Infogix Data360 Govern [EOL] vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance comparison

Precisely and Microsoft are both solutions in the Data Governance category. Additionally, 100% of Precisely users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 84% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Infogix Data360 Govern [EOL]

Read 2 Infogix Data360 Govern [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Purview Data Gove...

Read 60 Microsoft Purview Data Governance reviews

14,131 Views
11,870 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

Infogix Data360 Govern [EOL]

Microsoft Purview Data Gove...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Infogix Data360 Govern [EOL] and Microsoft Purview Data Governance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Collibra, Informatica and others in Data Governance.

To learn more, read our detailed Data Governance Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Data Governance

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,012 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Infogix Data360 Govern [EOL]

Average Rating

10.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Purview Data Gove...

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Governance (1st), Microsoft Security Suite (10th)

Featured Reviews

Delmar Assis

CEO at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Helpful support that is easy to speak with, reliable with no problems of instances of unavailability

There are three main areas that need to be improved. * The 360-degree view for the customers needs to be improved. The data should be more unified and cleaner. * Regulatory compliance needs to be achieved. * The governance itself needs improvement. It should be organized and linked to the data catalog and the business glossary, which would give a full view of the customer data. We would like to have the application available in Portuguese and Spanish. This is something that we have spoken with the vendor about.

Read full review

Ayinampudi Srikanth

Tech lead at a healthcare company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Automated data discovery has streamlined management while configuration remains complex

Compared to Big-ID, Microsoft Purview Data Governance looks complicated to me. I do not feel it has a good user-level UI. The interface feels a little complicated compared to Big-ID. I did not appreciate the configuration part. It felt complex, whereas when I went for a Big-ID demo, the interface looked better and was easier to understand for any user.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is an integrated solution that provides end-to-end capabilities for managing the data. It is very useful for cleaning the data. It also allows us to combine data from on-premises and cloud sources. On this unified data, we can perform some advanced analytics to predict customer behavior and create new products. Its management and governance capabilities are valuable. It provides full tracking of the data flow. It provides customers the full control over the data and the ability to protect the data. It enables us to provide the best service to the customers. We also get great support from Infogix."

"Infogix support stands out in terms of quality and response time, and it is really easy to speak with them by phone or by email."

"The custom classifications are one of the most valuable features."

"Data segregation is the most valuable feature."

"One important feature is data security, which both end users and the organization seek."

"Microsoft Purview is extremely stable."

"The DLP part and the AI related ones are the most valuable features; I mostly appreciate their automated data discovery."

"The sensitivity labeling is the most valuable feature because it is the foundation for automating the encryption process and ensuring proper data handling across the organization."

"One of the best features is the classification rules, especially the scan rule sets. They are really useful, especially when we need to understand the current data the company has to ensure that all the problematic data can be put under someone's responsibility."

"The most valuable feature is the tracking activity and device onboarding."

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance pros

Cons

"We would like this solution to be available in our local language. In our region, people are not fluent in English. It would be nice to have this solution in Portuguese and Spanish. Its workflows are great, but it would be useful to have business flow at a high level because we need to work together with business users. We need more capabilities for business users to understand something in terms of data."

"The 360-degree view for the customers needs to be improved."

"Setting up Purview in a production tenant proved challenging due to a lack of clear documentation on permission requirements."

"There are some limitations with regard to the lineage of data from different parts of the system."

"If we could have a view something like we have in CrowdStrike—which is, I believe, the biggest competitor to Microsoft when it comes to security—a node nodal view, which we also have in Defender, that would make it a more complete, one-stop solution. That would save a lot of time for the admins and the engineers."

"Enhancing the tool's capability to connect to multiple sources would be valuable."

"There should be more clarity about the costing, particularly how the cost is calculated, especially when utilizing health reports and quality features."

"One drawback of Microsoft Purview, though it's beneficial and easy to use, is that when you start plugging in connectors for third-party sources when setting the solution up for data collection, it becomes a bit more tricky."

"Licensing is frustrating due to multiple modules and licenses. The feature might be available in the console, but it won't work without the proper license, creating confusion."

"The features in the actual data governance could be improved, and I think there is room for improvement in the product."

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price is much lower than Informatica. Its licensing is very easy to understand. It is not too complex. There is no maintenance fee. The support is included with the license. Its licensing is subscription-based, which makes it easy to define the budget and other things. It also makes it easier to plan and understand how to use the solution. It uses the pay-as-you-use model, so you can start small and expand the solution and pay as per your usage."

"To get the full features of Purview, we currently need E5 enterprise licenses, which are expensive."

"Microsoft Purview requires a Microsoft 365 license and is included with an E5 license."

"Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is not cheap."

"While Purview's standard pricing might not be accessible to most small businesses, we were fortunate to benefit from the educational pricing which made it a financially viable option for our needs."

"I consider it cost-efficient because of the metrics it provides."

"The categorization within the licensing could be improved. There are a lot of solutions within Microsoft Purview. If the licensing could be a bit clearer and the solutions could be better categorized according to function and across multiple environments, that would be excellent. The licensing is very confusing."

"There is some competition out there, but the other solutions are quite expensive. They are enterprise tools that are a bit more mature but the license costs $100,000 for some of them. Purview is pay-per-use and a lot of companies are interested in that."

"Some people find the tier licensing system complicated, but it offers a lot of value for money if we use the features."

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,012 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	32

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Purview?

Microsoft Purview Data Governance is quite affordable compared to other market solutions, which have high initial costs. It allows for a cost-effective start with negligible initial cost. However, ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Purview?

The features in the actual data governance could be improved, and I think there is room for improvement in the product. We haven't used role-based access control in a complex way; it's somehow embe...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Azure Purview?

We are currently working with Microsoft Purview Data Governance and other Microsoft products. We are using Microsoft Purview Data Governance.

See all answers

Comparisons

Collibra Platform vs Infogix Data360 Govern [EOL]

Compared 52% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Infogix Data360 Govern [EOL]

Compared 24% of the time

More Infogix Data360 Govern [EOL] Competitors

Varonis Platform vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 14% of the time

Collibra Platform vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 12% of the time

Alation Data Catalog vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 8% of the time

Netwrix Access Analyzer vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 4% of the time

Atlan vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 4% of the time

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Governance

February 2026

Download Infogix Data360 Govern [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Purview Data Governance

February 2026

Microsoft Purview Data Governance report

Download Microsoft Purview Data Governance product report

Also Known As

No data available

Microsoft Purview, MS Azure Purview

Overview

Data360’s top-down approach to Data Governance makes it easy to understand the critical information that impacts business objectives and initiatives, thereby helping data governance team members focus on the data that matters.

Precisely

The new Microsoft Purview portal offers an enhanced governance experience, serving as a unified platform for managing and governing data across various sources, including Azure, Microsoft 365, on-premises, and multicloud environments. Designed to streamline governance, compliance, risk, and security efforts, the new portal provides a user-friendly interface and unlocks advanced features like live view and preset scans. Existing users of Microsoft Purview can upgrade to this enhanced experience, gaining access to improved user interface, enhanced capabilities, and consolidated management of data assets. Additionally, the upgrade sets the stage for future developments, including account consolidation and fine-grained access control.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Keurig Green Mountain

Information Not Available

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Collibra, Informatica and others in Data Governance. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,012 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Data Governance vendors.

We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.