Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs Microsoft Azure API Management comparison

IBM and Microsoft are both solutions in the API Management category. IBM is ranked #24 with an average rating of 8.5, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.9. IBM holds a 0.4% mindshare in APIM, compared to Microsoft’s 18.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.
IBM Cloud Pak for Integration
Read 5 IBM Cloud Pak for Integration reviews
  • 755 Views
  • 553 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Microsoft Azure API Management
Read 80 Microsoft Azure API Management reviews
  • 24,142 Views
  • 20,248 Comparison Views
91% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Microsoft Azure API Management and IBM Cloud Pak for Integration are competitive solutions focusing on enterprise API management and integration. Microsoft's offering benefits from favorable pricing and robust support, appealing to budget-conscious users, whereas IBM's extensive feature set attracts enterprises seeking thorough integration solutions.

Features: Microsoft Azure API Management stands out for its intuitive setup, seamless integration with Microsoft environments, and durable security protocols. Its integration into the Azure ecosystem offers significant advantages for those already using Microsoft technologies. Alternatively, IBM Cloud Pak for Integration provides a versatile toolkit with components like IBM App Connect and Messaging, alongside AI-driven insights, positioning it as a leader in tackling complex digital transformation challenges.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Azure API Management could enhance its cross-platform support and expand upon its existing tools for diverse cloud environments. Enhancements in custom integration options and providing more real-time analytics could also be beneficial. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration could work on simplifying the initial deployment process, reduce user reliance on IBM-specific expertise, and aim to lower initial costs to be more accessible for smaller enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Azure API Management facilitates easy deployment, especially for businesses already within the Microsoft ecosystem, supported by responsive customer service. In contrast, IBM Cloud Pak for Integration potentially requires more IBM expertise during deployment. However, this is balanced by highly personalized and effective support that helps navigate complex integration scenarios effectively.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Azure API Management is praised for its cost-effective pricing model, aligning well with a range of business sizes, facilitating high ROI due to its comprehensive integration with Microsoft services. While IBM Cloud Pak for Integration might have higher upfront costs, its extensive feature offerings and deep integration capabilities aim to deliver justified ROI for enterprises looking beyond basic integration solutions to full-scale digital transformation efforts.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. Microsoft Azure API Management Report (Updated: March 2025).
Buyer's Guide
IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. Microsoft Azure API Management
March 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 844,944 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration
Ranking in API Management
24th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Data Integration (15th)
Microsoft Azure API Management
Ranking in API Management
1st
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
80
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is 0.4%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Azure API Management is 18.5%, down from 19.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
API Management
 

Featured Reviews

Neelima Golla - PeerSpot reviewer
A hybrid integration platform that applies the functionality of closed-loop AI automation
I recommend using it because, in today's context, the cloud plays a significant role. Within the same user interface, you can develop applications and manage multiple applications, making it a more user-friendly option. Moreover, you can explore various other technologies while deploying on the cloud, broadening your knowledge of cloud technologies. In my case, the transition led to my learning of Kubernetes, enabling multi-scaling and expanding my technical skills. It was a valuable experience, and I had the opportunity to learn many new things during the migration process. I can easily rate it an eight or nine out of ten.
Read full review
Rajiv Bala Balasubramanian - PeerSpot reviewer
Efficiently manages and monetizes API
It is a scalable solution. You can add more computing power to your APM gateway. It also gives you the ability to have VNet integrations with your on-prem. It is one of the leading products in the API management space. It is not just software for users but software to handle requests. For example, for a B2C e-commerce store, all requests that users make from within the store pass through this API gateway. So it is defined by the number of requests to the API gateway, not by the number of actual users who use it. If you look at the number of requests, it would be a lot from all the different systems we have within Pampers.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable aspect of the Cloud Pak, in general, is the flexibility that you have to use the product."
"Redirection is a key feature. It helps in managing multiple microservices by centralizing control and access."
"It is a stable solution."
"Cloud Pak for Integration is definitely scalable. That is the most important criteria."
"The most preferable aspect would be the elimination of the command, which was a significant improvement. In the past, it was a challenge, but now we can proceed smoothly with the implementation of our policies and everything is managed through JCP. It's still among the positive aspects, and it's a valuable feature."
"We use Microsoft due to the stability of the company."
"The most valuable feature is its role as a linchpin in AI Hub architecture, enhancing data handling."
"The product gives API gateway-related features, like throttling, which are easy to use and low-code/no-code."
"The tool is very easy to use and manage APIs."
"The solution has overall high performance."
"The solution has significantly improved our organization by providing a user-friendly and easy-to-deploy API management system."
"It's easy to use compared to other products. It's easy to set up."
"The package as a whole is useful for our customers."
More Microsoft Azure API Management pros
 

Cons

"Its queuing and messaging features need improvement."
"The initial setup is not easy."
"Setting up Cloud Pak for Integration is relatively complex. It's not as easy because it has not yet been fully integrated. You still have some products that are still not containerized, so you still have to run them on a dedicated VM."
"The pricing can be improved."
"Enterprise bots are needed to balance products like Kafka and Confluent."
"In the API you need to delete the suffix. It is annoying that you need to have a suffix. We can add a suffix at the API level, not at the operation level, and that could be improved on."
"Microsoft Azure API Management is lagging behind Apigee and should also have a better CICD process."
"When you start with Azure API management, you also need to onboard the Azure console and the Azure cloud environment, which comes with a price."
"There is always room for improvement. There should be more analytics abilities so you can know how much traffic there is. Log Analyzer isn't well integrated with this solution."
"The developer console for external users could be improved, especially in the testing site."
"Azure is our most expensive resource; it's costly."
"It can be quite complex, somewhat lacking in flexibility."
"Technical support could be more flexible and try to meet the client's needs a bit more effectively."
More Microsoft Azure API Management cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is an expensive solution."
"The solution's pricing model is very flexible."
"The product pricing is reasonable."
"There are additional costs to the standard licensing fees."
"Compared to other solutions the cost is a seven out of ten."
"It's an expensive solution"
"We pay for a yearly license."
"It's pay as you go. The subscription packages have room for different scales. It's calculated by the number of apps or computers you use. You do not have to use the enterprise subscription. These subscriptions have different pricing, so you can find one to meet your needs for scalability."
"The licensing fees are expensive."
"It costs around 30,000 Kronas a month, which translates to about $3,000 dollars monthly."
More Microsoft Azure API Management pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
844,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?
The most preferable aspect would be the elimination of the command, which was a significant improvement. In the past, it was a challenge, but now we can proceed smoothly with the implementation of ...
See all answers
What needs improvement with IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?
Enterprise bots are needed to balance products like Kafka and Confluent.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?
It manages APIs and integrates microservices at the enterprise level. It offers a range of capabilities for handling APIs, microservices, and various integration needs. The platform supports thousa...
See all answers
How does Apigee differ from Azure API Management?
Apigee offers both cloud-based and on-prem options while Microsoft Azure API Management currently only offers a cloud-based solution. Both solutions are easy to use. Apigee allows for the ability...
See all answers
Which is better - Azure API Management or Amazon API Gateway?
If you use Azure products, API Management is a great solution. It solves many of the problems of externalizing web services. For example, when you need versioning, establish a developer portal and ...
See all answers
What do you like most about Microsoft Azure API Management?
Microsoft Azure API Management is a good, comprehensive solution for enterprise implementation.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

IBM App Connect vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Logo
IBM App Connect vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration
Compared 45% of the time
IBM API Connect vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Logo
IBM API Connect vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration
Compared 15% of the time
IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Logo
IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration
Compared 7% of the time
AWS Glue vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Logo
AWS Glue vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration
Compared 7% of the time
MuleSoft API Manager vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Logo
MuleSoft API Manager vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration
Compared 4% of the time
More IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Competitors
Amazon API Gateway vs Microsoft Azure API Management Logo
Amazon API Gateway vs Microsoft Azure API Management
Compared 45% of the time
Apigee vs Microsoft Azure API Management Logo
Apigee vs Microsoft Azure API Management
Compared 22% of the time
IBM API Connect vs Microsoft Azure API Management Logo
IBM API Connect vs Microsoft Azure API Management
Compared 6% of the time
Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Microsoft Azure API Management Logo
Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Microsoft Azure API Management
Compared 5% of the time
MuleSoft API Manager vs Microsoft Azure API Management Logo
MuleSoft API Manager vs Microsoft Azure API Management
Compared 4% of the time
More Microsoft Azure API Management Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
API Management
March 2025
IBM Cloud Pak for Integration reportDownload IBM Cloud Pak for Integration product report
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure API Management
March 2025
Microsoft Azure API Management reportDownload Microsoft Azure API Management product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Azure API Management, MS Azure API Management
 

Overview

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration gives you complete, flexible integration using capabilities you need to move at today's speed of business, including the tools to help you achieve your application modernization goals as part of your journey to the cloud.

IBM

Microsoft Azure API Management is essential for managing APIs, facilitating integration, and ensuring secure internal and external communication.

Organizations leverage Microsoft Azure API Management for seamless integration and effective API management. It supports microservices, legacy modernization, and platform orchestration in sectors like healthcare, telecom, and finance. Features such as developer portals and centralized libraries simplify usage. While it showcases strengths in hybrid cloud support and scalability, improvements are suggested in versioning and multi-tenancy.

What key features does it offer?
  • Integration with Microsoft services ensures robust access control and user-friendly deployment.
  • Developer portal and documentation improve usability and learning.
  • Hybrid cloud support offers seamless on-premise connectivity.
  • Scalability and security features are well-regarded.
  • Centralized API library simplifies management.
What benefits or ROI should users consider?
  • Facilitates API lifecycle management enhancing user experience.
  • Simplifies authentication and subscription models.
  • Enhances data exchange and real-time monitoring.
  • Streamlines API mapping and orchestration across platforms.
  • Promotes flexibility and transparency in system integration.

Microsoft Azure API Management aids modernization across healthcare, telecom, and financial services by enabling legacy system updates and facilitating smooth platform orchestration.

Microsoft
 

Sample Customers

CVS Health Corporation
adnymics GmbH, LG CNS, Centrebet, netfabb GmbH, MedPlast, Accelera Solutions, Sochi Organizing Committee, realzeit GmbH, Opensistemas
Buyer's Guide
IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. Microsoft Azure API Management
March 2025
Free Report: IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. Microsoft Azure API Management
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. Microsoft Azure API Management and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
844,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. Microsoft Azure API Management report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.