Infogix Data360 Govern [EOL] vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance comparison

Precisely and Microsoft are both solutions in the Data Governance category. Additionally, 100% of Precisely users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 84% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Infogix Data360 Govern [EOL]

Read 2 Infogix Data360 Govern [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Purview Data Gove...

Read 60 Microsoft Purview Data Governance reviews

14,131 Views
11,870 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

Infogix Data360 Govern [EOL]

Microsoft Purview Data Gove...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Infogix Data360 Govern [EOL] and Microsoft Purview Data Governance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Collibra, Informatica and others in Data Governance.

To learn more, read our detailed Data Governance Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Data Governance

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 883,044 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Infogix Data360 Govern [EOL]

Average Rating

10.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Purview Data Gove...

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Governance (1st), Microsoft Security Suite (10th)

Featured Reviews

Delmar Assis

CEO at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Helpful support that is easy to speak with, reliable with no problems of instances of unavailability

There are three main areas that need to be improved. * The 360-degree view for the customers needs to be improved. The data should be more unified and cleaner. * Regulatory compliance needs to be achieved. * The governance itself needs improvement. It should be organized and linked to the data catalog and the business glossary, which would give a full view of the customer data. We would like to have the application available in Portuguese and Spanish. This is something that we have spoken with the vendor about.

Read full review

Ayinampudi Srikanth

Tech lead at a healthcare company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Automated data discovery has streamlined management while configuration remains complex

Compared to Big-ID, Microsoft Purview Data Governance looks complicated to me. I do not feel it has a good user-level UI. The interface feels a little complicated compared to Big-ID. I did not appreciate the configuration part. It felt complex, whereas when I went for a Big-ID demo, the interface looked better and was easier to understand for any user.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Infogix support stands out in terms of quality and response time, and it is really easy to speak with them by phone or by email."

"It is an integrated solution that provides end-to-end capabilities for managing the data. It is very useful for cleaning the data. It also allows us to combine data from on-premises and cloud sources. On this unified data, we can perform some advanced analytics to predict customer behavior and create new products. Its management and governance capabilities are valuable. It provides full tracking of the data flow. It provides customers the full control over the data and the ability to protect the data. It enables us to provide the best service to the customers. We also get great support from Infogix."

"MIP also provides strong information rights management settings, such as the ability to specify who has access to content and at what time."

"My favorite features are eDiscovery and insider risk management, because these are the major threats to an organization that can't be easily traced."

"One of the best features is the classification rules, especially the scan rule sets. They are really useful, especially when we need to understand the current data the company has to ensure that all the problematic data can be put under someone's responsibility."

"I use the tool in projects as a medium to provide information as reports to the stakeholders."

"The reporting is excellent. Limiting what people can see is also valuable, especially when tagging documents."

"Data authentication enables us to classify documents based on whether they should be restricted for internal consumption or permitted for external sharing."

"Purview's ability to connect to iOS, Mac, and Android devices is critical."

"It is very easy to learn the interface, and it is very user-friendly."

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance pros

Cons

"We would like this solution to be available in our local language. In our region, people are not fluent in English. It would be nice to have this solution in Portuguese and Spanish. Its workflows are great, but it would be useful to have business flow at a high level because we need to work together with business users. We need more capabilities for business users to understand something in terms of data."

"The 360-degree view for the customers needs to be improved."

"The product needs improvement to edit the number of assets. It needs to be more inuitive as well."

"We haven't really gotten too far into it to identify areas for improvement just yet."

"Frequent daily updates from Microsoft can cause interface elements like buttons to appear and disappear, making navigation unpredictable."

"There is room for improvement when it comes to Purview's data connector platform in supporting ingestion from non-Microsoft data sources."

"While Purview's data connector platform can ingest information from non-Microsoft data sources, it is slow to do so and the information may become outdated."

"I would like to have AI functionality on the dashboard to help me analyze and report on the data that we capture using Purview on a daily basis."

"The technical support has room for improvement."

"It supports only a limited number of tools and technologies that pertain to Microsoft products. If you want to leverage other solutions such as Workday or Oracle Fusion, features will be coming up, but as of now, it is for the Microsoft suite."

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price is much lower than Informatica. Its licensing is very easy to understand. It is not too complex. There is no maintenance fee. The support is included with the license. Its licensing is subscription-based, which makes it easy to define the budget and other things. It also makes it easier to plan and understand how to use the solution. It uses the pay-as-you-use model, so you can start small and expand the solution and pay as per your usage."

"Some people find the tier licensing system complicated, but it offers a lot of value for money if we use the features."

"The price is reasonable because most of our clients already have an E3 license, which makes implementation easy."

"The categorization within the licensing could be improved. There are a lot of solutions within Microsoft Purview. If the licensing could be a bit clearer and the solutions could be better categorized according to function and across multiple environments, that would be excellent. The licensing is very confusing."

"The pricing is moderate. It's not too expensive, but it's not the most competitive."

"Microsoft Purview requires a Microsoft 365 license and is included with an E5 license."

"Microsoft Purview is the best option I have encountered when it comes to price. Maybe some of my information is outdated, but Microsoft offered it so that you could use it almost without paying."

"Aside from the complexity of the pricing model, the price itself is realistic. Features like AI components and automatic classification require additional licenses. Still, anyone can start using Purview with a basic E3 license if they're using Microsoft 365 and grow with additional licenses as needed. Overall, we're satisfied with the price."

"It is cheap. It is based on consumption. If somebody wants to start using it, the price is definitely cheaper than a tool like Collibra."

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

883,044 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	32

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Purview?

It is designed to seamlessly connect to various data sources, which is particularly beneficial for our customers who primarily use Microsoft technologies.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Purview?

Microsoft Purview Data Governance is quite affordable compared to other market solutions, which have high initial costs. It allows for a cost-effective start with negligible initial cost. However, ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Purview?

See all answers

Comparisons

Collibra Platform vs Infogix Data360 Govern [EOL]

Compared 53% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Infogix Data360 Govern [EOL]

Compared 22% of the time

More Infogix Data360 Govern [EOL] Competitors

Varonis Platform vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 15% of the time

Collibra Platform vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 12% of the time

Alation Data Catalog vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 9% of the time

Netwrix Access Analyzer vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 4% of the time

Atlan vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 4% of the time

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Governance

February 2026

Download Infogix Data360 Govern [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Purview Data Governance

February 2026

Microsoft Purview Data Governance report

Download Microsoft Purview Data Governance product report

Also Known As

No data available

Microsoft Purview, MS Azure Purview

Overview

Data360’s top-down approach to Data Governance makes it easy to understand the critical information that impacts business objectives and initiatives, thereby helping data governance team members focus on the data that matters.

Precisely

The new Microsoft Purview portal offers an enhanced governance experience, serving as a unified platform for managing and governing data across various sources, including Azure, Microsoft 365, on-premises, and multicloud environments. Designed to streamline governance, compliance, risk, and security efforts, the new portal provides a user-friendly interface and unlocks advanced features like live view and preset scans. Existing users of Microsoft Purview can upgrade to this enhanced experience, gaining access to improved user interface, enhanced capabilities, and consolidated management of data assets. Additionally, the upgrade sets the stage for future developments, including account consolidation and fine-grained access control.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Keurig Green Mountain

Information Not Available

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Collibra, Informatica and others in Data Governance. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

883,044 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Data Governance vendors.

We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.