HCL Verse vs Microsoft Exchange Online comparison

"The most valuable feature is the mail server."

"HCL Verse has a nice interface and it is a practical email solution. There are a diverse set of features, such as the search bar on top of the screens."

"I have found the interface to be user-friendly and the overall simplicity valuable features."

"I like that Exchange Online is easy to use and that I do not need to maintain the previous Exchange Server. I also do not need to worry about the security of the Exchange Server. If there are any issues, then it will be the service provider's problem and not mine."

"It allows us to work from home, at any time or anywhere."

"The most valuable feature is the cloud environment."

"The solution generally works well. We can send and receive emails just fine."

"All of the features are beneficial, but the scheduling feature is particularly useful."

"It is a reasonable solution."

"Microsoft Exchange Online is a stable product."

"Security is very important to us, so improvements to this functionality are welcome."

"The solution could improve by allowing us to use a color that we want in the editing boxes."

"What I don't like about Microsoft Exchange Online is too much integration because now it has many services connected to it. In the beginning, it was just email, and now it's also Teams and Visio, and many other services which I don't like. Microsoft Exchange Online should focus on one service. The product now lost focus, and this is its area for improvement. I would also like more freedom in choosing to use just one service, for example, just Microsoft Exchange Online, which means I don't need Teams or any other Microsoft product or service there. Right now, all services are either in the Microsoft Office suite, or there are more products or services integrated with Microsoft Exchange Online, and I'd like to just focus on one."

"I feel that there is a need for improvement in the product, considering that there are some concerns with the tool's integration capabilities."

"The solution's performance can be improved when you are trying to access it remotely."

"They should tighten their cloud security."

"It should integrate better with social media formats."

"It is tricky to integrate Microsoft Exchange Online if you are in an infrastructure provided by other vendors."

"I have found that Microsoft has vulnerabilities when it comes to Exchange Online. It has become the port of a lot of hacker attacks."

"We'd like to see more integration with other platforms."

"This is an affordable solution but the price could be improved."

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"The costs of this platform vary based on subscriptions, but it is generally reasonable."

"The model is one which is pay-per-use go. There is no license. We are talking about per-user subscription-based use."

"The price is not competitive."

"I pay approximately $120 or $150 per year, and as long as I pay that amount, they will do regular updates so that I always have the most recent and greatest version of the application."

"I would say the solution is reasonable and affordable."

"Microsoft Exchange Online is too expensive."

"The pricing for Microsoft Exchange Online is quite reasonable, in my opinion. Many licensing options are available so that we can choose based on the customer's needs. For example, if a customer only requires mailbox features, we can recommend Plan One or Plan 2. We can suggest an E3 or E5 license if they need the entire Office suite. There are also premium subscriptions for enterprise customers, offering additional security features. Overall, I don't find the pricing costly because Microsoft provides many features and security capabilities, making it reliable for all customers, depending on their requirements."

"I have no opinion."