Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

INTELLIBOT vs Jiffy.ai Automate comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 4, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.5
INTELLIBOT's Indian customer service is praised for effective support, though post-acquisition delays affect response times and troubleshooting.
Sentiment score
6.9
Jiffy.ai Automate excels in responsive customer service and support, despite limited staff, ensuring satisfaction with complex integrations.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
3.8
INTELLIBOT needs enhancements in cognitive marketing, scripting reduction, documentation, Java interaction, and improved user-friendliness and performance.
Sentiment score
4.5
Jiffy.ai Automate struggles with complexity, limited customization, and inadequate support, posing challenges for non-IT users.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.7
INTELLIBOT is scalable and flexible, supporting custom plugins for enterprise automation with potential for increased user adoption.
Sentiment score
7.5
Jiffy.ai Automate is scalable and effective across departments, managing large transactions and adapting processes with minimal changes.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
6.9
INTELLIBOT offers a cost-effective automation solution, with annual licensing starting at $1,500, appealing to budget-conscious enterprises.
Sentiment score
6.2
Jiffy.ai Automate offers cost-effective enterprise licensing with potential support costs, yet its features provide valuable for the price.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
INTELLIBOT is stable with minimal downtime, improved licensing, and rare issues despite necessary updates requiring reinstallation.
Sentiment score
6.4
Jiffy.ai Automate is stable across systems, cost-effective, but faces network issues; users rate stability seven out of ten.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.4
INTELLIBOT provides scalable, cost-effective automation with features like document scanning, AI integration, and easy user management across platforms.
Sentiment score
8.4
Jiffy.ai Automate features a user-friendly interface, advanced integration, computer vision, and supports no-code to low-code automation.
 

Categories and Ranking

INTELLIBOT
Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
17th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Jiffy.ai Automate
Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
25th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category, the mindshare of INTELLIBOT is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Jiffy.ai Automate is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
 

Featured Reviews

Asvinth Saravanan - PeerSpot reviewer
Has limited functionality, logging uses extensive resources; automation replay is great
This solution is not very user-friendly and I would not recommend it for robotic platforms. It has limited functionality and the logging takes over 1,000 GB. As a result, each year we need to increase the size of the database and create a workaround by archiving logs. It impacts performance and is a significant pain point for us. The logging is not user-friendly from an architect's perspective. The reporting is a mess in INTELLIBOT, even the developers are struggling to identify the issues and there are also problems when there are two cases hitting the queue.
JG
Removes the burden of having to do some tasks manually
Initially, in version 3, Jiffy.ai did not have support for containerization. In our environment, we are heavy users of containers and container illustrators. So, the initial deployment option was running based on individual hosts that we deployed in the cloud. That created a singularity in the way that we deployed services in our system. However, in the latest version release (4), they have full support for containerization. This has been a great improvement and one of the driving factors for switching from version 3 to version 4 very soon. The containerization capability will make a huge difference in our deployment process, because it doesn't create exceptions in the way we would deploy services. All the rest of the system is containers, so if you now have a product from a vendor that doesn't support containerization that means you must have a different process of deploying services, then accompany it with corresponding policies, because we have policies on how systems need to be configured to be reliable, secure, etc. Also, there are the BCDR aspects of it: the disaster recovery and business continuity. So, if you're introducing a new way of deploying services, now you need to have a BCDR plan dedicated to that as well, as opposed to deploying everything using a single model of deployment (mainly containers). Therefore, this will simplify a lot of things, in terms of DevOps.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.
823,875 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
28%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Real Estate/Law Firm
5%
Financial Services Firm
24%
Transportation Company
11%
Computer Software Company
11%
Healthcare Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about INTELLIBOT?
The return on investment is pretty good because the license cost is cheaper than other RPA tools in the market.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for INTELLIBOT?
It is quite cheap. In the year 2019, it was $1000 for a year.
What needs improvement with INTELLIBOT?
Exception handling activities within INTELLIBOT need to improve. While working with the platform, there were instances where the bot went to a different flow than intended, even when it was suppose...
What do you like most about Jiffy.ai Automate?
Its initial setup process was quite efficient.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jiffy.ai Automate?
The solution's price is reasonable in terms of its performance. The licensing costs approximately $10,000 per year. There are no additional costs involved.
What needs improvement with Jiffy.ai Automate?
The solution's support services need improvement.
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Southwest Airlines
Find out what your peers are saying about INTELLIBOT vs. Jiffy.ai Automate and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
823,875 professionals have used our research since 2012.