GitLab vs JFrog Pipeline comparison

"The initial setup of GitLab is pretty simple, with no complications."

"The most important features of GitLab for us are issue management and all the CI/CD tools. Another aspect that I love about GitLab is the UI."

"We use GitLab in the new project for CI/CD, integration, and deployment."

"We're only using the basic features of GitLab and haven't used any advanced features. The solution works fine, so that's what we like about GitLab. We're party using GitHub and GitLab. We have a GitHub server, while we use GitLab locally or only within our team, and it works okay. We don't have any significant problems with the solution. We also found the straightforward setup, stability, and scalability of GitLab valuable."

"The CI/CD process is very efficient."

"It speeds up our development, it's faster, safer, and more convenient."

"The most valuable features of Gitlab are integration with CIE and the ability to rapidly deploy solutions, projects, and applications. It is very easy to use, and there are no complaints."

"Git hosting has an integration with ACD which is why we liked this solution in the first place."

"Testing against multiple run times, versions, and environments is a plus point with the additional pipelines making it more interesting to see what is happening across your development process in a single pane of glass."

"The platform has some amazing features and the integration option makes it very simple to plug with any of our favorite tools."

"GitLab doesn't have AWS integration. It would be better to have integration with other container management environments beyond Kubernetes. It has very good integration with Kubernetes, but it doesn't have good integration with, for example, AWS, ETS, etc."

"There are some challenges with repository file management as GitLab may struggle to manage larger files."

"GitLab's Windows version is yet not available and having this would be an improvement."

"Based on what I know so far, its integration with Kubernetes is not so good. We have to develop many things to make it work. We have to acquire third-party components to work with Kubernetes."

"The licensing model could be improved to be more accommodating in terms of user numbers and costs."

"Perhaps the integration could be better."

"It would be better if there weren't any outages. There are occasions where we usually see a lot of outages using GitLab. It happens at least once a week or something like that. Whatever pipelines you're running, to check the logs, you need to have a different set of tools like Argus or something like that. If you have pipelines running on GitLab, you need a separate service deployed to view the logs, which is kind of a pain. If the logs can be used conveniently on GitLab, that would be definitely helpful. I'm not talking about the CI/CD pipelines but the back-end services and microservices deployed over GitLab. To view the logs for those microservices, you need to have separate log viewers, which is kind of a pain."

"I believe there's room for improvement in the advanced features, particularly in enhancing the pipeline functionalities."

"They could work on reducing the number of permissions required while using Bitbucket."

"I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month."

"In total, I believe we have more than 300 licenses spread over about 100 users, though I can't comment on the costs involved."

"GitLab is an open-source solution."

"We are using the open-source version."

"My company uses the free version of GitLab, which is GitLab Community Edition. There is a licensed version also available for GitLab."

"The price of GitLab could be better, it is expensive."

"The solution is based on a licensing model that includes technical support and is paid annually."

"The solution is based on a subscription model and is reasonably priced."

"The pricing is the cheapest compared to the other platforms out there."