PRTG Network Monitor and Nagios Core compete in the network monitoring category. PRTG seems to have the upper hand due to its user-friendly interface and versatility, while Nagios Core attracts users with its cost-free, extensive customizability.
Features: PRTG Network Monitor offers real-time monitoring and versatile sensor options, which are easy to use and provide comprehensive alert and reporting capabilities. Its intuitive interface and mobile app access add to its appeal for diverse IT environments. Nagios Core's most valuable features include its robust monitoring capability with extensive customizability options, support for various plugins, and a strong command structure that supports specific monitoring needs.
Room for Improvement: PRTG users suggest enhancing the desktop application and improving scalability options, as well as simplifying mapping and dashboard configurations. Nagios Core's interface is considered outdated and challenging for beginners, with calls for improved integration and a more simplified UI to broaden its user base. The learning curve resulting from its extensive customizability also suggests room for easing user experience.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PRTG is praised for straightforward deployment and accessible technical support, although faster response times are desired. Its self-help options through knowledge bases and forums are generally satisfactory. Nagios Core, being open-source, depends greatly on community-driven support and technical proficiency for setup, which can be cumbersome for users needing immediate assistance, given its complex nature.
Pricing and ROI: PRTG Network Monitor offers a flexible pricing model based on the number of sensors, striking a balance between cost and features. However, small businesses might find initial costs high, yet the return is seen in reduced downtime. Nagios Core is cost-effective as a free open-source solution, requiring no licensing fees, but it might demand substantial investment in technical expertise for optimal use. The ROI comes from its ability to customize monitoring without additional costs.
Tutorials are available so I can manage any issue with PRTG Network Monitor easily.
The setup process is well-documented, making it easy to deploy.
The solution is scalable.
On a scale of one to ten, scalability is rated as 9.5.
PRTG Network Monitor has the ability to scale and add new devices.
I tried many other solutions at work, however, in terms of Nagios, I haven't seen any disruption or downtime.
They need to improve application performance monitoring, error tracing mechanisms, and log management.
PRTG Network Monitor should provide syslog monitoring since it is not available at this time.
Pricing is by the number of devices, not by sensor.
The prices are very high for PRTG Network Monitor.
It has a very handy dashboard, providing live alerts and visibility for everything.
PRTG Network Monitor already provided me with 100 free sensors, which is enough for my network monitoring.
The pricing is affordable compared to SolarWinds.
This is IT infrastructure monitoring's industry-standard, open-source core. Free without professional support services.
PRTG Network Monitor runs on a Windows machine within your network, collecting various statistics from the machines, software, and devices which you designate. PRTG comes with an easy-to-use web interface with point-and-click configuration. You can easily share data from it with non-technical colleagues and customers, including via live graphs and custom reports. This will let you plan for network expansion, see what applications are using most of your connection, and make sure that no one is hogging the entire network just to torrent videos.
To monitor a large IT environment, it's important to be able to scale PRTG up. Paessler PRTG Enterprise Monitor includes all the proven capabilities of PRTG Network Monitor, which are enhanced by exclusive ITOps Board for a service-oriented, central overview of multiple PRTG servers.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.