IBM Cloud Pak for Security vs IBM Resilient comparison

"The interface is good and very user-friendly."

"The solution is reliable in our usage."

"The initial setup of IBM Resilient is not that complex since my company already has a support license that we use internally. In general, the product's deployment phase is not that complex."

"It's really simple and has a flexible interface."

"The UBA, User Behavior Analytics, is very good."

"IBM Resilient is scalable."

"The solution is simple to use and to integrate with IBM QRadar."

"This is a good solution that we recommend for customers."

"What I like most about IBM Resilient is that it has a complete stack, which means you don't need to use different OEM products because you have all you need under the IBM Resilient umbrella. You don't need to worry much about integrations and components because you're working with tested and proven architecture."

"Lacks sufficient technical support."

"This product could be improved with better customization. This product isn't the best on the market like QRadar, but it's actually a good solution. However, some competitors' solutions contain more integration, support, automation, or flexibility."

"The ability to analyze incidents needs to be improved in the solution."

"Integration with some devices, including Cisco PowerPower and certain antivirus products, has limitations."

"The tool needs to improve its documentation on license scripts."

"The product must provide more integration with other tools."

"IBM Resilient could integrate better with my tools."

"One thing to improve is how it handles data formats, which currently might require scripting for conversion to CSV before uploading."

"The response time of the support is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"There is a license you need to pay for in order to use this product."

"I would rate the tool’s pricing a three out of ten. The tool’s pricing is on a yearly basis."

"The licensing cost for IBM Resilient is not too expensive, but it's not affordable, so it's moderately expensive. Regarding price, I'm rating the solution seven out of ten. The company pays for the license yearly, based on the number of users. Apart from the cost of the license you need to pay for each user, you also need to spend an initial investment for the base platform. You also have to pay for IBM Resilient support."

"There are no costs except for the support services that our company pays in addition to the licensing charges attached to the solution."

"We could create unlimited users using the license we had purchased."

"I feel it is an expensive product when my company pays annually for renewal, support, and follow-up."

"The cost of the product is quite high."

"Pricing for the solution is good, in my opinion."