Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IFS Cloud Platform vs JIRA Service Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
5.7
IFS Cloud users saw a 4.5x ROI in 18 months, with full benefits realized in two to three years.
Sentiment score
7.7
JIRA Service Management boosts efficiency, saves time and money, streamlines requests, and improves productivity with centralized ticket management.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.1
IFS Cloud support is responsive in Australia, but regional inconsistencies and speed issues highlight need for improved communication.
Sentiment score
6.9
Jira Service Management offers efficient customer support with variable experiences, often complemented by local partners and community resources.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
IFS Cloud Platform is scalable, adaptable, and suitable for complex organizations, but core modifications and updates can be challenging.
Sentiment score
7.6
JIRA Service Management is highly scalable and flexible, though performance concerns exist for large organizations needing advanced features.
It supports introducing new features or levels efficiently across our global locations, helping everyone stay informed.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.2
IFS Cloud Platform is praised for its stability and reliability, with few unplanned outages and rare performance issues.
Sentiment score
8.0
Many users rate JIRA Service Management as stable, despite minor issues, appreciating its reliable performance with frequent updates.
There should be more governance for permissions and more options for customized access without frequently involving the admin.
 

Room For Improvement

IFS Cloud Platform requires improvements in usability, integration, pricing, customization, mobile compatibility, AI integration, support, and documentation.
JIRA Service Management struggles with email integration, customization complexity, high costs, limited features, and non-user-friendly interfaces.
JIRA's user interface needs training to understand and utilize.
It remains one of the main barriers to using JIRA Service Management across our entire company.
 

Setup Cost

IFS Cloud Platform offers competitive pricing with flexible licensing, best purchased directly due to partner training limitations.
JIRA Service Management provides tiered pricing and discounts, offering enterprise solutions with a cost-benefit balance despite additional agent fees.
 

Valuable Features

IFS Cloud Platform users appreciate its customizable, adaptive features, intuitive interface, and seamless integration across finance, CRM, and warehouse management.
JIRA Service Management enhances project and incident management with customizable interfaces, flexible workflows, integration, and comprehensive reporting.
JIRA itself is valuable for managing tickets, user stories, and pipeline.
 

Categories and Ranking

IFS Cloud Platform
Ranking in Help Desk Software
8th
Ranking in IT Service Management (ITSM)
6th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
30
Ranking in other categories
CRM (12th), Customer Experience Management (7th), Field Service Management (1st), ERP (9th), Activity Based Costing Software (7th), Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) (2nd), Local Government CRM (4th), IT Asset Management (8th), License Management (2nd)
JIRA Service Management
Ranking in Help Desk Software
2nd
Ranking in IT Service Management (ITSM)
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
81
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the IT Service Management (ITSM) category, the mindshare of IFS Cloud Platform is 1.5%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JIRA Service Management is 11.7%, down from 12.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IT Service Management (ITSM)
 

Featured Reviews

Patrick Abi Habib - PeerSpot reviewer
I like the connectivity and interfaces, but the reporting could be more user-friendly
IFS uses Crystal Report mostly, which isn't too user-friendly. Developing reports isn't easy and requires a lot of dev time. Since SAP bought it, Crystal Report has become more complicated to use on IFS. You have a dashboard for reporting that is good, but it's incomplete. Most of our clients use Power BI or some additional tooling for BI. I worked on a third-party system called Harmony Solution. This French company produces a reporting tool that I feel is better than Crystal Report for IFS. They could also improve the plugin for Excel data migration to clarify its use. Many clients use it for massive amounts of data, which affects their systems. There is no communication about that. Clients use the Excel plugin because they know it works, but it does not always work the way it should. They need to improve the plugin's performance or inform customers to limit their use. Migration jobs are often based on Excel inputs, particularly CSV files. That can cause issues when operating across several countries. For example, say I'm working on a French PC collaborating with someone in India who uses an Indian PC. Excel will transform the file based on the country's language, and the input data will be wrong. I believe they are trying to fix this with the smart data tool in the cloud.
Shambuling-Doni - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to use, offers good stability and visibility for operational efficiency
The search function could be improved. We have to search a certain way. There is no generic search, it is more object-oriented search. The interface could also be more user-friendly. So, the interface and search could be improved. Additionally, I would like to see more accessibility. It would also be great if there was a Jira mobile app.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Service Management (ITSM) solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
19%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
7%
Construction Company
7%
Computer Software Company
20%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IFS Applications?
Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine or ten out of ten since it is an extremely scalable solution that can be used for various use cases with thousands of users.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IFS Applications?
The product is reasonably priced. The costs are justified by the value provided, considering the comprehensive features and minimal need for customization. I rate the pricing a seven out of ten.
What needs improvement with IFS Applications?
The solution's reporting tools still require improvement. The current functionality could be more user-friendly and flexible, which can lead to increased reliance on service partners for custom cha...
What do you like most about JIRA Service Management?
JIRA Service Management is a very user-friendly solution.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JIRA Service Management?
We used Jira's free version for some time, and we used it as an offline service without communicating with the Jira team regarding the license.
 

Also Known As

IFS Applications, Assyst, IFS Cloud
JIRA Service Desk
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

China Airlines, Electrolux Group, Babcock, Cimcorp, Sky, Multiplex, Veolia. 
mgm technology partners, Telestream, Build.com, Zend Technologies, OfficeDrop, PGS Software, American Diabetes Association, NEPTUNE Canada
Find out what your peers are saying about IFS Cloud Platform vs. JIRA Service Management and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.