

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management ELM and TFS compete in the software development lifecycle management category. ELM seems to have an advantage in pricing and support, while TFS excels in features, offering better flexibility and integration capabilities.
Features: IBM ELM offers robust requirements management, configuration management, and comprehensive reporting. TFS distinguishes itself with strong integration capabilities, version control, and application lifecycle management. TFS's flexibility in software development cycles is a key difference compared to ELM's structured processes.
Room for Improvement: ELM could improve by simplifying its architecture to reduce setup time, enhancing its integration with non-IBM tools, and providing more streamlined processes for less structured environments. TFS may benefit from offering more competitive initial pricing, reducing dependency on additional Microsoft tools for full functionality, and enhancing its UI for users unfamiliar with Microsoft ecosystems.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TFS provides a straightforward deployment process along with excellent support, benefiting from seamless integration with other Microsoft tools. ELM may require more setup time due to its complex architecture but compensates with dedicated support for issue resolution.
Pricing and ROI: IBM ELM's setup costs are generally more flexible, offering significant ROI through its comprehensive functionalities tailored for disciplined environments. TFS, though initially more expensive, delivers substantial ROI due to its versatile and extensive toolset covering a broad spectrum of development needs.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| TFS | 3.9% |
| IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) | 4.0% |
| Other | 92.1% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 12 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 25 |
| Large Enterprise | 64 |
IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management stands out for its robust Agile Scrum planning, lifecycle traceability, and tool management, offering cloud-based configurability and strong collaboration features.
IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management provides rich capabilities for Agile project management, facilitating requirements and test management, configuration management, and version control. Its integration with IBM Doors supports comprehensive requirements handling, and the cloud-based platform enhances collaborative efficiency across teams. Despite needing advances in user-friendliness and reporting, ELM's global configuration and compliance features make it invaluable in demanding environments.
What are the key features of IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management?IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management is vital in sectors like automotive and manufacturing, where it implements Agile frameworks to manage requirements, conduct testing, and handle defects. It integrates into development pipelines ensuring live traceability and visibility, supporting critical engineering processes efficiently.
Visual Studio’s Team Foundation Server (TFS) is a powerful application development lifecycle management solution. It aids developers in managing every aspect of their DevOps and application creation. TFS combines many different types of solutions into a single powerful platform.
Visual Studio TFS Benefits
Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by choosing to deploy TFS include:
Visual Studio TFS Features
Source code management. TFS comes with all of the tools that developers need to completely manage their source code. They can share their code so that multiple developers can work on the same project. Additionally, TFS enables them to do things like review the history of a particular piece of source code.
Reviews from Real Users
TFS is a highly effective solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Two major advantages it offers are its source code management capabilities and its powerful integration suite.
Carl B., the vice president of engineering at Vertex Downhole Ltd, writes, “The most valuable features are related to source code management. Using TFS for source code management and being able to branch and have multiple developers work on the same projects is valuable. We can also branch and merge code back together.”
Ashish K., the principal consultant at Wipro, says, “I have found almost all of the features valuable because it integrates well with your Microsoft products. If a client is using the entire Microsoft platform, then TFS would be definitely preferable. It integrates with the digital studio development environment as well.”
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.