Infogix Data360 Govern [EOL] vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance comparison

Precisely and Microsoft are both solutions in the Data Governance category. Additionally, 100% of Precisely users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 84% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Infogix Data360 Govern [EOL]

Read 2 Infogix Data360 Govern [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Purview Data Gove...

Read 60 Microsoft Purview Data Governance reviews

14,550 Views
12,222 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

Infogix Data360 Govern [EOL]

Microsoft Purview Data Gove...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Infogix Data360 Govern [EOL] and Microsoft Purview Data Governance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Collibra, Informatica and others in Data Governance.

To learn more, read our detailed Data Governance Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Data Governance

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,410 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Infogix Data360 Govern [EOL]

Average Rating

10.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Purview Data Gove...

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Governance (1st), Microsoft Security Suite (8th)

Featured Reviews

Delmar Assis

CEO at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Helpful support that is easy to speak with, reliable with no problems of instances of unavailability

There are three main areas that need to be improved. * The 360-degree view for the customers needs to be improved. The data should be more unified and cleaner. * Regulatory compliance needs to be achieved. * The governance itself needs improvement. It should be organized and linked to the data catalog and the business glossary, which would give a full view of the customer data. We would like to have the application available in Portuguese and Spanish. This is something that we have spoken with the vendor about.

Read full review

Ayinampudi Srikanth

Tech lead at a healthcare company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Automated data discovery has streamlined management while configuration remains complex

Compared to Big-ID, Microsoft Purview Data Governance looks complicated to me. I do not feel it has a good user-level UI. The interface feels a little complicated compared to Big-ID. I did not appreciate the configuration part. It felt complex, whereas when I went for a Big-ID demo, the interface looked better and was easier to understand for any user.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Infogix support stands out in terms of quality and response time, and it is really easy to speak with them by phone or by email."

"It is an integrated solution that provides end-to-end capabilities for managing the data. It is very useful for cleaning the data. It also allows us to combine data from on-premises and cloud sources. On this unified data, we can perform some advanced analytics to predict customer behavior and create new products. Its management and governance capabilities are valuable. It provides full tracking of the data flow. It provides customers the full control over the data and the ability to protect the data. It enables us to provide the best service to the customers. We also get great support from Infogix."

"The data protection feature is vital as it controls who can access data when it moves out of our protected boundary."

"Purview's ability to connect to iOS, Mac, and Android devices is critical."

"Microsoft Purview is extremely stable."

"Data authentication enables us to classify documents based on whether they should be restricted for internal consumption or permitted for external sharing."

"The documentation is very exhaustive. Anyone can go ahead and try different use cases."

"It is critical that Purview delivers data protection across multi-cloud and multi-platform environments. That is the number one reason that people are adopting hybrid and best-of-the-breed approaches. Especially in banking, it is critical because people want to protect, govern, and secure their data. This is one of the first conversations that happens with security and the architecture group on the client side."

"My favorite features are eDiscovery and insider risk management, because these are the major threats to an organization that can't be easily traced."

"Instead of having to manually write down which tables and columns exist and then describe them, you can do that process in one go, by simply connecting to a source. That's a huge time-saver and a great benefit of Purview."

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance pros

Cons

"The 360-degree view for the customers needs to be improved."

"We would like this solution to be available in our local language. In our region, people are not fluent in English. It would be nice to have this solution in Portuguese and Spanish. Its workflows are great, but it would be useful to have business flow at a high level because we need to work together with business users. We need more capabilities for business users to understand something in terms of data."

"As Microsoft Purview got a little more mature, the deployments got a little more complex, as we were kind of seeing that there are a lot of ways, like there were a hundred ways to do one thing or less."

"Overcoming certain control issues would significantly enhance our overall satisfaction."

"There are differences when looking at an incident in the M365 portal versus Purview, and the main one is the advanced hunting. In the M365 portal, you can write KQL queries and fetch data. If that was available in Purview, it would be very good."

"We haven't really gotten too far into it to identify areas for improvement just yet."

"Non-Microsoft use cases are not very high. It's limited for now."

"Licensing is frustrating due to multiple modules and licenses. The feature might be available in the console, but it won't work without the proper license, creating confusion."

"Microsoft Purview's compliance processes for handling various Mac and iOS devices could be significantly improved."

"We are currently in the rollout phase, so I am not entirely sure about specific areas of improvement. However, there are some problems with DLP rules, and it would be great if the security around DLP could be expanded."

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price is much lower than Informatica. Its licensing is very easy to understand. It is not too complex. There is no maintenance fee. The support is included with the license. Its licensing is subscription-based, which makes it easy to define the budget and other things. It also makes it easier to plan and understand how to use the solution. It uses the pay-as-you-use model, so you can start small and expand the solution and pay as per your usage."

"The solution is extremely affordable for the K-12 space."

"People often and unjustly say that Microsoft product pricing is not in the scope of reality, that it's just too expensive at times. I do not feel that is the case at all... If I'm able to let go of 30 to 70 percent of my IT administration staff, that makes up for a lot of money."

"The interesting part is how they are bundling the version into the E5 stack. If it was not for that inclusion, this would have been a difficult conversation for us, so kudos to Microsoft on that. Separating it out may become a problem for customer retention. It is definitely a good move on Microsoft's part to include it as part of any existing or any system upgrades for customers that were on E3."

"I would rate the cost of Microsoft Purview a six out of ten with ten being the most expensive."

"The pricing depends on the client's requirements and the number of applications."

"There is some competition out there, but the other solutions are quite expensive. They are enterprise tools that are a bit more mature but the license costs $100,000 for some of them. Purview is pay-per-use and a lot of companies are interested in that."

"We pay $15,000 per end user for the E5 license."

"The pricing is moderate. It's not too expensive, but it's not the most competitive."

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,410 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	32

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Purview?

It is designed to seamlessly connect to various data sources, which is particularly beneficial for our customers who primarily use Microsoft technologies.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Purview?

Microsoft Purview Data Governance is quite affordable compared to other market solutions, which have high initial costs. It allows for a cost-effective start with negligible initial cost. However, ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Purview?

See all answers

Comparisons

Collibra Platform vs Infogix Data360 Govern [EOL]

Compared 54% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Infogix Data360 Govern [EOL]

Compared 20% of the time

More Infogix Data360 Govern [EOL] Competitors

Varonis Platform vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 16% of the time

Collibra Platform vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 15% of the time

Alation Data Catalog vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 9% of the time

Atlan vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 4% of the time

BigID Next vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 4% of the time

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Governance

February 2026

Download Infogix Data360 Govern [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Purview Data Governance

January 2026

Microsoft Purview Data Governance report

Download Microsoft Purview Data Governance product report

Also Known As

No data available

Microsoft Purview, MS Azure Purview

Overview

Data360’s top-down approach to Data Governance makes it easy to understand the critical information that impacts business objectives and initiatives, thereby helping data governance team members focus on the data that matters.

Precisely

The new Microsoft Purview portal offers an enhanced governance experience, serving as a unified platform for managing and governing data across various sources, including Azure, Microsoft 365, on-premises, and multicloud environments. Designed to streamline governance, compliance, risk, and security efforts, the new portal provides a user-friendly interface and unlocks advanced features like live view and preset scans. Existing users of Microsoft Purview can upgrade to this enhanced experience, gaining access to improved user interface, enhanced capabilities, and consolidated management of data assets. Additionally, the upgrade sets the stage for future developments, including account consolidation and fine-grained access control.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Keurig Green Mountain

Information Not Available

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Collibra, Informatica and others in Data Governance. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,410 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Data Governance vendors.

We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.