IBM Workload Automation vs UiPath Orchestrator comparison

IBM and UiPath are both solutions in the Workload Automation category. IBM is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.8, while UiPath is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.2. IBM holds a 7.2% mindshare in WA, compared to UiPath’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

IBM Workload Automation

Read 32 IBM Workload Automation reviews

3,686 Views
2,420 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

UiPath Orchestrator

Read 33 UiPath Orchestrator reviews

307 Views
176 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

IBM Workload Automation

UiPath Orchestrator

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 5, 2025

IBM Workload Automation and UiPath Orchestrator are both key players in automation solutions. IBM Workload Automation often gains favor due to customer satisfaction with its integration capabilities, whereas UiPath Orchestrator is noted for its advanced automation features, which can justify its higher pricing.

Features: IBM Workload Automation is recognized for its robust scheduling options, integration capabilities, and support for complex IT environments. It also offers event-based scheduling, multiplatform workload automation, and seamless integration with applications like SAP and Oracle. UiPath Orchestrator stands out with powerful automation, scalability, and ease of managing large environments, along with centralized data management, queue management, and integration capabilities.

Room for Improvement: IBM Workload Automation could improve by simplifying its deployment process, enhancing cloud capabilities, and providing more intuitive user interfaces. UiPath Orchestrator may benefit from offering more detailed documentation, improving pricing models for various business sizes, and enhancing offline capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: UiPath Orchestrator provides a more seamless deployment experience and includes comprehensive customer service due to its cloud-based model, which supports quick scaling and customization. IBM Workload Automation's deployment can be complex, requiring specialized knowledge, and might be more challenging for users inexperienced with the system.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Workload Automation indicates a lower initial setup cost, which is a viable option for budget-conscious businesses but can have a longer ROI period. UiPath Orchestrator, while potentially more expensive initially, tends to offer quicker ROI due to its efficient automation processes and reduced maintenance costs.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Workload Automation vs. UiPath Orchestrator Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Workload Automation vs. UiPath Orchestrator

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Workload Automation

Ranking in Workload Automation

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

UiPath Orchestrator

Ranking in Workload Automation

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Workload Automation category, the mindshare of IBM Workload Automation is 7.2%, down from 8.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Orchestrator is 0.8%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Workload Automation

Featured Reviews

Ilhami Arikan

Cloud Services Automation Technologies Manager at Garanti Teknoloji

With an easy setup phase in place, agent-based installation can be done in minutes

Sometimes we have issues with the solution's stability. So, stability can be improved. Reporting and visibility of the solution need improvement. These days, we need more visibility. We need to access the logs and databases easily. You need to keep track of the running number of logs, like which ones are executed, completed, etc. So if there would be a good reporting dashboard, then it would be good. There's room for improvement in the solution since it is a challenging thing when we want to use the solution's technology with our new technologies. For example, if we need to use TWS on our OpenShift platform, the solution's API is not capable enough. So the product itself needs to be aligned with new technologies.

Read full review

Bantu Kumar

Senior Technical Director at Globant

Improves operational efficiency through its centralized dashboard and asset management

There are overwhelming features added to UiPath Orchestrator, which can lead to complexities. Permissions, roles, and queues sometimes result in conflicts, requiring deeper understanding. I would prefer if the tool was more intuitive, and it is important to maintain simplicity instead of combining multiple functionalities, potentially through different licensing models to restrict features.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"IBM Workload Automation provides good performance and monitoring."

"Technical support from IBM is very good."

"I have supported this product in literally 100s of different environments and its unmatched in its ability to scale to any size."

"The whole product is valuable because it is a tool for batch automation."

"Jobs can be triggered in multiple nodes."

"The most valuable feature of IBM Workload Automation is its holistic view, which helps me find technical solutions quickly. For instance, if a customer has an issue completing their workload within a specific time frame, the tool provides enough information to identify and resolve the issue. One of the main challenges is dealing with data infrastructure problems and pending updates. Workload Automation helps me leverage current AI capabilities to recommend architectural updates to avoid these issues. It also allows me to balance CPU usage effectively, ensuring service level agreements are met. The interface is user-friendly and facilitates this process smoothly."

"Provides a robust, full spectrum enterprise-wide WLA platform."

"The DWC, when configured correctly, is a great GUI tool to provide Self-Service Scheduling capabilities to the user community."

More IBM Workload Automation pros

"The support team is very responsive and effective in resolving issues promptly."

"UiPath Orchestrator has helped us by replacing manual processes with automation."

"One standout feature I like in UiPath Orchestrator is the scheduling capability."

"The centralized login feature greatly helps because we can also use the Active Directory feature. We do not need to create a new user. We can connect with a user from a company, and we can add all the groups they have to set the features for a specific group. We do not need to do that for each user, and we can do that for a specific role we have in the company. I think this helps a lot."

"I also create user and machine templates and do other work in Orchestrator."

"UiPath Orchestrator is a user-friendly solution."

"UiPath Orchestrator has helped us by replacing manual processes with automation."

"The solution is easy to use."

More UiPath Orchestrator pros

Cons

"There should be more custom documentation, specifically around Java APIs. There should also be more training. In terms of features, we are currently using only 50% of its features. We don't use all features that are available, but there is always room for improvement in all of the tools."

"It is missing some features and can improve in areas where the competition is somewhat better like linking job dependencies."

"The configuration of IBM Workload Automation has some challenges. We have a difficult time customizing it, but it is similar to other solutions."

"The solution's installation could be improved because the customers have to do it all the time."

"The performance of the previous versions could be better."

"Scalability-wise, it can be a little bit challenging."

"It would be helpful to have a mobile app that could be used to follow the job schedule."

"The schedule refreshes daily and that's a challenge for us."

More IBM Workload Automation cons

"It takes us time to understand the process before we can publish it. Its pricing needs to be lower, and there needs to be a centralized dashboard."

"UiPath Orchestrator should improve its UI and make it more user-friendly."

"One of the significant challenges we've encountered with UiPath Orchestrator is the frequent and rapid changes in the tool's interface and functionality."

"The credential vault is generic and does not have process categorization. The tool needs to arrange a Customer Success Manager for support. It should also improve the credential manager and integrate a customized form of retrieving the details. There should be more dashboards as well."

"The solution's deployment and architecture aspects could be improved."

"It's a bit difficult to connect to the licenses."

"The solution’s licensing cost is high and could be improved."

"The vision libraries that the tool provides, along with the visualization part, are areas with shortcomings in the solution where improvements are required."

More UiPath Orchestrator cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We transitioned from a server license to per job license, and that saved us a lot money."

"It is about one-third of the cost of a controller."

"To my knowledge, IWA is the only WLA product that will provide "parallel tracking" capability to assist in upgrading from one platform to IWA."

"Pricing depends on the number of agents that you install."

"The solution is a little bit expensive."

"The solution's pricing is affordable."

"The contract is with the customer with whom we are working, so IBM is not directly involved in this."

"The product’s pricing is competitive."

"The solution is very expensive. Compared to Microsoft, another tool that is much cheaper than the tool, it does not have the same features that UiPath Orchestrator has. The most valuable feature in my platform is the queue items in UiPath Orchestrator to evaluate the products using this feature."

"The product is expensive, and the associated licenses add to the expenses, initially making deploying new processes costly."

"UiPath Orchestrator is an expensive tool to implement."

"The product’s pricing is a little higher than reasonable."

"I rate UiPath Orchestrator's pricing a six out of ten."

"The pricing seems reasonable based on project requirements."

"The solution’s pricing is reasonable."

More UiPath Orchestrator pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

32%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

19%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Workload Automation?

The initial setup is easy.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Workload Automation?

IBM needs to move away from its native terminology and adopt a more cloud-centric approach. For example, IBM still refers to machines as 'workstations,' whereas other systems, like Control-M, use m...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM Workload Automation?

We use the solution for network automation.

See all answers

What do you like most about UiPath Orchestrator?

Using UiPath Orchestrator, we can deploy tasks across different environments, including virtual machines, for both attended and unattended processes.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Orchestrator?

The pricing of UiPath Orchestrator is a bit high. However, we can compete with that, though if they decrease the prices, it would lead to better market penetration.

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Orchestrator?

I would like to see high availability over two sites, with a main site and a disaster recovery working as an active-active solution, which is not currently supported.

See all answers

Comparisons

Control-M vs IBM Workload Automation

Compared 31% of the time

HCL Workload Automation vs IBM Workload Automation

Compared 19% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs IBM Workload Automation

Compared 14% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs IBM Workload Automation

Compared 7% of the time

Stonebranch vs IBM Workload Automation

Compared 5% of the time

More IBM Workload Automation Competitors

Automic Automation vs UiPath Orchestrator

Compared 44% of the time

Control-M vs UiPath Orchestrator

Compared 35% of the time

JAMS vs UiPath Orchestrator

Compared 20% of the time

More UiPath Orchestrator Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM Workload Automation

March 2025

Download IBM Workload Automation product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Orchestrator

March 2025

Download UiPath Orchestrator product report

Also Known As

IBM Tivoli Workload Scheduler, IBM TWS

No data available

Overview

IBM Workload Automation helps companies manage operations, portfolio management, resource collection, and dependency scheduling. It facilitates transitions from legacy apps to web services, executing batch processing for tens of thousands of jobs daily with hundreds of users.

Teams rely on IBM Workload Automation to optimize backend workloads, maintain service levels, and offer support in remote environments. Its interface and job scheduler are appreciated for their value and effectiveness. Users benefit from batch automation, multiple node job triggering, stability, and batch app tracking. It provides a holistic view to resolve technical issues and leverage AI for updates. Its user-friendly interface simplifies workload management. Performance, monitoring, request features for adding functionalities, and workload management are key advantages.

What are the most important features?

Interface and Job Scheduler: Highly valued for managing processes efficiently.
Batch Automation: Facilitates the automation of batch processing tasks.
Multiple Node Job Triggering: Enables triggering jobs across multiple nodes.
Stability: Ensures a reliable and consistent performance.
Batch App Tracking: Allows tracking and monitoring of batch applications.
Holistic View: Helps in resolving technical issues and leveraging AI.

What are the benefits or ROI items to look for in reviews?

Performance: Enhanced system performance and monitoring capabilities.
Workload Management: Effective management of various workload types.
Request Feature: Ability to add new functionalities as needed.

IBM Workload Automation is implemented across several industries for diverse tasks. Companies executing high-volume batch processing, managing complex job dependencies, and transitioning from legacy systems find it valuable. Industries such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing utilize it to maintain operational efficiency, enhance system performance, and automate critical processes.

IBM

UiPath Orchestrator automates website processes, manages supply chains, handles log-ins, and processes invoices efficiently. It's a comprehensive tool for generating reports, managing RPA workflows, scheduling robots, and ensuring task accuracy, making it indispensable for organizations aiming to optimize automation.

UiPath Orchestrator stands out for its user-friendly interface, centralized data collection, and robust security measures. Its intuitive design, combined with a comprehensive view of bot activity, makes it highly appreciated among users. With asset encryption, AI-integrated functionalities, and role-based access control, organizations find it reduces the need for extensive technical knowledge, thereby enhancing automation efficiency. It also excels in asset and queue management, logging capabilities, and scheduling functions, contributing significantly to streamlined operational processes.

What are the most important features of UiPath Orchestrator?

Centralized data collection: Provides a unified view of all automation activities
Robust security measures: Includes asset encryption and role-based access control
Scheduling functions: Allows efficient planning and execution of automated tasks
Asset and queue management: Enhances organization in handling automation assets
Logging capabilities: Tracks activities for better oversight and troubleshooting
AI-integrated functionalities: Improves accuracy and efficiency in automation

What benefits should users look for in reviews when evaluating UiPath Orchestrator?

Market visibility: Increased exposure and promotional activities
Code management: Improved management capabilities for Studio
Support response: Faster and more efficient support services
Credential vault: Enhanced flexibility in handling transactional items
AI capabilities: Advanced features at competitive pricing
Documentation: Clearer guidelines for transitioning setups
Integration: Better integration with reporting tools and comprehensive dashboards
Licensing: Streamlined processes for managing licenses
Monitoring: Centralized triggers for better process monitoring

UiPath Orchestrator sees wide application across industries such as manufacturing, finance, and healthcare. In manufacturing, it streamlines supply chain processes and automates inventory management. Finance companies use it for processing invoices and managing compliance, while the healthcare sector benefits from automating patient data handling and optimizing appointment scheduling. Each industry leverages the platform\'s extensive capabilities to enhance operational efficiency and accuracy.

UiPath

Sample Customers

Standard Life Group, Banca Popolare di Milano, A*STAR, ArcelorMittal Gent

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

IBM Workload Automation vs. UiPath Orchestrator

March 2025

Free Report: IBM Workload Automation vs. UiPath Orchestrator

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Workload Automation vs. UiPath Orchestrator and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Workload Automation vs. UiPath Orchestrator report.

See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.

We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.