Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services vs ibi WebFOCUS comparison

"The most valuable feature is building ad hoc reports."

"I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten. It's highly scalable and can handle significant data volumes."

"The solution can read and write 500 different types of outputs."

"It stands out for its ability to work across different platforms, support mainframe data, offer cloud integration, automate report scheduling, and provide a robust scripting language."

"The initial setup is easy."

"I'm very satisfied with the customer service. And usually, whenever we have any issue or details, we get to the person for the support. I'm really satisfied with the service. Within a few minutes or within a few hours, the support person will be available."

"Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services (SSRS) is reliable for management dashboard and reporting purposes. It is helpful for user reporting and administrative tasks, such as monitoring progress. It is easy to use since it is lightweight and integrates well with the SQL Server database, making reporting straightforward. The visualization capabilities enhance our reporting needs with good pagination and KPI features. It integrates well with data servers and workbooks, allowing us to publish reports on mobile applications and tablets easily. Integrating other tools and platforms in our tech ecosystem is generally straightforward. However, if we need to perform something very specialized, we might have to use third-party tools rather than inbuilt options."

"I mainly use the solution for the ease of reporting and for executive dashboards."

"We were able to embed the report builder within our internal proprietary systems, improving our reporting capabilities."

"In Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services, the installation and configuration are easy."

"The tool's valuable features are its drill-down feature, graphs, and charts."

"I am impressed with the product's seamless integration. It can work with different databases like Oracle."

"When it comes to customer support, we don't always reach the right person. Sometimes, we get junior-level reps who aren't as knowledgeable as we are."

"If there were to be any improvements right now, their documentation needs to get in sync with their product."

"The challenge lies not in what the tool can do but in how you use it and understand the data."

"The solution can be improved by adding more automated options for reporting."

"It would be really nice to have better integration between the solution and Power BI."

"Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services needs to improve performance."

"Sometimes, we need to make sure that the configuration stays consistent across the reporting instances. They all connect to the same database. So, it shares that same backend, but the reporting services itself can also be configured. On the application level, for reporting level. And it is, based on my own experience, it is a manual effort to make sure that the reporting servers are configured the same across the environment."

"The product should improve its performance."

"The product could be improved by reducing the time it takes to build and deploy reports."

"I would like the solution to add the scheduling feature for reports."

"The setup is difficult because you have to install different servers."

"The complex tuning for report performance is complicated. There is a lack of native support for source code control. We often need to use separate tools like VS Code or other software to manage version control and changes in the database. It would be beneficial if source code management were integrated directly into SSRS, thus eliminating the need to rely on external tools. While CLI-based operations are exemplary, the trend is towards GUI for a better user experience. Integrating both visualization and source code management within SSRS would simplify the process for users."

"I would rate the pricing a five out of ten, with ten being expensive."

"The solution is expensive."

"The solution is cheaper than its alternatives."

"The product pricing is reasonable in terms of suitable features for business."

"The pricing is high."

"The tool's licensing costs are expensive."

"Value-wise, the solution's pricing is good for the price that we pay."

"The solution is free to use for developers."

"The price is pretty good."