Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Hitachi NAS Platform vs IBM FlashSystem comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 7, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
6.4
IBM FlashSystem improves efficiency and resilience with scalability and features, offering valuable stability and reduced downtime despite higher costs.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.5
Hitachi NAS Platform's technical support is reliable, helpful, and well-rated, though customer service documentation could improve.
Sentiment score
7.0
IBM FlashSystem customer service is efficient, but support quality varies by location, with premium options gaining more satisfaction.
Customers of alternatives like Dell and Hitachi enjoy more reliable and comprehensive support services directly from vendors rather than third-party subsidiaries.
IBM customer support is responsible, efficient, and responsive, though it is expensive.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
Hitachi NAS Platform is scalable and integrates well with third-party storage, offering reliability and excellent virtualization capabilities.
Sentiment score
7.2
IBM FlashSystem's scalability is praised for flexibility and expansion, though some note cost and hardware limitations for larger firms.
Hitachi NAS Platform is good with scalability as it can scale up to eight nodes.
For larger enterprises, scalability is an issue as the price becomes prohibitive.
The problem arises when migrating data to a later IBM FlashSystem version due to issues with firmware compatibility.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.5
The Hitachi NAS Platform is praised for stability, despite issues with a software version causing occasional crashes and corruption.
Sentiment score
7.6
IBM FlashSystem is globally reliable, offering stability with consistent performance despite occasional hardware challenges and frequent enhancements.
Customers have infrastructure that is 100% stable.
 

Room For Improvement

Hitachi NAS Platform needs better documentation, management, cloud support, and cost-effective options, enhancing usability for budget-conscious clients.
IBM FlashSystem needs improvements in scalability, GUI navigation, storage capacity, pricing, cloud integration, and technical support.
Hitachi NAS Platform needs to improve by offering a unified storage solution.
Competitors offer more reliable data reduction with guaranteed results, sometimes providing additional capacity at no extra charge if performance ratios are not met.
There is room for improvement in the troubleshooting part, specifically related to IBM Spectrum for Insight.
 

Setup Cost

Hitachi NAS Platform is costly, suited for enterprises, with variable cost based on features, capacity, and scalability needs.
IBM FlashSystem offers competitive pricing often discounted, with costs varying by storage size, features, and advanced options.
Licensing can become costly when scaling the system.
To install or upgrade any software features, the cost is high, which makes it challenging for smaller companies who do not require advanced features like deduplication or compression typically needed by larger organizations.
 

Valuable Features

Hitachi NAS Platform excels in performance, scalability, supports mixed services, ensures high availability, and offers competitive pricing.
IBM FlashSystem is valued for high performance, ease of use, scalability, reliability, and cost-effective management of demanding workloads.
It supports NAS to NAS replication and can scale out to two, four, or eight nodes, providing more reliability and performance.
There is built-in compression, a data reduction feature, and artificial intelligence-driven insights that calculate warnings and errors to redirect to customers automatically.
IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe is offered at a very low cost in Israel, which is advantageous for small companies.
 

Categories and Ranking

Hitachi NAS Platform
Ranking in NAS
17th
Average Rating
6.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IBM FlashSystem
Ranking in NAS
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
109
Ranking in other categories
Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) (3rd), All-Flash Storage (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the NAS category, the mindshare of Hitachi NAS Platform is 4.1%, up from 3.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM FlashSystem is 7.5%, up from 7.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
NAS
 

Featured Reviews

German Vazquez - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy-to-manage product with efficient backup features
The product offers a complete solution I encounter challenges while installing the upgrades for the product. I had to back up all the old installations and configurations in the media architecture. I have been using Hitachi NAS Platform for two years. It is an easily scalable solution. I have…
Raanan Sitton - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers cost-effective storage for small companies with budget constraints
IBM FlashSystem 5300 is offered at a very low cost in Israel, which is advantageous for small companies. However, other features like deduplication and compression do not perform effectively. The price sensitivity makes it a viable option for clients with budgetary constraints, as it allows us to secure deals based on the cost rather than advanced performance.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NAS solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Energy/Utilities Company
9%
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Hiachi NAS Platform?
The product has valuable features for data migration.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hiachi NAS Platform?
For every additional node added to the system, an additional license needs to be purchased, which can increase costs. Licensing can become costly when scaling the system.
What needs improvement with Hiachi NAS Platform?
Hitachi NAS Platform needs to improve by offering a unified storage solution. Due to budget constraints in regions like Southeast Asia, customers prefer a single machine that can handle all problem...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM FlashSystem?
Many factors affect purchasing directly from IBM, often involving a multi-step process. Customers, especially in banking, often use the latest devices as they are upgrading, indicating they do not ...
What needs improvement with IBM FlashSystem?
There is room for improvement in the troubleshooting part, specifically related to IBM Spectrum for Insight. Customers are uncomfortable with remote access, which affects automated remote support. ...
 

Also Known As

Hitachi NAS
IBM Storwize
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Intersect Australia
Celero, Friedhelm Loh Group, Clarks, Mingkang Natregro Health Food Group, Sofia, Etisalat Fights Fraud, UF Health Shands Hospital, Generali, Elecon Engineering Company Limited, Ventiv , Technology, CPFL Energia, Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., SciQuest, Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated, Paddy Power, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Interconnect Services, Severstal IP-Only AB, PVU Group GmbH
Find out what your peers are saying about Hitachi NAS Platform vs. IBM FlashSystem and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.