Hitachi NAS Platform vs IBM FlashSystem comparison

Hitachi Vantara and IBM are both solutions in the NAS category. Hitachi Vantara is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.0, while IBM is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3. Hitachi Vantara holds a 2.8% mindshare in N, compared to IBM’s 13.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Hitachi Vantara users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Hitachi NAS Platform

Read 11 Hitachi NAS Platform reviews

936 Views
600 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM FlashSystem

Read 110 IBM FlashSystem reviews

3,797 Views
2,867 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Hitachi NAS Platform

IBM FlashSystem

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 7, 2024

Hitachi NAS Platform and IBM FlashSystem compete in the storage solutions market. Hitachi NAS Platform has the upper hand in competitive pricing and customer support, while IBM FlashSystem leads in advanced features and performance.

Features: Hitachi NAS Platform offers robust scalability, integrated data protection, and the ability to handle a high number of users. IBM FlashSystem is valued for high-speed performance, advanced analytics, and comprehensive integration capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Hitachi NAS Platform could enhance advanced analytics and integration capabilities, improve data migration processes, and offer more features for demanding environments. IBM FlashSystem could improve setup processes, better address user feedback during complex configurations, and enhance initial cost-effectiveness to appeal to a broader market.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Hitachi NAS Platform provides simplified deployment and reliable customer service, supporting quick setup and ease of management. IBM FlashSystem involves a more complex deployment but offers dedicated customer service to manage intricate configurations and support.

Pricing and ROI: Hitachi NAS Platform is known for its lower setup cost, attracting budget-conscious buyers with a quicker ROI. IBM FlashSystem commands a higher upfront investment, justified by superior performance and long-term benefits, appealing to those prioritizing technological superiority and long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Hitachi NAS Platform vs. IBM FlashSystem Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Hitachi NAS Platform vs. IBM FlashSystem

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,640 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Hitachi NAS Platform

Ranking in NAS

15th

Average Rating

6.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM FlashSystem

Ranking in NAS

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

110

Ranking in other categories

Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) (4th), All-Flash Storage (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the NAS category, the mindshare of Hitachi NAS Platform is 2.8%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM FlashSystem is 13.9%, up from 13.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NAS

Featured Reviews

Atilla Celiloglu

Broadcast Technology Director at tv8

Significantly improved our storage operations storage operations but the interface needs enhancements

I am using Hitachi NAS for storage solutions Hitachi NAS has improved my storage operations significantly. Additionally, it enhances data accessibility, although I did not specify a particular functionality. I rated Hitachi NAS a seven out of ten, primarily due to the interface or insufficient…

Read full review

Raanan Sitton

Vice President Sales at BELOCAL LTD

Offers cost-effective storage for small companies with budget constraints

IBM FlashSystem 5300 is offered at a very low cost in Israel, which is advantageous for small companies. However, other features like deduplication and compression do not perform effectively. The price sensitivity makes it a viable option for clients with budgetary constraints, as it allows us to secure deals based on the cost rather than advanced performance.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product’s technical support services are good."

"It creates a NAS environment on top of Hitachi SAN, which facilitates customers who need NAS protocols along with their existing SAN portfolio."

"The most valuable feature is its ability to handle a high number of users while maintaining both stability and performance."

"Hitachi NAS Platform is very stable."

"The product has valuable features for data migration."

"Hitachi NAS has improved my storage operations significantly."

"The Hitachi storage platform is highly scalable and highly available."

"Hitachi NAS has improved my storage operations significantly."

More Hitachi NAS Platform pros

"The installation is nice and easy."

"The most valuable features of IBM FlashSystem are performance and security."

"The initial setup was really straightforward. It was not complex. Deployment took one month, due to the data migration duration."

"We've found the solution to be very stable so far."

"They have a virtualization feature and, even if you do not want to buy that feature, you can have it as a trial for two to three months. If you have another brand of storage from another company, you can use this tool to transfer all your data from the old system to the new Storwize system, which really shortens the migration time."

"The most valuable features are flexibility and performance."

"The solution is very easy to configure and use."

"The most valuable features are deduplication and compression, which together, enable you to have more space."

More IBM FlashSystem pros

Cons

"The monitoring tool is not well developed."

"The Hitachi NAS Platform is too complicated, not simple, and not cost-effective, sometimes being inappropriate for most situations."

"Hitachi NAS Platform is expensive."

"Hitachi NAS Platform needs to improve by offering a unified storage solution. Due to budget constraints in regions like Southeast Asia, customers prefer a single machine that can handle all problems, which the current platform does not provide."

"I would suggest that Hitachi make a NAS box that can work independently, without relying on SAN connectivity."

"There are insufficient improvements in certain areas."

"Hitachi NAS Platform's pricing could be reduced. It is high compared to other competitors."

"I encounter challenges while installing the upgrades for the product."

More Hitachi NAS Platform cons

"IBM FlashSystem 5300 needs improvement in its deduplication and compression features."

"IBM should improve its data reduction development."

"This solution could be improved by offering greater amounts of storage."

"I know they have a flashcopy manager, but it is extra software, an additional license, and some customers don't like to add addition costs to their infrastructure. If IBM could create, or include snapshot management within the GUI, that would really be helpful."

"The security features can be improved such that the encryption does not affect performance in any way."

"Include an option to upload the support package to the IBM ECuRep when opening an IBM PMR."

"It has room for improvement in the area of stability."

"The solution's pricing is a bit high so there is room for improvement."

More IBM FlashSystem cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This solution is priced well and there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"Hitachi NAS Platform’s price is high and depends on SCSI disc capacity."

"I would rate the solution's pricing six to seven out of ten."

"Costs are based on the features and it is a considerable amount."

"It is a highly-priced product."

"Overall the price of the solution is expensive and this includes the license."

"The solution has good pricing, but it is not cheaper."

"The pricing may be a bit higher than other brands. If you compare the IBM FlashSystems in midrange with Dell EMC in midrange, IBM costs a bit more, but I prefer IBM because it has more specs that I can benefit from."

"This solution is expensive compared to other solutions."

"You purchase it as a bundle and the price is comparable."

"The cost of the IBM FlashSystem is lower than the HPE solution."

"If five is a good price and one is a high price, I would rate the price a two or three out of five."

"For a yearly license, it is about $100,000. There are no additional costs. The entire system is included."

More IBM FlashSystem pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NAS solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,640 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Hiachi NAS Platform?

The product has valuable features for data migration.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hiachi NAS Platform?

I did not specify any thoughts on the pricing of Hitachi NAS.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Hiachi NAS Platform?

I rated Hitachi NAS a seven out of ten, primarily due to the interface or insufficient improvements in certain areas.

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM FlashSystem?

It is simple to make an update.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM FlashSystem?

Many factors affect purchasing directly from IBM, often involving a multi-step process. Customers, especially in banking, often use the latest devices as they are upgrading, indicating they do not ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM FlashSystem?

The GUI needs some improvement. An additional function that could be helpful is reducing the time it takes to delete volumes, especially if they are compressed or deduplicated.

See all answers

Comparisons

NetApp FAS Series vs Hitachi NAS Platform

Compared 32% of the time

Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs Hitachi NAS Platform

Compared 31% of the time

Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform vs Hitachi NAS Platform

Compared 26% of the time

More Hitachi NAS Platform Competitors

Dell PowerStore vs IBM FlashSystem

Compared 25% of the time

Pure Storage FlashArray vs IBM FlashSystem

Compared 8% of the time

Huawei OceanStor Dorado vs IBM FlashSystem

Compared 7% of the time

HPE Alletra Storage vs IBM FlashSystem

Compared 7% of the time

Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform vs IBM FlashSystem

Compared 6% of the time

More IBM FlashSystem Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NAS

January 2025

Download Hitachi NAS Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM FlashSystem

February 2025

Download IBM FlashSystem product report

Also Known As

Hitachi NAS

IBM Storwize

Overview

Hitachi NAS Platforms help you with file sharing, file server consolidation and application storage for Oracle, Microsoft and virtual environments. Deploy the highest performance per node in the industry. Apply capacity efficiencies that let you actually do more, but with a lot less. Realize significant cost savings for your organization.

Hitachi Vantara

IBM FlashSystem products are enterprise computer data storage systems that store data on flash memory chips. Unlike storage systems that use standard solid-state drives, IBM FlashSystem products incorporate custom hardware based on technology from the 2012 acquisition of Texas Memory Systems. This hardware provides performance, reliability, and efficiency benefits versus competitive offerings.

IBM

Sample Customers

Intersect Australia

Celero, Friedhelm Loh Group, Clarks, Mingkang Natregro Health Food Group, Sofia, Etisalat Fights Fraud, UF Health Shands Hospital, Generali, Elecon Engineering Company Limited, Ventiv , Technology, CPFL Energia, Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., SciQuest, Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated, Paddy Power, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Interconnect Services, Severstal IP-Only AB, PVU Group GmbH

Buyer's Guide

Hitachi NAS Platform vs. IBM FlashSystem

January 2025

Free Report: Hitachi NAS Platform vs. IBM FlashSystem

Find out what your peers are saying about Hitachi NAS Platform vs. IBM FlashSystem and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,640 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Hitachi NAS Platform vs. IBM FlashSystem report.

See our list of best NAS vendors.

We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.