Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Cloud Pak for Security vs IBM Resilient comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Cloud Pak for Security
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Cloud and Data Center Security (22nd)
IBM Resilient
Average Rating
7.4
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
Security Incident Response (3rd), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (9th)
 

Mindshare comparison

IBM Cloud Pak for Security and IBM Resilient aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. IBM Cloud Pak for Security is designed for Cloud and Data Center Security and holds a mindshare of 0.1%, up 0.1% compared to last year.
IBM Resilient, on the other hand, focuses on Security Incident Response, holds 12.9% mindshare, up 6.3% since last year.
Cloud and Data Center Security
Security Incident Response
 

Featured Reviews

AK
Jul 7, 2022
Great user-friendly interface; provides many functionalities and many free applications
Our use case is behavior analytics with machine learning. We are partners and distributors of Cloud Pak. I'm a system security manager.  The interface is good and very user-friendly, it's easy for our customers to use. Cloud Pak provides a lot of functionalities and many free applications…
Usman Bhatti - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 15, 2023
Simple deployment, scalable, but lacking third-party solution compatibility
Integrating IBM Resilient with other applications can be very difficult and technically challenging. Often, they use the excuse that you are using the latest version of an application, such as an endpoint security system, and they don't have an API or support for it at the moment. There is no automation in the SOAR solution. It's worth noting that many third-party add-on applications needed to be purchased separately to integrate with IBM Resilient. While there were built-in applications available for incident remediation, the selection was limited. Additionally, integrating third-party applications was often a difficult and time-consuming process due to the technical complexity involved.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The interface is good and very user-friendly."
"The UBA, User Behavior Analytics, is very good."
"This is a good solution that we recommend for customers."
"The integration with IBM SIM and the ability to block users during brute force attacks are particularly effective."
"The solution is simple to use and to integrate with IBM QRadar."
"The solution is easy to use."
"IBM Resilient is scalable."
"The product is very good at incident response."
"The most valuable features of IBM Resilient are its flexibility and customization options for incident response."
 

Cons

"Lacks sufficient technical support."
"Integration with some devices, including Cisco PowerPower and certain antivirus products, has limitations."
"The product must provide more integration with other tools."
"One thing to improve is how it handles data formats, which currently might require scripting for conversion to CSV before uploading."
"The response time of the support is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"IBM Resilient could integrate better with my tools."
"It is not very straightforward to set up custom integrations, especially with services like Azure. You need an additional server for integration."
"IBM Resilient is quite complex, including its configuration."
"The product needs a bit more development."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"It is very expensive."
"I feel it is an expensive product when my company pays annually for renewal, support, and follow-up."
"The cost of the product is quite high."
"I would rate the tool’s pricing a three out of ten. The tool’s pricing is on a yearly basis."
"We could create unlimited users using the license we had purchased."
"There is a license you need to pay for in order to use this product."
"The licensing cost for IBM Resilient is not too expensive, but it's not affordable, so it's moderately expensive. Regarding price, I'm rating the solution seven out of ten. The company pays for the license yearly, based on the number of users. Apart from the cost of the license you need to pay for each user, you also need to spend an initial investment for the base platform. You also have to pay for IBM Resilient support."
"Pricing for the solution is good, in my opinion."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud and Data Center Security solutions are best for your needs.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Retailer
15%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Government
9%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
26%
Computer Software Company
13%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about IBM Resilient?
It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Resilient?
I am not the one in charge of pricing, so I am not sure about the costs.
What needs improvement with IBM Resilient?
Integration with some devices, including Cisco PowerPower and certain antivirus products, has limitations.
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Golden Living, Health Equity, USA Funds
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Akamai, Illumio and others in Cloud and Data Center Security. Updated: November 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.