Infor LX vs Infor M3 comparison

Infor LX and Infor M3 are both solutions in the ERP category. Infor LX is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.3, while Infor M3 is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.7. Infor LX holds a 1.5% mindshare in ERP, compared to Infor M3’s 3.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Infor LX users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Infor M3 users who would recommend it.

Infor LX

Read 9 Infor LX reviews

1,007 Views
967 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Infor M3

Read 15 Infor M3 reviews

2,934 Views
2,846 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Infor LX

Infor M3

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Infor LX and Infor M3 are both ERP solutions competing in the realm of enterprise resource planning. Infor M3 seems to hold the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set, enhanced scalability, and industry-specific capabilities, even if it comes with higher initial costs.

Features: Infor LX includes robust tools for manufacturing and supply chain management, ideal for process manufacturers, highly interactive system architecture, and strong planning capabilities. Infor M3 offers extensive functionality across manufacturing, distribution, and equipment, industry-specific features for fashion, food and beverage, and chemicals, and detailed customization and integration options.

Room for Improvement: Infor LX could enhance cloud deployment options, reduce setup time, and expand its industry-specific capabilities. Infor M3 may benefit from reducing its setup costs, simplifying usability for non-technical users, and optimizing its pricing structure to improve accessibility for mid-sized enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Infor LX uses a traditional on-premise deployment model, offering control but with longer setup times, backed by consistent and reliable customer support. Infor M3 supports cloud-based and hybrid deployments, enabling quicker scalability and improved global accessibility, with customer service tailored for complex environments.

Pricing and ROI: Infor LX presents a lower upfront cost, attractive for tighter budgets, with quick ROI due to its straightforward implementation. Infor M3 entails higher initial costs, justified by its advanced functionalities and integration capabilities, promising substantial long-term ROI for businesses that utilize its broad feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed Infor LX vs. Infor M3 Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Infor LX vs. Infor M3

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,422 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Infor LX

Ranking in ERP

17th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Infor M3

Ranking in ERP

12th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Activity Based Costing Software (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the ERP category, the mindshare of Infor LX is 1.5%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Infor M3 is 3.4%, down from 4.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

ERP Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Infor M3	3.4%
Infor LX	1.5%
Other	95.1%

ERP

Featured Reviews

Eugenio Santos

IT and processes re-engineering manager at DEUTZ AG

Program adapts to our requirements and handles our operations effectively

The interface we use currently needs enhancement, as I am still using the outdated green screens. I would benefit for us to adpot the latest INFOR user interface, which is a more integrated interface. Additionally, improvements in warehouse handling with handheld terminal, quality management in warehouses, and managing a dual sourcing strategy would be beneficial. I have had to build my own applications for some features that are lacking, and aligning all components for uncertainty management in the market is necessary.

Read full review

Umesh D

Vice President, Delivery at Independent Computer Consulting Group, Incorporated

Maximized industry-specific process efficiency with rapid implementation

The best features of Infor M3 are the micro-vertical and industry ready-made solutions rather than generic solutions. They have ready-made solutions ready, so the implementation of the process discovery happens very fast. It won't take more than two months, and if the process is very simple and they adopt the standard, it may happen within five weeks, covering the implementation cycle which will finish within seven to eight months. Most of the time, it helps streamline business processes; maybe some processes such as unique subcontracting vary by continent or job work, which could be different due to legal compliance. Other than that, everything helps because the processes are very much streamlined. Everywhere you have a check and maker concept, there is a workflow, and all those things are there; document management is also very simple. You can drag and drop the reports. The workflow feature is very good and flexible, working with multi-level authorization and all those capabilities. Apart from that, the GUI interface screens are really good. Users can design their own workspace based on the roles, and there are roles-based security options, with many roles available that you need not define—you can just tweak them.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the major advantages of Infor LX is the stability of the program."

"Infor LX has helped us in conducting efficient production planning, streamlining procurement processes, and maintaining a reliable source of information for our vendors and procurement purchase orders."

"Mainly for manufacturing and processing, everything is excellent."

"Infor LX has improved my customers' manufacturing processes by creating a standard in the process, which improves performance in manufacturing as well as finance, distribution, and supply chain."

"The most valuable features are the exit points that enable integration with external software."

"I've been using it since December 2009, and it has been absolutely stable till now."

"One of the things I love about Infor LX is that everything is integrated."

More Infor LX pros

"The most valuable feature is the ability to cover different types of activities, and the requirement for maintenance and data is very low."

"Infor M3 has several valuable features, including customer order management and integration capabilities with third-party applications like ION."

"Infor M3 has ready-made processes, which provide the best workflows."

"M3 has several useful features for managing supply chains, production, and customer orders. It's an excellent system that helps me meet all my requirements for fixed costs."

"Infor comes up with different tools every year, and they are all compatible with Infor M3, which makes it a more reliable and trustworthy tool. The integration is very smooth."

"provides all modules, supply chain, HR - it's good for management."

"It's simple to use. You don't need any complex training to use it."

"Its ease of use is most valuable. Inquiries are transparent, and it shows good information on each screen. We don't have to go to 14 different screens to find out about one item, which is a big advantage."

More Infor M3 pros

Cons

"It lacks in finance and administration, especially related to Italian accounting."

"Infor needs more APIs, as in the current version, APIs are not fully developed."

"The user interface of Infor LX needs significant enhancement to be more user-friendly."

"The connectors, performance, and knowledgebase availability can be improved."

"It's based on AS/400 or Power i, a robust technology and platform. However, it is harder to manage admin most of the time."

"Infor's support side is not that good, and they seem to be focusing on other products above LX."

"The user interface of Infor LX needs significant enhancement to be more user-friendly."

"The interface needs enhancement, as I am still using outdated screens. I would benefit from a more integrated interface."

More Infor LX cons

"An area for improvement in Infor M3 is training. There should be more training resources available for clients. Clients also find it challenging to get consultants or integrators for Infor M3. The product doesn't have enough resources in the market to help clients."

"Here in Infor M3, you have certain limitations where the main components cannot be modified—you must work around or use bolt-ons."

"The implementation could be simplified, it's complex."

"Improvements could be made in security and scalability."

"The solution's technical support is an area with shortcomings that need improvement, especially the support for the product named M3 rather than the support offered by Infor as an organization."

"Sometimes, M3 alone cannot handle all the planning functionalities required by a customer. It has to be used along with industry-specific planning tools because M3 doesn't have all the features. However, no product can handle all the requirements of all the industries. There will be some shortcomings in all the products. Though this is an area for improvement, it is not a very serious shortfall or limitation. It can be covered by using third-party planning applications that integrate with Infor M3."

"The product's technical support has certain shortcomings. Sometimes, my company doesn't get a proper response from their end."

"It would be great if Infor added some new workflows in the finance module. I'd also like to see better integration with third-party applications."

More Infor M3 cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Infor LX is not cheap but much cheaper compared to SAP HANA."

"Pricing is variable due to different deals and discounts, typically starting at around $2000 US dollars for one license."

"Our last maintenance fee was around $15,000 a year for 33 current users."

"Infor M3 is a tier-two product and is cheaper than tier-one products such as SAP and Oracle. However, it is more expensive than some other tier-two products. The licensing cost is dependent on the number of users. Also, if you purchase other tools from Infor as a package, then there may be other discounts offered."

"If you compare Infor M3 to SAP, Infor M3 is less expensive than SAP, but if you compare Infor M3 to Dynamics 365, Infor M3 is more expensive. It also depends on the model that you buy. It depends on whether you have the complete package or whether you have separate models."

"There is a yearly licensing cost. The price is based on the modules you need. There are several modules, such as HR module, accounting module, sales module, scheduling module, etc., and the price will vary depending on the number of modules you choose. The customers always say that it's very expensive. It can cost a lot of money if your organization is huge. It's not implemented in a lot of organizations in my country because it's too expensive."

"I'm not part of the team that manages Infor M3 pricing, but it depends on the client, integration, ship-out, and training levels. You get the price from the solution provider, but it would be best to discuss it because nothing is set in stone regarding pricing."

"The cost is between $50 and $100 per user annually."

"The tool’s licensing is yearly."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

20%

Computer Software Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

10%

Retailer

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Infor LX?

For Infor LX itself, the gap for improvement is to add some AI functionality to the product in the future.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Infor LX?

Infor LX is primarily used for manufacturing. The use case involved transitioning from a previous Wipro project, moving from Pfizer to GSK, with the entire migration occurring within Infor LX. For ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Infor LX?

Regarding pricing for Infor LX, on a scale where one is a high price and ten is a low price, I would rate it accordingly.

See all answers

What do you like most about Infor M3?

The product's initial setup phase is easy.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Infor M3?

Some customers expect more out-of-box reports, and in some areas, they should provide more reports. However, Infor has introduced a report tool so that key users or global champions can generate re...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Infor M3?

Infor M3 is specifically dominant in fashion, food and beverages, and chemicals manufacturing; it works into micro-verticals. In food and beverage, it specializes in meat processing, confectionery,...

See all answers

Comparisons

Infor LN vs Infor LX

Compared 47% of the time

SAP ERP vs Infor LX

Compared 19% of the time

SAP S/4HANA vs Infor LX

Compared 9% of the time

SAP Business ByDesign vs Infor LX

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central vs Infor LX

Compared 5% of the time

More Infor LX Competitors

SAP ERP vs Infor M3

Compared 36% of the time

Infor LN vs Infor M3

Compared 16% of the time

Infor CloudSuite vs Infor M3

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central vs Infor M3

Compared 5% of the time

Infor VISUAL vs Infor M3

Compared 3% of the time

More Infor M3 Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Infor LX

December 2025

Download Infor LX product report

Buyer's Guide

Infor M3

December 2025

Download Infor M3 product report

Also Known As

Infor ERP LX, ERP LX

Infor Lawson M3, Lawson M3

Overview

Infor LX is a comprehensive process manufacturing system that covers various manufacturing methods, including made to stock, made to order, configure to order, assemble to order, batch, repetitive, flow, and Lean manufacturing. A wide range of industries—including consumer packaged goods, food and beverage, life sciences, medical devices, chemicals, automotive, and general manufacturing—trust Infor LX to improve performance and profit margins at a lower total cost than comparable solutions.

Infor

Infor M3 offers ultimate flexibility in operations, technology, and scale. As a multi-site, multi-country, and multi-company solution, M3 empowers your organization to adapt to changing business needs. It provides flexibility in managing mixed-mode and complex environments, with the agility to make quick adjustments at any time. Written in Java, M3 also gives you platform independence and choice.

Infor

Sample Customers

Shaklee Corporation, Clover Dairy, Cremer, Group Dekko

Grosfillex, High Five Sportswear, L_derach, OTK Group, PHS Group, Propper International, Red Wing Shoe Company, Reynolds Catering Supplies, Saudi Diesel, Sheetz, Zeppelin, Zodiac Aerospace

Buyer's Guide

Infor LX vs. Infor M3

December 2025

Free Report: Infor LX vs. Infor M3

Find out what your peers are saying about Infor LX vs. Infor M3 and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Infor LX vs. Infor M3 report.

See our list of best ERP vendors.

We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.