IBM Rational Performance Tester vs TestRail comparison

IBM and IDERA are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. IBM is ranked #24, while IDERA is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3. IBM holds a 1.4% mindshare in TMT, compared to IDERA’s 12.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of IDERA users who would recommend it.

IBM Rational Performance Te...

Read 17 IBM Rational Performance Tester reviews

110 Views
84 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

TestRail

Read 22 TestRail reviews

1,937 Views
930 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

IBM Rational Performance Te...

TestRail

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

IBM Rational Performance Tester and TestRail compete in the software testing and quality assurance category. TestRail seems to have the upper hand with higher overall user satisfaction.

Features: IBM Rational Performance Tester is noted for comprehensive performance testing, integration with other Rational tools, and detailed performance evaluations. TestRail offers intuitive test case management, efficient reporting features, and a user-friendly interface.

Room for Improvement: IBM Rational Performance Tester needs a more modern update cycle, improved ease of use, and better documentation for new users. TestRail could enhance its reporting capabilities, integration with other tools, and expand its customizable options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Rational Performance Tester requires complex setup and configuration but has helpful customer service. TestRail offers simpler deployment and responsive customer support.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Rational Performance Tester is on the pricier side but provides comprehensive features. TestRail offers good value for money with a straightforward pricing structure, leading to a better ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Rational Performance Tester vs. TestRail Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Rational Performance Tester vs. TestRail

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Rational Performance Te...

Ranking in Test Management Tools

24th

Average Rating

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

TestRail

Ranking in Test Management Tools

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of IBM Rational Performance Tester is 1.4%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TestRail is 12.2%, down from 13.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Management Tools

Featured Reviews

it_user323943

Netcool Engineer with 10,001+ employees

We can edit captured transactions and organize them by those for which we require performance metrics, but it lacks a set of manuals or guides that would take out some guess work.

It is used to capture and generate HTTP tests. The capture process is very easy. After this, we edited the captured transactions to organize them into the sections or transactions we require performance metrics for (i.e. splash page, user authentication, main pageload, logout, etc.). This editing process is easy to perform with the interface provided in Rational Performance Tester Finally, Rational Performance Tester has an import/export feature that has been extremely useful. We have used it to export our complete test library and import it into another Rational Performance Tester server with no loss or issues. This allows for platform test migrations and backup.

Read full review

StuartBarker

Managing Director at Corecom Quality Engineering

A tool that provides effective test management and real-time reporting capabilities

I have faced some issues with the integration between TestRail and Jira where the status of tests is not displayed (in Jira) due to I suspect security settings on the browser. In a large corporate environment, it is not easily changed. The support wasn't particularly helpful. It would be great if I could create custom reports, ideally with a tool designed specifically for that.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It can support both web applications and mobile applications, and in certain cases, it can also support testing of desktop applications or software-based applications. You can write web applications, mobile applications, and software-based applications."

"Technical support is very good. I'm very satisfied with the assistance we've received so far."

"Reliable and stable. It is important that TestRail be up and running 24/7 as we have users around the world using it."

"I use the product to create test cases and share them with my team and manager."

"This is a user friendly solution."

"I haven't faced any stability issues using the solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The biggest advantage of using TestRail is its simplicity and intuitive interface."

"You don't need to follow complex procedures to create a test run, test case, etc."

"I use the solution for test management."

"The solution is very stable. We've never had any issues with it."

More TestRail pros

Cons

"The solution is not easily scalable. If you want to extend the solution, you need to purchase a different kind of license. You also have to work with the IBM team to assist in scaling."

"There are some features that Micro Focus LoadRunner provides, but they are not available in IBM Rational Performance Tester. They should include such features. It can also have more reports similar to what HP provides. It might also need some improvement in terms of the tools and support for other technology areas. Certain technologies are not supported by every tool. They need to support all sorts of technologies and platforms on which web applications and mobile applications are built. They need complete support for all sorts of technologies."

"There are a number of improvements that have been requested. While I don't have a list of these requests available, many can be found on Gurock's forum."

"It would be useful if it had its own issue management system. At the moment, it's purely a test management tool and you have to link to a defect management tool, like JIRA. It would be useful if there was an option to use its own defect management tool so that it's integrated and not two separate tools."

"Customer support could be enhanced. All the support is provided via chat and emails. Sometimes, you really need to speak to a person, and arranging such calls is not easy."

"It would be nice if they would add an export to Word."

"I have faced some issues with the integration between TestRail and Jira, which haven't been permanently resolved yet."

"Their customer support could be improved. Sometimes we struggle with that. It could be faster. Whenever we raise any query, they get back to you but the turnaround time is very slow."

"TestRail's user interface is not great. When you use it for the first time, you will be very uncomfortable and not know how to create test cases. It doesn't have a field for preconditions and post-conditions."

"It's not easy to create a custom report. It's not straightforward. A good improvement would be if there was a way to report and create a custom report without using a plugin or scripting language."

More TestRail cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is much cheaper than Micro Focus LoadRunner. We need perpetual licenses. Support is included in the first sale. After that, you need to renew support every year."

"The product is not much expensive."

"The product has a reasonable price in terms of the features."

"Pricing for small teams seems correct with respect to competitors."

"Negotiate the best deal you can."

"The solution is quite reasonably priced for what it offers and offers a monthly subscription model."

"Use TestRail Cloud (online TR hosted server) and don't worry about maintenance or scalability. It saves a lot of cash and time."

"I give the price a five out of ten."

"The price of the solution is based on how many users you have per year. When you grow, it is segmented, For example, 10 to 25, you have a price, and more than 50, or 100, you need to take the enterprise license. I don't think we will reach this point."

More TestRail pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

30%

Computer Software Company

20%

Government

13%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about TestRail by Gurock?

I use the solution for test management.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TestRail by Gurock?

The product has a reasonable price in terms of the features.

See all answers

What needs improvement with TestRail by Gurock?

TestRail should improve its pricing.

See all answers

Comparisons

Apache JMeter vs IBM Rational Performance Tester

Compared 63% of the time

OpenText LoadRunner Professional vs IBM Rational Performance Tester

Compared 24% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs IBM Rational Performance Tester

Compared 14% of the time

More IBM Rational Performance Tester Competitors

Tricentis qTest vs TestRail

Compared 18% of the time

TFS vs TestRail

Compared 16% of the time

Zephyr Enterprise vs TestRail

Compared 13% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs TestRail

Compared 7% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs TestRail

Compared 7% of the time

More TestRail Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM Rational Performance Tester

March 2025

Download IBM Rational Performance Tester product report

Buyer's Guide

TestRail

March 2025

Download TestRail product report

Also Known As

Rational Performance Tester

TestRail by Gurock

Overview

IBM Rational Performance Tester is a performance testing solution that validates the scalability of web and server applications. Rational Performance Tester identifies the presence and cause of system performance bottlenecks and reduces load testing complexity.

IBM

TestRail helps you manage and track your software testing efforts and organize your QA department. Its intuitive web-based user interface makes it easy to create test cases, manage test runs and coordinate your entire testing process.

Easily track and follow the status of individual tests, milestones and projects with dashboards and activity reports. Get real-time insights into your testing progress and boost productivity with personalized todo lists, filters and email notifications. Efficient test management, get started today!

IDERA

Sample Customers

andagon, Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon

Apple, Microsoft, Boeing, Intel, NASA, Amazon, HP, Samsung

Buyer's Guide

IBM Rational Performance Tester vs. TestRail

March 2025

Free Report: IBM Rational Performance Tester vs. TestRail

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational Performance Tester vs. TestRail and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Rational Performance Tester vs. TestRail report.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.