Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy and ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform compete in the field of access management and endpoint security. Google Cloud Platform stands out for its scalable and feature-rich offerings suitable for dynamic environments, while ThreatLocker offers robust security with its zero-trust approach and excellent application control.
Features: Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy highlights scalability, efficient Kubernetes support, and group-based access management, making it suitable for deploying dynamic environments quickly. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform emphasizes selective process elevation, zero trust security, and application control, offering detailed visibility into user activities and the ability to meticulously block unauthorized access.
Room for Improvement: Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy could enhance its user documentation and configuration simplicity, offering better drag-and-drop and integration features. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform might benefit from improved learning mode accessibility, more flexible training options, and a more responsive support system to address user queries more efficiently.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy excels with its extensive public cloud usage but faces mixed reviews on technical support efficiency. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform provides flexible deployment across on-premises, hybrid, and cloud environments, coupled with personalized customer support that eases technical query resolution.
Pricing and ROI: The cost of Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is perceived as high by some users due to its extensive features, yet it secures significant ROI. ThreatLocker's pricing is often seen as reasonable and adaptable, providing substantial value and flexibility that scales with customer needs, leading to a significant ROI due to its comprehensive endpoint protection capabilities.
Google’s mission is to organize the world‘s information and make it universally accessible and useful.
Since our founding in 1998, Google has grown by leaps and bounds. From offering search in a single language we now offer dozens of products and services—including various forms of advertising and web applications for all kinds of tasks—in scores of languages. And starting from two computer science students in a university dorm room, we now have thousands of employees and offices around the world. A lot has changed since the first Google search engine appeared. But some things haven’t changed: our dedication to our users and our belief in the possibilities of the Internet itself.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform offers robust endpoint security through application control and allowlisting, safeguarding servers and workstations from unauthorized software execution.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform provides extensive application control with features like ring-fencing and selective elevation, ensuring meticulous execution management. Offering learning mode and extensive support, it integrates threat detection and activity monitoring to enhance compliance, reduce costs, and bolster cybersecurity through alerts and approvals. Despite its strengths, there are areas for improvement in training flexibility, policy updates, and interface enhancements, along with challenges in handling non-digitally signed software. Deployed across environments, it works well with existing cybersecurity instruments for real-time threat prevention.
What are the top features of ThreatLocker?ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform is widely implemented to safeguard IT infrastructures against unauthorized access and application use. In sectors where data security is paramount, this platform enables users to prevent unauthorized software installations and control device applications, ensuring real-time threat prevention and compliance with industry regulations.
We monitor all ZTNA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.