Hitachi NAS Platform vs IBM FlashSystem comparison

Hitachi Vantara and IBM are both solutions in the NAS category. Hitachi Vantara is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.0, while IBM is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.4. Hitachi Vantara holds a 4.0% mindshare in N, compared to IBM’s 7.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Hitachi Vantara users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Hitachi NAS Platform

Read 10 Hitachi NAS Platform reviews

964 Views
624 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM FlashSystem

Read 110 IBM FlashSystem reviews

3,799 Views
2,926 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Hitachi NAS Platform

IBM FlashSystem

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 7, 2024

Hitachi NAS Platform and IBM FlashSystem compete in the storage solutions market. Hitachi NAS Platform has the upper hand in competitive pricing and customer support, while IBM FlashSystem leads in advanced features and performance.

Features: Hitachi NAS Platform offers robust scalability, integrated data protection, and the ability to handle a high number of users. IBM FlashSystem is valued for high-speed performance, advanced analytics, and comprehensive integration capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Hitachi NAS Platform could enhance advanced analytics and integration capabilities, improve data migration processes, and offer more features for demanding environments. IBM FlashSystem could improve setup processes, better address user feedback during complex configurations, and enhance initial cost-effectiveness to appeal to a broader market.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Hitachi NAS Platform provides simplified deployment and reliable customer service, supporting quick setup and ease of management. IBM FlashSystem involves a more complex deployment but offers dedicated customer service to manage intricate configurations and support.

Pricing and ROI: Hitachi NAS Platform is known for its lower setup cost, attracting budget-conscious buyers with a quicker ROI. IBM FlashSystem commands a higher upfront investment, justified by superior performance and long-term benefits, appealing to those prioritizing technological superiority and long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Hitachi NAS Platform vs. IBM FlashSystem Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Hitachi NAS Platform vs. IBM FlashSystem

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,158 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Hitachi NAS Platform

Ranking in NAS

15th

Average Rating

6.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM FlashSystem

Ranking in NAS

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

110

Ranking in other categories

Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) (4th), All-Flash Storage (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the NAS category, the mindshare of Hitachi NAS Platform is 4.0%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM FlashSystem is 7.6%, up from 7.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NAS

Featured Reviews

Atilla Celiloglu

Broadcast Technology Director at tv8

Significantly improved our storage operations storage operations but the interface needs enhancements

I am using Hitachi NAS for storage solutions Hitachi NAS has improved my storage operations significantly. Additionally, it enhances data accessibility, although I did not specify a particular functionality. I rated Hitachi NAS a seven out of ten, primarily due to the interface or insufficient…

Read full review

Raanan Sitton

Vice President Sales at BELOCAL LTD

Offers cost-effective storage for small companies with budget constraints

IBM FlashSystem 5300 is offered at a very low cost in Israel, which is advantageous for small companies. However, other features like deduplication and compression do not perform effectively. The price sensitivity makes it a viable option for clients with budgetary constraints, as it allows us to secure deals based on the cost rather than advanced performance.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Simple and extremely reliable."

"Hitachi NAS has improved my storage operations significantly."

"The reliability and scalability of Hitachi NAS Platform are valuable features."

"The product has valuable features for data migration."

"The pricing of this solution is good, which is an advantage that positions this product well."

"Hitachi NAS Platform is very stable."

"Hitachi is reliable with high availability and solid performance. It performs well regardless of the workload."

"The most valuable feature is its ability to handle a high number of users while maintaining both stability and performance."

More Hitachi NAS Platform pros

"The most valuable features in IBM FlashSystem are IOPS, performance, duplication, and compression."

"The most valuable feature is that is supports a high IOPS rate."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is compression."

"The maintenance service and support from IBM is very good."

"Most of the features for the reduction in data compression are useful. It is also very easy to use and administer. Its performance is also good."

"One of the most valuable features is that it's very easy to use and configure. It used to be more difficult, but now it's almost flawless."

"The valuable features of IBM FlashSystem include flash copy mapping, which is a procedure to collect instant point-in-time data for testing real data."

"IBM's technical support do excellent work."

More IBM FlashSystem pros

Cons

"I do not like Hitachi NAS because it's an old-school NAS solution, compared to the other, newer-type solutions such as Isilon from Dell or Qumulo."

"Hitachi could be more flexible and have a simpler management interface."

"I rated Hitachi NAS a seven out of ten, primarily due to the interface or insufficient improvements in certain areas."

"There are insufficient improvements in certain areas."

"I encounter challenges while installing the upgrades for the product."

"Hitachi NAS Platform's pricing could be reduced. It is high compared to other competitors."

"Hitachi NAS Platform needs to improve by offering a unified storage solution. Due to budget constraints in regions like Southeast Asia, customers prefer a single machine that can handle all problems, which the current platform does not provide."

"The monitoring tool is not well developed."

More Hitachi NAS Platform cons

"The solution is not able to replicate data in one-to-many scenario."

"They can include Amazon file system S3 protocol in the upcoming releases. It is a cloud file system. IBM FlashSystem doesn't have this feature in the box for high-end or mid-range. We have got requests for this from customers because we need to use S3 for EDI application storage. At the beginning of every year, IBM releases firmware. When I find any bugs in the firmware during the year, I am unable to find any information from IBM regarding the bug. I need to open a ticket, and the IBM engineering team makes a patch only for me. This patch is not public. By creating a customized patch for a client, they don't really solve the issue for everyone. If multiple users have the same bug, IBM should upload the patch on the official website so that we can download it. IBM FlashSystem has a monitoring tool in the box, but it is not advanced. I need a more advanced tool for more advanced equations and monitoring. All top three storage vendors, that is, EMC, IBM, and Pure Storage, don't have a powerful monitoring tool. To monitor our box to show the statistics for I/Os and latency, I need to pay for extra software. The built-in monitoring storage is not mature enough to handle all requests and generate all reports that I need. They can include the functionality to stretch a cluster natively without using any additional boxes. In addition, there are some features that EMC has integrated with the box. These features are not available in IBM FlashSystem."

"The customer's expectations are what they get on the cloud, they're expecting even in the on-premises deployments, going forward."

"The only issue my team faced was transferring the data from the old system to IBM FlashSystem, which is an area for improvement in the solution."

"Include an option to upload the support package to the IBM ECuRep when opening an IBM PMR."

"The solution's infrastructure technology level could be PCI Express 5 instead of PCI Express 4 for the next version."

"The data reduction pool feature sucks and is not recommended for use with heavy workloads."

"The storage capacity of this solution could be improved."

More IBM FlashSystem cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Hitachi NAS Platform’s price is high and depends on SCSI disc capacity."

"It is a highly-priced product."

"This solution is priced well and there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"I would rate the solution's pricing six to seven out of ten."

"Costs are based on the features and it is a considerable amount."

"For a yearly license, it is about $100,000. There are no additional costs. The entire system is included."

"The pricing may be a bit higher than other brands. If you compare the IBM FlashSystems in midrange with Dell EMC in midrange, IBM costs a bit more, but I prefer IBM because it has more specs that I can benefit from."

"You purchase it as a bundle and the price is comparable."

"The cost is pretty high in terms of licensing. We pay at least $100,000 USD in licensing fees for the storage."

"The price depends of the technology that our customers need. The price can come at a lower cost but this may increase as storage is added."

"The total storage capacity vs price is still quite high for the IBM Flash Array."

"The pricing has been very competitive for the last few years. IBM got to the point where they changed the pricing model and we feel very comfortable with the pricing. It's very competitive. Over the last two years, IBM has been coming up with all kinds of interesting promos, especially for the SMB systems. That makes it very competitive price-wise and in terms of performance..."

"I'd rate the basic licensing and the Virtualize software a ten out of ten, and the extra Spectrum and other an eight out of ten."

More IBM FlashSystem pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NAS solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Energy/Utilities Company

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Hiachi NAS Platform?

The product has valuable features for data migration.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hiachi NAS Platform?

I did not specify any thoughts on the pricing of Hitachi NAS.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Hiachi NAS Platform?

I rated Hitachi NAS a seven out of ten, primarily due to the interface or insufficient improvements in certain areas.

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM FlashSystem?

It is simple to make an update.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM FlashSystem?

Many factors affect purchasing directly from IBM, often involving a multi-step process. Customers, especially in banking, often use the latest devices as they are upgrading, indicating they do not ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM FlashSystem?

There is room for improvement in the troubleshooting part, specifically related to IBM Spectrum for Insight. Customers are uncomfortable with remote access, which affects automated remote support. ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs Hitachi NAS Platform

Compared 33% of the time

NetApp FAS Series vs Hitachi NAS Platform

Compared 31% of the time

Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform vs Hitachi NAS Platform

Compared 24% of the time

More Hitachi NAS Platform Competitors

Dell PowerStore vs IBM FlashSystem

Compared 25% of the time

Pure Storage FlashArray vs IBM FlashSystem

Compared 8% of the time

Huawei OceanStor Dorado vs IBM FlashSystem

Compared 7% of the time

Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform vs IBM FlashSystem

Compared 6% of the time

HPE Alletra Storage vs IBM FlashSystem

Compared 6% of the time

More IBM FlashSystem Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NAS

January 2025

Download Hitachi NAS Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM FlashSystem

January 2025

Download IBM FlashSystem product report

Also Known As

Hitachi NAS

IBM Storwize

Learn More

Hitachi Vantara

IBM

Overview

Hitachi NAS Platforms help you with file sharing, file server consolidation and application storage for Oracle, Microsoft and virtual environments. Deploy the highest performance per node in the industry. Apply capacity efficiencies that let you actually do more, but with a lot less. Realize significant cost savings for your organization.

IBM FlashSystem products are enterprise computer data storage systems that store data on flash memory chips. Unlike storage systems that use standard solid-state drives, IBM FlashSystem products incorporate custom hardware based on technology from the 2012 acquisition of Texas Memory Systems. This hardware provides performance, reliability, and efficiency benefits versus competitive offerings.

Sample Customers

Intersect Australia

Celero, Friedhelm Loh Group, Clarks, Mingkang Natregro Health Food Group, Sofia, Etisalat Fights Fraud, UF Health Shands Hospital, Generali, Elecon Engineering Company Limited, Ventiv , Technology, CPFL Energia, Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., SciQuest, Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated, Paddy Power, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Interconnect Services, Severstal IP-Only AB, PVU Group GmbH

Buyer's Guide

Hitachi NAS Platform vs. IBM FlashSystem

January 2025

Free Report: Hitachi NAS Platform vs. IBM FlashSystem

Find out what your peers are saying about Hitachi NAS Platform vs. IBM FlashSystem and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Hitachi NAS Platform vs. IBM FlashSystem report.

See our list of best NAS vendors.

We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.