Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Maximo vs ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Maximo
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) (1st), Billing Software (2nd)
ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
63
Ranking in other categories
Help Desk Software (3rd), IT Service Management (ITSM) (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

IBM Maximo and ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. IBM Maximo is designed for Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) and holds a mindshare of 26.9%, up 25.8% compared to last year.
ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus, on the other hand, focuses on Help Desk Software, holds 7.3% mindshare, down 8.1% since last year.
Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)
Help Desk Software
 

Featured Reviews

Jose Pedro Muñoz - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 25, 2023
A very strong and powerful tool in the market preferred by a variety of industries
The solution is used for a variety of industries like manufacturing, pharmaceuticals, and transportation Work management, optimization, and maintenance indicators are some of the valuable features of the solution. Pricing, purchasing, invoicing areas, and mobility are some areas in the solution…
CarlosPerez7 - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 15, 2023
Easy to configure and affordable compared to other software options
In my experience, I have implemented it at four different companies including Banyan Health Systems, Jessie Trice Health Systems, Harvard Maintenance, and another service-based company. I primarily use it to maintain different health systems One of the most valuable features of Service Desk Plus…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature is asset management maintenance as well as asset management overall."
"IBM Maximo is the best software for assets management."
"The ability to configure and integrate it with other solutions for ERP."
"Has a powerful audit combination that helps achieve high accuracy."
"​Maximo is very stable. We really do not have problem with stability.​"
"The most valuable features of IBM Maximo are the overall power and interface, and there are a lot of different modules that we use that are helpful. Additionally, it's an integrated solution and it has a lot of capabilities."
"The most valuable features are the ability to create work orders and preventative maintenance."
"Reliable, very configurable, and it's all integrated in the same database."
"ManageEngine provides additional modules that we can integrate in the future."
"There are a lot of great templates that you can take advantage of."
"It's very easy to customize the tool to your business needs."
"I like that ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus has everything and can be integrated into a single product like SAP. It has also got operations, helpdesk, MDM, and everything integrated. Multiple products can be integrated into one product. You don't have to go for them separately. I also like that they have many partners in India who can come to the site and complete installations."
"It offers robust project management capabilities. You can create projects, define staging environments, and set rules and regulations according to organizational standards."
"The solution is interactive and flexible so engineers find it much easier to work with than other tools."
"The GUI is very good."
"The solution offers a lot of opportunities for integrations."
 

Cons

"Initial setup is a longer process because Maximo is bigger and has more processes."
"The solution is not stable. We can have one day when it is stable and another day it is not. Sometimes it crashes or becomes very slow, and there are times we are not even able to download all the databases. Without the database, we cannot work on that application. These are the small glitches, and stability issues we are facing."
"You can get lost using the application"
"There are always ways to improve and make things better."
"Revision management of file attachments."
"It needs full-service visibility. There are a lot of things that are hard for users to find out. For example, the Service Catalog is not too friendly. You really have to know what you're looking for."
"Vendor management needs enhancement."
"I feel that the interface is a little too complicated with a large number of fields to enter."
"Security could be better. It would be better if ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus had really good defense products like BlackBerry. I can recommend BlackBerry for the defense part, but not the other things. For example, before we switched over to ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus, we had issues with mobiles switching off cameras, and now it doesn't happen at all."
"ManageEngine has developed and implemented new features in its cloud version. I would like to see the features extended to the on-premises version."
"When I think of improvements the first thing that comes to mind would have to be the active management function. I have encountered some bugs with this aspect of the tool. I wouldn't necessarily identify these issues as bugs, they're more like processes issues associated with the scanning assets; the process could be improved."
"ServiceDesk's reporting module could use an update. It looks outdated, and the interface could be more intuitive."
"It would be better if they could just bring up interface changes because, from the past five years, I don't see any difference in the way or look and feel of the application."
"The reporting capabilities are not as good as Ivanti's. So, ManageEngine could certainly improve on that."
"There's no native integrations between the systems."
"I would also like to see better integration with external software. It is possible, but it is tough. The APIs are not very flexible, so you really have to write a lot of code to create that integration. Opening it up for external integration would allow for easier customization of the existing autobox workflows. It would help with the user's perception."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"IBM Maximo offers a licensing application, and you have to comply with the license."
"IBM has changed the licensing policy. As I understand now, they are going from a complex way of licensing to a more simple way of licensing."
"You pay for what you get. There are lots of options depending on how you would like to implement Maximo."
"The price of IBM Maximo could reduce, it is expensive."
"​Explore internal processes in order to evaluate the correct number of users in each Maximo module, then evaluate the different offers of pricing and licensing.​"
"Where available, concurrent licenses can be more cost efficient and provide more flexibility."
"$USD700 per agent user."
"The concurrent user license is much more effective in management and cost-wise, as it is more suitable for maintenance management."
"It is not an expensive solution."
"For 90 service agents and our need for a cloud solution with incident management and service request management, it annually costs around 12,000. If you need additional development or deployment support from the vendor, there might be an additional cost."
"The price of the solution is low. However, it still could be less expensive."
"Pricing can always be improved and made more affordable."
"As compared to a lot of systems out there, it is more affordable."
"It is cheaper than its competitors."
"The platform has good pricing."
"ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus' price is very reasonable."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) solutions are best for your needs.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
36%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
7%
Educational Organization
60%
Computer Software Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
5%
Manufacturing Company
3%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Maximo?
It can be particularly useful for power line operations, enabling linemen in the field to gather information and send it across the country as well as different parts of the world.
What needs improvement with IBM Maximo?
Though I liked it a lot, I think it was lagging a lot. It was very slow due to the lagging issues. So that was kind of frustrating, considering how slow it was while functioning. The aforementioned...
What is your primary use case for IBM Maximo?
It can be particularly useful for power line operations, enabling linemen in the field to gather information and send it across the country as well as different parts of the world. With IBM Maximo,...
What do you like most about ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus?
The platform's most beneficial features are incident management, change management, request management, and asset management.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus?
I am not directly involved with the pricing and negotiations, but I am aware they are managed by the higher management of the company.
What needs improvement with ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus?
ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus could improve by offering a user-friendly environment similar to ServiceNow. It should also include more compatibility with different types of devices, especially conc...
 

Also Known As

Maximo
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Royal Boskalis Westminster N.V., DTE Energy, Swedish Match, Projetech, Fingrid, East Coast
Tranter IT Infrastructure Services Limited, Sterlite Technologies, averda, Radiology Associates
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, IFS, Infor and others in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM). Updated: October 2024.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.