GitLab vs JFrog Pipeline comparison

"The most valuable feature of GitLab is its convenience. I am able to trace back most of my changes up to a far distance in time and it helps me to analyze and see the older version of the code."

"The solution has an established roadmap that lays out its plans for upgrades over the next two to three years."

"The solution makes the CI/CD pipelines easy to execute."

"It's a great toolbox where the CI/CD pipeline is the fundamental component, but there are so many other features that you can pull from, which makes it a very powerful tool. My current client is using AWS, and they can, of course, use AWS CodePipeline, but GitLab is much more mature than that, and it also gives you the freedom to decide to go to another platform or have a multi-cloud strategy and things like that. That freedom for me is also very valuable."

"GitLab's source control is excellent."

"The most valuable aspects of GitLab are the ability to create branches, merge branches, and compare branches to resolve code conflicts."

"GitLab is kind of an image of GitHub, so it gives us the flexibility to monitor our changes in the repos."

"The solution's most valuable feature is that it is compatible with GitHub. The product's integration capabilities are sufficient for our small company of 35 people."

"Testing against multiple run times, versions, and environments is a plus point with the additional pipelines making it more interesting to see what is happening across your development process in a single pane of glass."

"The platform has some amazing features and the integration option makes it very simple to plug with any of our favorite tools."

"I would like to see better integration with project management tools such as Jira."

"Merge conflicts and repository maintenance could improve. If there is someone new to the system they would not know if there is a conflict."

"Expand features to match other tools such as a static code analysis tool so third-party integrations are not required."

"The integration and storage capabilities could be better."

"I would like more Agile features in the Premium version. The Premium version should have all Agile features that exist in the Ultimate version. IBM AOM has a complete Agile implementation, but in GitLab, you only have these features if you buy the Ultimate version. It would be good if we can use these in the Premium version."

"Even if I say I want some improvement, they will say it is already planned in the first quarter, second quarter, or third quarter. That said, most everything is quite improved already, and they're improving even further still."

"Technologies are always changing. Nowadays, new things like serverless computing and workload management have emerged. We have noticed a few gap items for faster service delivery. For example, we do user interface testing in the latest team and automate it using some tools. Recently, we integrated a tool with user interface testing, which can simulate a multi-user environment. So, we would like to see more integration with different platforms."

"I would like to see AI support in GitLab."

"They could work on reducing the number of permissions required while using Bitbucket."

"In total, I believe we have more than 300 licenses spread over about 100 users, though I can't comment on the costs involved."

"The solution's pricing is acceptable."

"GitLab is cheap."

"I'm not aware of the licensing costs because those were covered by the customer."

"GitLab is highly priced for smaller teams, but it's okay if considering a user base of thousands."

"We are using the open-source version."

"I don't mind the price because I use the free version."

"It seems reasonable. Our IT team manages the licenses."

"The pricing is the cheapest compared to the other platforms out there."