Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Hitachi NAS Platform vs IBM FlashSystem comparison

Hitachi Vantara and IBM are both solutions in the NAS category. Hitachi Vantara is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.0, while IBM is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.5. Hitachi Vantara holds a 2.8% mindshare in N, compared to IBM’s 13.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Hitachi Vantara users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of IBM users who would recommend it.
Hitachi NAS Platform
Read 11 Hitachi NAS Platform reviews
  • 934 Views
  • 582 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
IBM FlashSystem
Read 110 IBM FlashSystem reviews
  • 3,687 Views
  • 2,812 Comparison Views
91% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 7, 2024

Hitachi NAS Platform and IBM FlashSystem compete in the storage solutions market. Hitachi NAS Platform has the upper hand in competitive pricing and customer support, while IBM FlashSystem leads in advanced features and performance.

Features: Hitachi NAS Platform offers robust scalability, integrated data protection, and the ability to handle a high number of users. IBM FlashSystem is valued for high-speed performance, advanced analytics, and comprehensive integration capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Hitachi NAS Platform could enhance advanced analytics and integration capabilities, improve data migration processes, and offer more features for demanding environments. IBM FlashSystem could improve setup processes, better address user feedback during complex configurations, and enhance initial cost-effectiveness to appeal to a broader market.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Hitachi NAS Platform provides simplified deployment and reliable customer service, supporting quick setup and ease of management. IBM FlashSystem involves a more complex deployment but offers dedicated customer service to manage intricate configurations and support.

Pricing and ROI: Hitachi NAS Platform is known for its lower setup cost, attracting budget-conscious buyers with a quicker ROI. IBM FlashSystem commands a higher upfront investment, justified by superior performance and long-term benefits, appealing to those prioritizing technological superiority and long-term value.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Hitachi NAS Platform vs. IBM FlashSystem Report (Updated: March 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Hitachi NAS Platform vs. IBM FlashSystem
March 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 841,004 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Hitachi NAS Platform
Ranking in NAS
15th
Average Rating
6.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IBM FlashSystem
Ranking in NAS
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
110
Ranking in other categories
Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) (4th), All-Flash Storage (13th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the NAS category, the mindshare of Hitachi NAS Platform is 2.8%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM FlashSystem is 13.6%, up from 13.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
NAS
 

Featured Reviews

Mir Gulzar Ahmed - PeerSpot reviewer
Needs standalone functionality but provides a robust NAS solution for existing SAN environments
I would suggest that Hitachi make a NAS box that can work independently, without relying on SAN connectivity. The current solution only suits customers who already have a Hitachi SAN environment and want to add NAS protocols like NFS and CIFS. It's not suitable for customers without an existing SAN, as they would first need to acquire the SAN infrastructure before adding NAS functionality.
Read full review
Raanan Sitton - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers cost-effective storage for small companies with budget constraints
IBM FlashSystem 5300 is offered at a very low cost in Israel, which is advantageous for small companies. However, other features like deduplication and compression do not perform effectively. The price sensitivity makes it a viable option for clients with budgetary constraints, as it allows us to secure deals based on the cost rather than advanced performance.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Hitachi NAS Platform is very stable."
"The product has valuable features for data migration."
"The reliability and scalability of Hitachi NAS Platform are valuable features."
"Simple and extremely reliable."
"It creates a NAS environment on top of Hitachi SAN, which facilitates customers who need NAS protocols along with their existing SAN portfolio."
"The Hitachi storage platform is highly scalable and highly available."
"Hitachi NAS has improved my storage operations significantly."
"The pricing of this solution is good, which is an advantage that positions this product well."
More Hitachi NAS Platform pros
"Over the years, it has become increasingly user-friendly."
"It is simple to make an update."
"The most valuable features are deduplication and compression."
"The installation is nice and easy."
"Virtualization of external storage, while adding cache and speed to the external storage."
"The power systems are very reliable if you are running 24/7 operations. For ongoing mission-critical applications, it's the best solution."
"The initial setup is straightforward and can be done in an hour and a half by one person."
"The most crucial feature of IBM FlashSystem is compression."
More IBM FlashSystem pros
 

Cons

"I rated Hitachi NAS a seven out of ten, primarily due to the interface or insufficient improvements in certain areas."
"There are insufficient improvements in certain areas."
"Hitachi NAS Platform is expensive."
"I do not like Hitachi NAS because it's an old-school NAS solution, compared to the other, newer-type solutions such as Isilon from Dell or Qumulo."
"I encounter challenges while installing the upgrades for the product."
"I would suggest that Hitachi make a NAS box that can work independently, without relying on SAN connectivity."
"The monitoring tool is not well developed."
"Hitachi NAS Platform's pricing could be reduced. It is high compared to other competitors."
More Hitachi NAS Platform cons
"I would like to see an improvement in the handling of large amounts of rights."
"I know they have a flashcopy manager, but it is extra software, an additional license, and some customers don't like to add addition costs to their infrastructure. If IBM could create, or include snapshot management within the GUI, that would really be helpful."
"The Data Reduction Pools (DRP) support could be better."
"The interface could improve in IBM FlashSystem."
"The deduplication and compression ratio is not very good. It's not reaching a very high ratio."
"The design is a little old-fashioned and could be updated. The rack is very primitive and designed in an older style."
"It is slightly more expensive, however, it all depends on your supplier."
"The price is very costly."
More IBM FlashSystem cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This solution is priced well and there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."
"I would rate the solution's pricing six to seven out of ten."
"Costs are based on the features and it is a considerable amount."
"Hitachi NAS Platform’s price is high and depends on SCSI disc capacity."
"It is a highly-priced product."
"Overall the price of the solution is expensive and this includes the license."
"The price is a little bit high so is rated a six out of ten."
"I would rate the pricing of this solution a four out of five."
"I'd rate the basic licensing and the Virtualize software a ten out of ten, and the extra Spectrum and other an eight out of ten."
"This is an expensive product and if the price were reduced it would be better."
"We have no issues with the price as it is very competitive."
"Its price is very good."
"Among IBM, Dell EMC, and Pure Storage, IBM is the cheapest. The price is also based on our location, the size of our entity, and our regular annual purchases from them. We are a very big IBM customer, so we normally get very high discounts. We are not a big customer of Pure Storage. We don't buy that much from Pure Storage per year. Everything is included in the price. There is no extra license for different functions."
More IBM FlashSystem pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NAS solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
841,004 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Energy/Utilities Company
9%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Hiachi NAS Platform?
The product has valuable features for data migration.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hiachi NAS Platform?
I did not specify any thoughts on the pricing of Hitachi NAS.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Hiachi NAS Platform?
I rated Hitachi NAS a seven out of ten, primarily due to the interface or insufficient improvements in certain areas.
See all answers
What do you like most about IBM FlashSystem?
It is simple to make an update.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM FlashSystem?
Many factors affect purchasing directly from IBM, often involving a multi-step process. Customers, especially in banking, often use the latest devices as they are upgrading, indicating they do not ...
See all answers
What needs improvement with IBM FlashSystem?
The GUI needs some improvement. An additional function that could be helpful is reducing the time it takes to delete volumes, especially if they are compressed or deduplicated.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs Hitachi NAS Platform Logo
Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs Hitachi NAS Platform
Compared 38% of the time
NetApp FAS Series vs Hitachi NAS Platform Logo
NetApp FAS Series vs Hitachi NAS Platform
Compared 27% of the time
Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform vs Hitachi NAS Platform Logo
Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform vs Hitachi NAS Platform
Compared 24% of the time
More Hitachi NAS Platform Competitors
Dell PowerStore vs IBM FlashSystem Logo
Dell PowerStore vs IBM FlashSystem
Compared 25% of the time
Pure Storage FlashArray vs IBM FlashSystem Logo
Pure Storage FlashArray vs IBM FlashSystem
Compared 7% of the time
HPE Alletra Storage vs IBM FlashSystem Logo
HPE Alletra Storage vs IBM FlashSystem
Compared 7% of the time
Huawei OceanStor Dorado vs IBM FlashSystem Logo
Huawei OceanStor Dorado vs IBM FlashSystem
Compared 7% of the time
Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform vs IBM FlashSystem Logo
Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform vs IBM FlashSystem
Compared 6% of the time
More IBM FlashSystem Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
NAS
February 2025
Hitachi NAS Platform reportDownload Hitachi NAS Platform product report
Buyer's Guide
IBM FlashSystem
February 2025
IBM FlashSystem reportDownload IBM FlashSystem product report
 

Also Known As

Hitachi NAS
IBM Storwize
 

Overview

Hitachi NAS Platforms help you with file sharing, file server consolidation and application storage for Oracle, Microsoft and virtual environments. Deploy the highest performance per node in the industry. Apply capacity efficiencies that let you actually do more, but with a lot less. Realize significant cost savings for your organization.
Hitachi Vantara

IBM FlashSystem products are enterprise computer data storage systems that store data on flash memory chips. Unlike storage systems that use standard solid-state drives, IBM FlashSystem products incorporate custom hardware based on technology from the 2012 acquisition of Texas Memory Systems. This hardware provides performance, reliability, and efficiency benefits versus competitive offerings.

IBM
 

Sample Customers

Intersect Australia
Celero, Friedhelm Loh Group, Clarks, Mingkang Natregro Health Food Group, Sofia, Etisalat Fights Fraud, UF Health Shands Hospital, Generali, Elecon Engineering Company Limited, Ventiv , Technology, CPFL Energia, Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., SciQuest, Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated, Paddy Power, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Interconnect Services, Severstal IP-Only AB, PVU Group GmbH
Buyer's Guide
Hitachi NAS Platform vs. IBM FlashSystem
March 2025
Free Report: Hitachi NAS Platform vs. IBM FlashSystem
Find out what your peers are saying about Hitachi NAS Platform vs. IBM FlashSystem and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
841,004 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Hitachi NAS Platform vs. IBM FlashSystem report.
See our list of best NAS vendors.

We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.