Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Hitachi Content Platform vs IBM Cloud Object Storage comparison

Hitachi Vantara and IBM are both solutions in the File and Object Storage category. Hitachi Vantara is ranked #18 with an average rating of 7.0, while IBM is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.8. Hitachi Vantara holds a 1.7% mindshare in FaOS, compared to IBM’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Hitachi Vantara users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of IBM users who would recommend it.
Hitachi Content Platform
Read 14 Hitachi Content Platform reviews
  • 1,417 Views
  • 981 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend
IBM Cloud Object Storage
Read 7 IBM Cloud Object Storage reviews
  • 1,526 Views
  • 980 Comparison Views
85% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

IBM Cloud Object Storage and Hitachi Content Platform are key players in the cloud storage market, each appealing to different organizational needs. IBM has an edge with competitive pricing and broad integration capabilities, while Hitachi offers advanced data management suitable for enterprises with specific data requirements.

Features: IBM Cloud Object Storage offers scalability, flexible storage classes, and seamless integration with IBM cloud services, which is beneficial for businesses using multiple IBM products. On the other hand, Hitachi Content Platform provides comprehensive data management capabilities, multi-cloud support, and sophisticated data retention policies, catering to enterprises needing advanced solutions.

Room for Improvement: IBM Cloud Object Storage could enhance its interface for non-tech users, offer more granular data analytics, and expand third-party integrations. Hitachi Content Platform may improve its deployment simplicity, reduce the complexity of its pricing models, and increase documentation clarity for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Cloud Object Storage stands out for its straightforward deployment and accessible support, simplifying the implementation process for customers. Hitachi Content Platform might have a more complex deployment process but compensates with strong customer service and detailed documentation, suiting companies requiring specialized support.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Cloud Object Storage is known for its cost-effective pricing that offers high ROI for businesses with diverse storage needs. In contrast, Hitachi Content Platform, despite its higher initial costs, provides a solid ROI for enterprises focusing on extensive data governance and protection, making it a valuable investment for targeted use cases.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Hitachi Content Platform vs. IBM Cloud Object Storage Report (Updated: December 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Hitachi Content Platform vs. IBM Cloud Object Storage
December 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 824,067 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

Hitachi Content Platform
Ranking in File and Object Storage
18th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IBM Cloud Object Storage
Ranking in File and Object Storage
12th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the File and Object Storage category, the mindshare of Hitachi Content Platform is 1.7%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Cloud Object Storage is 1.4%, down from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
File and Object Storage
 

Featured Reviews

Mir Gulzar Ahmed - PeerSpot reviewer
Integrates well with existing systems but technical support for the platform needs improvement
While deployment is simple, it's not as simple as StorageGRID. The architecture is entirely different, even though the end product uses the same protocols. The user interface isn't as user-friendly, and the management platform UI isn't as intuitive as others. Deployment isn't as centralized either. Although I've deployed Hitachi Content myself in our production head office for the VM team, even though it's simple, it wasn't completely straightforward. They still required my help with the initial configuration environment setup. So, it's not just simple; there are some tricky aspects. The environment is tricky, but if you understand it, configuration can be done quickly.
Read full review
Steve Qualls - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers the ease with which you can move data between on-premises storage and the cloud and then retrieve it back on-premises when necessary
IBM Cloud Object Storage supports big data and analytics workflows. However, I usually have to refer to my documentation for that. Cloud environments are part of almost every project I've been involved in over the last few years, but I rely heavily on documentation whenever I need to do anything in the cloud. I know the basics, but the technical details always need refreshing. I create the drawings or diagrams of how the on-premises and cloud environments interact. So, visual representations are helpful. I'll diagram the on-premises environment, the cloud environment, and any appliances in between and then work from there. The integration capabilities simplified our data workflows. Like, the integration itself is pretty easy. The access appliances create the connection between both environments.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The main selling point is its compatibility with different environments. It functions like an on-prem Google Drive or Dropbox built on top of the object storage."
"Companies can scale the solution."
"As an architect, I like the management features that come with Hitachi Content Platform because it makes things easy."
"The way that they handle the DR is very good because when there is a failover, it is seamless to the users."
"Integrating Hitachi Content Platform with existing systems is not challenging."
"Hitachi is a big company, so it's a very strong product."
"The features that I have found most valuable are their retention logs. The other thing I have found most valuable is the way they handle the BHEA. Basically the DNS and everything is managed by itself. It is seamless to the users."
"The product provides the fastest technology."
More Hitachi Content Platform pros
"The most valuable feature I like is when you connect it via CLI plug-in...It is a stable solution."
"The standout feature of IBM Cloud Object Storage is its top-notch security, making it ideal for sensitive applications like mobile financial transactions."
"IBM Cloud Object Storage integrates well."
"One of Cloud Object Storage's best features is infinite capacity. This is one of the main advantages if you don't want to use your own storage. You also have the ability to write only, write once, and read many. It's like tape storage but software-based. This feature is essential for financial institutions that require that kind of protection if you write backup or data there."
"IBM has the most number of additional services, this is the main advantage."
"The integration itself is pretty easy. The access appliances create the connection between both environments."
 

Cons

"Hitachi Content Platform is a complicated solution. You need to put several pieces of the hardware together in order to achieve the capacity or the performance needed."
"Two things that can be improved are pricing and configuration. Mostly the pricing is an issue. And if I were to add anything, I would say more integration with backup solutions such as Veeam Backup."
"In terms of the customer support, I can say it's a mixed reaction depending on the country."
"The solution could use more integration with clouds."
"Although they claim to provide NFS, the actual implementation requires an additional gateway, which makes it a costly solution."
"This product's ability to track logs for access still needs to be improved."
"There is room for improvement in the capacity for integration with other platforms."
"What is lacking in this solution is a simple process to migrate from existing systems."
More Hitachi Content Platform cons
"The performance could improve in IBM Cloud Object Storage. The throughput or objects per second can have degradation."
"One improvement could be incorporating a feature similar to Dropbox's version history. This would allow users to track modifications made to files over time, which is particularly important for maintaining a record of changes. While the free version might not include this feature, it could be included in the paid version to provide added value to clients. Additionally, having a version history feature that allows users to access modifications made to files over the past three months could be beneficial."
"One area where IBM Cloud Object Storage could potentially improve is in modernizing its underlying codebase."
"If I had to choose one area, it would be making the consoles more intuitive would be helpful. Sometimes, they can be a little complicated if you're not familiar with them."
"The performance could be better. It isn't bad, but everything is network-based, so you have a performance penalty on the network. You can never achieve the same performance as hardware. That's the disadvantage of cloud storage solutions in general. Cloud performance is one of the main issues clients have."
"IBM Cloud storage is not cheap, but it could be."
"IBM has limited cloud storage."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Hitachi is more expensive than StorageGRID."
"The pricing could be better."
"I think the ROI for this solution is very good because the pricing for it is in between other solutions."
"Pricing is comparable to other solutions in the market."
"The product’s cost is average."
"Overall, it's costly."
"The price of the Hitachi Content Platform is very high."
"Pricing is not cheap."
"You have the option of a monthly or yearly license. Most customers choose the monthly option. I understand what you would like to say. IBM also lets you choose among four types of Cloud Object Storage. The difference is usage, performance, etc. Of course, high-performance storage is more expensive, while low-performance storage is for cold data, and it's really cheap."
"Like most cloud providers, IBM likely charges based on storage capacity, typically per gigabyte or terabyte. Their pricing is competitive when compared to AWS or Microsoft."
"IBM Cloud is cheaper than AWS. If you want to scale your cloud infrastructure, it can be bought at almost the same price."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File and Object Storage solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
27%
Computer Software Company
20%
Government
11%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Educational Organization
41%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Hitachi Content Platform?
Integrating Hitachi Content Platform with existing systems is not challenging.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Hitachi Content Platform?
In comparison to competitors like Huawei, which can use all storage protocols in the same platform, Hitachi Content Platform lacks the integration of block, file, and object on a single system. Alt...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Hitachi Content Platform?
Mainly, from my project, Hitachi Content Platform is used for archiving. The customer is in banking, so they need to keep their long-term data on the platform. The platform is replacing their exist...
See all answers
What do you like most about IBM Cloud Object Storage?
The integration itself is pretty easy. The access appliances create the connection between both environments.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Cloud Object Storage?
Like most cloud providers, IBM likely charges based on storage capacity, typically per gigabyte or terabyte. Their pricing is competitive when compared to AWS or Microsoft. I don't believe it's sig...
See all answers
What needs improvement with IBM Cloud Object Storage?
All cloud environments have been pretty robust over the last few years. Of course, there's always room for improvement. If I had to choose one area, it would be making the consoles more intuitive w...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Dell ECS vs Hitachi Content Platform Logo
Dell ECS vs Hitachi Content Platform
Compared 30% of the time
MinIO vs Hitachi Content Platform Logo
MinIO vs Hitachi Content Platform
Compared 27% of the time
NetApp StorageGRID vs Hitachi Content Platform Logo
NetApp StorageGRID vs Hitachi Content Platform
Compared 13% of the time
Red Hat Ceph Storage vs Hitachi Content Platform Logo
Red Hat Ceph Storage vs Hitachi Content Platform
Compared 11% of the time
More Hitachi Content Platform Competitors
Red Hat Ceph Storage vs IBM Cloud Object Storage Logo
Red Hat Ceph Storage vs IBM Cloud Object Storage
Compared 25% of the time
Dell ECS vs IBM Cloud Object Storage Logo
Dell ECS vs IBM Cloud Object Storage
Compared 21% of the time
MinIO vs IBM Cloud Object Storage Logo
MinIO vs IBM Cloud Object Storage
Compared 18% of the time
NetApp StorageGRID vs IBM Cloud Object Storage Logo
NetApp StorageGRID vs IBM Cloud Object Storage
Compared 10% of the time
IBM Spectrum Scale vs IBM Cloud Object Storage Logo
IBM Spectrum Scale vs IBM Cloud Object Storage
Compared 4% of the time
More IBM Cloud Object Storage Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Hitachi Content Platform
December 2024
Hitachi Content Platform reportDownload Hitachi Content Platform product report
Buyer's Guide
IBM Cloud Object Storage
December 2024
IBM Cloud Object Storage reportDownload IBM Cloud Object Storage product report
 

Also Known As

HCP, Hitachi Vantara Content Platform, Hitachi Vantara HCP
Cleversafe
 

Learn More

Hitachi Vantara
IBM
 

Overview

Hitachi Content Platform is an object storage solution that enables IT organizations and cloud service providers to store, share, sync, protect, preserve, analyze and retrieve file data from a single system. It is more efficient, easier to use, and capable of handling much more data than traditional file storage solutions. HCP automates day-to-day IT operations like data protection and readily evolves to changes in scale, scope, applications, storage, server and cloud technologies over the life of data. In IT environements where data grows quickly or must live for years, decades or even indefinitely, these capabilities are invaluable.

IBM Cloud Object Storage is a web-scale platform that stores unstructured data - from petabyte to exabyte - with reliability, security, availability and disaster recovery without replication.

 

Sample Customers

Rabobank, Xinhua News Agency, Kremsm'ller Industrieanlagenbau KG, KSC Commercial Internet, AIS Group, Shanghai Interactive Television Co. Ltd (SiTV), China Telecom, Spin Master
Bitly, Dreamstime, Prime Research
Buyer's Guide
Hitachi Content Platform vs. IBM Cloud Object Storage
December 2024
Free Report: Hitachi Content Platform vs. IBM Cloud Object Storage
Find out what your peers are saying about Hitachi Content Platform vs. IBM Cloud Object Storage and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Hitachi Content Platform vs. IBM Cloud Object Storage report.
See our list of best File and Object Storage vendors.

We monitor all File and Object Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.