GitHub CoPilot vs Microsoft Power Apps comparison

GitHub and Microsoft are both solutions in the Rapid Application Development Software category. GitHub is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.2, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.9. GitHub holds a 4.8% mindshare in RADS, compared to Microsoft’s 16.2% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

GitHub CoPilot

Read 26 GitHub CoPilot reviews

1,887 Views
1,758 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Microsoft Power Apps

Read 92 Microsoft Power Apps reviews

23,640 Views
18,717 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

GitHub CoPilot

Microsoft Power Apps

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 5, 2025

Microsoft Power Apps and GitHub CoPilot cater to different aspects of app and code development, focusing on business apps and coding efficiency, respectively. Microsoft Power Apps seems to have the upper hand in business app creation due to its seamless integration with Microsoft tools and low-code capability.

Features: Microsoft Power Apps provides seamless data connectivity, integrates with various Microsoft tools, and supports low-code development, making it ideal for rapid app development. GitHub CoPilot offers AI-based code suggestions, enhances coding efficiency, and integrates well with popular development environments like Visual Studio Code.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Power Apps could improve scalability, documentation, and user-friendliness, with a focus on reducing costs for external users. GitHub CoPilot needs improvement in suggestion accuracy and broader IDE integration. Price adjustments and better support for complex coding environments could broaden its appeal.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Power Apps is versatile, supported across Private, Hybrid, and Public Clouds but has varied technical support. GitHub CoPilot operates primarily on on-premises environments and offers consistent but at times slow support, suggesting a need for streamlined services.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Power Apps is cost-effective for internal use, offering substantial ROI in automation and productivity despite complex pricing. GitHub CoPilot is generally affordable for enterprises but may be costly for individuals. It provides coding efficiency improvements, impacting ROI differently than broader business process automation.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub CoPilot vs. Microsoft Power Apps Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub CoPilot vs. Microsoft Power Apps

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,265 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub CoPilot

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

10th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Code Assistants (2nd)

Microsoft Power Apps

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

1st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Low-Code Development Platforms (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of GitHub CoPilot is 4.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Power Apps is 16.2%, down from 23.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Rapid Application Development Software

Featured Reviews

Sathya Prasad

Director at Synechron

Enhances our productivity while coding and provides suggestions and reviews

If you're considering a complete CI/CD pipeline, you'll need to integrate various tools such as Jenkins for builds and ensure connectivity with platforms like AWS or Azure. All these aspects must be managed effectively. Therefore, it's essential to have a dedicated configuration management team to oversee and maintain the pipeline. We're working on developing our in-house AI tool. GitHub Copilot, closely integrated with Microsoft products like .NET, offers extensive support for various programming languages. For example, it supports a wide range of languages, while a customized tool might only cover around seventy percent of the same range. It definitely can do a little bit of statistical analysis and give recommendations. I would recommend considering GitHub Copilot. If you already use another tool, be aware of the migration effort required to switch to Copilot. Assess the process of adopting and onboarding Copilot to ensure a smooth transition. If you're moving from one tool to Copilot, you'll need to evaluate the migration effort involved. It’s essential to have early adopters to facilitate this process. Overall, I rate the solution a nine-point five out of ten.

Read full review

Guhan Eshwar

Solutions Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees

Building tools with user-friendly interfaces abut needs integration improvements

An integration of Copilot options within Microsoft Power Apps would be useful. In UiPath apps, there is an autopilot function that uses a generative AI model, which creates layouts and connects data services automatically with a prompt. Such integration would be beneficial to build basic frameworks that can be enhanced. This would assist business process users who lack coding knowledge.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I can upload code snippets or class files and ask for solutions to improve them, which works well. It's a great productivity tool that saves me time searching websites. While there are alternatives like ChatGPT and other AI tools, the advantage of the tool is that it is built into the IDE."

"The product's most valuable feature is vulnerability management features."

"The solution increases coding efficiency."

"I use it almost like a search engine, but it goes a step beyond."

"The product's initial setup is straightforward because it's pushed through the updates."

"When I write code, I feel like I have someone sitting with me to help me. Wherever I'm stuck, I just ask a question, and it provides guidance that I can use."

"GitHub CoPilot helps us auto-complete code. The tool's context awareness benefits our projects because it identifies the context in which we are working and automatically proposes solutions that we use."

"The solution's most valuable features are context awareness, multi language support, integration with popular IDs like Visual Studio Code or JetBrains, and reduced coding time."

More GitHub CoPilot pros

"The solution is easy to use and map."

"The solution becomes easier the set up once you get used to it."

"Issue tracking and centralized issue management are significantly enhanced with Power Apps, reducing lengthy data consolidation processes across departments."

"It is easy to design automation processes."

"The support is the most valuable feature."

"The solution works great and is stable."

"We have integrated data from external systems without facing any significant challenges."

"I like the containerization of Azure."

More Microsoft Power Apps pros

Cons

"Sometimes, if it is a bigger piece of code, it breaks in between."

"In certain instances, OpenAI didn't respond in the expected way. The responses were more general and didn't address the specific point."

"There's room for improvement to ensure that suggestions align more precisely with the context of what I'm seeking, minimizing instances of unrelated or inaccurate code suggestions."

"It would be useful if we could use the solution to create documents, not only prompts."

"In a few cases, the results aren't correct, so that needs improvement. Also, it would be great if the results could be presented in different formats, not just text. As engineers, it takes time to read through text-based results."

"They could improve the product in terms of integration with other tools."

"GitHub CoPilot's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"Some of the suggestions provided by GitHub CoPilot are not accurate, making it an area of concern where improvements are required."

More GitHub CoPilot cons

"I recommend improving Microsoft Power Apps' licensing model. I've encountered challenges related to licensing complexity, which has led some customers to opt for traditional solution development and deployment methods instead."

"It's easy to use."

"The solution must provide more integration with third-party applications."

"The solution could improve by having more connectors for different solutions in a way to create custom connectors. Additionally, they should make HTTP Connectors free again because it was not always a premium feature. These HTTP connectors allow you to send API requests which can be important."

"The solution is evolving very fast and every month new features are introduced. Sometimes it's difficult to catch up with all the evolution that's happening. I had to focus on Power BI for a while and left PowerApps at the side for a couple of months and when I came back, it had changed its interface and moved components around."

"Can be improved to cater to complex developments."

"We would like to see some improvement in the cost of the solution when an organization has a more complex network structure. The advanced connectors are very expensive, which discourages our customers from implementing it."

"The area where this product can be improved is the documentation. When we get stuck it's with the documentation when we are not able to find the codes we need."

More Microsoft Power Apps cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product offers a free version and a paid version. Whether to choose the product's free version or paid version depends on the size of the company where it will be used."

"The solution is costly."

"GitHub CoPilot's pricing is reasonable. Our licensing costs were initially monthly, but then we switched to yearly payments. I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."

"The pricing for GitHub Copilot is around ten dollars per month."

"The product has a tiered pricing model that starts with a free version for individual developers but requires a separate license fee for enterprise use."

"A personal license is priced at ten dollars per month, while a professional or enterprise license costs nineteen dollars per user, and these rates are consistent for all users."

"We have a license but need another one for the GitHub CoPilot tool."

"It's affordable."

More GitHub CoPilot pricing and cost advice

"Typically, it's $20 per user, per month, commercial. For the government, on a per user basis, what we were looking at is $11.23 per month."

"We use the Office 365 package, and Microsoft PowerApps is a part of the package. We don't pay any separate price for this. There are no additional costs. We just pay for the Office 365 package."

"The tool is neither cheap nor expensive. The tool's cost is manageable."

"Whatever the cost of licensing is, it is in the millions."

"Pricing for this solution is completely based on user requirement. If your requirement is simple or less complex, then the basic licensing model can work, e.g. the free model, or else, you need to go for the premium features or premium model."

"The product is inexpensive."

"I pay nine dollars monthly for the subscription to this solution and the price of the is reasonable."

"It might be too complicated to continuously monitor the business consumption and what to pay."

More Microsoft Power Apps pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

10%

Healthcare Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub CoPilot?

The product is easy to integrate.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub CoPilot?

The pricing for GitHub Copilot is around $10 per month. While it offers significant productivity gains, lowering the price to $5 could encourage more users. If the price were lower, it might be mor...

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub CoPilot?

In terms of understanding user queries and providing code that aligns with my expectations, there is room for improvement. Sometimes it requires multiple iterations to get the code I need, like for...

See all answers

How would you choose between Microsoft PowerApps and Salesforce Platform?

I think it depends on your use case. If your organization uses Microsoft Enterprise products, PowerApps will work better in your environment. Similarly, if you have a Salesforce integration in pla...

See all answers

Would you choose ServiceNow over Microsoft PowerApps?

Hi Netanya, I will choose ServiceNow because ServiceNow is a very good tool compared to Microsoft PowerApp. Because ServiceNow has a very strong module (Performance Analysis) reporting which will ...

See all answers

Would you choose Microsoft Azure App Service or PowerApps?

Microsoft Azure App Service is helpful if you need to set up temporary servers for customers to run their programs in locations that other cloud providers do not cater to. When servers are closer t...

See all answers

Comparisons

GitLab vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 37% of the time

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 12% of the time

Claude vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 8% of the time

Pega Platform vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 7% of the time

ServiceNow vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 5% of the time

More GitHub CoPilot Competitors

ServiceNow vs Microsoft Power Apps

Compared 17% of the time

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs Microsoft Power Apps

Compared 16% of the time

Appian vs Microsoft Power Apps

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Azure App Service vs Microsoft Power Apps

Compared 10% of the time

Salesforce Platform vs Microsoft Power Apps

Compared 7% of the time

More Microsoft Power Apps Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub CoPilot

January 2025

Download GitHub CoPilot product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Power Apps

January 2025

Download Microsoft Power Apps product report

Also Known As

No data available

PowerApps, MS PowerApps

Learn More

GitHub

Microsoft

Overview

GitHub CoPilot accelerates developer productivity with code generation, test case creation, and code explanation. It provides context-aware suggestions, integrates with popular IDEs, and supports multiple languages.

GitHub CoPilot significantly boosts development efficiency by reducing coding and debugging time. Its user-friendly auto-complete and variable detection features streamline complex tasks, serving as a learning tool for developers. Areas needing improvement include its accuracy, stability, and broader integration with IDEs and languages. Users find the pricing strategy expensive and wish for enhanced contextual understanding, diverse result formats, and image support. Expanded functionality and better integration in highly regulated environments are important for future growth.

What are the most valued features of GitHub CoPilot?

Code Generation: Accelerates coding with smart suggestions.
Test Case Creation: Streamlines automated testing.
Code Explanation: Offers detailed insights into code segments.
Context-Aware Suggestions: Provides personalized assistance.
Multi-Language Support: Enhances versatility across programming languages.

Which benefits should users look for in reviews?

Increased Efficiency: Reduces time spent on coding tasks.
Enhanced Productivity: Speeds up the development process.
Learning Aid: Aids developers in understanding and creating complex code.
Task Automation: Facilitates automating repetitive coding tasks.

Utilized across industries to enhance application development and productivity, GitHub CoPilot assists in generating code snippets, writing code skeletons, analyzing documents, and automating workflows. It supports coding best practices, prompt engineering, and natural language processing. Developers leverage its capabilities for creating meeting summaries, report recommendations, and content ideas, thereby optimizing workflow efficiency.

Microsoft Power Apps is a rapid application development software and low-code development platform. The solution consists of a suite of apps, services, connectors, and a data platform. It provides an environment for building custom apps which is suitable for different businesses.

Microsoft Power Apps allows users to not only build applications, but also connect them to Microsoft's other sources, including the underlying data platform Microsoft Dataverse, as well as online and on-premise sources such as SharePoint, Dynamics 365, and Microsoft 365. The applications built using Microsoft Power Apps have a responsive design that makes them suitable for work in browsers and on mobile applications on different devices.

The no-code side of the product makes it suitable for complete beginners to app building, allowing them to easily create fully functional applications with many features. The solution also has a specialized platform for developers where specialists can access data and metadata, create custom connectors, integrate with external data, and apply business logic. The solution allows users to create three types of apps: canvas, model-driven, and portal. They are made using:

Power Apps Studio: Canvas apps are designed through Power Apps Studio. This app designer is suitable for complete beginners, as the app creation process resembles the building of presentations in Microsoft PowerPoint.
App Designer: Model-driven apps are created through App Designer. The creation process allows users to define the sitemap and add components to build the application.
Power Apps Portals Studio: This is a What You See Is What You Get (WYSIWYG) design tool. It is suitable for portal applications, as it allows users to add and configure web pages, forms, components, and lists.

Microsoft Power Apps Features

The three different design tools of the solution, Power Apps Studio, App Designer, and Power Apps Portals Studio, come with various features which allow users to utilize the tools. Some of these features include:

Common Data Service (CDS): The data storage feature of the solution allows users to store and manage the data used for business applications securely. The data within the feature is stored among a set of entities, including a base set of standard entities as well as user-made custom ones, using Power Query. The data within CDS can be used to build apps.
Cloud connectivity: Microsoft Power Apps has the ability to connect with various types of cloud services. It can connect with MS CDS, as well as SQL, DropBox, and Google Drive.
Sharing feature: The tool has a feature for sharing built applications. Users can share the app they have created with users within the same organization as them.
Role-based feature: The product allows organizations to assign their employees roles within the platform. This is done to create customization based on the assigned roles, potentially eliminating issues that a completely free access can create.
AI automation: The tool has a feature that utilizes artificial intelligence (AI). It provides users with an AI builder and pre-built AI components to facilitate the application building process.
APIs feature: Microsoft Power Apps facilitates the app-building process through application program interfaces (APIs).
Collaboration support: The tool supports collaboration within the organization in the application building process. Through this feature, multiple employees can contribute to the creation of an app.

Microsoft Power Apps Benefits

The product brings various benefits to organizations and individuals who utilize it. Some of the biggest advantages of Microsoft Power Apps include:

The solution saves time for organizations by eliminating manual coding and providing ready-to-use solutions.
Applications built on the product can be made compatible with various platforms, including the web, Windows, Android, and iOS.
The premium connectors and wide integration of the platform allow developers to use data from Microsoft and from third-party services to build their applications.
The no-code capability enhances mobility and innovations within companies.
The AI feature of the product allows companies to increase their productivity through prebuilt AI scenarios.
The tool offers various ways to follow the data from the created applications, allowing companies to benefit from the reports of the performance of their apps.
Professional developers receive a platform to follow crucial metrics and access the application development in detail.
Power Apps can be connected across the entire Microsoft Power Platform, allowing organizations to utilize all features that the provider offers.

Reviews from Real Users

An IT Specialist (INFOSEC) at a government appreciates this tool because it is low-code, low learning curve, and reduces manpower.

Rafael T., a data engineer at NTT Security, likes Microsoft Power Apps, because it is great for making apps quickly, has helpful support, and integrates with Power BI.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

TransAlta, Rackspace, Telstra

Buyer's Guide

GitHub CoPilot vs. Microsoft Power Apps

January 2025

Free Report: GitHub CoPilot vs. Microsoft Power Apps

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub CoPilot vs. Microsoft Power Apps and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub CoPilot vs. Microsoft Power Apps report.

See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.

We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.