Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs WSO2 API Manager comparison

IBM and WSO2 are both solutions in the API Management category. IBM is ranked #24 with an average rating of 8.5, while WSO2 is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.7. IBM holds a 0.4% mindshare in APIM, compared to WSO2’s 4.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of WSO2 users who would recommend it.
IBM Cloud Pak for Integration
Read 5 IBM Cloud Pak for Integration reviews
  • 755 Views
  • 553 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
WSO2 API Manager
Read 40 WSO2 API Manager reviews
  • 6,382 Views
  • 4,570 Comparison Views
94% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

WSO2 API Manager and IBM Cloud Pak for Integration are competitive products in the API management and integration space. WSO2 API Manager appeals for its cost-effectiveness whereas IBM Cloud Pak for Integration stands out for its comprehensive features.

Features:WSO2 API Manager offers seamless API lifecycle management, strong analytics, and scalability, primarily due to its open-source flexibility. It provides robust support services and a simple user interface. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration boasts end-to-end integration capabilities, hybrid cloud flexibility, and AI-driven automation. It offers advanced integration and broad functionality, distinguishing it with comprehensive features suitable for complex enterprise needs.

Room for Improvement:WSO2 API Manager could enhance its integration capacity to match broader enterprise needs, expand support for advanced security features, and improve the documentation of new functionalities. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration could streamline its setup process to simplify deployment, reduce overall complexity, and provide more cost-effective pricing options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:WSO2 API Manager is noted for straightforward deployment and responsive support, making it user-friendly. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration involves more intricate setups due to its comprehensive nature, but its robust documentation and superior customer service assist in mitigating complexities. WSO2 provides a more direct approach, whereas IBM delivers a stable deployment environment for complex needs.

Pricing and ROI:WSO2 API Manager is attractive for its lower setup costs and agile ROI, making it appealing for cost-efficient solutions. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration requires a higher initial investment but provides significant ROI through extensive integration capabilities and efficiency improvements. The primary contrast lies in affordability versus comprehensive return value, where WSO2 offers cost savings, and IBM offers high returns for strategic investments.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. WSO2 API Manager Report (Updated: March 2025).
Buyer's Guide
IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. WSO2 API Manager
March 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 844,944 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration
Ranking in API Management
24th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Data Integration (15th)
WSO2 API Manager
Ranking in API Management
9th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
40
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is 0.4%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WSO2 API Manager is 4.8%, up from 4.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
API Management
 

Featured Reviews

Neelima Golla - PeerSpot reviewer
A hybrid integration platform that applies the functionality of closed-loop AI automation
I recommend using it because, in today's context, the cloud plays a significant role. Within the same user interface, you can develop applications and manage multiple applications, making it a more user-friendly option. Moreover, you can explore various other technologies while deploying on the cloud, broadening your knowledge of cloud technologies. In my case, the transition led to my learning of Kubernetes, enabling multi-scaling and expanding my technical skills. It was a valuable experience, and I had the opportunity to learn many new things during the migration process. I can easily rate it an eight or nine out of ten.
Read full review
VishalSingh14 - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to deploy APIs and easy to manage CORS configuration
I have used WSO2 Store and WSO2 API Manager at the architecture level. I worked on two versions, namely WSO2 API Manager 2.6.0 and 5.7.0. I have also worked with WSO2 Identity Server versions 5.7 and 5.11. There are certain things that Apigee handles better than WSO2 API Manager. The user interface of WSO2 API Manager is much easier than that of Apigee. The scope of flexibility was much greater in Apigee. In WSO2 API Manager, we had little flexibility and were restricted to a specific software or tool. On the other hand, we had the scope of customization in Apigee.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable aspect of the Cloud Pak, in general, is the flexibility that you have to use the product."
"The most preferable aspect would be the elimination of the command, which was a significant improvement. In the past, it was a challenge, but now we can proceed smoothly with the implementation of our policies and everything is managed through JCP. It's still among the positive aspects, and it's a valuable feature."
"It is a stable solution."
"Cloud Pak for Integration is definitely scalable. That is the most important criteria."
"Redirection is a key feature. It helps in managing multiple microservices by centralizing control and access."
"Most of the time, we need to install a plug-in without having any lapse in services or restarting the application. The WSO2 platform can do all deployments without any downtime."
"One of the great things about WSO2 API Manager is that it is so easy to adopt. And because it's an open source solution, we're able to extend the implementation any time to suit our company needs better."
"It's very scalable, which is one of the best features."
"The solution is open source and easy to configure."
"I think the best part about WSO2 API Manager is that it's highly customizable because it's open-source. The partnership model is quite lucrative for us, it helps us to go and pitch to our customers. You can build a lot of business models yourself that you want to use. You are able to do a lot of the solutions."
"WSO2 API Manager has a user-friendly model."
"It's a good product."
"The main feature — the publication of the API, the management section — is great in general."
More WSO2 API Manager pros
 

Cons

"Its queuing and messaging features need improvement."
"The pricing can be improved."
"Enterprise bots are needed to balance products like Kafka and Confluent."
"Setting up Cloud Pak for Integration is relatively complex. It's not as easy because it has not yet been fully integrated. You still have some products that are still not containerized, so you still have to run them on a dedicated VM."
"The initial setup is not easy."
"Providing easy configuration for email and SMS notifications, layout and customization of admin and developer landing pages."
"Integration is an area that needs to be improved."
"From what I have experienced from the versions I have tried, they could improve on the multi-tenant environments to allow some kind of SSO single sign-on between tenant."
"The user interface needs to improve, it is a bit outdated."
"The user interface could be a bit better."
"The initial setup can be difficult."
"The interface needs to be modernized and made more user friendly so the product continues to have a growing community of users."
"WSO2 API Manager can be improved a lot relating to usability"
More WSO2 API Manager cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's pricing model is very flexible."
"It is an expensive solution."
"We use the open-source version — the free version."
"I think the other competitors that are providing the same solution are quite expensive. WSO2 API Manager is quite cheap."
"For our projects, we found the pricing to be a little high."
"The challenge is the increasing pricing, which has led some customers to consider alternatives, like using Spring Boot solutions instead. The rising costs, especially as cores and usage increase, have been a concern, prompting some to migrate to other products."
"It is costly, around ten thousand per year, per instance"
"WSO2 API Manager is a low-cost solution. It is one of the most affordable solutions."
"We use the open-source version of WSO2 API Manager, there is no cost."
"I am using the free version."
More WSO2 API Manager pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
844,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
8%
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Government
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?
The most preferable aspect would be the elimination of the command, which was a significant improvement. In the past, it was a challenge, but now we can proceed smoothly with the implementation of ...
See all answers
What needs improvement with IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?
Enterprise bots are needed to balance products like Kafka and Confluent.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?
It manages APIs and integrates microservices at the enterprise level. It offers a range of capabilities for handling APIs, microservices, and various integration needs. The platform supports thousa...
See all answers
What do you like most about WSO2 API Manager?
It is possible to scale up and scale down with the solution...I can say that I have not seen any issues related to scalability.
See all answers
What needs improvement with WSO2 API Manager?
One area for improvement is monitoring. Dashboards for application monitoring of the APIs would be beneficial, allowing us to check for faulty APIs.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for WSO2 API Manager?
We use WSO2 API Manager for our microservices and our APIs, both internally and externally.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

IBM App Connect vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Logo
IBM App Connect vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration
Compared 45% of the time
IBM API Connect vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Logo
IBM API Connect vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration
Compared 15% of the time
IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Logo
IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration
Compared 7% of the time
AWS Glue vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Logo
AWS Glue vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration
Compared 7% of the time
IBM DataPower Gateway vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Logo
IBM DataPower Gateway vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration
Compared 6% of the time
More IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Competitors
Apigee vs WSO2 API Manager Logo
Apigee vs WSO2 API Manager
Compared 23% of the time
Kong Gateway Enterprise vs WSO2 API Manager Logo
Kong Gateway Enterprise vs WSO2 API Manager
Compared 17% of the time
Apache APISIX vs WSO2 API Manager Logo
Apache APISIX vs WSO2 API Manager
Compared 15% of the time
Amazon API Gateway vs WSO2 API Manager Logo
Amazon API Gateway vs WSO2 API Manager
Compared 13% of the time
Microsoft Azure API Management vs WSO2 API Manager Logo
Microsoft Azure API Management vs WSO2 API Manager
Compared 11% of the time
More WSO2 API Manager Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
API Management
March 2025
IBM Cloud Pak for Integration reportDownload IBM Cloud Pak for Integration product report
Buyer's Guide
WSO2 API Manager
March 2025
WSO2 API Manager reportDownload WSO2 API Manager product report
 

Overview

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration gives you complete, flexible integration using capabilities you need to move at today's speed of business, including the tools to help you achieve your application modernization goals as part of your journey to the cloud.

IBM

WSO2 API Manager is a comprehensive platform that allows organizations to design, publish, and manage APIs. 

It provides a centralized interface for API governance, security, and analytics. 

With features like API monetization and developer portal, it enables businesses to drive innovation and create new revenue streams.

WSO2
 

Sample Customers

CVS Health Corporation
1. eBay 2. StubHub 3. Cisco 4. Verizon 5. T-Mobile 6. Vodafone 7. Orange 8. BT Group 9. Telstra 10. Deutsche Telekom 11. Swisscom 12. AT&T 13. Sprint 14. Telefonica 15. O2 16. British Airways 17. Lufthansa 18. Emirates 19. Qatar Airways 20. Etihad Airways 21. Air France 22. KLM 23. American Express 24. Visa 25. Mastercard 26. PayPal 27. Western Union 28. Citibank 29. HSBC 30. Barclays 31. Santander 32. Goldman Sachs
Buyer's Guide
IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. WSO2 API Manager
March 2025
Free Report: IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. WSO2 API Manager
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. WSO2 API Manager and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
844,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. WSO2 API Manager report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.