting organizations prioritizing straightforward implementation and cost-effectiveness.
Download NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE typically involves a higher initial setup cost compared to PRTG Network Monitor, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE typically involves a higher initial setup cost compared to PRTG Network Monitor, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Meraki Dashboard
4.3 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Meraki Dashboard
4.3 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor is chosen for its rapid deployment and robust monitoring across various IT environments. In comparison, Meraki Dashboard offers centralized cloud management and a security suite. PRTG emphasizes scalability, while Meraki is favored for single-pane management and advanced analytics.
Download Meraki Dashboard vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor often highlights a flexible setup cost, while Meraki Dashboard users typically note a higher upfront expense. This indicates a significant difference in initial investment requirements between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor often highlights a flexible setup cost, while Meraki Dashboard users typically note a higher upfront expense. This indicates a significant difference in initial investment requirements between the two solutions.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)
4.2 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers easy setup and cost-effective solutions for smaller networks through its bandwidth graphing and flexible deployments. In comparison, IBM SevOne Network Performance Management provides scalability and near real-time data, appealing to larger, complex networks with its comprehensive data analytics.
Download IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a lower setup cost, while IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) may entail higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a lower setup cost, while IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) may entail higher initial expenses.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
DX Spectrum
4.2 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
DX Spectrum
4.2 out of 5
DX Spectrum's advanced modeling and automation attract large organizations seeking comprehensive network monitoring. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor provides an easier setup and cost-effective solution for smaller businesses seeking flexible deployment options. Spectrum prioritizes sophisticated fault isolation, while PRTG emphasizes affordability and ease of use.
Download DX Spectrum vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
The DX Spectrum setup cost is often highlighted as higher compared to PRTG Network Monitor, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
The DX Spectrum setup cost is often highlighted as higher compared to PRTG Network Monitor, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
WhatsUp Gold
3.9 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
WhatsUp Gold
3.9 out of 5
WhatsUp Gold offers intuitive dashboards ideal for diverse networks, appealing to those valuing simplicity and cost efficiency. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor provides robust integration and advanced features, attracting tech buyers needing comprehensive, adaptable monitoring for complex infrastructures.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. WhatsUp Gold Report
WhatsUp Gold has upfront setup costs, while PRTG Network Monitor offers a more flexible setup with no initial fees.
View comparison
Pricing
WhatsUp Gold has upfront setup costs, while PRTG Network Monitor offers a more flexible setup with no initial fees.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
ManageEngine OpManager
4.0 out of 5
ManageEngine OpManager excels in device management and seamless automation for extensive network infrastructure, including military-grade devices. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor provides customizable monitoring with features like NetFlow analyzer, ideal for comprehensive network insights, despite potential sluggish performance with remote probes.
Download ManageEngine OpManager vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
ManageEngine OpManager often involves a higher setup cost compared to PRTG Network Monitor, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
ManageEngine OpManager often involves a higher setup cost compared to PRTG Network Monitor, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
LibreNMS
1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
LibreNMS
1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers a comprehensive solution with guided installation, making it ideal for businesses seeking streamlined monitoring. In comparison, LibreNMS attracts organizations needing customization and cost savings, thanks to its open-source platform and community-driven enhancements without licensing fees.
PRTG Network Monitor has a higher setup cost compared to LibreNMS, which offers a more budget-friendly installation.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor has a higher setup cost compared to LibreNMS, which offers a more budget-friendly installation.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance
4.4 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor excels in ease of deployment, cost-effective licensing, and comprehensive monitoring suited for smaller businesses. In comparison, Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance offers robust connectivity assurance ideal for large-scale networks, despite higher costs, benefiting from enhanced features and integration capabilities.
Download Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup process with minimal initial costs, while Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance requires a more complex and potentially higher-cost setup, highlighting a significant upfront investment difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup process with minimal initial costs, while Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance requires a more complex and potentially higher-cost setup, highlighting a significant upfront investment difference between the two solutions.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
vRealize Network Insight
4.3 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor delivers rapid deployment and easy scalability, ideal for straightforward monitoring tasks. In comparison, vRealize Network Insight offers deep insights and advanced capabilities, making it suitable for complex scenarios and environments requiring detailed traffic and flow analysis.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. vRealize Network Insight Report
PRTG Network Monitor features a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while vRealize Network Insight entails a higher setup expense reflecting its broader functionality.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor features a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while vRealize Network Insight entails a higher setup expense reflecting its broader functionality.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
LiveAction LiveNX
3.4 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
LiveAction LiveNX
3.4 out of 5
LiveAction LiveNX offers advanced traffic visualization and analytics, appealing to those needing in-depth network insights. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor provides a broad sensor-based monitoring system with flexible pricing and simpler deployment, making it suitable for general infrastructure oversight.
Download LiveAction LiveNX vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
LiveAction LiveNX has a higher setup cost compared to PRTG Network Monitor, which offers a more budget-friendly initial expenditure.
View comparison
Pricing
LiveAction LiveNX has a higher setup cost compared to PRTG Network Monitor, which offers a more budget-friendly initial expenditure.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Pandora FMS
4.6 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Pandora FMS
4.6 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor excels in rapid deployment and ease of use with a focus on scalability and sensor versatility. In comparison, Pandora FMS offers extensive monitoring across devices and applications, providing customizable solutions ideal for diverse IT environments, prioritizing flexibility and cost-effective pricing models.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. Pandora FMS Report
PRTG Network Monitor has a lower initial setup cost compared to Pandora FMS, which involves additional setup expenses making PRTG more budget-friendly.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor has a lower initial setup cost compared to Pandora FMS, which involves additional setup expenses making PRTG more budget-friendly.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Flowmon
4.3 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Flowmon
4.3 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers affordable pricing with easy deployment and strong customer support. In comparison, Flowmon provides robust features and advanced analytics for complex environments. While cost-effective solutions may favor PRTG, Flowmon justifies its higher cost with comprehensive network security and analysis.
Download Flowmon vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor has a straightforward setup cost, while Flowmon typically requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor has a straightforward setup cost, while Flowmon typically requires a higher initial investment.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
AppNeta by Broadcom
4.3 out of 5
AppNeta by Broadcom excels in real-time diagnostics suitable for large enterprises with complex networks. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor offers flexibility and extensive customization with a user-friendly setup, appealing to mid-sized organizations seeking a cost-effective and comprehensive monitoring solution.
Download AppNeta by Broadcom vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
AppNeta by Broadcom has a higher initial setup cost compared to PRTG Network Monitor, which offers a more affordable entry point.
View comparison
Pricing
AppNeta by Broadcom has a higher initial setup cost compared to PRTG Network Monitor, which offers a more affordable entry point.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
eG Enterprise
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
eG Enterprise
4.1 out of 5
eG Enterprise offers comprehensive ICT stack observability with deep diagnostic features and scalability for complex environments. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor provides ease of use and fast deployment, with a focus on network infrastructure through customizable sensors and intuitive dashboards.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. eG Enterprise Report
eG Enterprise has a higher setup cost compared to PRTG Network Monitor, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment, making PRTG a cost-effective choice for users prioritizing lower upfront expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
eG Enterprise has a higher setup cost compared to PRTG Network Monitor, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment, making PRTG a cost-effective choice for users prioritizing lower upfront expenses.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
OP5 Monitor
4.3 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
OP5 Monitor
4.3 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor attracts businesses with easy deployment and efficient support. In comparison, OP5 Monitor provides advanced features with customizable dashboards, appealing to enterprises prioritizing depth and control. PRTG offers cost-efficient pricing, while OP5 justifies higher costs with feature-rich capabilities.
Download OP5 Monitor vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor requires a one-time setup cost, whereas OP5 Monitor involves an ongoing subscription fee, highlighting a key difference in their pricing strategies. Each option provides unique cost structures depending on your monitoring needs.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor requires a one-time setup cost, whereas OP5 Monitor involves an ongoing subscription fee, highlighting a key difference in their pricing strategies. Each option provides unique cost structures depending on your monitoring needs.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
FortiMonitor
4.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
FortiMonitor
4.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor appeals to buyers seeking cost-effective solutions with straightforward deployment and customizable dashboards. In comparison, FortiMonitor attracts those needing a more comprehensive system offering enhanced cloud-native monitoring and extensive third-party integrations, suitable for complex network environments.
Download FortiMonitor vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor has a lower setup cost, making it a budget-friendly choice, while FortiMonitor offers a more comprehensive package at a higher initial expense.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor has a lower setup cost, making it a budget-friendly choice, while FortiMonitor offers a more comprehensive package at a higher initial expense.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Kentik
4.6 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Kentik
4.6 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor is favored for ease of deployment, scalability, and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Kentik offers superior data exploration and real-time insights for complex environments, appealing to buyers focused on advanced analytics and deep traffic analysis.
Download Kentik vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup cost structure, while Kentik requires a more tailored approach. PRTG's pricing is generally predictable, whereas Kentik's may vary based on specific network monitoring needs and configurations.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup cost structure, while Kentik requires a more tailored approach. PRTG's pricing is generally predictable, whereas Kentik's may vary based on specific network monitoring needs and configurations.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Nmap
4.3 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Nmap
4.3 out of 5
Nmap excels in network scanning with a powerful command-line interface, offering detailed assessments ideal for security-focused operations. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor provides extensive features and an intuitive interface, appealing to organizations seeking comprehensive monitoring and centralized tracking of network performance.
Download Nmap vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
Nmap requires no setup cost, offering an open-source solution; PRTG Network Monitor involves a setup cost but provides a more comprehensive monitoring feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
Nmap requires no setup cost, offering an open-source solution; PRTG Network Monitor involves a setup cost but provides a more comprehensive monitoring feature set.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
DX Unified Infrastructure Management
4.1 out of 5
DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers advanced monitoring across multiple environments, appealing to enterprises requiring extensive infrastructure visibility. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor's ease of use and cost-effectiveness make it ideal for smaller environments seeking straightforward and flexible monitoring solutions.
Download DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
DX Unified Infrastructure Management has a higher setup cost compared to PRTG Network Monitor, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
DX Unified Infrastructure Management has a higher setup cost compared to PRTG Network Monitor, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Azure Network Watcher
4.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor is known for its ease of use and scalability, appealing to those seeking quick deployment and customizability. In comparison, Azure Network Watcher targets enterprises needing robust cloud-native capabilities and seamless Azure integration, despite its potentially complex initial setup.
Download Azure Network Watcher vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor incurs significant setup costs, while Azure Network Watcher typically involves lower initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor incurs significant setup costs, while Azure Network Watcher typically involves lower initial expenses.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Zenoss Cloud
4.2 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Zenoss Cloud
4.2 out of 5
Zenoss Cloud excels in scalable infrastructure, offering real-time analytics for dynamic environments. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor provides comprehensive value with pre-configured sensors and detailed reporting. A tech buyer might prefer Zenoss for its insights or PRTG for its inclusive features and ease of use.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. Zenoss Cloud Report
Zenoss Cloud typically involves a higher initial setup cost, whereas PRTG Network Monitor is generally more budget-friendly in terms of setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Zenoss Cloud typically involves a higher initial setup cost, whereas PRTG Network Monitor is generally more budget-friendly in terms of setup expenses.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
OmniPeek
3.9 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
OmniPeek
3.9 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers broad monitoring capabilities and ease of deployment, appealing to businesses seeking cost-effective solutions. In comparison, OmniPeek provides advanced protocol analysis and real-time data capture, justifying a higher price for organizations needing in-depth network insights.
Download OmniPeek vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a lower setup cost compared to OmniPeek, making it more budget-friendly for smaller organizations, while OmniPeek provides advanced features that may justify its higher initial investment for larger enterprises.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a lower setup cost compared to OmniPeek, making it more budget-friendly for smaller organizations, while OmniPeek provides advanced features that may justify its higher initial investment for larger enterprises.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
DX NetOps
4.3 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
DX NetOps
4.3 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor excels in scalability and cost-effectiveness, offering compatibility and intuitive deployment. In comparison, DX NetOps focuses on performance management and trend analysis, making it suitable for efficient resource allocation. Both solutions provide ROI and cater to different tech buyer needs.
Download DX NetOps vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor involves minimal setup costs, offering a straightforward implementation process, while DX NetOps may require higher initial investment and complexities during setup.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor involves minimal setup costs, offering a straightforward implementation process, while DX NetOps may require higher initial investment and complexities during setup.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Arista Data ANalyZer
1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor is ideal for cost-effective hardware monitoring with an intuitive setup. In comparison, Arista Data ANalyZer offers advanced data analytics and scalability, suitable for larger networks seeking detailed insights, despite its higher technical demands and initial investment.
PRTG Network Monitor often highlights minimal setup costs, while Arista Data ANalyZer typically involves higher initial expenses, emphasizing a difference in upfront investment between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor often highlights minimal setup costs, while Arista Data ANalyZer typically involves higher initial expenses, emphasizing a difference in upfront investment between the two solutions.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Plixer Scrutinizer
4.3 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Plixer Scrutinizer
4.3 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor is praised for ease of use, diverse integrations, and customizable alerts, ideal for quick deployment. In comparison, Plixer Scrutinizer excels in scalability and traffic correlation, offering detailed security insights, which can enhance operational efficiency for larger implementations.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. Plixer Scrutinizer Report
PRTG Network Monitor involves a competitive setup cost focused on scalability, while Plixer Scrutinizer requires a higher investment with advanced traffic analysis features. PRTG's pricing model caters to flexible deployment, contrasting Plixer's premium analytics emphasis.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor involves a competitive setup cost focused on scalability, while Plixer Scrutinizer requires a higher investment with advanced traffic analysis features. PRTG's pricing model caters to flexible deployment, contrasting Plixer's premium analytics emphasis.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Opsview
4.3 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Opsview
4.3 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor is favored for its ease of use and rapid deployment, ideal for small to medium businesses. In comparison, Opsview's robust feature set, including advanced alerting and cloud support, suits enterprises seeking comprehensive monitoring for diverse infrastructures.
Download Opsview vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor users note low setup costs compared to Opsview, which often involves higher initial expenses. Users find PRTG more cost-effective in the initial stage, highlighting distinct approaches in cost structure for both network monitoring solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor users note low setup costs compared to Opsview, which often involves higher initial expenses. Users find PRTG more cost-effective in the initial stage, highlighting distinct approaches in cost structure for both network monitoring solutions.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
OpenNMS
1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
OpenNMS
1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor attracts cost-conscious buyers with its intuitive setup and affordable pricing. In comparison, OpenNMS appeals to enterprises seeking robust scalability and open-source flexibility, offering extensive features and deeper insights ideal for complex network management.
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup cost, making it accessible, while OpenNMS presents a more flexible structure suitable for larger organizations seeking customization.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup cost, making it accessible, while OpenNMS presents a more flexible structure suitable for larger organizations seeking customization.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Alluvio AppResponse
4.4 out of 5
Alluvio AppResponse offers granular data analysis and deep packet inspection for detailed application performance insights. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor provides scalability with a wide range of sensors and user-friendly deployment, appealing to those seeking broad network oversight and diverse IT environment integration.
Download Alluvio AppResponse vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
Alluvio AppResponse has a higher setup cost compared to PRTG Network Monitor, which is known for its affordable initial pricing, making it a cost-effective option for budget-conscious users seeking powerful network monitoring solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Alluvio AppResponse has a higher setup cost compared to PRTG Network Monitor, which is known for its affordable initial pricing, making it a cost-effective option for budget-conscious users seeking powerful network monitoring solutions.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Entuity
4.2 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Entuity
4.2 out of 5
Entuity excels in deep network insights and proactive fault management, making it ideal for large, complex environments. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor's wide range of sensors and flexible customization cater to diverse monitoring tasks, appealing to those seeking quick setup and diverse capabilities.
Download Entuity vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
Entuity's setup cost is higher upfront but offers comprehensive features, while PRTG Network Monitor presents an affordable initial investment with flexible scaling options.
View comparison
Pricing
Entuity's setup cost is higher upfront but offers comprehensive features, while PRTG Network Monitor presents an affordable initial investment with flexible scaling options.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Pulseway
4.3 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Pulseway
4.3 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers robust scalability and a comprehensive monitoring system suitable for complex infrastructures. In comparison, Pulseway provides excellent mobile capabilities ideal for remote management. Tech buyers may choose PRTG for extensive infrastructure insights or Pulseway for seamless on-the-go monitoring.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. Pulseway Report
PRTG Network Monitor requires a higher setup cost due to its extensive features, while Pulseway offers a more budget-friendly setup. This pricing difference highlights the varying entry barriers for businesses evaluating these network monitoring solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor requires a higher setup cost due to its extensive features, while Pulseway offers a more budget-friendly setup. This pricing difference highlights the varying entry barriers for businesses evaluating these network monitoring solutions.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM)
4.0 out of 5
Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller excels in managing Nexus devices with comprehensive insights but is expensive, suitable for larger organizations. In comparison, PRTG is affordable with flexible deployment, ideal for smaller environments, though costs increase with scale.
Download Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller is known for its higher setup costs, whereas PRTG Network Monitor offers a more budget-friendly setup, highlighting a cost-effective solution.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller is known for its higher setup costs, whereas PRTG Network Monitor offers a more budget-friendly setup, highlighting a cost-effective solution.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
NetXMS
5.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
NetXMS
5.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers extensive built-in sensors and swift deployment, attracting those prioritizing ease of use and ROI. In comparison, NetXMS provides a customizable, scalable platform, appealing to enterprises needing flexibility across diverse infrastructures, despite requiring more technical expertise.
PRTG Network Monitor includes setup costs, while NetXMS offers free installation with potential expenses for optional support.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor includes setup costs, while NetXMS offers free installation with potential expenses for optional support.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
LogRhythm NetMon
3.8 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
LogRhythm NetMon
3.8 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers rapid deployment, scalability, and affordability with its all-in-one pricing, making it ideal for varied environments. In comparison, LogRhythm NetMon provides extensive threat detection and deep packet analytics, appealing to cybersecurity-focused organizations despite its higher cost.
Download LogRhythm NetMon vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup with no additional costs, while LogRhythm NetMon may involve higher initial expenses. The distinct difference lies in the cost-effectiveness of PRTG's setup compared to LogRhythm NetMon's potential financial commitment.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup with no additional costs, while LogRhythm NetMon may involve higher initial expenses. The distinct difference lies in the cost-effectiveness of PRTG's setup compared to LogRhythm NetMon's potential financial commitment.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
NetCrunch
4.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
NetCrunch
4.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor appeals with adaptable pricing and effective customer support. In comparison, NetCrunch offers advanced visualization and robust features, justifying its higher cost. PRTG excels in easy deployment, while NetCrunch provides enhanced functionality for greater operational flexibility.
Download NetCrunch vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a flexible licensing model with a lower initial setup cost, whereas NetCrunch has a straightforward pricing structure but may include higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a flexible licensing model with a lower initial setup cost, whereas NetCrunch has a straightforward pricing structure but may include higher initial expenses.

Related categories

Network Monitoring Software
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
Cloud Monitoring Software