HCL Verse vs Zimbra Collaboration comparison

"HCL Verse has a nice interface and it is a practical email solution. There are a diverse set of features, such as the search bar on top of the screens."

"The most valuable feature is the mail server."

"The backup and storage management features of Zimbra Collaboration are valuable."

"The most valuable feature of Zimbra Collaboration is email functionality."

"Zimbra Collaboration's sharing features are most valuable."

"Good email solution and it's open-source."

"One of the premium features was customized rooms tailored to the collaboration needs. Many of the clients customize features such as organization logos and scanners."

"Zimbra Collaboration is a good tool for video calls...Zimbra Collaboration's initial setup phase was easy."

"It has all collaboration features, such as document sharing, video conferencing, chatting, task sharing, and calendar sharing."

"The Zimbra Collaboration's most valuable feature is web access."

"The solution could improve by allowing us to use a color that we want in the editing boxes."

"Security is very important to us, so improvements to this functionality are welcome."

"The installation is not straightforward, it can take two days for the full implementation."

"Zimbra Collaboration does not have a solution roadmap as aggressive as the new collaboration mail solutions. Additionally, they can have a better interface and integration with single sign-on."

"In the next release, Zimbra Collaboration should include a security feature to allow access for mobile device administrators."

"There are some security issues."

"We have had an issue with security."

"Zimbra Collaboration could improve the migration from a basic solution to a more containerized solution. For example, the installation should be able to extend to the containers and manage them with some solution, such as OpenShift or Kubernetes."

"Some issues cause the solution not to function correctly or to cause downtime once a month."

"It is good and competent, but you have to pay for video and group chat features."

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"This is an affordable solution but the price could be improved."

"It's very expensive. When we compare the cost with Google Workspace, it's so expensive."

"There is an annual standard licensing fee to use Zimbra Collaboration and there is no other cost."

"We do not pay for licenses to use this solution."

"We are using perpetual licenses. We have deployed it in our local data center, and we buy perpetual licenses on a per-user basis."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the price a four"

"When it comes to the licensing of Zimbra Collaboration, my license covers the servers and I find its terms to be much simpler than those of Microsoft Exchange."

"Zimbra Collaboration is less expensive than Microsoft Exchange. Zimbra works for small companies because it is not expensive. Zimbra Collaboration has more security tools than Microsoft Exchange. If you are choosing between Zimbra Collaboration and Microsoft Exchange, you have to take into account the cost of security tools with Microsoft Exchange. When you purchase Microsoft Exchange, you will also have to purchase tools for security, which adds to the cost. The migration from Zimbra Collaboration to another email solution is very simple and easy. Migration from Microsoft Exchange to another email solution is very difficult. Microsoft doesn't allow migration that easily. In fact, you have to pay for tools to do that. You have to buy some expensive tools to migrate."

"We pay yearly licenses for Zimbra Collaboration."