HP Wolf Security vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) comparison

HP and Trellix are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. HP is ranked #39 with an average rating of 8.0, while Trellix is ranked #24 with an average rating of 7.6. HP holds a 5.6% mindshare in EPP, compared to Trellix’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of HP users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

HP Wolf Security

Read 8 HP Wolf Security reviews

6,743 Views
5,747 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Trellix Endpoint Security (...

Read 53 Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) reviews

6,882 Views
5,189 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

HP Wolf Security

Trellix Endpoint Security (...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

HP Wolf Security and Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) are leading solutions in the cybersecurity market. HP Wolf Security has an edge in pricing and customer support, while Trellix ENS stands out for its comprehensive features.

Features: HP Wolf Security provides advanced threat protection, isolation capabilities, and seamless integration into existing systems. Trellix ENS offers extensive customization options, robust analytics, and a broader feature set.

Room for Improvement: HP Wolf Security could enhance advanced malware detection, reporting functionalities, and detection rates. Trellix ENS needs to simplify management, reduce false positives, and streamline the user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HP Wolf Security is recognized for its swift deployment and responsive support team. Trellix ENS, while more complex to deploy, benefits from comprehensive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: HP Wolf Security is cost-effective with a satisfactory return on investment. Trellix ENS has higher setup costs but offers a superior feature set and substantial long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed HP Wolf Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Report (Updated: November 2024).

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

November 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

HP Wolf Security

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

39th

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

40th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

3.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Trellix Endpoint Security (...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

24th

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

17th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of HP Wolf Security is 5.6%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is 1.6%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2344002

Owner at a performing arts with 11-50 employees

Adds a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments

The tool's deployment is easy. HP Wolf Security's deployment was a swift process since it was initially compatible with Windows 10, the operating system on both machines. However, when I transitioned to Windows 11, I encountered minor issues that prompted me to delve deeper into Wolf Security to fine-tune security settings according to my preferences. While I mostly used default settings, there was an initial adjustment where I disabled the AI function related to malware. Currently, the system is running smoothly with no reported issues. Adjusting some settings raised concerns about compatibility between HP Wolf Security and Norton 360. Specifically, aspects of HP Wolf Security, such as the virtual machine component, intrigued me, but I hesitated due to potential conflicts. During my investigation, Windows 11 raised a flag, questioning the system's security settings with Norton 360 and HP Wolf Security. However, it seems that they coexist well without causing issues.

Read full review

Venugopal Potumudi

Senior Consultant at Tata Consultancy

Reliable with good independent modules and a straightforward setup

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. Having used Trend Micro as well, I would rate Trend Micro higher. However, I would still choose this product as a second option. When we recommend a product, we would recommend something based on the fit of the product and customer requirements. We worked with Defender, we worked with Trend Micro, and we worked with McAfee. All of them almost overlap in multiple use cases. That said, we do see the customer IT strategy and where they're going, and they are adopting Azure more. We know there are certain limitations in their landscape where there may be some old legacy systems, and in that case, then we would either switch back to McAfee or Trend Micro instead of Defender.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Our overall security posture has absolutely improved as a result of adding Bromium to our security stack. We continue to have less user impact through a significantly reduced amount of malware infections. It's become a non-event."

"Now, instead of us having to go through that analysis, they actually give us a monthly report that shows us: "Here's what you got hit with, here's what would have happened, here are the forensics behind the attack," and, obviously, Bromium stopped it."

"We've been able to isolate and prevent malicious code from external email attachments and from downloaded internet files. Those are the two big areas that have really made an impact."

"The feature that stands out the most is that when someone clicks on a link in an email... [if] that link is malicious and it has some malware or keylogger attached to it, when it opens up in that Bromium virtualized browser, there's no chance of it actually being on the machine and running, because as soon as they click that "X" in the upper right-hand side of the browser, everything just vanishes. That is an added plus."

"The most valuable feature is the process isolation because it simply stops malware from infecting the machines."

"The isolation feature is the most important because it prevents attacks."

"I use HP Wolf Security to add a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments."

"It has prevented thousands of potential threats by encapsulating them within its own vSentry container, thus providing overall protection and integrity of the operating system."

"Provides good mobile device protection."

"The stability has been great."

"It has a feature called Isolation. If a device is compromised, we can connect it to our SOC, and no one would be able to access it. This way we can limit the damage to the network while we are investigating."

"The setup is not that complex. It takes five to ten minutes to set up."

"The product can be installed in almost any environment"

"The exploit guard and malware protection features are very useful. The logon tracker feature is also very useful. They have also given new modules such as logout backup, process backup. We ordered these modules from the FireEye market place, and we have installed these modules. We are currently exploring these features."

"I found the initial setup to be easy."

"If the network has seen something, we can use that to put a block to all the endpoints."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) pros

Cons

"I did not find this to be an out-of-the-box solution, it required planning and alignment across many groups."

"After a major release, there's always a lot of "dust settling." You have to work through all those issues and then you're fine for a while. The problem is, it's stable, it's fine, until the next major release comes out. Then you go back into the cycle again of uncertainty, instability, working through issues until they have patched and remediated all the problems that you're having. It's not unlike any other vendor though"

"They need to improve the compatibility with other applications and its stability. It works well with attacks, but it doesn't work well with all software on the clients. There is a lot of troubleshooting and a lot of things that need to be tuned to make it work and not break things."

"Initially, when we came in contact with Bromium a few years ago, it had a nice threat analyst, or a LAVA Pop, which is what they used to call it. Once it detected malware, it would show us the malware's path... I don't see that on the computers now. We only get to see that in the console. I would like to still see that on the individual machines because when we go out to look at a machine, we don't necessarily have access to the console."

"Room for improvement would be keeping up with the rate of change, specifically on Windows platforms. There are a lot of updates that come out for Microsoft Windows operating systems and the Bromium product needs to be able to keep up quickly with those updates and all the browser updates that are coming out. It's hard to do, but that's really where they need to be more responsive because we end up with problems and then we have to call support to get patches, etc."

"When you deploy, not only is the user asked to reboot their computer, they are also asked to wait for 20 minutes while it sits there and initializes. It definitely impacts the end-user. It takes time away from their day."

"The tool behaves differently when I ported to Windows 11."

"They have always struggled with usability. The protection that it offers you is tremendous, but there's definitely an impact with use of resources on the computer. It's gotten a lot better now with Win 10. But sometimes, when you open up a website, it's going to take longer than it would without Bromium, and it's the same with documents."

More HP Wolf Security cons

"I hope the solution can be used in cloud systems going forward."

"We would like to solution to offer better security."

"The detection and response capabilities need to be improved."

"The email protection isn't efficient enough, and I'd like to see DLP features in the next release."

"The customization capabilities of the solution are an area where it lacks, so it would be great if our company could customize the solution to meet the demands of our customers."

"The product is consolidating its portfolio into one product. It is difficult at the moment."

"There should be better integration between the ePolicy Orchestrator and FireEye console. The integration of both consoles should be better."

"It has very good integrations. However, its integration with Palo Alto was not good, and they seem to be working on it at the backend. It is not very resource-hungry, but it can be even better in terms of resource utilization. It could be improved in terms of efficiency, memory sizing, and disk consumption by agents."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is very fair compared to the competition. The licensing is straightforward."

"The product came as a bundle with the machine."

"Pricing is reasonable."

"I think the pricing is a good value. All of these security products are always going to be very expensive, but I don't think Bromium is unreasonable. I think Bromium is decently priced. It’s a tiered licensing platform. The more you buy, the cheaper gets per unit, and I think their tiers are very well defined. I think they're fair."

"The product's pricing is a good value. We only run it on our internet-facing workstations, we don't run it on everything in our environment. We are very selective. Some organizations may want to consider doing something like that to reduce their license count."

"I don't think there are any extra expenses besides its licensing costs."

"We had a discount when purchasing the solution because of the size of our company and we are happy with the price."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"The price of the product is similar to the ones in the market that offer the same features."

"The product pricing is high."

"Pricing for McAfee MVISION Endpoint is not very good, and I would rate its cost three out of five, though I won't be able to mention how much its actual price is."

"We are on an annual subscription for McAfee MVISION Endpoint. The cost for the license could be less expensive."

"They should reduce the cost or make it free, open-source software."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Educational Organization

Computer Software Company

15%

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HP Wolf Security?

The product came as a bundle with the machine.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HP Wolf Security?

The tool behaves differently when I ported to Windows 11.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HP Wolf Security?

I use HP Wolf Security to add a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments.

See all answers

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?

The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...

See all answers

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?

The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint?

The product's initial setup phase was straightforward.

See all answers

Comparisons

Norton Small Business vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 18% of the time

Bitdefender Total Security vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Business vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 10% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 6% of the time

More HP Wolf Security Competitors

Trellix Endpoint Security vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 22% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 17% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 14% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 13% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 6% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security

December 2024

Download HP Wolf Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

November 2024

Download Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) product report

Also Known As

Bromium vSentry

McAfee MVISION Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (HX)

Learn More

Video not available

Trellix

Overview

HP Wolf Security is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution that bolsters your organization's cyber-resilience on multiple fronts. With its full-stack security approach, it ensures layered protection from hardware to the cloud, providing a robust defense against cyber threats. HP Wolf Security introduces endpoint isolation, a cutting-edge feature that effectively halts threats that may go unnoticed by Next-Generation Antivirus (NGAV) and Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) systems. Moreover, it extends its security coverage to printers, equipping them with advanced detection and self-healing capabilities to further safeguard your digital ecosystem. This integrated solution streamlines IT and security risk management, resulting in fewer alerts and false positives, and reduces the time and effort required for endpoint incident analysis and remediation. Notably, HP Wolf Security prioritizes productivity, allowing you to manage risk without disrupting the user experience, enabling worry-free work from anywhere, and offering rapid IT disaster recovery at scale.

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is a comprehensive solution designed to protect organizations from advanced cyber threats. With its advanced threat detection capabilities, ENS provides real-time visibility into endpoint activities, enabling proactive threat hunting and response.

It leverages machine learning algorithms to identify and block sophisticated malware, ransomware, and zero-day attacks. ENS also offers robust data loss prevention (DLP) features, preventing sensitive information from being leaked or stolen. With its centralized management console, ENS allows administrators to easily deploy, monitor, and manage security policies across all endpoints.

ENS provides seamless integration with existing security infrastructure, ensuring a layered defense approach. With Trellix ENS, organizations can enhance their security posture and safeguard their critical assets from evolving cyber threats.

Sample Customers

Valspar

Tech Resources Limited, Globe Telecom, Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

November 2024

Free Report: HP Wolf Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Find out what your peers are saying about HP Wolf Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HP Wolf Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.