Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Resilient vs IBM Security QRadar comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Resilient
Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
9th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
Security Incident Response (3rd)
IBM Security QRadar
Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
204
Ranking in other categories
Log Management (6th), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (4th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (1st), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (18th), Managed Detection and Response (MDR) (10th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (14th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category, the mindshare of IBM Resilient is 2.9%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Security QRadar is 8.0%, down from 9.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
 

Featured Reviews

Usman Bhatti - PeerSpot reviewer
Simple deployment, scalable, but lacking third-party solution compatibility
Integrating IBM Resilient with other applications can be very difficult and technically challenging. Often, they use the excuse that you are using the latest version of an application, such as an endpoint security system, and they don't have an API or support for it at the moment. There is no automation in the SOAR solution. It's worth noting that many third-party add-on applications needed to be purchased separately to integrate with IBM Resilient. While there were built-in applications available for incident remediation, the selection was limited. Additionally, integrating third-party applications was often a difficult and time-consuming process due to the technical complexity involved.
Muzzamil Hussain - PeerSpot reviewer
Is easy to integrate and doesn't require maintenance
One major drawback we are facing is in the area of IBM Security QRadar integration with flat file databases. IBM Security QRadar does not support flat file database integration. We are currently facing an issue with respect to the database, which you normally call a NoSQL database. There is no direct integration mechanism available with IBM Security QRadar. We have to approach IBM and generate a ticket so that they can develop a custom method for the integration. In database integration, we are facing issues with IBM Security QRadar. The solution does not support the integration of flat file databases. Certain organizations have flat file databases. IBM does not support direct integration with some databases. We had to create a plug, and we requested IBM to develop a parser, but it is taking IBM a couple of months to develop it. I think a flat-file database should be supported directly instead of developing a parser plugin. There should be a more refined threat intelligence platform, and cross-integration should be possible with locally available threat intelligence platforms.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"Its flexibility is the most valuable."
"IBM Resilient is scalable."
"It's really simple and has a flexible interface."
"The UBA, User Behavior Analytics, is very good."
"This is a good solution that we recommend for customers."
"The solution is very easy to use."
"The solution is simple to use and to integrate with IBM QRadar."
"I have found the most important features to be the flexibility, tech framework, and disk manager."
"The most valuable feature is the DSM Editor. The custom parsing tool is very nice, outstanding."
"The most valuable feature is the searching capability and real-time operational use."
"Technical support is good overall."
"It saves a lot of time. We integrate the customer's firewall with all their networking devices."
"I have found its network traffic log, network bit log, and QBI most valuable."
"The scalability is good."
"Log correlation is very useful for processing alerts. It serves to follow up alerts in real-time, building an entire workflow."
 

Cons

"The product must provide more integration with other tools."
"The ability to analyze incidents needs to be improved in the solution."
"The initial setup is complex."
"Its price needs improvement."
"The tool needs to improve its documentation on license scripts."
"It is not very straightforward to set up custom integrations, especially with services like Azure. You need an additional server for integration."
"The response time of the support is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"IBM Resilient is quite complex, including its configuration."
"We would like to see better instrumentation for debugging changes in the log flow."
"The quoting and the dashboard session could be improved. It should be more user-friendly."
"In terms of additional features, a mobile app would be nice. Also, the reporting is definitely okay, but you have to make sure that everybody with different roles can understand it. There is room for improvement in the reporting."
"The solution is highly used here in Pakistan and in many sectors, they could improve it by having more SIEM connectors."
"For future updates, I'd like to see more advanced threat intelligence features integrated with AI. This would help with analyzing traffic patterns and improving protection. QRadar currently doesn't integrate with AI for threat analysis. However, AI could enhance its capabilities by learning traffic patterns and automatically blocking or quarantining suspicious traffic. This would be especially useful when administrators are not actively monitoring. AI could help by analyzing incoming and outgoing traffic and adjusting policies accordingly."
"The price of IBM Security QRadar is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The solution should enhance its capabilities of UEBA and AI/ML tech modeling."
"I think that the search speed of this solution could be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We could create unlimited users using the license we had purchased."
"It is very expensive."
"There are no costs except for the support services that our company pays in addition to the licensing charges attached to the solution."
"The licensing cost for IBM Resilient is not too expensive, but it's not affordable, so it's moderately expensive. Regarding price, I'm rating the solution seven out of ten. The company pays for the license yearly, based on the number of users. Apart from the cost of the license you need to pay for each user, you also need to spend an initial investment for the base platform. You also have to pay for IBM Resilient support."
"I feel it is an expensive product when my company pays annually for renewal, support, and follow-up."
"There is a license you need to pay for in order to use this product."
"The cost of the product is quite high."
"Pricing for the solution is good, in my opinion."
"QRadar UBA's price is a little more than street price and could be reduced."
"It is cheaper than ArcSight."
"IBM Security QRadar is a very expensive tool."
"The solution is priced fairly, there is a license for the solution, and we pay annually."
"QRadar's price is reasonable compared to LogRhythm."
"Customers have to purchase a license based on the number of users, devices, and applications they want to protect. It allows you to take a license on a subscription basis for three years or five years."
"When it comes to the initial pricing there can be a huge discount from there side and also I think they are open to competing with other products."
"found other solutions, with more features at the same cost or less. You don’t have to leave the Gartner Magic Quadrant to beat their price."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

VS
Jun 28, 2015
Qradar vs. ArcSight
Continuing with the SIEM posts we have done at Infosecnirvana, this post is a Head to head comparison of the two Industry leading SIEM products in the market – HP ArcSight and IBM QRadar Both the products have consistently been in the Gartner Leaders Quadrant. Both HP and IBM took over niche SIEM…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
27%
Computer Software Company
13%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Educational Organization
23%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Resilient?
It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Resilient?
I am not the one in charge of pricing, so I am not sure about the costs.
What needs improvement with IBM Resilient?
Integration with some devices, including Cisco PowerPower and certain antivirus products, has limitations.
What are the biggest differences between Securonix UEBA, Exabeam, and IBM QRadar?
It mostly depends on your use-cases and environment. Exabeam and Securonix have a stronger UEBA feature set, friendlier GUI and are not licensed based on capacity (amount of logs and information in...
What SOC product do you recommend?
For tools I’d recommend: -SIEM- LogRhythm -SOAR- Palo Alto XSOAR Doing commercial w/o both (or at least an XDR) is asking to miss details that are critical, and ending up a statistic. Also, rememb...
What do you like most about IBM QRadar?
The event collector, flow collector, PCAP and SOAR are valuable.
 

Also Known As

No data available
IBM QRadar, QRadar SIEM, QRadar UBA, QRadar on Cloud, QRadar, IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics, IBM QRadar Advisor with Watson
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Golden Living, Health Equity, USA Funds
Clients across multiple industries, such as energy, financial, retail, healthcare, government, communications, and education use QRadar.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Resilient vs. IBM Security QRadar and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.