Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Hexadite vs IBM Resilient comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Hexadite
Ranking in Security Incident Response
19th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IBM Resilient
Ranking in Security Incident Response
3rd
Average Rating
7.4
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (9th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Security Incident Response category, the mindshare of Hexadite is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Resilient is 12.9%, up from 6.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Security Incident Response
 

Featured Reviews

Use Hexadite?
Share your opinion
Usman Bhatti - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 15, 2023
Simple deployment, scalable, but lacking third-party solution compatibility
Integrating IBM Resilient with other applications can be very difficult and technically challenging. Often, they use the excuse that you are using the latest version of an application, such as an endpoint security system, and they don't have an API or support for it at the moment. There is no automation in the SOAR solution. It's worth noting that many third-party add-on applications needed to be purchased separately to integrate with IBM Resilient. While there were built-in applications available for incident remediation, the selection was limited. Additionally, integrating third-party applications was often a difficult and time-consuming process due to the technical complexity involved.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"I would rate the tool’s pricing a three out of ten. The tool’s pricing is on a yearly basis."
"We could create unlimited users using the license we had purchased."
"The licensing cost for IBM Resilient is not too expensive, but it's not affordable, so it's moderately expensive. Regarding price, I'm rating the solution seven out of ten. The company pays for the license yearly, based on the number of users. Apart from the cost of the license you need to pay for each user, you also need to spend an initial investment for the base platform. You also have to pay for IBM Resilient support."
"The cost of the product is quite high."
"There is a license you need to pay for in order to use this product."
"It is very expensive."
"There are no costs except for the support services that our company pays in addition to the licensing charges attached to the solution."
"I feel it is an expensive product when my company pays annually for renewal, support, and follow-up."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Incident Response solutions are best for your needs.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
26%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about IBM Resilient?
It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Resilient?
I am not the one in charge of pricing, so I am not sure about the costs.
What needs improvement with IBM Resilient?
Integration with some devices, including Cisco PowerPower and certain antivirus products, has limitations.
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

Information not available
 

Sample Customers

Nuance
Golden Living, Health Equity, USA Funds
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, ServiceNow, IBM and others in Security Incident Response. Updated: November 2024.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.