Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM InfoSphere MDM vs Talend MDM Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM InfoSphere MDM
Ranking in Master Data Management (MDM) Software
5th
Average Rating
7.4
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Talend MDM Platform
Ranking in Master Data Management (MDM) Software
10th
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) Solutions (10th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Master Data Management (MDM) Software category, the mindshare of IBM InfoSphere MDM is 8.2%, up from 6.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Talend MDM Platform is 7.1%, up from 5.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Master Data Management (MDM) Software
 

Featured Reviews

SoumikDolui - PeerSpot reviewer
May 15, 2022
Provides inbuilt data model and good matching engine
It's a tough tool for developers. Right now in the market, I think Informatica MDM is number one and is used a lot. IBM MDM was developed by some other company and IBM developed it more. There are definitely some flaws. The tool is difficult to understand from a customer perspective and for developers. Generally, customers can understand Informatica MDM and its functionality easily. If a developer is facing issues with IBM MDM, then a customer will definitely not understand most of the functionality. That is the main concern. IBM is introducing some Next-Gen MDM, where they are using a lot of current technologies and machine learning. Most of the problems we may be facing right now are probably solved in that version.
AR
Sep 23, 2022
Good for diagnostics, stable, and has a straightforward setup, but lacks technology references
I use the Talend MDM Platform for managing the master data around ERP systems and customer care systems for clients What I like about the Talend MDM Platform is that it's a good vendor diagnostic tool. What's missing in the Talend MDM Platform is that it's not maintaining technology references.…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"When users update their information on one product, the data is sent to a database. My approach was to maintain a master data record, ensuring that each platform loads the latest updated record. Instead of having three separate records, the system keeps one master data record, storing the historical records for reference."
"The advantage is that the matching engine is very good, so that's why customers generally prefer it. From the inbuilt data model perspective, IBM MDM is good."
"The features that are most valuable are the governance, the end-profiling and the ETL which allows you to see the metadata repositories."
"There are not really many areas of the product that need improvement because the product stays up-to-date with data management needs."
"What I like about the Talend MDM Platform is that it's a good vendor diagnostic tool."
 

Cons

"The tool is difficult to understand from a customer perspective and for developers."
"IBM InfoSphere MDM's UI is complicated. It also needs to improve its on-prem configuration."
"We also want better cloud integration, so we could do things in the cloud if we needed to. This would be a good feature to add in a future release."
"The product is really only created for large organizations."
"What's missing in the Talend MDM Platform is that it's not maintaining technology references. For example, my company needs a reference case if the platform has been implemented for a configuration that's similar to the client's required configuration. Currently, the client is still reluctant to roll out the Talend MDM Platform at a wider level because there's still no reference received from the Talend team."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It may be costly for small organizations but adds value for large organizations with demanding workflows."
"The licensing cost for the Talend MDM Platform is paid yearly, but I'm unable to give you the figure. I would rate its price as four out of five because it's on the cheaper side. I'm not aware of any extra costs in addition to the standard licensing fees for the Talend MDM Platform."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Master Data Management (MDM) Software solutions are best for your needs.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
23%
Insurance Company
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
Government
6%
Government
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Computer Software Company
8%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM InfoSphere MDM?
When users update their information on one product, the data is sent to a database. My approach was to maintain a master data record, ensuring that each platform loads the latest updated record. In...
What needs improvement with IBM InfoSphere MDM?
IBM InfoSphere MDM's UI is complicated. It also needs to improve its on-prem configuration.
What is your primary use case for IBM InfoSphere MDM?
When users update their information on one product, the data is sent to a database. My approach was to maintain a master data record, ensuring that each platform loads the latest updated record. In...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

InfoSphere MDM, InfoSphere Master Data Management
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

L'Oreal S.A., Kingland Systems, Oncor, Farmaceuticos Maypo, Volkswagen Financial Services
Calor Gas, Oxfordshire County Council, Vinci, Veolia Water France
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Microsoft, TIBCO and others in Master Data Management (MDM) Software. Updated: October 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.