Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs WSO2 API Manager comparison

IBM and WSO2 are both solutions in the API Management category. IBM is ranked #24 with an average rating of 8.5, while WSO2 is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.7. IBM holds a 0.4% mindshare in APIM, compared to WSO2’s 4.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of WSO2 users who would recommend it.
IBM Cloud Pak for Integration
Read 5 IBM Cloud Pak for Integration reviews
  • 777 Views
  • 573 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
WSO2 API Manager
Read 40 WSO2 API Manager reviews
  • 6,643 Views
  • 4,719 Comparison Views
94% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

WSO2 API Manager and IBM Cloud Pak for Integration are competitive products in the API management and integration space. WSO2 API Manager appeals for its cost-effectiveness whereas IBM Cloud Pak for Integration stands out for its comprehensive features.

Features:WSO2 API Manager offers seamless API lifecycle management, strong analytics, and scalability, primarily due to its open-source flexibility. It provides robust support services and a simple user interface. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration boasts end-to-end integration capabilities, hybrid cloud flexibility, and AI-driven automation. It offers advanced integration and broad functionality, distinguishing it with comprehensive features suitable for complex enterprise needs.

Room for Improvement:WSO2 API Manager could enhance its integration capacity to match broader enterprise needs, expand support for advanced security features, and improve the documentation of new functionalities. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration could streamline its setup process to simplify deployment, reduce overall complexity, and provide more cost-effective pricing options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:WSO2 API Manager is noted for straightforward deployment and responsive support, making it user-friendly. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration involves more intricate setups due to its comprehensive nature, but its robust documentation and superior customer service assist in mitigating complexities. WSO2 provides a more direct approach, whereas IBM delivers a stable deployment environment for complex needs.

Pricing and ROI:WSO2 API Manager is attractive for its lower setup costs and agile ROI, making it appealing for cost-efficient solutions. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration requires a higher initial investment but provides significant ROI through extensive integration capabilities and efficiency improvements. The primary contrast lies in affordability versus comprehensive return value, where WSO2 offers cost savings, and IBM offers high returns for strategic investments.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. WSO2 API Manager Report (Updated: March 2025).
Buyer's Guide
IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. WSO2 API Manager
March 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 842,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration
Ranking in API Management
24th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Data Integration (15th)
WSO2 API Manager
Ranking in API Management
9th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
40
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is 0.4%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WSO2 API Manager is 4.6%, up from 4.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
API Management
 

Featured Reviews

Neelima Golla - PeerSpot reviewer
A hybrid integration platform that applies the functionality of closed-loop AI automation
I recommend using it because, in today's context, the cloud plays a significant role. Within the same user interface, you can develop applications and manage multiple applications, making it a more user-friendly option. Moreover, you can explore various other technologies while deploying on the cloud, broadening your knowledge of cloud technologies. In my case, the transition led to my learning of Kubernetes, enabling multi-scaling and expanding my technical skills. It was a valuable experience, and I had the opportunity to learn many new things during the migration process. I can easily rate it an eight or nine out of ten.
Read full review
VishalSingh14 - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to deploy APIs and easy to manage CORS configuration
I have used WSO2 Store and WSO2 API Manager at the architecture level. I worked on two versions, namely WSO2 API Manager 2.6.0 and 5.7.0. I have also worked with WSO2 Identity Server versions 5.7 and 5.11. There are certain things that Apigee handles better than WSO2 API Manager. The user interface of WSO2 API Manager is much easier than that of Apigee. The scope of flexibility was much greater in Apigee. In WSO2 API Manager, we had little flexibility and were restricted to a specific software or tool. On the other hand, we had the scope of customization in Apigee.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Cloud Pak for Integration is definitely scalable. That is the most important criteria."
"The most preferable aspect would be the elimination of the command, which was a significant improvement. In the past, it was a challenge, but now we can proceed smoothly with the implementation of our policies and everything is managed through JCP. It's still among the positive aspects, and it's a valuable feature."
"It is a stable solution."
"The most valuable aspect of the Cloud Pak, in general, is the flexibility that you have to use the product."
"Redirection is a key feature. It helps in managing multiple microservices by centralizing control and access."
"It is a scalable solution because it can be scaled horizontally and vertically."
"The product is easy to use."
"Its open-source features are very good, especially for your production work."
"Functionality-wise, I like WSO2 API Manager - Publisher API and WSO2 Enterprise Service Bus."
"A complete integration suite and a good platform."
"The scalability is fine for our purposes."
"WSO2 API Manager is easy to use."
"There are a lot of tools to help the manager. WSO2 is very easy to install. It has all the principal functionalities that you think about when you want to put up the management solution. It's a very friendly tool."
More WSO2 API Manager pros
 

Cons

"Its queuing and messaging features need improvement."
"Setting up Cloud Pak for Integration is relatively complex. It's not as easy because it has not yet been fully integrated. You still have some products that are still not containerized, so you still have to run them on a dedicated VM."
"The pricing can be improved."
"The initial setup is not easy."
"Enterprise bots are needed to balance products like Kafka and Confluent."
"They don't have different URLs for administrators."
"Integration is an area that needs to be improved."
"API Manager is not easy to scale because some of its components lack scalability. It's a difficult point. Especially because companies are so cloud-based these days, microservice scalability is a major thing."
"The stability is pretty good, but it could be improved."
"The tool's commercial aspect could be improved. Pricing varies with partners, so selecting the appropriate pricing can be challenging."
"The interface needs to be modernized and made more user friendly so the product continues to have a growing community of users."
"From what I have experienced from the versions I have tried, they could improve on the multi-tenant environments to allow some kind of SSO single sign-on between tenant."
"For fresh graduates and engineers, the setup process can be very difficult."
More WSO2 API Manager cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's pricing model is very flexible."
"It is an expensive solution."
"We use the open-source version of WSO2 API Manager, there is no cost."
"WSO2 API Manager is a costly solution, and its pricing is not competitive enough compared to other products."
"The solution costs less than 20,000 euros a year. I'm not sure of the exact number."
"We have not opted for the paid version of WSO2 but we have implemented the free and open source WSO2 software to a great extent and it is working as per our expectation."
"It's not expensive, but it could be cheaper."
"WSO2 API Manager is quite an expensive tool. I rate the product's pricing a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is low and ten is high."
"As far as I'm aware, the costs are not minimal but satisfactory."
"WSO2 API Manager is an open-source solution."
More WSO2 API Manager pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
842,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
8%
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Government
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?
The most preferable aspect would be the elimination of the command, which was a significant improvement. In the past, it was a challenge, but now we can proceed smoothly with the implementation of ...
See all answers
What needs improvement with IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?
Enterprise bots are needed to balance products like Kafka and Confluent.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?
It manages APIs and integrates microservices at the enterprise level. It offers a range of capabilities for handling APIs, microservices, and various integration needs. The platform supports thousa...
See all answers
What do you like most about WSO2 API Manager?
It is possible to scale up and scale down with the solution...I can say that I have not seen any issues related to scalability.
See all answers
What needs improvement with WSO2 API Manager?
One area for improvement is monitoring. Dashboards for application monitoring of the APIs would be beneficial, allowing us to check for faulty APIs.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for WSO2 API Manager?
We use WSO2 API Manager for our microservices and our APIs, both internally and externally.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

IBM App Connect vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Logo
IBM App Connect vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration
Compared 43% of the time
IBM API Connect vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Logo
IBM API Connect vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration
Compared 16% of the time
AWS Glue vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Logo
AWS Glue vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration
Compared 10% of the time
IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Logo
IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration
Compared 6% of the time
Apigee vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Logo
Apigee vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration
Compared 6% of the time
More IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Competitors
Apigee vs WSO2 API Manager Logo
Apigee vs WSO2 API Manager
Compared 24% of the time
Kong Gateway Enterprise vs WSO2 API Manager Logo
Kong Gateway Enterprise vs WSO2 API Manager
Compared 16% of the time
Apache APISIX vs WSO2 API Manager Logo
Apache APISIX vs WSO2 API Manager
Compared 15% of the time
Amazon API Gateway vs WSO2 API Manager Logo
Amazon API Gateway vs WSO2 API Manager
Compared 13% of the time
Microsoft Azure API Management vs WSO2 API Manager Logo
Microsoft Azure API Management vs WSO2 API Manager
Compared 11% of the time
More WSO2 API Manager Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
API Management
March 2025
IBM Cloud Pak for Integration reportDownload IBM Cloud Pak for Integration product report
Buyer's Guide
WSO2 API Manager
March 2025
WSO2 API Manager reportDownload WSO2 API Manager product report
 

Overview

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration gives you complete, flexible integration using capabilities you need to move at today's speed of business, including the tools to help you achieve your application modernization goals as part of your journey to the cloud.

IBM

WSO2 API Manager is a comprehensive platform that allows organizations to design, publish, and manage APIs. 

It provides a centralized interface for API governance, security, and analytics. 

With features like API monetization and developer portal, it enables businesses to drive innovation and create new revenue streams.

WSO2
 

Sample Customers

CVS Health Corporation
1. eBay 2. StubHub 3. Cisco 4. Verizon 5. T-Mobile 6. Vodafone 7. Orange 8. BT Group 9. Telstra 10. Deutsche Telekom 11. Swisscom 12. AT&T 13. Sprint 14. Telefonica 15. O2 16. British Airways 17. Lufthansa 18. Emirates 19. Qatar Airways 20. Etihad Airways 21. Air France 22. KLM 23. American Express 24. Visa 25. Mastercard 26. PayPal 27. Western Union 28. Citibank 29. HSBC 30. Barclays 31. Santander 32. Goldman Sachs
Buyer's Guide
IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. WSO2 API Manager
March 2025
Free Report: IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. WSO2 API Manager
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. WSO2 API Manager and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
842,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. WSO2 API Manager report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.