Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services vs ibi WebFOCUS comparison

"I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten. It's highly scalable and can handle significant data volumes."

"The most valuable feature is building ad hoc reports."

"It stands out for its ability to work across different platforms, support mainframe data, offer cloud integration, automate report scheduling, and provide a robust scripting language."

"The solution can read and write 500 different types of outputs."

"I mainly use the solution for the ease of reporting and for executive dashboards."

"Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services (SSRS) is reliable for management dashboard and reporting purposes. It is helpful for user reporting and administrative tasks, such as monitoring progress. It is easy to use since it is lightweight and integrates well with the SQL Server database, making reporting straightforward. The visualization capabilities enhance our reporting needs with good pagination and KPI features. It integrates well with data servers and workbooks, allowing us to publish reports on mobile applications and tablets easily. Integrating other tools and platforms in our tech ecosystem is generally straightforward. However, if we need to perform something very specialized, we might have to use third-party tools rather than inbuilt options."

"The initial setup is easy."

"The solution's features are all just wrapped up in one nice easy package. I don't need a lot of toolsets to get everything I need done."

"The solution is known for its robust security features."

"The SQL Server Reporting Services makes it very easy to get the data whenever we need it."

"We can create quality reports in real time."

"I am impressed with the product's seamless integration. It can work with different databases like Oracle."

"If there were to be any improvements right now, their documentation needs to get in sync with their product."

"The challenge lies not in what the tool can do but in how you use it and understand the data."

"When it comes to customer support, we don't always reach the right person. Sometimes, we get junior-level reps who aren't as knowledgeable as we are."

"The solution can be improved by adding more automated options for reporting."

"Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services needs to improve performance."

"The setup is difficult because you have to install different servers."

"I would like the solution to add the scheduling feature for reports."

"Tableau is more user-friendly because it doesn't need to do any extra programming. It has drag-and-drop functionality."

"Technical support is in minor need of improvement so that they can solve problems in a more timely manner."

"Sometimes, we need to make sure that the configuration stays consistent across the reporting instances. They all connect to the same database. So, it shares that same backend, but the reporting services itself can also be configured. On the application level, for reporting level. And it is, based on my own experience, it is a manual effort to make sure that the reporting servers are configured the same across the environment."

"The complex tuning for report performance is complicated. There is a lack of native support for source code control. We often need to use separate tools like VS Code or other software to manage version control and changes in the database. It would be beneficial if source code management were integrated directly into SSRS, thus eliminating the need to rely on external tools. While CLI-based operations are exemplary, the trend is towards GUI for a better user experience. Integrating both visualization and source code management within SSRS would simplify the process for users."

"In this solution, the cost should be reduced for the enterprise edition."

"I would rate the pricing a five out of ten, with ten being expensive."

"The solution is cheaper than its alternatives."

"The price is pretty good."

"The solution is free to use for developers."

"The product pricing is reasonable in terms of suitable features for business."

"The solution is expensive."

"The pricing is high."

"Value-wise, the solution's pricing is good for the price that we pay."

"The tool's licensing costs are expensive."